Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

0.009379721 = product of:
  0.018759442 = sum of:
    0.018759442 = product of:
      0.037518885 = sum of:
        0.037518885 = weight(_text_:2000 in 1853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037518885 = score(doc=1853,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.17909452 = fieldWeight in 1853, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1853)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: Spektrum der Wissenschaft 2000, H.9, S.109 (H.W. Franke)

0.0070347907 = product of:
  0.014069581 = sum of:
    0.014069581 = product of:
      0.028139163 = sum of:
        0.028139163 = weight(_text_:2000 in 592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028139163 = score(doc=592,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.13432088 = fieldWeight in 592, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=592)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: JASIST 58(2007) no.11, S.1704 (D.E. Agosto): "Student participation in computer science (CS) has dropped significantly over the past few years in the United States. As the Computing Research Association (Vegso, 2006) recently noted, "After five years of decline, the number of new CS majors in fall 2005 was half of what it was in fall 2000 (15,958 vs. 7,952)." Many computing educators and working professionals worry that this reduced level of participation might result in slowed technological innovation in future years. Adding to the problem is especially low female participation in the computer-related disciplines. For example, Cohoon (2003) showed that the percentage of high school girls indicating intent to study CS in college dropped steadily from 1991 to 2001, from a high of 37% to a low of 20%. The National Science Foundation's most recent report on Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering (National Science Foundation, 2004) indicates that while females obtained 57% of all bachelor's degrees in 2001, they obtained just 28% of computer-related undergraduate degrees. These low percentages of female participation are reflected in the computing workforce as well. Women and Information Technology: Research on Underrepresentation provides an overview of research projects and research trends relating to gender and computing. The book takes a proactive general stance; the ultimate goal of publishing the research included in the volume is to lead to significant gains in female representation in the study and practice of the computing-related fields. ... The volume as a whole does not offer a clear-cut solution to the problem of female underrepresentation, but a number of the chapters do indicate that recruitment and retention must be dealt with jointly, as each is dependent on the other. Another recurring theme is the importance of role models from early on in girls' lives, in the form of both female faculty and female computing professionals as role models. Still another recurring theme is the importance of female mentoring before and during the college years, including both informal peer mentoring and formal faculty mentoring. Taken as a whole, this is a successful work that is probably most useful as a background reference tool. As such, it should assist students and scholars interested in continuing this undeniably important area of research."

0.0070347907 = product of:
  0.014069581 = sum of:
    0.014069581 = product of:
      0.028139163 = sum of:
        0.028139163 = weight(_text_:2000 in 655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028139163 = score(doc=655,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.13432088 = fieldWeight in 655, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=655)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: Sepktrum der Wissenschaft (U. Riß): "Was Gunter Dueck über die Denk-weise in heutigen Großunternehmen erzählt, kann ich mühelos anhand eigener Erfahrung nachvollziehen. Die vielen seltsam anmutenden Beispiele stammen keineswegs nur aus seinem persönlichen Umfeld, sondern lassen sich in allen Firmen wiederfinden, die sich einer modernen Unternehmenskultur verpflichtet haben, also insbesondere in der Welt der so genannten Global Player. Dem Autor geht es jedoch nicht vorrangig um das Erzählen von Geschichten, sondern darum, die Ursachen dieser teilweise skurrilen Begebenheiten aufzudecken. Dabei greift er weit in die Menschheitsgeschichte zurück: Sein Ausgangspunkt ist der Übergang von einer sporadisch aktiven Jägerkultur zu einer der Effizienz verpflichteten Bauernkultur, oder eben die Ablösung des Intuitiven und Sporadischen durch Logik und Ordnung. Mit diesem Wandel ist eine Änderung der in der Gesellschaft dominanten psychologischen Präferenzen verbunden. Wie schon in dem Vorgängerbuch "Wild Duck" (besprochen in Spektrum der Wissenschaft 11/2000, S. 101) teilt Dueck die Menschen in Typen ein: diesmal in den ordnungswahrenden Citizen, den anpackenden Go West, den dem Tiefgründigen verbundenen Star Trek und den sinnsuchenden Blue Helmet. Dueck beschreibt, wie das vorherrschende Bauerndenken im Bemühen, die vorhandenen Strukturen immer effizienter zu gestalten, in eine Sackgasse gerät. Vorangetrieben wird diese Entwicklung von den alles durchdenkenden Citizens, die sich als eine Art Superbauern entpuppen. Dieses Denken durchdringt inzwischen alle Bereiche unseres Lebens, von der Schule, wo wir immer ordentlich unsere Hausaufgaben machen sollen, bis ins Berufsleben, in dem die Tugenden der Superbauern als idealer Karriereweg gelten. Abweichungen gelten beinahe schon als krankhaft. Den Nicht-Bauern werden in Randbereichen misstrauisch beäugte Reservate eingeräumt: für Künstler, Lehrer oder Altenpfleger. Sie alle scheinen dem Anspruch der Effizienz nicht zu genügen.

0.007003988 = product of:
  0.014007976 = sum of:
    0.014007976 = product of:
      0.028015953 = sum of:
        0.028015953 = weight(_text_:22 in 2667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028015953 = score(doc=2667,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2667, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2667)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 2.2009 12:33:37