Search (28 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.05 
    0.049151126 = product of:
  0.09830225 = sum of:
    0.09830225 = sum of:
      0.056278326 = weight(_text_:2000 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056278326 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051695216 = queryNorm
          0.26864177 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
      0.042023927 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042023927 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051695216 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Research patterns could enhance understanding of the Information Systems (IS) field. Citation analysis is the methodology commonly used to determine such research patterns. In this study, the citation methodology is applied to one of the top-ranked Information Systems conferences - International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Information is extracted from papers in the proceedings of ICIS 2000 to 2002. A total of 145 base articles and 4,226 citations are used. Research patterns are obtained using total citations, citations per journal or conference, and overlapping citations. We then provide the citation ranking of journals and conferences. We also examine the difference between the citation ranking in this study and the ranking of IS journals and IS conferences in other studies. Based on the comparison, we confirm that IS research is a multidisciplinary research area. We also identify the most cited papers and authors in the IS research area, and the organizations most active in producing papers in the top-rated IS conference. We discuss the findings and implications of the study.
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
  2. Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008) 0.05 
    0.049151126 = product of:
  0.09830225 = sum of:
    0.09830225 = sum of:
      0.056278326 = weight(_text_:2000 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056278326 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051695216 = queryNorm
          0.26864177 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
      0.042023927 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042023927 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051695216 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The paper attempts to provide an alternative method for measuring the importance of scientific papers based on the Google's PageRank. The method is a meaningful extension of the common integer counting of citations and is then experimented for bringing PageRank to the citation analysis in a large citation network. It offers a more integrated picture of the publications' influence in a specific field. We firstly calculate the PageRanks of scientific papers. The distributional characteristics and comparison with the traditionally used number of citations are then analyzed in detail. Furthermore, the PageRank is implemented in the evaluation of research influence for several countries in the field of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology during the time period of 2000-2005. Finally, some advantages of bringing PageRank to the citation analysis are concluded.
    Date
    31. 7.2008 14:22:05
  3. Remler, A.: Lässt sich wissenschaftliche Leistung messen? : Wer zitiert wird, liegt vorne - in den USA berechnet man Forschungsleistung nach einem Zitat-Index (2000) 0.04 
    0.040207177 = product of:
  0.080414355 = sum of:
    0.080414355 = product of:
      0.16082871 = sum of:
        0.16082871 = weight(_text_:2000 in 5392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16082871 = score(doc=5392,freq=3.0), product of:
            0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.7677078 = fieldWeight in 5392, product of:
              1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                3.0 = termFreq=3.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5392)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Year
    2000
  4. Cronin, B.: Semiotics and evaluative bibliometrics (2000) 0.04 
    0.037076604 = product of:
  0.07415321 = sum of:
    0.07415321 = product of:
      0.14830641 = sum of:
        0.14830641 = weight(_text_:2000 in 4542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14830641 = score(doc=4542,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.70793325 = fieldWeight in 4542, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4542)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 56(2000) no.4, S.440-453
    Year
    2000
  5. ¬The Web of knowledge : Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (2000) 0.03 
    0.028719414 = product of:
  0.057438828 = sum of:
    0.057438828 = product of:
      0.114877656 = sum of:
        0.114877656 = weight(_text_:2000 in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.114877656 = score(doc=461,freq=3.0), product of:
            0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.54836273 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
              1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                3.0 = termFreq=3.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Year
    2000
  6. Stock, W.G.: Eugene Garfield und die Folgen : der Weg der Fußnote bis in die Wissenschaftspolitik (2002) 0.03 
    0.028139163 = product of:
  0.056278326 = sum of:
    0.056278326 = product of:
      0.11255665 = sum of:
        0.11255665 = weight(_text_:2000 in 472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11255665 = score(doc=472,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.53728354 = fieldWeight in 472, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=472)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Ein Besprechungsaufsatz zur Festschrift für E. Garfield: The Web of knowledge: Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield. Medford, NJ: Information Today 2000.
  7. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.03 
    0.028015953 = product of:
  0.056031905 = sum of:
    0.056031905 = product of:
      0.11206381 = sum of:
        0.11206381 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11206381 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  8. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.02 
    0.024762837 = product of:
  0.049525674 = sum of:
    0.049525674 = product of:
      0.09905135 = sum of:
        0.09905135 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09905135 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  9. Meho, L.I.; Sonnenwald, D.H.: Citation ranking versus peer evaluation of senior faculty research performance : a case study of Kurdish scholarship (2000) 0.02 
    0.02224596 = product of:
  0.04449192 = sum of:
    0.04449192 = product of:
      0.08898384 = sum of:
        0.08898384 = weight(_text_:2000 in 4382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08898384 = score(doc=4382,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.42475992 = fieldWeight in 4382, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4382)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.2, S.123-138
    Year
    2000
  10. Steele, T.W.; Stier, J.C.: ¬The impact of interdisciplinary research in the environmental sciences : a forestry case study (2000) 0.02 
    0.02224596 = product of:
  0.04449192 = sum of:
    0.04449192 = product of:
      0.08898384 = sum of:
        0.08898384 = weight(_text_:2000 in 4592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08898384 = score(doc=4592,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.42475992 = fieldWeight in 4592, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4592)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.5, S.476-484
    Year
    2000
  11. Brooks, T.A.: How good are the best papers of JASIS? (2000) 0.02 
    0.02224596 = product of:
  0.04449192 = sum of:
    0.04449192 = product of:
      0.08898384 = sum of:
        0.08898384 = weight(_text_:2000 in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08898384 = score(doc=4593,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.42475992 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.5, S.485-486
    Year
    2000
  12. Jacobs, N.; Woodfield, J.; Morris, A.: Using local citation data to relate the use of journal articles by academic researchers to the coverage of full-text document access systems (2000) 0.02 
    0.02224596 = product of:
  0.04449192 = sum of:
    0.04449192 = product of:
      0.08898384 = sum of:
        0.08898384 = weight(_text_:2000 in 4541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08898384 = score(doc=4541,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.42475992 = fieldWeight in 4541, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4541)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 56(2000) no.5, S.563-581
    Year
    2000
  13. Case, D.O.; Higgins, G.M.: How can we investigate citation behavior? : A study of reasons for citing literature in communication (2000) 0.02 
    0.018538302 = product of:
  0.037076604 = sum of:
    0.037076604 = product of:
      0.07415321 = sum of:
        0.07415321 = weight(_text_:2000 in 4775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07415321 = score(doc=4775,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.35396662 = fieldWeight in 4775, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4775)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.7, S.635-645
    Year
    2000
  14. Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002) 0.02 
    0.01750997 = product of:
  0.03501994 = sum of:
    0.03501994 = product of:
      0.07003988 = sum of:
        0.07003988 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07003988 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
  15. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.01 
    0.014857704 = product of:
  0.029715408 = sum of:
    0.029715408 = product of:
      0.059430815 = sum of:
        0.059430815 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059430815 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  16. Davis, P.M.; Cohen, S.A.: ¬The effect of the Web on undergraduate citation behavior 1996-1999 (2001) 0.01 
    0.014069581 = product of:
  0.028139163 = sum of:
    0.028139163 = product of:
      0.056278326 = sum of:
        0.056278326 = weight(_text_:2000 in 5768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056278326 = score(doc=5768,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.26864177 = fieldWeight in 5768, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5768)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    A citation analysis of undergraduate term papers in microeconomics revealed a significant decrease in the frequency of scholarly resources cited between 1996 and 1999. Book citations decreased from 30% to 19%, newspaper citations increased from 7% to 19%, and Web citations increased from 9% to 21%. Web citations checked in 2000 revealed that only 18% of URLs cited in 1996 led to the correct Internet document. For 1999 bibliographies, only 55% of URLs led to the correct document. The authors recommend (1) setting stricter guidelines for acceptable citations in course assignments; (2) creating and maintaining scholarly portals for authoritative Web sites with a commitment to long-term access; and (3) continuing to instruct students how to critically evaluate resources
  17. Abt, H.A.; Garfield, E.: Is the relationship between numbers of references and paper lengths the same for all sciences? (2002) 0.01 
    0.014069581 = product of:
  0.028139163 = sum of:
    0.028139163 = product of:
      0.056278326 = sum of:
        0.056278326 = weight(_text_:2000 in 5223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056278326 = score(doc=5223,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.26864177 = fieldWeight in 5223, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5223)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    It has been shown in the physical sciences that a paper's length is related to its number of references in a linear manner. Abt and Garfield here look at the life and social sciences with the thought that if the relation holds the citation counts will provide a measure of relative importance across these disciplines. In the life sciences 200 research papers from 1999-2000 were scanned in each of 10 journals to produce counts of 1000 word normalized pages. In the social sciences an average of 70 research papers in nine journals were scanned for the two-year period. Papers of average length in the various sciences have the same average number of references within plus or minus 17%. A look at the 30 to 60 papers over the two years in 18 review journals indicates twice the references of research papers of the same length.
  18. Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001) 0.01 
    0.012256979 = product of:
  0.024513958 = sum of:
    0.024513958 = product of:
      0.049027916 = sum of:
        0.049027916 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049027916 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    16.12.2001 14:01:22
  19. Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006) 0.01 
    0.012256979 = product of:
  0.024513958 = sum of:
    0.024513958 = product of:
      0.049027916 = sum of:
        0.049027916 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049027916 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:20:01
  20. Stock, W.G.: Forschung im internationalen Vergleich - Wissenschaftsindikatoren auf Zitationsbasis : ISI Essential Science Indicators (2002) 0.01 
    0.011724652 = product of:
  0.023449304 = sum of:
    0.023449304 = product of:
      0.046898607 = sum of:
        0.046898607 = weight(_text_:2000 in 474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046898607 = score(doc=474,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.22386816 = fieldWeight in 474, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=474)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Bewertung wissenschaftlicher Forschungsergebnisse aus einer elektronischen Datenbank heraus? Rangordnungen der wichtigsten Institutionen, Wissenschaftler, Zeitschriften und sogar Länder in Fachdisziplinen nach Einfluss? Markierung "heißer", hochaktueller Artikel? Auflisten der hochzitierten Forschungsfronten in den einzelnen Wissenschaftsdisziplinen? Und das alles auf Knopfdruck und nicht mittels umständlicher szientometrischer Verfahren? Geht so etwas überhaupt? Es geht. Mit den "Essential Science Indicators" (ESI) legt das ISl ein webbasiertes Informationssystem zur Wissenschaftsevaluation vor, das einzigartige Ergebnisse präsentiert und in der Tat ausgesprochen einfach zu bedienen ist. Aber es geht, verglichen mit ausgeklügelten Methoden der empirischen Wissenschaftsforschung, nicht alles. Wo liegen die Grenzen des Systems? Wir werden die Arbeitsweise der ESI, seine Datenbasis, die eingesetzten informetrischen Algorithmen - und deren methodischen Probleme, die Suchoberfläche sowie die Ergebnisdarstellung skizzieren. Als Beispiel dienen uns Aspekte deutscher Forschung. Etwa: In welcher Disziplin haben Deutschlands Forscher den größten internationalen Einfluss? Welches deutsche Institut der Neurowissenschaften kann aufglobaler Ebene mitmischen? Oder: Welcher in Deutschland tätige Wissenschaftler führt eine disziplinspezifische Rangordnung an?Letztlich: Wer braucht die "Essential Science Indicators"? - Wir testeten die Essential Science Indicators Mitte Februar 2002 anhand der Version vom 1. Januar 2002, die das Zehn-Jahres-Intervall 1991 bis 2000 sowie die ersten zehn Monate aus 2001 berücksichtigt.

Authors

Languages

  • e 20
  • d 8

Types

  • a 26
  • el 2
  • m 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes