Search (90 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Computerlinguistik"
  1. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.12 
    0.11562679 = product of:
  0.28906697 = sum of:
    0.24693725 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24693725 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43937603 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051825367 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.04212973 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04212973 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18148361 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051825367 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  2. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.05 
    0.04938745 = product of:
  0.24693725 = sum of:
    0.24693725 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24693725 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43937603 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051825367 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  3. Fóris, A.: Network theory and terminology (2013) 0.04 
    0.03759983 = product of:
  0.09399958 = sum of:
    0.058891464 = weight(_text_:40 in 1365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058891464 = score(doc=1365,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19765252 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.813818 = idf(docFreq=2651, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051825367 = queryNorm
        0.29795453 = fieldWeight in 1365, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.813818 = idf(docFreq=2651, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1365)
    0.03510811 = weight(_text_:22 in 1365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03510811 = score(doc=1365,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18148361 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051825367 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1365, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1365)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    2. 9.2014 19:19:40
    2. 9.2014 21:22:48
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 40(2013) no.6, S.424-429
  4. Ney, H.: Maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung und Statistik (1995) 0.03 
    0.026651233 = product of:
  0.13325617 = sum of:
    0.13325617 = weight(_text_:40 in 6799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13325617 = score(doc=6799,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19765252 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.813818 = idf(docFreq=2651, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051825367 = queryNorm
        0.6741941 = fieldWeight in 6799, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.813818 = idf(docFreq=2651, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6799)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    8. 3.1997 10:20:40
  5. Computerunterstützte Textanalyse (2001) 0.02 
    0.023319827 = product of:
  0.116599135 = sum of:
    0.116599135 = weight(_text_:40 in 5646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.116599135 = score(doc=5646,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19765252 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.813818 = idf(docFreq=2651, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051825367 = queryNorm
        0.5899198 = fieldWeight in 5646, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.813818 = idf(docFreq=2651, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5646)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    iX. 2001, H.6, S.40
  6. Proszeky, G.: Language technology tools in the translator's practice (1999) 0.02 
    0.023319827 = product of:
  0.116599135 = sum of:
    0.116599135 = weight(_text_:40 in 6873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.116599135 = score(doc=6873,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19765252 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.813818 = idf(docFreq=2651, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051825367 = queryNorm
        0.5899198 = fieldWeight in 6873, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.813818 = idf(docFreq=2651, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6873)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    30. 3.2002 18:29:40
  7. Warner, A.J.: Natural language processing (1987) 0.02 
    0.02246919 = product of:
  0.11234595 = sum of:
    0.11234595 = weight(_text_:22 in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11234595 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18148361 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051825367 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.79-108
  8. Schürmann, H.: Software scannt Radio- und Fernsehsendungen : Recherche in Nachrichtenarchiven erleichtert (2001) 0.02 
    0.021490185 = product of:
  0.05372546 = sum of:
    0.029149784 = weight(_text_:40 in 5759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029149784 = score(doc=5759,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19765252 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.813818 = idf(docFreq=2651, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051825367 = queryNorm
        0.14747995 = fieldWeight in 5759, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.813818 = idf(docFreq=2651, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5759)
    0.024575677 = weight(_text_:22 in 5759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024575677 = score(doc=5759,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18148361 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051825367 = queryNorm
        0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 5759, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5759)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Um Firmen und Agenturen die Beobachtungen von Medien zu erleichtern, entwickeln Forscher an der Duisburger Hochschule zurzeit ein System zur automatischen Themenerkennung in Rundfunk und Fernsehen. Das so genannte Alert-System soll dem Nutzer helfen, die für ihn relevanten Sprachinformationen aus Nachrichtensendungen herauszufiltem und weiterzuverarbeiten. Durch die automatische Analyse durch den Computer können mehrere Programme rund um die Uhr beobachtet werden. Noch erfolgt die Informationsgewinnung aus TV- und Radiosendungen auf klassischem Wege: Ein Mensch sieht, hört, liest und wertet aus. Das ist enorm zeitaufwendig und für eine Firma, die beispielsweise die Konkurrenz beobachten oder ihre Medienpräsenz dokumentieren lassen möchte, auch sehr teuer. Diese Arbeit ließe sich mit einem Spracherkenner automatisieren, sagten sich die Duisburger Forscher. Sie arbeiten nun zusammen mit Partnern aus Deutschland, Frankreich und Portugal in einem europaweiten Projekt an der Entwicklung einer entsprechenden Technologie (http://alert.uni-duisburg.de). An dem Projekt sind auch zwei Medienbeobachtungsuntemehmen beteiligt, die Oberserver Argus Media GmbH aus Baden-Baden und das französische Unternehmen Secodip. Unsere Arbeit würde schon dadurch erleichtert, wenn Informationen, die über unsere Kunden in den Medien erscheinen, vorselektiert würden", beschreibt Simone Holderbach, Leiterin der Produktentwicklung bei Oberserver, ihr Interesse an der Technik. Und wie funktioniert Alert? Das Spracherkennungssystem wird darauf getrimmt, Nachrichtensendungen in Radio und Fernsehen zu überwachen: Alles, was gesagt wird - sei es vom Nachrichtensprecher, Reporter oder Interviewten -, wird durch die automatische Spracherkennung in Text umgewandelt. Dabei werden Themen und Schlüsselwörter erkannt und gespeichert. Diese werden mit den Suchbegriffen des Nutzers verglichen. Gefundene Übereinstimmungen werden angezeigt und dem Benutzer automatisch mitgeteilt. Konventionelle Spracherkennungstechnik sei für die Medienbeobachtung nicht einsetzbar, da diese für einen anderen Zweck entwickelt worden sei, betont Prof. Gerhard Rigoll, Leiter des Fachgebiets Technische Informatik an der Duisburger Hochschule. Für die Umwandlung von Sprache in Text wurde die Alert-Software gründlich trainiert. Aus Zeitungstexten, Audio- und Video-Material wurden bislang rund 3 50 Millionen Wörter verarbeitet. Das System arbeitet in drei Sprachen. Doch so ganz fehlerfrei sei der automatisch gewonnene Text nicht, räumt Rigoll ein. Zurzeit liegt die Erkennungsrate bei 40 bis 70 Prozent. Und das wird sich in absehbarer Zeit auch nicht ändern." Musiküberlagerungen oder starke Hintergrundgeräusche bei Reportagen führen zu Ungenauigkeiten bei der Textumwandlung. Deshalb haben die, Duisburger Wissenschaftler Methoden entwickelt, die über die herkömmliche Suche nach Schlüsselwörtern hinausgehen und eine inhaltsorientierte Zuordnung ermöglichen. Dadurch erhält der Nutzer dann auch solche Nachrichten, die zwar zum Thema passen, in denen das Stichwort aber gar nicht auftaucht", bringt Rigoll den Vorteil der Technik auf den Punkt. Wird beispielsweise "Ölpreis" als Suchbegriff eingegeben, werden auch solche Nachrichten angezeigt, in denen Olkonzerne und Energieagenturen eine Rolle spielen. Rigoll: Das Alert-System liest sozusagen zwischen den Zeilen!' Das Forschungsprojekt wurde vor einem Jahr gestartet und läuft noch bis Mitte 2002. Wer sich über den Stand der Technik informieren möchte, kann dies in dieser Woche auf der Industriemesse in Hannover. Das Alert-System wird auf dem Gemeinschaftsstand "Forschungsland NRW" in Halle 18, Stand M12, präsentiert
    Source
    Handelsblatt. Nr.79 vom 24.4.2001, S.22
  9. Lawson, V.; Vasconcellos, M.: Forty ways to skin a cat : users report on machine translation (1994) 0.02 
    0.019988423 = product of:
  0.09994212 = sum of:
    0.09994212 = weight(_text_:40 in 6956) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09994212 = score(doc=6956,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19765252 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.813818 = idf(docFreq=2651, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051825367 = queryNorm
        0.5056456 = fieldWeight in 6956, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.813818 = idf(docFreq=2651, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6956)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    In the most extensive survey of machine translation (MT) use ever performed, explores the responeses to a questionnaire survey of 40 MT users concerning their experiences
  10. Flanders, J.; Bauman, S.; Caton, P.; Courname, M.: Names proper and improper : applying the TEI to the classification of proper nouns (1998) 0.02 
    0.019988423 = product of:
  0.09994212 = sum of:
    0.09994212 = weight(_text_:40 in 3146) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09994212 = score(doc=3146,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19765252 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.813818 = idf(docFreq=2651, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051825367 = queryNorm
        0.5056456 = fieldWeight in 3146, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.813818 = idf(docFreq=2651, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3146)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    28. 2.1999 18:10:40
  11. Vilar, P.; Dimec, J.: Krnjenje kot osnova nekaterih nekonvencionalnih metod poizvedovanja (2000) 0.02 
    0.019988423 = product of:
  0.09994212 = sum of:
    0.09994212 = weight(_text_:40 in 6331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09994212 = score(doc=6331,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19765252 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.813818 = idf(docFreq=2651, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051825367 = queryNorm
        0.5056456 = fieldWeight in 6331, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.813818 = idf(docFreq=2651, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6331)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    28. 3.2002 10:01:40
  12. McMahon, J.G.; Smith, F.J.: Improved statistical language model performance with automatic generated word hierarchies (1996) 0.02 
    0.019660542 = product of:
  0.09830271 = sum of:
    0.09830271 = weight(_text_:22 in 3164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09830271 = score(doc=3164,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18148361 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051825367 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3164, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3164)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Computational linguistics. 22(1996) no.2, S.217-248
  13. Ruge, G.: ¬A spreading activation network for automatic generation of thesaurus relationships (1991) 0.02 
    0.019660542 = product of:
  0.09830271 = sum of:
    0.09830271 = weight(_text_:22 in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09830271 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18148361 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051825367 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    8.10.2000 11:52:22
  14. Somers, H.: Example-based machine translation : Review article (1999) 0.02 
    0.019660542 = product of:
  0.09830271 = sum of:
    0.09830271 = weight(_text_:22 in 6672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09830271 = score(doc=6672,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18148361 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051825367 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6672, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6672)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    31. 7.1996 9:22:19
  15. New tools for human translators (1997) 0.02 
    0.019660542 = product of:
  0.09830271 = sum of:
    0.09830271 = weight(_text_:22 in 1179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09830271 = score(doc=1179,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18148361 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051825367 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1179, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1179)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    31. 7.1996 9:22:19
  16. Baayen, R.H.; Lieber, H.: Word frequency distributions and lexical semantics (1997) 0.02 
    0.019660542 = product of:
  0.09830271 = sum of:
    0.09830271 = weight(_text_:22 in 3117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09830271 = score(doc=3117,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18148361 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051825367 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3117, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3117)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    28. 2.1999 10:48:22
  17. ¬Der Student aus dem Computer (2023) 0.02 
    0.019660542 = product of:
  0.09830271 = sum of:
    0.09830271 = weight(_text_:22 in 1079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09830271 = score(doc=1079,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18148361 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051825367 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1079, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1079)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    27. 1.2023 16:22:55
  18. Byrne, C.C.; McCracken, S.A.: ¬An adaptive thesaurus employing semantic distance, relational inheritance and nominal compound interpretation for linguistic support of information retrieval (1999) 0.02 
    0.016851893 = product of:
  0.08425946 = sum of:
    0.08425946 = weight(_text_:22 in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08425946 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18148361 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051825367 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    15. 3.2000 10:22:37
  19. Boleda, G.; Evert, S.: Multiword expressions : a pain in the neck of lexical semantics (2009) 0.02 
    0.016851893 = product of:
  0.08425946 = sum of:
    0.08425946 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08425946 = score(doc=4888,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18148361 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051825367 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    1. 3.2013 14:56:22
  20. Monnerjahn, P.: Vorsprung ohne Technik : Übersetzen: Computer und Qualität (2000) 0.02 
    0.016851893 = product of:
  0.08425946 = sum of:
    0.08425946 = weight(_text_:22 in 5429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08425946 = score(doc=5429,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18148361 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051825367 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5429, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5429)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    c't. 2000, H.22, S.230-231

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 63
  • d 25
  • ru 1
  • slv 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 71
  • el 14
  • m 7
  • p 3
  • s 3
  • x 3
  • d 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications