Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0088916775 = product of:
  0.03556671 = sum of:
    0.03556671 = sum of:
      0.019442094 = weight(_text_:model in 1787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.019442094 = score(doc=1787,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047605187 = queryNorm
          0.106210366 = fieldWeight in 1787, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1787)
      0.016124614 = weight(_text_:22 in 1787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.016124614 = score(doc=1787,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16670525 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047605187 = queryNorm
          0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 1787, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1787)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The discovery of rules for the systematicity and dynamics of terminology creations is essential for a sound basis of a theory of terminology. This quest provides the driving force for the dynamics of terminology in which Dr Kageura demonstrates the interaction of these two factors on a specific corpus of Japanese terminology which, beyond the necessary linguistic circumstances, also has a model character for similar studies. His detailed examination of the relationships between terms and their constituent elements, the relationships among the constituent elements and the type of conceptual combinations used in the construction of the terminology permits deep insights into the systematic thought processes underlying term creation. To compensate for the inherent limitation of a purely descriptive analysis of conceptual patterns, Dr. Kageura offers a quantitative analysis of the patterns of the growth of terminology.

Date

22. 3.2008 18:18:53

0.0040311534 = product of:
  0.016124614 = sum of:
    0.016124614 = product of:
      0.032249227 = sum of:
        0.032249227 = weight(_text_:22 in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032249227 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16670525 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047605187 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

14. 4.2007 10:04:22

0.0040311534 = product of:
  0.016124614 = sum of:
    0.016124614 = product of:
      0.032249227 = sum of:
        0.032249227 = weight(_text_:22 in 997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032249227 = score(doc=997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16670525 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047605187 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=997)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 7.2013 10:53:30

0.0032249228 = product of:
  0.012899691 = sum of:
    0.012899691 = product of:
      0.025799382 = sum of:
        0.025799382 = weight(_text_:22 in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025799382 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16670525 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047605187 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 7.2013 10:53:30

0.0019442094 = product of:
  0.007776838 = sum of:
    0.007776838 = product of:
      0.015553676 = sum of:
        0.015553676 = weight(_text_:model in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015553676 = score(doc=91,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047605187 = queryNorm
            0.08496829 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Inhalt: Information und Sprache und mehr - eine Einleitung - Information und Kommunikation Wolf Rauch: Auch Information ist eine Tochter der Zeit Winfried Lenders: Information und kulturelles Gedächtnis Rainer Hammwöhner: Anmerkungen zur Grundlegung der Informationsethik Hans W. Giessen: Ehrwürdig stille Informationen Gernot Wersig: Vereinheitlichte Medientheorie und ihre Sicht auf das Internet Johann Haller, Anja Rütten: Informationswissenschaft und Translationswissenschaft: Spielarten oder Schwestern? Rainer Kuhlen: In Richtung Summarizing für Diskurse in K3 Werner Schweibenz: Sprache, Information und Bedeutung im Museum. Narrative Vermittlung durch Storytelling - Sprache und Computer, insbesondere Information Retrieval und Automatische Indexierung Manfred Thiel: Bedingt wahrscheinliche Syntaxbäume Jürgen Krause: Shell Model, Semantic Web and Web Information Retrieval Elisabeth Niggemann: Wer suchet, der findet? Verbesserung der inhaltlichen Suchmöglichkeiten im Informationssystem Der Deutschen Bibliothek Christa Womser-Hacker: Zur Rolle von Eigennamen im Cross-Language Information Retrieval Klaus-Dirk Schmitz: Wörterbuch, Thesaurus, Terminologie, Ontologie. Was tragen Terminologiewissenschaft und Informationswissenschaft zur Wissensordnung bei?