Search (605 results, page 1 of 31)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Moreiro-González, J.A.; Ortiz-Repiso, V.: What is happening about KOS in Spain : scientific production analysis, 2000-2017 (2018) 0.07
    0.06553484 = product of:
      0.13106968 = sum of:
        0.13106968 = sum of:
          0.07503777 = weight(_text_:2000 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07503777 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051695216 = queryNorm
              0.35818905 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
          0.056031905 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056031905 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051695216 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    19. 1.2019 14:22:24
  2. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.04
    0.041052856 = product of:
      0.08210571 = sum of:
        0.08210571 = product of:
          0.24631712 = sum of:
            0.24631712 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24631712 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.43827263 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  3. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.04
    0.041052856 = product of:
      0.08210571 = sum of:
        0.08210571 = product of:
          0.24631712 = sum of:
            0.24631712 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24631712 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.43827263 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  4. Schubert, T.; Michels, C.: Placing articles in the large publisher nations : is there a "free lunch" in terms of higher impact? (2013) 0.04
    0.040959276 = product of:
      0.08191855 = sum of:
        0.08191855 = sum of:
          0.046898607 = weight(_text_:2000 in 669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046898607 = score(doc=669,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051695216 = queryNorm
              0.22386816 = fieldWeight in 669, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=669)
          0.03501994 = weight(_text_:22 in 669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03501994 = score(doc=669,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051695216 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 669, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=669)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper deals with the role of a journal's publisher country in determining the expected citation rates of the articles published in it. We analyze whether a paper has a higher citation rate when it is published in one of the large publisher nations, the U.S., U.K., or the Netherlands, compared to a hypothetical situation when the same paper is published in journals of different origin. This would constitute a "free lunch," which could be explained by a Matthew effect visible on the country-level, similar to the well-documented Matthew effect on the author-level. We first use a simulation model that highlights increasing citation returns to quality as the central key condition on which such a Matthew effect may emerge. Then we use an international bibliometric panel data set of forty-nine countries for the years 2000-2010 and show that such a "free lunch" implied by this Matthew effect can be observed for top journals from the U.S. and depending on the specification also from the U.K. and the Netherlands, while there is no effect for lower-ranked American journals and negative effects for lower-ranked British journals as well as those coming from the Netherlands.
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:45:49
  5. Li, X.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ¬The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication (2015) 0.04
    0.040959276 = product of:
      0.08191855 = sum of:
        0.08191855 = sum of:
          0.046898607 = weight(_text_:2000 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046898607 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051695216 = queryNorm
              0.22386816 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
          0.03501994 = weight(_text_:22 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03501994 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051695216 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The four major Subject Repositories (SRs), arXiv, Research Papers in Economics (RePEc), Social Science Research Network (SSRN) and PubMed Central (PMC), are all important within their disciplines but no previous study has systematically compared how often they are cited in academic publications. In response, the purpose of this paper is to report an analysis of citations to SRs from Scopus publications, 2000-2013. Design/methodology/approach Scopus searches were used to count the number of documents citing the four SRs in each year. A random sample of 384 documents citing the four SRs was then visited to investigate the nature of the citations. Findings Each SR was most cited within its own subject area but attracted substantial citations from other subject areas, suggesting that they are open to interdisciplinary uses. The proportion of documents citing each SR is continuing to increase rapidly, and the SRs all seem to attract substantial numbers of citations from more than one discipline. Research limitations/implications Scopus does not cover all publications, and most citations to documents found in the four SRs presumably cite the published version, when one exists, rather than the repository version. Practical implications SRs are continuing to grow and do not seem to be threatened by institutional repositories and so research managers should encourage their continued use within their core disciplines, including for research that aims at an audience in other disciplines. Originality/value This is the first simultaneous analysis of Scopus citations to the four most popular SRs.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  6. Dreisiebner, S.; Schlögl, C.: Assessing disciplinary differences in information literacy teaching materials (2019) 0.04
    0.040959276 = product of:
      0.08191855 = sum of:
        0.08191855 = sum of:
          0.046898607 = weight(_text_:2000 in 5495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046898607 = score(doc=5495,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051695216 = queryNorm
              0.22386816 = fieldWeight in 5495, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5495)
          0.03501994 = weight(_text_:22 in 5495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03501994 = score(doc=5495,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051695216 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5495, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5495)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to uncover similarities and differences among emphasized information literacy (IL) skills for the disciplines of political- and social sciences, economics, educational sciences, law sciences, mathematics, life sciences, history and German studies, based on an analysis of IL teaching materials. Design/methodology/approach Eight issues of the German language publication series Erfolgreich recherchieren (Succesful Research Strategies) are compared by using a structuring content analysis. The category system is based on the IL standards and performance indicators of the Association of College and Research Libraries (2000), extended with additional categories. Findings The results, first, suggest that the biggest similarities and differences among the disciplines are found concerning the determination of the nature and extent of the needed information, especially in the area of identifying potential sources of information. Second, some of the disciplines focus more on international sources, whereas others focus on country- and language-specific sources. Third, the criteria to define the appropriate retrieval system differ among the various disciplines. Fourth, approaches to narrow the search results differ among the various disciplines. Fifth, the critical evaluation of sources is addressed in all disciplines but relates to different contexts. Research limitations/implications This approach only addresses one book per discipline out of a German language book series. Further research is needed. Originality/value This paper is unique in its approach and one of few papers on disciplinary differences in IL perception.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  7. Freitas, J.L.; Gabriel Jr., R.F.; Bufrem, L.S.: Theoretical approximations between Brazilian and Spanish authors' production in the field of knowledge organization in the production of journals on information science in Brazil (2012) 0.03
    0.03276742 = product of:
      0.06553484 = sum of:
        0.06553484 = sum of:
          0.037518885 = weight(_text_:2000 in 144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037518885 = score(doc=144,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051695216 = queryNorm
              0.17909452 = fieldWeight in 144, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=144)
          0.028015953 = weight(_text_:22 in 144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028015953 = score(doc=144,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051695216 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 144, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=144)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This work identifies and analyzes literature about knowledge organization (KO), expressed in scientific journals' communication of information science (IS). It performs an exploratory study on the Base de Dados Referencial de Artigos de Periódicos em Ciência da Informação (BRAPCI, Reference Database of Journal Articles on Information Science) between the years 2000 and 2010. The descriptors relating to "knowledge organization" are used in order to recover and analyze the corresponding articles and to identify descriptors and concepts which integrate the semantic universe related to KO. Through the analysis of content, based on metrical studies, this article gathers and interprets data relating to documents and authors. Through this, it demonstrates the development of this field and its research fronts according to the observed characteristics, as well as noting the transformation indicative in the production of knowledge. The work describes the influences of the Spanish researchers on Brazilian literature in the fields of knowledge and information organization. As a result, it presents the most cited and productive authors, the theoretical currents which support them, and the most significant relationships of the Spanish-Brazilian authors network. Based on the constant key-words analysis in the cited articles, the co-existence of the French conception current and the incipient Spanish influence in Brazil is observed. Through this, it contributes to the comprehension of the thematic range relating to KO, stimulating both criticism and self-criticism, debate and knowledge creation, based on studies that have been developed and institutionalized in academic contexts in Spain and Brazil.
    Content
    Beitrag einer Section "Selected Papers from the 1ST Brazilian Conference on Knowledge Organization And Representation, Faculdade de Ciência da Informação, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro Brasília, DF Brasil, October 20-22, 2011" Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_3_g.pdf.
  8. Schöne neue Welt? : Fragen und Antworten: Wie Facebook menschliche Gedanken auslesen will (2017) 0.02
    0.024762837 = product of:
      0.049525674 = sum of:
        0.049525674 = product of:
          0.09905135 = sum of:
            0.09905135 = weight(_text_:22 in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09905135 = score(doc=2810,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2004 9:42:33
    22. 4.2017 11:58:05
  9. Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017) 0.02
    0.024762837 = product of:
      0.049525674 = sum of:
        0.049525674 = product of:
          0.09905135 = sum of:
            0.09905135 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09905135 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 4.2017 10:42:05
    22. 4.2017 10:48:38
  10. Poscher, R.: ¬Die Zukunft der informationellen Selbstbestimmung als Recht auf Abwehr von Grundrechtsgefährdungen (2012) 0.02
    0.024762837 = product of:
      0.049525674 = sum of:
        0.049525674 = product of:
          0.09905135 = sum of:
            0.09905135 = weight(_text_:22 in 3975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09905135 = score(doc=3975,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3975, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3975)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2018 12:06:44
    22. 2.2018 12:13:53
  11. Cronin, B.: Thinking about data (2013) 0.02
    0.024513958 = product of:
      0.049027916 = sum of:
        0.049027916 = product of:
          0.09805583 = sum of:
            0.09805583 = weight(_text_:22 in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09805583 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 16:18:36
  12. Grudin, J.: Human-computer interaction (2011) 0.02
    0.024513958 = product of:
      0.049027916 = sum of:
        0.049027916 = product of:
          0.09805583 = sum of:
            0.09805583 = weight(_text_:22 in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09805583 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27.12.2014 18:54:22
  13. Shen, J.; Yao, L.; Li, Y.; Clarke, M.; Wang, L.; Li, D.: Visualizing the history of evidence-based medicine : a bibliometric analysis (2013) 0.02
    0.023449304 = product of:
      0.046898607 = sum of:
        0.046898607 = product of:
          0.093797214 = sum of:
            0.093797214 = weight(_text_:2000 in 1090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.093797214 = score(doc=1090,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.20949209 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.44773632 = fieldWeight in 1090, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1090)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The aim of this paper is to visualize the history of evidence-based medicine (EBM) and to examine the characteristics of EBM development in China and the West. We searched the Web of Science and the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure database for papers related to EBM. We applied information visualization techniques, citation analysis, cocitation analysis, cocitation cluster analysis, and network analysis to construct historiographies, themes networks, and chronological theme maps regarding EBM in China and the West. EBM appeared to develop in 4 stages: incubation (1972-1992 in the West vs. 1982-1999 in China), initiation (1992-1993 vs. 1999-2000), rapid development (1993-2000 vs. 2000-2004), and stable distribution (2000 onwards vs. 2004 onwards). Although there was a lag in EBM initiation in China compared with the West, the pace of development appeared similar. Our study shows that important differences exist in research themes, domain structures, and development depth, and in the speed of adoption between China and the West. In the West, efforts in EBM have shifted from education to practice, and from the quality of evidence to its translation. In China, there was a similar shift from education to practice, and from production of evidence to its translation. In addition, this concept has diffused to other healthcare areas, leading to the development of evidence-based traditional Chinese medicine, evidence-based nursing, and evidence-based policy making.
  14. Williamson, N.J.: Classification issues in 2011 : report (2012) 0.02
    0.021011963 = product of:
      0.042023927 = sum of:
        0.042023927 = product of:
          0.084047854 = sum of:
            0.084047854 = weight(_text_:22 in 6224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084047854 = score(doc=6224,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6224, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6224)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:17:00
  15. Cronin, B.: ¬The writing on the wall (2015) 0.02
    0.021011963 = product of:
      0.042023927 = sum of:
        0.042023927 = product of:
          0.084047854 = sum of:
            0.084047854 = weight(_text_:22 in 7297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084047854 = score(doc=7297,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 7297, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7297)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26. 4.2015 19:27:22
  16. Deisseroth, K.: Lichtschalter im Gehirn (2011) 0.02
    0.021011963 = product of:
      0.042023927 = sum of:
        0.042023927 = product of:
          0.084047854 = sum of:
            0.084047854 = weight(_text_:22 in 4248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084047854 = score(doc=4248,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4248, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4248)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2011, H.2, S.22-29
  17. Xiao, G.: ¬A knowledge classification model based on the relationship between science and human needs (2013) 0.02
    0.021011963 = product of:
      0.042023927 = sum of:
        0.042023927 = product of:
          0.084047854 = sum of:
            0.084047854 = weight(_text_:22 in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084047854 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2013 12:36:34
  18. Szostak, R.: Speaking truth to power in classification : response to Fox's review of my work; KO 39:4, 300 (2013) 0.02
    0.021011963 = product of:
      0.042023927 = sum of:
        0.042023927 = product of:
          0.084047854 = sum of:
            0.084047854 = weight(_text_:22 in 591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084047854 = score(doc=591,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 591, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=591)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2013 12:35:05
  19. Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014) 0.02
    0.021011963 = product of:
      0.042023927 = sum of:
        0.042023927 = product of:
          0.084047854 = sum of:
            0.084047854 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084047854 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18. 3.2014 19:13:22
  20. Antos, G.: Wie Sprache Entscheidungen (vor)prägt : zum Einfluss und zur Rhetorik kollektiver Selbsttäuschungen (2014) 0.02
    0.021011963 = product of:
      0.042023927 = sum of:
        0.042023927 = product of:
          0.084047854 = sum of:
            0.084047854 = weight(_text_:22 in 1489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084047854 = score(doc=1489,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18102784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051695216 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1489, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1489)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 7.2014 18:22:33

Languages

  • e 461
  • d 142
  • a 1
  • More… Less…

Types

Themes