Search (171 results, page 1 of 9)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Mukherjee, B.: Do open-access journals in library and information science have any scholarly impact? : a bibliometric study of selected open-access journals using Google Scholar (2009) 0.05
    0.050672293 = product of:
      0.101344585 = sum of:
        0.101344585 = sum of:
          0.066324644 = weight(_text_:2000 in 2745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.066324644 = score(doc=2745,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051695216 = queryNorm
              0.31659737 = fieldWeight in 2745, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2745)
          0.03501994 = weight(_text_:22 in 2745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03501994 = score(doc=2745,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051695216 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2745, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2745)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Using 17 fully open-access journals published uninterruptedly during 2000 to 2004 in the field of library and information science, the present study investigates the impact of these open-access journals in terms of quantity of articles published, subject distribution of the articles, synchronous and diachronous impact factor, immediacy index, and journals' and authors' self-citation. The results indicate that during this 5-year publication period, there are as many as 1,636 articles published by these journals. At the same time, the articles have received a total of 8,591 Web citations during a 7-year citation period. Eight of 17 journals have received more than 100 citations. First Monday received the highest number of citations; however, the average number of citations per article was the highest in D-Lib Magazine. The value of the synchronous impact factor varies from 0.6989 to 1.0014 during 2002 to 2005, and the diachronous impact factor varies from 1.472 to 2.487 during 2000 to 2004. The range of the immediacy index varies between 0.0714 and 1.395. D-Lib Magazine has an immediacy index value above 0.5 in all the years whereas the immediacy index value varies from year to year for the other journals. When the citations of sample articles were analyzed according to source, it was found that 40.32% of the citations came from full-text articles, followed by 33.35% from journal articles. The percentage of journals' self-citation was only 6.04%.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:54:59
  2. Haycock, L.A.: Citation analysis of education dissertations for collection development (2004) 0.05
    0.049151126 = product of:
      0.09830225 = sum of:
        0.09830225 = sum of:
          0.056278326 = weight(_text_:2000 in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056278326 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051695216 = queryNorm
              0.26864177 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
          0.042023927 = weight(_text_:22 in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042023927 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051695216 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The reference lists of forty-three education dissertations on curriculum and instruction completed at the University of Minnesota during the calendar years 2000-2002 were analyzed to inform collection development. As one measure of use of the academic library collection, the citation analysis yielded data to guide journal selection, retention, and cancellation decisions. The project aimed to ensure that the most frequently cited journals were retained on subscription. The serial monograph ratio for citation also was evaluated in comparison with other studies and explored in the context of funding ratios. Results of citation studies can provide a basis for liaison conversations with faculty in addition to guiding selection decisions. This research project can serve as a model for similar projects in other libraries that look at literature in education as well as other fields.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.05
    0.049151126 = product of:
      0.09830225 = sum of:
        0.09830225 = sum of:
          0.056278326 = weight(_text_:2000 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056278326 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051695216 = queryNorm
              0.26864177 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
          0.042023927 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042023927 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051695216 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Research patterns could enhance understanding of the Information Systems (IS) field. Citation analysis is the methodology commonly used to determine such research patterns. In this study, the citation methodology is applied to one of the top-ranked Information Systems conferences - International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Information is extracted from papers in the proceedings of ICIS 2000 to 2002. A total of 145 base articles and 4,226 citations are used. Research patterns are obtained using total citations, citations per journal or conference, and overlapping citations. We then provide the citation ranking of journals and conferences. We also examine the difference between the citation ranking in this study and the ranking of IS journals and IS conferences in other studies. Based on the comparison, we confirm that IS research is a multidisciplinary research area. We also identify the most cited papers and authors in the IS research area, and the organizations most active in producing papers in the top-rated IS conference. We discuss the findings and implications of the study.
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
  4. Schubert, T.; Michels, C.: Placing articles in the large publisher nations : is there a "free lunch" in terms of higher impact? (2013) 0.04
    0.040959276 = product of:
      0.08191855 = sum of:
        0.08191855 = sum of:
          0.046898607 = weight(_text_:2000 in 669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046898607 = score(doc=669,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051695216 = queryNorm
              0.22386816 = fieldWeight in 669, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=669)
          0.03501994 = weight(_text_:22 in 669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03501994 = score(doc=669,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051695216 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 669, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=669)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper deals with the role of a journal's publisher country in determining the expected citation rates of the articles published in it. We analyze whether a paper has a higher citation rate when it is published in one of the large publisher nations, the U.S., U.K., or the Netherlands, compared to a hypothetical situation when the same paper is published in journals of different origin. This would constitute a "free lunch," which could be explained by a Matthew effect visible on the country-level, similar to the well-documented Matthew effect on the author-level. We first use a simulation model that highlights increasing citation returns to quality as the central key condition on which such a Matthew effect may emerge. Then we use an international bibliometric panel data set of forty-nine countries for the years 2000-2010 and show that such a "free lunch" implied by this Matthew effect can be observed for top journals from the U.S. and depending on the specification also from the U.K. and the Netherlands, while there is no effect for lower-ranked American journals and negative effects for lower-ranked British journals as well as those coming from the Netherlands.
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:45:49
  5. Cronin, B.: Semiotics and evaluative bibliometrics (2000) 0.04
    0.037076604 = product of:
      0.07415321 = sum of:
        0.07415321 = product of:
          0.14830641 = sum of:
            0.14830641 = weight(_text_:2000 in 4542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14830641 = score(doc=4542,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.70793325 = fieldWeight in 4542, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4542)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 56(2000) no.4, S.440-453
    Year
    2000
  6. Freitas, J.L.; Gabriel Jr., R.F.; Bufrem, L.S.: Theoretical approximations between Brazilian and Spanish authors' production in the field of knowledge organization in the production of journals on information science in Brazil (2012) 0.03
    0.03276742 = product of:
      0.06553484 = sum of:
        0.06553484 = sum of:
          0.037518885 = weight(_text_:2000 in 144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037518885 = score(doc=144,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051695216 = queryNorm
              0.17909452 = fieldWeight in 144, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=144)
          0.028015953 = weight(_text_:22 in 144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028015953 = score(doc=144,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051695216 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 144, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=144)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This work identifies and analyzes literature about knowledge organization (KO), expressed in scientific journals' communication of information science (IS). It performs an exploratory study on the Base de Dados Referencial de Artigos de Periódicos em Ciência da Informação (BRAPCI, Reference Database of Journal Articles on Information Science) between the years 2000 and 2010. The descriptors relating to "knowledge organization" are used in order to recover and analyze the corresponding articles and to identify descriptors and concepts which integrate the semantic universe related to KO. Through the analysis of content, based on metrical studies, this article gathers and interprets data relating to documents and authors. Through this, it demonstrates the development of this field and its research fronts according to the observed characteristics, as well as noting the transformation indicative in the production of knowledge. The work describes the influences of the Spanish researchers on Brazilian literature in the fields of knowledge and information organization. As a result, it presents the most cited and productive authors, the theoretical currents which support them, and the most significant relationships of the Spanish-Brazilian authors network. Based on the constant key-words analysis in the cited articles, the co-existence of the French conception current and the incipient Spanish influence in Brazil is observed. Through this, it contributes to the comprehension of the thematic range relating to KO, stimulating both criticism and self-criticism, debate and knowledge creation, based on studies that have been developed and institutionalized in academic contexts in Spain and Brazil.
    Content
    Beitrag einer Section "Selected Papers from the 1ST Brazilian Conference on Knowledge Organization And Representation, Faculdade de Ciência da Informação, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro Brasília, DF Brasil, October 20-22, 2011" Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_3_g.pdf.
  7. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬The influence of publication delays on the observed aging distribution of scientific literature (2000) 0.03
    0.029661283 = product of:
      0.059322566 = sum of:
        0.059322566 = product of:
          0.11864513 = sum of:
            0.11864513 = weight(_text_:2000 in 4385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11864513 = score(doc=4385,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.5663466 = fieldWeight in 4385, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4385)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.2, S.158-165
    Year
    2000
  8. Bensman, S.J.: Probability distributions in library and information science : a historical and practitioner viewpoint (2000) 0.03
    0.029661283 = product of:
      0.059322566 = sum of:
        0.059322566 = product of:
          0.11864513 = sum of:
            0.11864513 = weight(_text_:2000 in 4859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11864513 = score(doc=4859,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.5663466 = fieldWeight in 4859, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4859)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.9, S.816-833
    Year
    2000
  9. Thelwall, M.: Web impact factors and search engine coverage (2000) 0.03
    0.029661283 = product of:
      0.059322566 = sum of:
        0.059322566 = product of:
          0.11864513 = sum of:
            0.11864513 = weight(_text_:2000 in 4539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11864513 = score(doc=4539,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.5663466 = fieldWeight in 4539, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4539)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 56(2000) no.2, S.185-189
    Year
    2000
  10. ¬The Web of knowledge : Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (2000) 0.03
    0.028719414 = product of:
      0.057438828 = sum of:
        0.057438828 = product of:
          0.114877656 = sum of:
            0.114877656 = weight(_text_:2000 in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.114877656 = score(doc=461,freq=3.0), product of:
                0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.54836273 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
                  1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                    3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Year
    2000
  11. Stock, W.G.: Eugene Garfield und die Folgen : der Weg der Fußnote bis in die Wissenschaftspolitik (2002) 0.03
    0.028139163 = product of:
      0.056278326 = sum of:
        0.056278326 = product of:
          0.11255665 = sum of:
            0.11255665 = weight(_text_:2000 in 472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11255665 = score(doc=472,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.53728354 = fieldWeight in 472, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=472)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Ein Besprechungsaufsatz zur Festschrift für E. Garfield: The Web of knowledge: Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield. Medford, NJ: Information Today 2000.
  12. Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986) 0.03
    0.028015953 = product of:
      0.056031905 = sum of:
        0.056031905 = product of:
          0.11206381 = sum of:
            0.11206381 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11206381 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
  13. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.03
    0.028015953 = product of:
      0.056031905 = sum of:
        0.056031905 = product of:
          0.11206381 = sum of:
            0.11206381 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11206381 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  14. Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987) 0.03
    0.028015953 = product of:
      0.056031905 = sum of:
        0.056031905 = product of:
          0.11206381 = sum of:
            0.11206381 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11206381 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
  15. Schlögl, C.: Informationskompetenz am Beispiel einer szientometrischen Untersuchung zum Informationsmanagement (2000) 0.03
    0.02595362 = product of:
      0.05190724 = sum of:
        0.05190724 = product of:
          0.10381448 = sum of:
            0.10381448 = weight(_text_:2000 in 5485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10381448 = score(doc=5485,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.49555326 = fieldWeight in 5485, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5485)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Informationskompetenz - Basiskompetenz in der Informationsgesellschaft: Proceedings des 7. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2000), Hrsg.: G. Knorz u. R. Kuhlen
    Year
    2000
  16. Ohly, H.P.: State-of-the-art reports : a bibliometric point of view (2000) 0.03
    0.02595362 = product of:
      0.05190724 = sum of:
        0.05190724 = product of:
          0.10381448 = sum of:
            0.10381448 = weight(_text_:2000 in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10381448 = score(doc=135,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.49555326 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al
    Year
    2000
  17. Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998) 0.02
    0.024762837 = product of:
      0.049525674 = sum of:
        0.049525674 = product of:
          0.09905135 = sum of:
            0.09905135 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09905135 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:22:35
  18. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.02
    0.024762837 = product of:
      0.049525674 = sum of:
        0.049525674 = product of:
          0.09905135 = sum of:
            0.09905135 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09905135 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  19. Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994) 0.02
    0.024513958 = product of:
      0.049027916 = sum of:
        0.049027916 = product of:
          0.09805583 = sum of:
            0.09805583 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09805583 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
  20. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990) 0.02
    0.024513958 = product of:
      0.049027916 = sum of:
        0.049027916 = product of:
          0.09805583 = sum of:
            0.09805583 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09805583 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:29

Years

Languages

  • e 157
  • d 13
  • ro 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 168
  • m 3
  • el 2
  • s 2
  • More… Less…