Search (17 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Ding, Y."
  1. Ding, Y.: Topic-based PageRank on author cocitation networks (2011) 0.09
    0.08563382 = product of:
      0.17126764 = sum of:
        0.130858 = weight(_text_:vector in 4348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.130858 = score(doc=4348,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30654848 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.439392 = idf(docFreq=191, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047605187 = queryNorm
            0.4268754 = fieldWeight in 4348, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.439392 = idf(docFreq=191, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4348)
        0.04040964 = product of:
          0.08081928 = sum of:
            0.08081928 = weight(_text_:model in 4348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08081928 = score(doc=4348,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.44150823 = fieldWeight in 4348, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4348)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Ranking authors is vital for identifying a researcher's impact and standing within a scientific field. There are many different ranking methods (e.g., citations, publications, h-index, PageRank, and weighted PageRank), but most of them are topic-independent. This paper proposes topic-dependent ranks based on the combination of a topic model and a weighted PageRank algorithm. The author-conference-topic (ACT) model was used to extract topic distribution of individual authors. Two ways for combining the ACT model with the PageRank algorithm are proposed: simple combination (I_PR) or using a topic distribution as a weighted vector for PageRank (PR_t). Information retrieval was chosen as the test field and representative authors for different topics at different time phases were identified. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to analyze the ranking difference between I_PR and PR_t.
  2. Ding, Y.; Jacob, E.K.; Zhang, Z.; Foo, S.; Yan, E.; George, N.L.; Guo, L.: Perspectives on social tagging (2009) 0.02
    0.021484317 = product of:
      0.08593727 = sum of:
        0.08593727 = weight(_text_:space in 3290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08593727 = score(doc=3290,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24842183 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2183776 = idf(docFreq=650, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047605187 = queryNorm
            0.34593284 = fieldWeight in 3290, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2183776 = idf(docFreq=650, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3290)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Social tagging is one of the major phenomena transforming the World Wide Web from a static platform into an actively shared information space. This paper addresses various aspects of social tagging, including different views on the nature of social tagging, how to make use of social tags, and how to bridge social tagging with other Web functionalities; it discusses the use of facets to facilitate browsing and searching of tagging data; and it presents an analogy between bibliometrics and tagometrics, arguing that established bibliometric methodologies can be applied to analyze tagging behavior on the Web. Based on the Upper Tag Ontology (UTO), a Web crawler was built to harvest tag data from Delicious, Flickr, and YouTube in September 2007. In total, 1.8 million objects, including bookmarks, photos, and videos, 3.1 million taggers, and 12.1 million tags were collected and analyzed. Some tagging patterns and variations are identified and discussed.
  3. Li, D.; Ding, Y.; Sugimoto, C.; He, B.; Tang, J.; Yan, E.; Lin, N.; Qin, Z.; Dong, T.: Modeling topic and community structure in social tagging : the TTR-LDA-Community model (2011) 0.01
    0.011905802 = product of:
      0.04762321 = sum of:
        0.04762321 = product of:
          0.09524642 = sum of:
            0.09524642 = weight(_text_:model in 4759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09524642 = score(doc=4759,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.5203224 = fieldWeight in 4759, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4759)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The presence of social networks in complex systems has made networks and community structure a focal point of study in many domains. Previous studies have focused on the structural emergence and growth of communities and on the topics displayed within the network. However, few scholars have closely examined the relationship between the thematic and structural properties of networks. Therefore, this article proposes the Tagger Tag Resource-Latent Dirichlet Allocation-Community model (TTR-LDA-Community model), which combines the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) model with the Girvan-Newman community detection algorithm through an inference mechanism. Using social tagging data from Delicious, this article demonstrates the clustering of active taggers into communities, the topic distributions within communities, and the ranking of taggers, tags, and resources within these communities. The data analysis evaluates patterns in community structure and topical affiliations diachronically. The article evaluates the effectiveness of community detection and the inference mechanism embedded in the model and finds that the TTR-LDA-Community model outperforms other traditional models in tag prediction. This has implications for scholars in domains interested in community detection, profiling, and recommender systems.
  4. Tan, L.K.-W.; Na, J.-C.; Ding, Y.: Influence diffusion detection using the influence style (INFUSE) model (2015) 0.01
    0.010868462 = product of:
      0.043473847 = sum of:
        0.043473847 = product of:
          0.086947694 = sum of:
            0.086947694 = weight(_text_:model in 2125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.086947694 = score(doc=2125,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.4749872 = fieldWeight in 2125, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2125)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Blogs are readily available sources of opinions and sentiments that in turn could influence the opinions of the blog readers. Previous studies have attempted to infer influence from blog features, but they have ignored the possible influence styles that describe the different ways in which influence is exerted. We propose a novel approach to analyzing bloggers' influence styles and using the influence styles as features to improve the performance of influence diffusion detection among linked bloggers. The proposed influence style (INFUSE) model describes bloggers' influence through their engagement style, persuasion style, and persona. Methods used include similarity analysis to detect the creating-sharing aspect of engagement style, subjectivity analysis to measure persuasion style, and sentiment analysis to identify persona style. We further extend the INFUSE model to detect influence diffusion among linked bloggers based on the bloggers' influence styles. The INFUSE model performed well with an average F1 score of 76% compared with the in-degree and sentiment-value baseline approaches. Previous studies have focused on the existence of influence among linked bloggers in detecting influence diffusion, but our INFUSE model is shown to provide a fine-grained description of the manner in which influence is diffused based on the bloggers' influence styles.
  5. Ding, Y.: Scholarly communication and bibliometrics : Part 1: The scholarly communication model: literature review (1998) 0.01
    0.009721047 = product of:
      0.03888419 = sum of:
        0.03888419 = product of:
          0.07776838 = sum of:
            0.07776838 = weight(_text_:model in 3995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07776838 = score(doc=3995,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.42484146 = fieldWeight in 3995, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3995)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  6. Li, D.; Tang, J.; Ding, Y.; Shuai, X.; Chambers, T.; Sun, G.; Luo, Z.; Zhang, J.: Topic-level opinion influence model (TOIM) : an investigation using tencent microblogging (2015) 0.01
    0.009721047 = product of:
      0.03888419 = sum of:
        0.03888419 = product of:
          0.07776838 = sum of:
            0.07776838 = weight(_text_:model in 2345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07776838 = score(doc=2345,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.42484146 = fieldWeight in 2345, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2345)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Text mining has been widely used in multiple types of user-generated data to infer user opinion, but its application to microblogging is difficult because text messages are short and noisy, providing limited information about user opinion. Given that microblogging users communicate with each other to form a social network, we hypothesize that user opinion is influenced by its neighbors in the network. In this paper, we infer user opinion on a topic by combining two factors: the user's historical opinion about relevant topics and opinion influence from his/her neighbors. We thus build a topic-level opinion influence model (TOIM) by integrating both topic factor and opinion influence factor into a unified probabilistic model. We evaluate our model in one of the largest microblogging sites in China, Tencent Weibo, and the experiments show that TOIM outperforms baseline methods in opinion inference accuracy. Moreover, incorporating indirect influence further improves inference recall and f1-measure. Finally, we demonstrate some useful applications of TOIM in analyzing users' behaviors in Tencent Weibo.
  7. Li, D.; Wang, Y.; Madden, A.; Ding, Y.; Sun, G.G.; Zhang, N.; Zhou, E.: Analyzing stock market trends using social media user moods and social influence (2019) 0.01
    0.009721047 = product of:
      0.03888419 = sum of:
        0.03888419 = product of:
          0.07776838 = sum of:
            0.07776838 = weight(_text_:model in 5362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07776838 = score(doc=5362,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.42484146 = fieldWeight in 5362, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5362)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Information from microblogs is gaining increasing attention from researchers interested in analyzing fluctuations in stock markets. Behavioral financial theory draws on social psychology to explain some of the irrational behaviors associated with financial decisions to help explain some of the fluctuations. In this study we argue that social media users who demonstrate an interest in finance can offer insights into ways in which irrational behaviors may affect a stock market. To test this, we analyzed all the data collected over a 3-month period in 2011 from Tencent Weibo (one of the largest microblogging websites in China). We designed a social influence (SI)-based Tencent finance-related moods model to simulate investors' irrational behaviors, and designed a Tencent Moods-based Stock Trend Analysis (TM_STA) model to detect correlations between Tencent moods and the Hushen-300 index (one of the most important financial indexes in China). Experimental results show that the proposed method can help explain the data fluctuation. The findings support the existing behavioral financial theory, and can help to understand short-term rises and falls in a stock market. We use behavioral financial theory to further explain our findings, and to propose a trading model to verify the proposed model.
  8. Li, D.; Luo, Z.; Ding, Y.; Tang, J.; Sun, G.G.-Z.; Dai, X.; Du, J.; Zhang, J.; Kong, S.: User-level microblogging recommendation incorporating social influence (2017) 0.01
    0.008418675 = product of:
      0.0336747 = sum of:
        0.0336747 = product of:
          0.0673494 = sum of:
            0.0673494 = weight(_text_:model in 3426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0673494 = score(doc=3426,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.36792353 = fieldWeight in 3426, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3426)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    With the information overload of user-generated content in microblogging, users find it extremely challenging to browse and find valuable information in their first attempt. In this paper we propose a microblogging recommendation algorithm, TSI-MR (Topic-Level Social Influence-based Microblogging Recommendation), which can significantly improve users' microblogging experiences. The main innovation of this proposed algorithm is that we consider social influences and their indirect structural relationships, which are largely based on social status theory, from the topic level. The primary advantage of this approach is that it can build an accurate description of latent relationships between two users with weak connections, which can improve the performance of the model; furthermore, it can solve sparsity problems of training data to a certain extent. The realization of the model is mainly based on Factor Graph. We also applied a distributed strategy to further improve the efficiency of the model. Finally, we use data from Tencent Weibo, one of the most popular microblogging services in China, to evaluate our methods. The results show that incorporating social influence can improve microblogging performance considerably, and outperform the baseline methods.
  9. Ni, C.; Shaw, D.; Lind, S.M.; Ding, Y.: Journal impact and proximity : an assessment using bibliographic features (2013) 0.01
    0.0058326283 = product of:
      0.023330513 = sum of:
        0.023330513 = product of:
          0.046661027 = sum of:
            0.046661027 = weight(_text_:model in 686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046661027 = score(doc=686,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.25490487 = fieldWeight in 686, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=686)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Journals in the Information Science & Library Science category of Journal Citation Reports (JCR) were compared using both bibliometric and bibliographic features. Data collected covered journal impact factor (JIF), number of issues per year, number of authors per article, longevity, editorial board membership, frequency of publication, number of databases indexing the journal, number of aggregators providing full-text access, country of publication, JCR categories, Dewey decimal classification, and journal statement of scope. Three features significantly correlated with JIF: number of editorial board members and number of JCR categories in which a journal is listed correlated positively; journal longevity correlated negatively with JIF. Coword analysis of journal descriptions provided a proximity clustering of journals, which differed considerably from the clusters based on editorial board membership. Finally, a multiple linear regression model was built to predict the JIF based on all the collected bibliographic features.
  10. Lu, C.; Bu, Y.; Wang, J.; Ding, Y.; Torvik, V.; Schnaars, M.; Zhang, C.: Examining scientific writing styles from the perspective of linguistic complexity : a cross-level moderation model (2019) 0.01
    0.0058326283 = product of:
      0.023330513 = sum of:
        0.023330513 = product of:
          0.046661027 = sum of:
            0.046661027 = weight(_text_:model in 5219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046661027 = score(doc=5219,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.25490487 = fieldWeight in 5219, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5219)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  11. Ding, Y.: Applying weighted PageRank to author citation networks (2011) 0.01
    0.0056436146 = product of:
      0.022574458 = sum of:
        0.022574458 = product of:
          0.045148917 = sum of:
            0.045148917 = weight(_text_:22 in 4188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045148917 = score(doc=4188,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16670525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4188, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4188)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:02:21
  12. Lin, N.; Li, D.; Ding, Y.; He, B.; Qin, Z.; Tang, J.; Li, J.; Dong, T.: ¬The dynamic features of Delicious, Flickr, and YouTube (2012) 0.00
    0.0048605236 = product of:
      0.019442094 = sum of:
        0.019442094 = product of:
          0.03888419 = sum of:
            0.03888419 = weight(_text_:model in 4970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03888419 = score(doc=4970,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.21242073 = fieldWeight in 4970, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4970)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article investigates the dynamic features of social tagging vocabularies in Delicious, Flickr, and YouTube from 2003 to 2008. Three algorithms are designed to study the macro- and micro-tag growth as well as the dynamics of taggers' activities, respectively. Moreover, we propose a Tagger Tag Resource Latent Dirichlet Allocation (TTR-LDA) model to explore the evolution of topics emerging from those social vocabularies. Our results show that (a) at the macro level, tag growth in all the three tagging systems obeys power law distribution with exponents lower than 1; at the micro level, the tag growth of popular resources in all three tagging systems follows a similar power law distribution; (b) the exponents of tag growth vary in different evolving stages of resources; (c) the growth of number of taggers associated with different popular resources presents a feature of convergence over time; (d) the active level of taggers has a positive correlation with the macro-tag growth of different tagging systems; and (e) some topics evolve into several subtopics over time while others experience relatively stable stages in which their contents do not change much, and certain groups of taggers continue their interests in them.
  13. Bu, Y.; Ding, Y.; Xu, J.; Liang, X.; Gao, G.; Zhao, Y.: Understanding success through the diversity of collaborators and the milestone of career (2018) 0.00
    0.0048605236 = product of:
      0.019442094 = sum of:
        0.019442094 = product of:
          0.03888419 = sum of:
            0.03888419 = weight(_text_:model in 4012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03888419 = score(doc=4012,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.21242073 = fieldWeight in 4012, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4012)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Scientific collaboration is vital to many fields, and it is common to see scholars seek out experienced researchers or experts in a domain with whom they can share knowledge, experience, and resources. To explore the diversity of research collaborations, this article performs a temporal analysis on the scientific careers of researchers in the field of computer science. Specifically, we analyze collaborators using 2 indicators: the research topic diversity, measured by the Author-Conference-Topic model and cosine, and the impact diversity, measured by the normalized standard deviation of h-indices. We find that the collaborators of high-impact researchers tend to study diverse research topics and have diverse h-indices. Moreover, by setting PhD graduation as an important milestone in researchers' careers, we examine several indicators related to scientific collaboration and their effects on a career. The results show that collaborating with authoritative authors plays an important role prior to a researcher's PhD graduation, but working with non-authoritative authors carries more weight after PhD graduation.
  14. Min, C.; Ding, Y.; Li, J.; Bu, Y.; Pei, L.; Sun, J.: Innovation or imitation : the diffusion of citations (2018) 0.00
    0.0048605236 = product of:
      0.019442094 = sum of:
        0.019442094 = product of:
          0.03888419 = sum of:
            0.03888419 = weight(_text_:model in 4445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03888419 = score(doc=4445,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.21242073 = fieldWeight in 4445, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4445)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Citations in scientific literature are important both for tracking the historical development of scientific ideas and for forecasting research trends. However, the diffusion mechanisms underlying the citation process remain poorly understood, despite the frequent and longstanding use of citation counts for assessment purposes within the scientific community. Here, we extend the study of citation dynamics to a more general diffusion process to understand how citation growth associates with different diffusion patterns. Using a classic diffusion model, we quantify and illustrate specific diffusion mechanisms which have been proven to exert a significant impact on the growth and decay of citation counts. Experiments reveal a positive relation between the "low p and low q" pattern and high scientific impact. A sharp citation peak produced by rapid change of citation counts, however, has a negative effect on future impact. In addition, we have suggested a simple indicator, saturation level, to roughly estimate an individual article's current stage in the life cycle and its potential to attract future attention. The proposed approach can also be extended to higher levels of aggregation (e.g., individual scientists, journals, institutions), providing further insights into the practice of scientific evaluation.
  15. Liu, M.; Bu, Y.; Chen, C.; Xu, J.; Li, D.; Leng, Y.; Freeman, R.B.; Meyer, E.T.; Yoon, W.; Sung, M.; Jeong, M.; Lee, J.; Kang, J.; Min, C.; Zhai, Y.; Song, M.; Ding, Y.: Pandemics are catalysts of scientific novelty : evidence from COVID-19 (2022) 0.00
    0.0048605236 = product of:
      0.019442094 = sum of:
        0.019442094 = product of:
          0.03888419 = sum of:
            0.03888419 = weight(_text_:model in 633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03888419 = score(doc=633,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.21242073 = fieldWeight in 633, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=633)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Scientific novelty drives the efforts to invent new vaccines and solutions during the pandemic. First-time collaboration and international collaboration are two pivotal channels to expand teams' search activities for a broader scope of resources required to address the global challenge, which might facilitate the generation of novel ideas. Our analysis of 98,981 coronavirus papers suggests that scientific novelty measured by the BioBERT model that is pretrained on 29 million PubMed articles, and first-time collaboration increased after the outbreak of COVID-19, and international collaboration witnessed a sudden decrease. During COVID-19, papers with more first-time collaboration were found to be more novel and international collaboration did not hamper novelty as it had done in the normal periods. The findings suggest the necessity of reaching out for distant resources and the importance of maintaining a collaborative scientific community beyond nationalism during a pandemic.
  16. Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chambers, T.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis : the next generation of citation analysis (2014) 0.00
    0.004837384 = product of:
      0.019349536 = sum of:
        0.019349536 = product of:
          0.03869907 = sum of:
            0.03869907 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03869907 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16670525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 16:52:04
  17. Klein, M.; Ding, Y.; Fensel, D.; Omelayenko, B.: Ontology management : storing, aligning and maintaining ontologies (2004) 0.00
    0.003888419 = product of:
      0.015553676 = sum of:
        0.015553676 = product of:
          0.031107351 = sum of:
            0.031107351 = weight(_text_:model in 4402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031107351 = score(doc=4402,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.16993658 = fieldWeight in 4402, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4402)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Ontologies need to be stored, sometimes aligned and their evolution needs to be managed. All these tasks together are called ontology management. Alignment is a central task in ontology re-use. Re-use of existing ontologies often requires considerable effort: the ontologies either need to be integrated, which means that they are merged into one new ontology, or the ontologies can be kept separate. In both cases, the ontologies have to be aligned, which means that they have to be brought into mutual agreement. The problems that underlie the difficulties in integrating and aligning are the mismatches that may exist between separate ontologies. Ontologies can differ at the language level, which can mean that they are represented in a different syntax, or that the expressiveness of the ontology language is dissimilar. Ontologies also can have mismatches at the model level, for example, in the paradigm, or modelling style. Ontology alignment is very relevant in a Semantic Web context. The Semantic Web will provide us with a lot of freely accessible domain specific ontologies. To form a real web of semantics - which will allow computers to combine and infer implicit knowledge - those separate ontologies should be aligned and linked.