Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

0.04449192 = product of:
  0.08898384 = sum of:
    0.08898384 = product of:
      0.17796768 = sum of:
        0.17796768 = weight(_text_:2000 in 4620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17796768 = score(doc=4620,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.84951985 = fieldWeight in 4620, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4620)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: nfd 51(2000) H.5, S.302-303 (A. Baumgartner)

Year

2000

0.028139163 = product of:
  0.056278326 = sum of:
    0.056278326 = product of:
      0.11255665 = sum of:
        0.11255665 = weight(_text_:2000 in 4619) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11255665 = score(doc=4619,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.53728354 = fieldWeight in 4619, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4619)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Zugl.: Dissertation an der Univ. Bamberg, 2000

0.014359707 = product of:
  0.028719414 = sum of:
    0.028719414 = product of:
      0.057438828 = sum of:
        0.057438828 = weight(_text_:2000 in 6037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057438828 = score(doc=6037,freq=3.0), product of:
            0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.27418137 = fieldWeight in 6037, product of:
              1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                3.0 = termFreq=3.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6037)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Year

2000

0.011724652 = product of:
  0.023449304 = sum of:
    0.023449304 = product of:
      0.046898607 = sum of:
        0.046898607 = weight(_text_:2000 in 6359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046898607 = score(doc=6359,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.22386816 = fieldWeight in 6359, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6359)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Was bedeutet der Einsatz Neuer Medien in den Schulen? Ist der Umgang mit moderner Technik selbstzweckhaft, oder gibt er den Lehr- und Lernprozessen eine neue Qualität? Der vorliegende Band greift, basierend auf den 4. Buckower Mediengesprächen im Herbst 2000, den kontroversen Diskussionsprozess um die genannten Fragen auf. Ausgehend von technologischen Möglichkeiten geht es dabei in erster Linie um einen an den Bedürfnissen der betroffenen Menschen orientierten Sinndiskurs. Es werden Möglichkeiten, Voraussetzungen und Grenzen eines auf medialen Gegebenheiten basierenden Unterrichts aufgezeigt. Dabei werden wesentliche Wechselbeziehungen zu traditionellen Medieninhalten und -formen deutlich. in diesem Zusammenhang wird die Aufmerksamkeit in starkem Maße auf Fragen der Werteorientierung in einer zur Beliebigkeit tendierenden Weit gelenkt. Strukturelle Überlegungen zum Profil der regionalen Medienzentren zeigen deren Potenzial bei der Gestaltung gegenwärtiger Bildungs- und Erziehungsprozesse auf

0.011724652 = product of:
  0.023449304 = sum of:
    0.023449304 = product of:
      0.046898607 = sum of:
        0.046898607 = weight(_text_:2000 in 44) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046898607 = score(doc=44,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.22386816 = fieldWeight in 44, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=44)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The virtual university environment provides librarians with new opportunities to contribute to the educational process. Building on the success of team-teaching a traditional liberal arts core course with composition and communications faculty, librarians and a communications professor worked together to integrate the Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL) Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education (2000) into the online environment. The resulting graduate-level course in multimedia literacy assembled faculty and curriculum resources normally untapped in traditional classrooms. All five information literacy standards covering need, access, evaluation, use and the social, economic, legal, and ethical issues surrounding information use were addressed. Readings and threaded discussions about intellectual property, fair use of copyrighted materials, the evaluation of free and fee-based Web information and Web page design and construction prepared students to work in groups to design and construct Web sites. Students also completed a capstone project in the form of individual Web portfolios, which demonstrated the information and multimedia principles they learned in the class. Assessment of information literacy skills occurred through the analysis of student discussion, evaluative annotations, Web site assignments, perception surveys, and a master's level comprehensive exam question. What was learned in this course will serve as a model for future collaborative partnerships in which faculty and librarians work together to ensure that students who learn from a distance truly master information literacy competencies.

0.0070347907 = product of:
  0.014069581 = sum of:
    0.014069581 = product of:
      0.028139163 = sum of:
        0.028139163 = weight(_text_:2000 in 2391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028139163 = score(doc=2391,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.13432088 = fieldWeight in 2391, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2391)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: JASIST 59(2008) no.9, S.1531. (C. Caldeira): "Successful, real-world organizations employ groups to get work done. Despite the large number of years of collaborative models in work-group paradigm, it is a little surprising that there are very few books about the subject. Furthermore, most of those studies are mainly focused on work group performance management and work productivity. This text belongs to the advanced type, and is a valuable resource for graduate students in a wide range of courses and for a large spectrum of professionals interested in collaborative work. Due to its advanced level, some topics are relatively difficult to understand if the reader does not have some background in collaborative work and group cognition. Students who use this book will rapidly understand the most important topics of the science of collaboration for computer-supported cooperative work and computer-supported collaborative learning, and their relation to the business world of our days. The main concern and fundamental idea of this book is to set its focus primarily on work group, and not on individuals. Stahl's baseline is to use the science of collaboration for computer-supported cooperative work and computer-supported collaborative learning to conduct comparative studies on group interaction, group meaning, group cognition, group discourse, and thinking. The book is divided into three distinct parts. The first one is about the design of computer support for collaborative work and presents eight studies centered on software tools and their particular applications: The first three are AI applications for collaborative computer-supported cooperative work and computer-supported collaborative learning, the fourth and the fifth are about collaborative media, and the last ones are a combination of computational technology and collaborative functions. The second part is focused on the analysis on knowledge building in the collaborative work of small groups. It is developed with support on five essays published by Stahl from 2000 to 2004. In the first of those chapters, he describes a model of collaborative knowledge building and how to share knowledge production. The second criticizes some cooperative work and collaborative learning research methodologies that make the collaborative phenomena hard to perceive. The remaining chapters mostly provide mechanisms to understand in new and better ways collaborative processes. The third part contains the theoretical corpus of the book. Chapters 14 through 21 contain the most recent of Stahl's contributions to the theoretical foundations of computer-supported cooperative work and computer-supported collaborative learning. Chapters 16 to 18 provide much material about topics directly related to group cognition research and collaborative work in modern organizations. Finally, the last part of the book contains an exhaustive list of references that will be of great value to all interested in the multiple aspects and fields of cooperative work and collaborative learning."

0.007003988 = product of:
  0.014007976 = sum of:
    0.014007976 = product of:
      0.028015953 = sum of:
        0.028015953 = weight(_text_:22 in 1782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028015953 = score(doc=1782,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1782, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1782)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 3.2008 14:43:03