Search (40 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  1. Aliprand, J.M.: ¬The Unicode Standard : its scope, design prin. ciples, and prospects for international cataloging (2000) 0.11 
    0.10917315 = product of:
  0.2183463 = sum of:
    0.2183463 = sum of:
      0.14830641 = weight(_text_:2000 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14830641 = score(doc=4608,freq=5.0), product of:
          0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051695216 = queryNorm
          0.70793325 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
            2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
              5.0 = termFreq=5.0
            4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
      0.07003988 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07003988 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051695216 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 44(2000) no.3, S.160-167
    Year
    2000
  2. Bowman, J.H.: ¬The catalog as barrier to retrieval : Part 1: hyphens and ampersands in titles (2000) 0.08 
    0.0764212 = product of:
  0.1528424 = sum of:
    0.1528424 = sum of:
      0.10381448 = weight(_text_:2000 in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10381448 = score(doc=5365,freq=5.0), product of:
          0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051695216 = queryNorm
          0.49555326 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
            2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
              5.0 = termFreq=5.0
            4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
      0.049027916 = weight(_text_:22 in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049027916 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051695216 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    An Internet survey of 38 different OPAC systems, at eighty different libraries, was undertaken to investigate the effect on retrieval of the presence of the hyphen or the ampersand in titles. Title and Keyword searches were performed. In Title search, 22 of the systems treat the hyphen as equivalent to a space, while in Keyword the number is 16. The other systems treat it in various different ways (even including the equivalent of NOT), which means that results of searching multiple catalogs are very inconsistent. The ampersand may be ignored, treated as a special character, or treated as "and," again with very inconsistent results. Various recommendations are made with a view to improving consistency of performance.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 29(2000) no.4, S.39-59
    Year
    2000
  3. Esser, R.: Gesamtnachweis der an der ETH-Zürich vorhandenen Literatur (2000) 0.06 
    0.059322566 = product of:
  0.11864513 = sum of:
    0.11864513 = product of:
      0.23729026 = sum of:
        0.23729026 = weight(_text_:2000 in 4469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23729026 = score(doc=4469,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            1.1326932 = fieldWeight in 4469, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4469)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 34(2000) H.3, S.374-375
    Year
    2000
  4. Erdei, K.: Kein Umzug für Zettel : Die digitalisierten Kataloge im Neubau der UB Kiel (2001) 0.06 
    0.057342984 = product of:
  0.11468597 = sum of:
    0.11468597 = sum of:
      0.06565805 = weight(_text_:2000 in 5777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06565805 = score(doc=5777,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051695216 = queryNorm
          0.3134154 = fieldWeight in 5777, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5777)
      0.049027916 = weight(_text_:22 in 5777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049027916 = score(doc=5777,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051695216 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5777, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5777)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Wie bereits vor einiger Zeit im BIBLIOTHEKDIENST berichtet, wurde der Neubau der UB Kiel am 1. Dezember 2000 fertiggestellt. Der Umzug der ca. 100 Mitarbeiter und über 1 Million Bücher dauerte vier Monate. Bis auf drei Schließungstage wurde der normale Betrieb auch während dieser Zeit vollständig aufrechterhalten - eine logistische Herausforderung, verbunden mit einem wesentlich erhöhten Arbeitsaufwand. Eine Ausnahme gab es dennoch: die Zettelkataloge. Sie konnten wir getrost stehen lassen bzw. - pietätlos ausgedrückt - entsorgen. Pünktlich zum realen Umzug war auch die retrospektive Konversion abgeschlossen: Die Benutzerkataloge sind allesamt digitalisiert und bilden jetzt einen alles umfassenden Online-Katalog der Zentralbibliothek. Den ursprünglich für die Zettelkataloge vorgesehenen Platz nehmen nun zusätzliche Benutzercomputer für die Katalogrecherche und Bestellung ein
    Date
    28. 4.2001 16:49:22
  5. Byrum, J.D.: ¬The emerging global bibliographical network : the era of international standardization in the development of cataloging policy (2000) 0.05 
    0.054586574 = product of:
  0.10917315 = sum of:
    0.10917315 = sum of:
      0.07415321 = weight(_text_:2000 in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07415321 = score(doc=190,freq=5.0), product of:
          0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051695216 = queryNorm
          0.35396662 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
            2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
              5.0 = termFreq=5.0
            4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
      0.03501994 = weight(_text_:22 in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03501994 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051695216 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 44(2000) no.3, S.114-121
    Year
    2000
  6. Doering, W.: Managing the transition to a new catalog : tips for smotth sailing (2000) 0.05 
    0.05190724 = product of:
  0.10381448 = sum of:
    0.10381448 = product of:
      0.20762897 = sum of:
        0.20762897 = weight(_text_:2000 in 3382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20762897 = score(doc=3382,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.9911065 = fieldWeight in 3382, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3382)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Computers in libraries. 20(2000) no.7, S,20-22,24
    Year
    2000
  7. Gajewski, T.; Klement, T.: Generierung eines multidimensionalen Katalogsystems mit Datawarehouse-Architektur (2000) 0.05 
    0.05190724 = product of:
  0.10381448 = sum of:
    0.10381448 = product of:
      0.20762897 = sum of:
        0.20762897 = weight(_text_:2000 in 6009) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20762897 = score(doc=6009,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.9911065 = fieldWeight in 6009, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6009)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Series
    GMD research series; 2/2000
    Year
    2000
  8. Bolin, M.K.: Catalog design, catalog maintenance, catalog governance (2000) 0.05 
    0.05190724 = product of:
  0.10381448 = sum of:
    0.10381448 = product of:
      0.20762897 = sum of:
        0.20762897 = weight(_text_:2000 in 493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20762897 = score(doc=493,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.9911065 = fieldWeight in 493, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=493)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Library collections, acquisitions and technical services. 24(2000) no.1, S.53-63
    Year
    2000
  9. Matthews, J.: ¬The value of information in library catalogs (2000) 0.05 
    0.05190724 = product of:
  0.10381448 = sum of:
    0.10381448 = product of:
      0.20762897 = sum of:
        0.20762897 = weight(_text_:2000 in 659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20762897 = score(doc=659,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.9911065 = fieldWeight in 659, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=659)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information outlook. 4(2000) no.7, S.18-24
    Year
    2000
  10. Angelus, A.; Eichhorn-Berndt, C.; Schnelling, H.: Digitalisierung des Realkataloges (Hartwig-Katalog) der Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt und seine Visualisierung im Internet (2000) 0.04 
    0.04449192 = product of:
  0.08898384 = sum of:
    0.08898384 = product of:
      0.17796768 = sum of:
        0.17796768 = weight(_text_:2000 in 4470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17796768 = score(doc=4470,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.84951985 = fieldWeight in 4470, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4470)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 34(2000) H.3, S.422-434
    Year
    2000
  11. Petek, M.: Konzeptualni modelni na podrocju knjiznicnih katalogov (2000) 0.04 
    0.04449192 = product of:
  0.08898384 = sum of:
    0.08898384 = product of:
      0.17796768 = sum of:
        0.17796768 = weight(_text_:2000 in 5178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17796768 = score(doc=5178,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.84951985 = fieldWeight in 5178, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5178)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Knjiznica. 44(2000) nos.1/2, S.75-88
    Year
    2000
  12. Rodman, R.L.: Making the connection between processing and access : do cataloging decisions affect user access? (2000) 0.04 
    0.04449192 = product of:
  0.08898384 = sum of:
    0.08898384 = product of:
      0.17796768 = sum of:
        0.17796768 = weight(_text_:2000 in 518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17796768 = score(doc=518,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.84951985 = fieldWeight in 518, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=518)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Library collections, acquisitions and technical services. 24(2000) no.x, S.443-458
    Year
    2000
  13. Guerrini, M.: ¬The functions of the catalogue from ICCP to FRBR (2000) 0.04 
    0.037076604 = product of:
  0.07415321 = sum of:
    0.07415321 = product of:
      0.14830641 = sum of:
        0.14830641 = weight(_text_:2000 in 3947) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14830641 = score(doc=3947,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.70793325 = fieldWeight in 3947, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3947)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Seminario FRBR: Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records : reguisiti funzionali per record bibliografici, Florence, 27-28 January 2000. Proceedings. Ed.by M.Guerrini
    Year
    2000
  14. Managing cataloging and the organization of information : philosophies, practices and challenges at the onset of the 21st century (2000) 0.03 
    0.03236057 = product of:
  0.06472114 = sum of:
    0.06472114 = sum of:
      0.040207177 = weight(_text_:2000 in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040207177 = score(doc=238,freq=3.0), product of:
          0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051695216 = queryNorm
          0.19192696 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
            1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
              3.0 = termFreq=3.0
            4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
      0.024513958 = weight(_text_:22 in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024513958 = score(doc=238,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051695216 = queryNorm
          0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in ZfBB 51(2004) H.1, S.54-55 (G. Pflug): "Unter dem wachsenden Einfluss der Informationstechnologie auf den Bibliotheksbereich nimmt die Katalogisierung eine Schlüsselstellung ein. Das vorliegende Werk gliedert sich in zwei Teile. Der erste Abschnitt ist mit »National Libraries« überschrieben, befasst sich jedoch nur mit der Library of Congress und der National Library of Canada. Ihm folgen Artikel über »Libraries around the world«. Dabei fälltjedoch auf, dass diese Studien zwar Bibliotheken in Großbritannien, Australien, Mittel- und Südamerika und selbst Afrika (Botswana) behandeln, nicht jedoch aus Kontinentaleuropa, trotz entsprechender Aktivitäten etwa in den Niederlanden, in Frankreich oder den deutschsprachigen Ländern. Nur DOBIS/LIBIS wird erwähnt, aber nur, weil es für kurze Zeit die kanadische Entwicklung beeinflusst hat. Im zweiten Teil kommen Katalogisierungsfachleute aus vier Spezial- und neun akademischen Bibliotheken - ausschließlich aus Nordamerika und Großbritannien - zu Wort. So enthält das Werk in 22 Beispielen Berichte über individuelle und regionale Lösungen. Dabei steht die Frage im Vordergrund, zu welchen Änderungen in der Katalogisierungs- und Sacherschließungspraxis die neuen elektronischen Techniken geführt haben. So streben z.B. die englischen Hochschulbibliotheken ein koordiniertes System an. Mit dem Übergang der British Library zu MARC 21 wird das Katalogsystem in Großbritannien nachhaltig beeinflusst - um nur zwei nahe liegende Beispiele zu nennen. Insgesamt werden drei Aspekte behandelt, die Automatisierungstechnik; die dabei einzusetzende Kooperation und das Outsourcing - nicht nur durch Übernahme von Daten anderer Bibliotheken oder durch Verbundsysteme, vor allem der Library of Congress, sondern auch durch Buchhandelsfirmen wie Blackwell North America Authority Control Service. In der Frage der Sacherschließung befassen sich die Beiträge mit den im amerikanischen Bereich üblichen Klassifikationssystemen, vor allem der Colon Classification, Dewey in seinen beiden Formen oder der Library of Congress Classification. Für die deutsche Diskussion sind diese Aspekte vor allem wegen des Übergangs der Deutschen Bibliothek in ihrer Nationalbibliografie zur DDC von großem Interesse (vgl. Magda Heiner-Freiling: Die DDC in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie. In Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 15. 2003, Nr. 3, S. 8-13). Doch stellen auch die unterschiedlichen Überlegungen zur alphabetischen Katalogisierung, verbunden mit den da zugehörigen Datenbanken, einen interessanten Beitrag zur augenblicklichen Diskussion in Deutschland dar, da auch hier seit einigen Jahren die Katalogisierung nach RAK und ihre Ablösung eine lebhafte Diskussion ausgelöst hat, wie unter anderem der zusammenfassende Beitrag von Elisabeth Niggemann in: Dialog mit Bibliotheken (15. 2003, Nr. 2, S. 4-8) zeigt. Auch die angloamerikanischen und die mit ihnen zum Beispiel in Mexiko, Südamerika oder Australien verbundenen Bibliotheken - das zeigt das Buch deutlich - diskutieren die Frage der alphabetischen Katalogisierung kontrovers. So werden z.B. neben den dominanten AACR-Regeln mit ihrer Weiterentwicklung mehr als zehn andere Katalogisierungssysteme und rund 20 Online-Datenbanken behandelt. Damit liefert das Buch für die Diskussion in Deutschland und die anstehenden Entscheidungen in seiner Grundtendenz wie in den unterschiedlichen-auch widersprüchlichen-Aspekten dereinzelnen Beiträge wertvolle Anregungen."
    Year
    2000
  15. Bowman, J.H.: ¬The catalog as barrier to retrieval : Part 2: forms of name (2000) 0.03 
    0.02595362 = product of:
  0.05190724 = sum of:
    0.05190724 = product of:
      0.10381448 = sum of:
        0.10381448 = weight(_text_:2000 in 5400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10381448 = score(doc=5400,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.49555326 = fieldWeight in 5400, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5400)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 30(2000) no.4, S.51-73
    Year
    2000
  16. Coyle, K.: ¬The virtual union catalog : a comparative study (2000) 0.02 
    0.02224596 = product of:
  0.04449192 = sum of:
    0.04449192 = product of:
      0.08898384 = sum of:
        0.08898384 = weight(_text_:2000 in 1230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08898384 = score(doc=1230,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.42475992 = fieldWeight in 1230, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1230)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 6(2000) no.3, xx S
    Year
    2000
  17. Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001) 0.02 
    0.021011963 = product of:
  0.042023927 = sum of:
    0.042023927 = product of:
      0.084047854 = sum of:
        0.084047854 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.084047854 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
  18. Condron, L.: Management by action : how we're embracing new cataloging work at Tufts (2000) 0.02 
    0.018538302 = product of:
  0.037076604 = sum of:
    0.037076604 = product of:
      0.07415321 = sum of:
        0.07415321 = weight(_text_:2000 in 5390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07415321 = score(doc=5390,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.35396662 = fieldWeight in 5390, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5390)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 30(2000) nos.2/3, S.299-313
    Year
    2000
  19. Sauperl, A.; Saye, J.D.: Have we made any progress? : catalogues of the future revisited (2009) 0.02 
    0.016581161 = product of:
  0.033162322 = sum of:
    0.033162322 = product of:
      0.066324644 = sum of:
        0.066324644 = weight(_text_:2000 in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066324644 = score(doc=2843,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.31659737 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose - Library online public access catalogues (OPACs) are considered to be unattractive in comparison with popular internet sites. In 2000, the authors presented some suggestions on how library catalogues should change. Have librarians actually made their OPACs more user-friendly by adopting techniques and technologies already present in other information resources? This paper aims to address these issues. Design/methodology/approach - The characteristics of four OPACs, one online bookstore and two internet search engines are analyzed. The paper reviews some of the changes and directions suggested by researchers and adds some of authors own. All this is in the hope that library catalogues will survive "Google attack." Findings - Changes are identified in the information services studied over a seven-year period. Least development is found in library catalogues. Suggestions are made for library catalogues of the future. Research limitations/implications - A library catalogue, a web search engine and an internet bookstore cannot be compared directly because of differences in scope. But features from each could be fruitfully used in others. Practical implications - OPACs must be both attractive and useful. They should be at least as easy to use as their competitors. With the results of research as well as the knowledge librarians have many years, the profession should be able to develop better OPACs than we have today and regain lost ground in the "competition" for those with information needs. Originality/value - A comparison of OPAC features in 2000 and 2007, even if subjective, can provide a panoramic view of the development of the field.
  20. LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008) 0.01 
    0.014857704 = product of:
  0.029715408 = sum of:
    0.029715408 = product of:
      0.059430815 = sum of:
        0.059430815 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059430815 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051695216 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    19. 6.2010 19:22:28

Authors

Languages

  • e 24
  • d 15
  • slv 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 36
  • b 3
  • m 3
  • el 1
  • r 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes