Search (63 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  1. Kent, R.E.: Implications and rules in thesauri (1994) 0.03
    0.028645756 = product of:
      0.11458302 = sum of:
        0.11458302 = weight(_text_:space in 3457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11458302 = score(doc=3457,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24842183 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2183776 = idf(docFreq=650, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047605187 = queryNorm
            0.46124378 = fieldWeight in 3457, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2183776 = idf(docFreq=650, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3457)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    A central consideration in the study of whole language semantic space as encoded in thesauri is word sense comparability. Shows how word sense comparability can be adequately expressed by the logical implications and rules from Formal Concept Analysis. Formal concept analysis, a new approach to formal logic initiated by Rudolf Wille, has been used for data modelling, analysis and interpretation, and also for knowledge representation and knowledge discovery
  2. Rorvig, M.E.; Turner, C.H.; Moncada, J.: ¬The NASA Image Collection Visual Thesaurus (1999) 0.03
    0.028645756 = product of:
      0.11458302 = sum of:
        0.11458302 = weight(_text_:space in 3919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11458302 = score(doc=3919,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24842183 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2183776 = idf(docFreq=650, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047605187 = queryNorm
            0.46124378 = fieldWeight in 3919, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2183776 = idf(docFreq=650, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3919)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article is an unpublished manuscript of a paper presented at the 17th Annual Mid-Year Meeting of the ASIS at Ann Arbor, Mich., May 15-18, 1988. It is the first recorded proposal for visual support of indexing. The system itself was built and developed at NASA in the Johnson space Center Image Archives from 1989 to 1992
  3. Pollard, R.: ¬A hypertext-based thesaurus as a subject browsing aid for bibliographic databases (1993) 0.03
    0.025065036 = product of:
      0.100260146 = sum of:
        0.100260146 = weight(_text_:space in 5096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.100260146 = score(doc=5096,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24842183 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2183776 = idf(docFreq=650, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047605187 = queryNorm
            0.4035883 = fieldWeight in 5096, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2183776 = idf(docFreq=650, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5096)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Part of a special issue on hypertext and information retrieval. Conventional information retrieval systems provide little support for browsing. Browsing is the major method of searching in hypertext system but users can become disoriented even when browsing small information space. If hypertext is to be used to support browsing in bibliographic databases navigational assistance will be required. Examines the role of thesauri as navigational aids for subject domains of Bibliographic databases. Presents the design of an experimental hypertext-based browsing inference for a thesaurus and its implementation using a commercially available hypertext program. Examines strategies for linking the thesaurus to a database
  4. Gilchrist, A.: Thesauri, taxonomies and ontologies : an etymological note (2003) 0.03
    0.025065036 = product of:
      0.100260146 = sum of:
        0.100260146 = weight(_text_:space in 4455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.100260146 = score(doc=4455,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24842183 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2183776 = idf(docFreq=650, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047605187 = queryNorm
            0.4035883 = fieldWeight in 4455, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2183776 = idf(docFreq=650, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4455)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The amount of work to be done in rendering the digital information space more efficient and effective has attracted a wide range of disciplines which, in turn, has given rise to a degree of confusion in the terminology applied to information problems. This note seeks to shed some light on the three terms thesauri, taxonomies and ontologies as they are currently being used by, among others, information scientists, AI practitioners, and those working on the foundations of the semantic Web. The paper is not a review of the techniques themselves.
  5. Crouch, C.J.: ¬An approach to the automatic construction of global thesauri (1990) 0.02
    0.024896696 = product of:
      0.099586785 = sum of:
        0.099586785 = sum of:
          0.054437865 = weight(_text_:model in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.054437865 = score(doc=4042,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047605187 = queryNorm
              0.29738903 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
          0.045148917 = weight(_text_:22 in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.045148917 = score(doc=4042,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16670525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047605187 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The benefits of a well constructed thesaurus to an information retrieval system have long been recognised by both researchers and practitioners in the field. Examines both early and current approaches to automatic thesaurus construction and describes an approach to the automatic generation of global thesauri based on the term discrimination value model of Salton Yang, and Yu and on an appropriate clustering algorithm. This method has been implemented and applied to 2 document collections. Preliminary results indicate that this method, which produces improvements in retrieval performance in excess of 10 and 15% in the test collections, is viable and worthy of continued investigation.
    Date
    22. 4.1996 3:39:53
  6. Chen, H.; Martinez, J.; Kirchhoff, A.; Ng, T.D.; Schatz, B.R.: Alleviating search uncertainty through concept associations : automatic indexing, co-occurence analysis, and parallel computing (1998) 0.02
    0.021484317 = product of:
      0.08593727 = sum of:
        0.08593727 = weight(_text_:space in 5202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08593727 = score(doc=5202,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24842183 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2183776 = idf(docFreq=650, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047605187 = queryNorm
            0.34593284 = fieldWeight in 5202, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2183776 = idf(docFreq=650, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5202)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, we report research on an algorithmic approach to alleviating search uncertainty in a large information space. Grounded on object filtering, automatic indexing, and co-occurence analysis, we performed a large-scale experiment using a parallel supercomputer (SGI Power Challenge) to analyze 400.000+ abstracts in an INSPEC computer engineering collection. Two system-generated thesauri, one based on a combined object filtering and automatic indexing method, and the other based on automatic indexing only, were compaed with the human-generated INSPEC subject thesaurus. Our user evaluation revealed that the system-generated thesauri were better than the INSPEC thesaurus in 'concept recall', but in 'concept precision' the 3 thesauri were comparable. Our analysis also revealed that the terms suggested by the 3 thesauri were complementary and could be used to significantly increase 'variety' in search terms the thereby reduce search uncertainty
  7. Martín-Moncunill, D.; García-Barriocanal, E.; Sicilia, M.-A.; Sánchez-Alonso, S.: Evaluating the practical applicability of thesaurus-based keyphrase extraction in the agricultural domain : insights from the VOA3R project (2015) 0.02
    0.017903598 = product of:
      0.07161439 = sum of:
        0.07161439 = weight(_text_:space in 2106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07161439 = score(doc=2106,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24842183 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2183776 = idf(docFreq=650, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047605187 = queryNorm
            0.28827736 = fieldWeight in 2106, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2183776 = idf(docFreq=650, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2106)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The use of Knowledge Organization Systems (KOSs) in aggregated metadata collections facilitates the implementation of search mechanisms operating on the same term or keyphrase space, thus preparing the ground for improved browsing, more accurate retrieval and better user profiling. Automatic thesaurus-based keyphrase extraction appears to be an inexpensive tool to obtain this information, but the studies on its effectiveness are scattered and do not consider the practical applicability of these techniques compared to the quality obtained by involving human experts. This paper presents an evaluation of keyphrase extraction using the KEA software and the AGROVOC vocabulary on a sample of a large collection of metadata in the field of agriculture from the AGRIS database. This effort includes a double evaluation, the classical automatic evaluation based on precision and recall measures, plus a blind evaluation aimed to contrast the quality of the keyphrases extracted against expert-provided samples and against the keyphrases originally recorded in the metadata. Results show not only that KEA outperforms humans in matching the original keyphrases, but also that the quality of the keyphrases extracted was similar to those provided by humans.
  8. Model, F.: Thesaurus in der Dokumentation : Vielschichtigkeit des Begriffs und historische Entwicklung (1966) 0.02
    0.015553676 = product of:
      0.062214702 = sum of:
        0.062214702 = product of:
          0.124429405 = sum of:
            0.124429405 = weight(_text_:model in 1981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.124429405 = score(doc=1981,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.6797463 = fieldWeight in 1981, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1981)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  9. Will, L.D.: UML model : as given in British Standard Draft for Development DD8723-5:2008 (2008) 0.01
    0.013609466 = product of:
      0.054437865 = sum of:
        0.054437865 = product of:
          0.10887573 = sum of:
            0.10887573 = weight(_text_:model in 7636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10887573 = score(doc=7636,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.59477806 = fieldWeight in 7636, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7636)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  10. Dextre Clarke, S.G.; Will, L.D.; Cochard, N.: ¬The BS8723 thesaurus data model and exchange format, and its relationship to SKOS (2008) 0.01
    0.013609466 = product of:
      0.054437865 = sum of:
        0.054437865 = product of:
          0.10887573 = sum of:
            0.10887573 = weight(_text_:model in 6051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10887573 = score(doc=6051,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.59477806 = fieldWeight in 6051, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6051)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  11. Jarvelin, K.: ¬A deductive data model for thesaurus navigation and query expansion (1996) 0.01
    0.0134698795 = product of:
      0.053879518 = sum of:
        0.053879518 = product of:
          0.107759036 = sum of:
            0.107759036 = weight(_text_:model in 5625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.107759036 = score(doc=5625,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.58867764 = fieldWeight in 5625, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5625)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a deductive data model based on 3 abstraction levels for representing vocabularies for information retrieval: conceptual level; expression level; and occurrence level. The proposed data model can be used for the representation and navigation of indexing and retrieval thesauri and as a vocabulary source for concept based query expansion in heterogeneous retrieval environments
  12. Röttsches, H.: Thesauruspflege im Verbund der Bibliotheken der obersten Bundesbehörden (1989) 0.01
    0.011287229 = product of:
      0.045148917 = sum of:
        0.045148917 = product of:
          0.09029783 = sum of:
            0.09029783 = weight(_text_:22 in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09029783 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16670525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Parlaments- und Behördenbibliotheken. 1989, H.67, S.1-22
  13. Cochard, N.: ¬A data model and XML schema for BS 8723-5 (2007) 0.01
    0.009721047 = product of:
      0.03888419 = sum of:
        0.03888419 = product of:
          0.07776838 = sum of:
            0.07776838 = weight(_text_:model in 532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07776838 = score(doc=532,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.42484146 = fieldWeight in 532, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=532)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  14. Byrne, C.C.; McCracken, S.A.: ¬An adaptive thesaurus employing semantic distance, relational inheritance and nominal compound interpretation for linguistic support of information retrieval (1999) 0.01
    0.009674768 = product of:
      0.03869907 = sum of:
        0.03869907 = product of:
          0.07739814 = sum of:
            0.07739814 = weight(_text_:22 in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07739814 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16670525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    15. 3.2000 10:22:37
  15. Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999) 0.01
    0.009674768 = product of:
      0.03869907 = sum of:
        0.03869907 = product of:
          0.07739814 = sum of:
            0.07739814 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07739814 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16670525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  16. Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999) 0.01
    0.009674768 = product of:
      0.03869907 = sum of:
        0.03869907 = product of:
          0.07739814 = sum of:
            0.07739814 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07739814 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16670525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  17. Qin, J.; Paling, S.: Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology : the case of GEM (2001) 0.01
    0.009674768 = product of:
      0.03869907 = sum of:
        0.03869907 = product of:
          0.07739814 = sum of:
            0.07739814 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07739814 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16670525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    24. 8.2005 19:20:22
  18. Jones, S.: ¬A thesaurus data model for an intelligent retrieval system (1993) 0.01
    0.0082485825 = product of:
      0.03299433 = sum of:
        0.03299433 = product of:
          0.06598866 = sum of:
            0.06598866 = weight(_text_:model in 5279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06598866 = score(doc=5279,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.36048993 = fieldWeight in 5279, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5279)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper demonstrates the application of conventional database design techniques to thesaurus representation. The thesaurus is considered as a printed document, as a semantic net, and as a relational database to be used in conjunction with an intelligent information retrieval system. Some issues raised by analysis of two standard thesauri include: the prevalence of compound terms and the representation of term structure; thesaurus redundancy and the extent to which it can be eliminated in machine-readable versions; the difficulty of exploiting thesaurus knowledge originally designed for human rather than automatic interpretation; deriving 'strength of association' measures between terms in a thesaurus considered as a semantic net; facet representation and the need for variations in the data model to cater for structural differences between thesauri. A complete schema of database tables is presented, with an outline suggestion for using the stored information when matching one or more thesaurus terms with a user's query
  19. Fischer, D.H.; Möhr, W.; Rostek, L.: ¬A modular, object-oriented and generic approach for building terminology maintenance systems (1996) 0.01
    0.0082485825 = product of:
      0.03299433 = sum of:
        0.03299433 = product of:
          0.06598866 = sum of:
            0.06598866 = weight(_text_:model in 6345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06598866 = score(doc=6345,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.36048993 = fieldWeight in 6345, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6345)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Five years ago, we raised the question: is there a data model which is general enough such that all existing thesauri can be represented by a specialization of this general model without loss of information? The answer was not given at that time, but we referred to the principle of abstraction, well supported in object-oriented data modelling. We gained the empirical basis for that process of abstraction by modelling existing thesauri and a terminological dictionary; an abstracting view was afterwards presented in a paper to the TKE'93 conference. The present paper reports on a third step of abstraction with its very concrete consequences, embodies in a software called TerminologyFramework(TFw)
  20. Will, L.: ¬The ISO 25964 data model for the structure of an information retrieval thesaurus (2012) 0.01
    0.0082485825 = product of:
      0.03299433 = sum of:
        0.03299433 = product of:
          0.06598866 = sum of:
            0.06598866 = weight(_text_:model in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06598866 = score(doc=862,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.36048993 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    International standard ISO 25964-1:2011 - Thesauri for information retrieval, includes a detailed data model for thesaurus structure. It is intended to provide a rigorous presentation of the elements and relationships which will not only clarify and standardise the varying and conflicting interpretations which exist but which can also be implemented consistently in automated systems. It makes a clear distinction between concepts and the terms which are used to label them, and includes other features that may be present in a thesaurus, such as compound equivalence, arrays and node labels, concept groups, notes and version history.

Authors

Languages

  • e 44
  • d 9
  • f 4
  • sp 3
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 53
  • el 6
  • m 4
  • n 1
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…