Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × subject_ss:"Information storage and retrieval systems"
  1. Kowalski, G.J.; Maybury, M.T.: Information storage and retrieval systems : theory and implemetation (2000) 0.03
    0.026321776 = product of:
      0.052643552 = sum of:
        0.052643552 = product of:
          0.105287105 = sum of:
            0.105287105 = weight(_text_:2000 in 6727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.105287105 = score(doc=6727,freq=7.0), product of:
                0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.5025827 = fieldWeight in 6727, product of:
                  2.6457512 = tf(freq=7.0), with freq of:
                    7.0 = termFreq=7.0
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6727)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Classification
    QA76.9.D3 K686 2000
    LCC
    QA76.9.D3 K686 2000
    Year
    2000
  2. Modern information retrieval (1999) 0.02
    0.023213625 = product of:
      0.04642725 = sum of:
        0.04642725 = product of:
          0.0928545 = sum of:
            0.0928545 = weight(_text_:2000 in 852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0928545 = score(doc=852,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.44323632 = fieldWeight in 852, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=852)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 51(2000) no.5, S.490-491 (T.A. Brooks); nfd 51(2000) H.4, S.247-248 (T. Mandl)
  3. Meadow, C.T.: Text information retrieval systems (1992) 0.01
    0.011724652 = product of:
      0.023449304 = sum of:
        0.023449304 = product of:
          0.046898607 = sum of:
            0.046898607 = weight(_text_:2000 in 1519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046898607 = score(doc=1519,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.22386816 = fieldWeight in 1519, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1519)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This book's purpose is to teach people who will be searching or designing text retrieval systems how the systems work. For designers, it covers problems they will face and reviews currently available solutions to provide a basis for more advanced study. For the searcher its purpose is to describe why such systems work as they do. Text Information Retrieval Systems, Second Edition is primarily about computer-based retrieval systems, but the principles apply to non-mechanized ones as well. - Winner of the ASIS Best Information Science Book Award 2000!
  4. Frické, M.: Logic and the organization of information (2012) 0.01
    0.008207256 = product of:
      0.016414512 = sum of:
        0.016414512 = product of:
          0.032829024 = sum of:
            0.032829024 = weight(_text_:2000 in 1782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032829024 = score(doc=1782,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.1567077 = fieldWeight in 1782, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1782)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: J. Doc. 70(2014) no.4: "Books on the organization of information and knowledge, aimed at a library/information audience, tend to fall into two clear categories. Most are practical and pragmatic, explaining the "how" as much or more than the "why". Some are theoretical, in part or in whole, showing how the practice of classification, indexing, resource description and the like relates to philosophy, logic, and other foundational bases; the books by Langridge (1992) and by Svenonious (2000) are well-known examples this latter kind. To this category certainly belongs a recent book by Martin Frické (2012). The author takes the reader for an extended tour through a variety of aspects of information organization, including classification and taxonomy, alphabetical vocabularies and indexing, cataloguing and FRBR, and aspects of the semantic web. The emphasis throughout is on showing how practice is, or should be, underpinned by formal structures; there is a particular emphasis on first order predicate calculus. The advantages of a greater, and more explicit, use of symbolic logic is a recurring theme of the book. There is a particularly commendable historical dimension, often omitted in texts on this subject. It cannot be said that this book is entirely an easy read, although it is well written with a helpful index, and its arguments are generally well supported by clear and relevant examples. It is thorough and detailed, but thereby seems better geared to the needs of advanced students and researchers than to the practitioners who are suggested as a main market. For graduate students in library/information science and related disciplines, in particular, this will be a valuable resource. I would place it alongside Svenonious' book as the best insight into the theoretical "why" of information organization. It has evoked a good deal of interest, including a set of essay commentaries in Journal of Information Science (Gilchrist et al., 2013). Introducing these, Alan Gilchrist rightly says that Frické deserves a salute for making explicit the fundamental relationship between the ancient discipline of logic and modern information organization. If information science is to continue to develop, and make a contribution to the organization of the information environments of the future, then this book sets the groundwork for the kind of studies which will be needed." (D. Bawden)
  5. Multimedia content and the Semantic Web : methods, standards, and tools (2005) 0.01
    0.0075820405 = product of:
      0.015164081 = sum of:
        0.015164081 = product of:
          0.030328162 = sum of:
            0.030328162 = weight(_text_:22 in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030328162 = score(doc=150,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.16753313 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Classification
    006.7 22
    Date
    7. 3.2007 19:30:22
    DDC
    006.7 22
  6. Chu, H.: Information representation and retrieval in the digital age (2010) 0.00
    0.0046898606 = product of:
      0.009379721 = sum of:
        0.009379721 = product of:
          0.018759442 = sum of:
            0.018759442 = weight(_text_:2000 in 92) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018759442 = score(doc=92,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.08954726 = fieldWeight in 92, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=92)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 56(2005) no.2, S.215-216 (A. Heath): "What is small, thoroughly organized, and easy to understand? Well, it's Heting Chu's latest book an information retrieval. A very welcome release, this small literary addition to the field (only 248 pages) contains a concise and weIl-organized discussion of every major topic in information retrieval. The often-complex field of information retrieval is presented from its origin in the early 1950s to the present day. The organization of this text is top-notch, thus making this an easy read for even the novice. Unlike other titles in this area, Chu's user-friendly style of writing is done an purpose to properly introduce newcomers to the field in a less intimidating way. As stated by the author in the Preface, the purpose of the book is to "present a systematic, thorough yet nontechnical view of the field by using plain language to explain complex subjects." Chu has definitely struck up the right combination of ingredients. In a field so broad and complex, a well-organized presentation of topics that don't trip an themselves is essential. The use of plain language where possible is also a good choice for this topic because it allows one to absorb topics that are, by nature, not as easy to grasp. For instance, Chapters 6 and 7, which cover retrieval approaches and techniques, an often painstaking topic for many students and teachers is deftly handled with the use of tables that can be used to compare and contrast the various models discussed. I particularly loved Chu's use of Koll's 2000 article from the Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science to explain subject searching at the beginning of Chapter 6, which discusses the differences between browsing and searching. The Koll article uses the task of finding a needle in a haystack as an analogy.