Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Literaturübersicht"
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Fattahi, R.: Anglo American Cataloguing Rules in an online environment : a literature review (1995) 0.02
    0.015936451 = product of:
      0.031872902 = sum of:
        0.031872902 = product of:
          0.063745804 = sum of:
            0.063745804 = weight(_text_:online in 596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.063745804 = score(doc=596,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05220068 = queryNorm
                0.40237486 = fieldWeight in 596, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=596)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    As a standard set of rules, AACR2 has received much attention in the literature of descriptive cataloguing. Considers that despite this extensive literature, an important aspect of the code, namely its relevance to the online environment, has not received much attention, particularly in terms of empirical research. Notes however that there is a general criticism that AACR2, being based on manual systems, does not correspond effectively to the online environment. From a review of the literature concludes that while the advent of online catalogues has changed both the internal structure and external appearance of library catalogues, a mojority of writers consider that radical changes in the code are impossible and undesirable in the near future, owing to various factors such as the belief that that MARC format is not conductive to radical change and the large size of existing catalogues created according to the current rules
  2. Kim, K.-S.: Recent work in cataloging and classification, 2000-2002 (2003) 0.01
    0.014144942 = product of:
      0.028289884 = sum of:
        0.028289884 = product of:
          0.05657977 = sum of:
            0.05657977 = weight(_text_:22 in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05657977 = score(doc=152,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05220068 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. Chambers, S.; Myall, C.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2007-8 (2010) 0.01
    0.012376824 = product of:
      0.024753649 = sum of:
        0.024753649 = product of:
          0.049507298 = sum of:
            0.049507298 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049507298 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05220068 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  4. Kirkland, L.N.: Resources for catalogers : an annotated bibliography (2005) 0.01
    0.0106243 = product of:
      0.0212486 = sum of:
        0.0212486 = product of:
          0.0424972 = sum of:
            0.0424972 = weight(_text_:online in 5716) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0424972 = score(doc=5716,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05220068 = queryNorm
                0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 5716, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5716)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Considerable documentation, tools, and manuals are available to aid catalogers, but without some guidance, many have no idea how to use these shelves of reference guides and manuals. This bibliography is intended as a guide to the information and resources available to assist the cataloger in cataloging. The availability of each resource is given (including online availability), along with a brief summary of the type of information that each resource contains.
  5. Genereux, C.: Building connections : a review of the serials literature 2004 through 2005 (2007) 0.01
    0.010608707 = product of:
      0.021217413 = sum of:
        0.021217413 = product of:
          0.042434826 = sum of:
            0.042434826 = weight(_text_:22 in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042434826 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05220068 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  6. Martin, K.E.; Mundle, K.: Positioning libraries for a new bibliographic universe (2014) 0.01
    0.010608707 = product of:
      0.021217413 = sum of:
        0.021217413 = product of:
          0.042434826 = sum of:
            0.042434826 = weight(_text_:22 in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042434826 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05220068 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  7. Knutson, G.: ¬The year's work in descriptive cataloging, 1992 (1993) 0.01
    0.009296263 = product of:
      0.018592525 = sum of:
        0.018592525 = product of:
          0.03718505 = sum of:
            0.03718505 = weight(_text_:online in 5192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03718505 = score(doc=5192,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05220068 = queryNorm
                0.23471867 = fieldWeight in 5192, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5192)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The descriptive cataloging literature of 1992 is examined. A number of works deal with the cataloging of special materials. Work in artificial intelligence and expert systems is drawing increased attention, as is the problem of dealing with nonroman scripts in the online environment. Critical analyses of the Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC) formats are also notable. The practicing cataloger is faced with the familiar dilemma of needing to improve cataloging techniques in the here and now, which almost inevitably means incremental change and the desire for a broader vision of the future. The literature shows good efforts in both areas but leaves many fundamental questions unanswered