Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchtaktik"
  • × author_ss:"Spink, A."
  1. Spink, A.; Goodrum, A.; Robins, D.: Elicitation behavior during mediated information retrieval (1998) 0.01
    0.011659914 = product of:
      0.058299568 = sum of:
        0.058299568 = weight(_text_:40 in 3265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058299568 = score(doc=3265,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19765252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.813818 = idf(docFreq=2651, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051825367 = queryNorm
            0.2949599 = fieldWeight in 3265, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.813818 = idf(docFreq=2651, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3265)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Considers what elicitation or requests for information search intermediaries make of users with information requests during an information retrieval interaction - including prior to and during an information retrieval interaction - and for what purpose. Reports a study of elicitations during 40 mediated information retrieval interactions. Identifies a total of 1.557 search intermediary elicitations within 15 purpose categories. The elicitation purposes of search intermediaries included requests for information on search terms and strategies, database selection, search procedures, system's outputs and relevance of retrieved items, and users' knowledge and previous information seeking. Investigates the transition sequences from 1 type of search intermediary elicitation to another. Compares these findings with results from a study of end user questions
  2. Spink, A.; Park, M.; Koshman, S.: Factors affecting assigned information problem ordering during Web search : an exploratory study (2006) 0.01
    0.009994212 = product of:
      0.04997106 = sum of:
        0.04997106 = weight(_text_:40 in 991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04997106 = score(doc=991,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19765252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.813818 = idf(docFreq=2651, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051825367 = queryNorm
            0.2528228 = fieldWeight in 991, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.813818 = idf(docFreq=2651, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=991)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Multitasking is the human ability to handle the demands of multiple tasks. Multitasking behavior involves the ordering of multiple tasks and switching between tasks. People often multitask when using information retrieval (IR) technologies as they seek information on more than one information problem over single or multiple search episodes. However, limited studies have examined how people order their information problems, especially during their Web search engine interaction. The aim of our exploratory study was to investigate assigned information problem ordering by forty (40) study participants engaged in Web search. Findings suggest that assigned information problem ordering was influenced by the following factors, including personal interest, problem knowledge, perceived level of information available on the Web, ease of finding information, level of importance and seeking information on information problems in order from general to specific. Personal interest and problem knowledge were the major factors during assigned information problem ordering. Implications of the findings and further research are discussed. The relationship between information problem ordering and gratification theory is an important area for further exploration.
  3. Jansen, B.J.; Booth, D.L.; Spink, A.: Determining the informational, navigational, and transactional intent of Web queries (2008) 0.01
    0.009994212 = product of:
      0.04997106 = sum of:
        0.04997106 = weight(_text_:40 in 2091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04997106 = score(doc=2091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19765252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.813818 = idf(docFreq=2651, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051825367 = queryNorm
            0.2528228 = fieldWeight in 2091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.813818 = idf(docFreq=2651, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2091)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    1. 8.2008 11:51:40
  4. Jansen, B.J.; Booth, D.L.; Spink, A.: Patterns of query reformulation during Web searching (2009) 0.01
    0.009994212 = product of:
      0.04997106 = sum of:
        0.04997106 = weight(_text_:40 in 2936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04997106 = score(doc=2936,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19765252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.813818 = idf(docFreq=2651, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051825367 = queryNorm
            0.2528228 = fieldWeight in 2936, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.813818 = idf(docFreq=2651, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2936)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Query reformulation is a key user behavior during Web search. Our research goal is to develop predictive models of query reformulation during Web searching. This article reports results from a study in which we automatically classified the query-reformulation patterns for 964,780 Web searching sessions, composed of 1,523,072 queries, to predict the next query reformulation. We employed an n-gram modeling approach to describe the probability of users transitioning from one query-reformulation state to another to predict their next state. We developed first-, second-, third-, and fourth-order models and evaluated each model for accuracy of prediction, coverage of the dataset, and complexity of the possible pattern set. The results show that Reformulation and Assistance account for approximately 45% of all query reformulations; furthermore, the results demonstrate that the first- and second-order models provide the best predictability, between 28 and 40% overall and higher than 70% for some patterns. Implications are that the n-gram approach can be used for improving searching systems and searching assistance.