Search (32 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Literaturübersicht"
  1. Corbett, L.E.: Serials: review of the literature 2000-2003 (2006) 0.04
    0.043869503 = product of:
      0.087739006 = sum of:
        0.07161439 = weight(_text_:space in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07161439 = score(doc=1088,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24842183 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2183776 = idf(docFreq=650, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047605187 = queryNorm
            0.28827736 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2183776 = idf(docFreq=650, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
        0.016124614 = product of:
          0.032249227 = sum of:
            0.032249227 = weight(_text_:22 in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032249227 = score(doc=1088,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16670525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The topic of electronic journals (e-journals) dominated the serials literature from 2000 to 2003. This review is limited to the events and issues within the broad topics of cost, management, and archiving. Coverage of cost includes such initiatives as PEAK, JACC, BioMed Central, SPARC, open access, the "Big Deal," and "going e-only." Librarians combated the continued price increase trend for journals, fueled in part by publisher mergers, with the economies found with bundled packages and consortial subscriptions. Serials management topics include usage statistics; core title lists; staffing needs; the "A-Z list" and other services from such companies as Serials Solutions; "deep linking"; link resolvers such as SFX; development of standards or guidelines, such as COUNTER and ERMI; tracking of license terms; vendor mergers; and the demise of integrated library systems and a subscription agent's bankruptcy. Librarians archived print volumes in storage facilities due to space shortages. Librarians and publishers struggled with electronic archiving concepts, discussing questions of who, where, and how. Projects such as LOCKSS tested potential solutions, but missing online content due to the Tasini court case and retractions posed more archiving difficulties. The serials literature captured much of the upheaval resulting from the rapid pace of changes, many linked to the advent of e-journals.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. Rogers, Y.: New theoretical approaches for human-computer interaction (2003) 0.02
    0.017723657 = product of:
      0.07089463 = sum of:
        0.07089463 = weight(_text_:space in 4270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07089463 = score(doc=4270,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24842183 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2183776 = idf(docFreq=650, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047605187 = queryNorm
            0.28538004 = fieldWeight in 4270, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.2183776 = idf(docFreq=650, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4270)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    "Theory weary, theory leery, why can't I be theory cheery?" (Erickson, 2002, p. 269). The field of human-computer interaction (HCI) is rapidly expanding. Alongside the extensive technological developments that are taking place, a profusion of new theories, methods, and concerns has been imported into the field from a range of disciplines and contexts. An extensive critique of recent theoretical developments is presented here together with an overview of HCI practice. A consequence of bringing new theories into the field has been much insightful explication of HCI phenomena and also a broadening of the field's discourse. However, these theoretically based approaches have had limited impact an the practice of interaction design. This chapter discusses why this is so and suggests that different kinds of mechanisms are needed that will enable both designers and researchers to better articulate and theoretically ground the challenges facing them today. Human-computer interaction is bursting at the seams. Its mission, goals, and methods, well established in the '80s, have all greatly expanded to the point that "HCI is now effectively a boundless domain" (Barnard, May, Duke, & Duce, 2000, p. 221). Everything is in a state of flux: The theory driving research is changing, a flurry of new concepts is emerging, the domains and type of users being studied are diversifying, many of the ways of doing design are new, and much of what is being designed is significantly different. Although potentially much is to be gained from such rapid growth, the downside is an increasing lack of direction, structure, and coherence in the field. What was originally a bounded problem space with a clear focus and a small set of methods for designing computer systems that were easier and more efficient to use by a single user is now turning into a diffuse problem space with less clarity in terms of its objects of study, design foci, and investigative methods. Instead, aspirations of overcoming the Digital Divide, by providing universal accessibility, have become major concerns (e.g., Shneiderman, 2002a). The move toward greater openness in the field means that many more topics, areas, and approaches are now considered acceptable in the worlds of research and practice.
  3. Singh, S. (Sewa); Singh, S. (Sukhbir): Colon Classification : a select bibliography (1992) 0.01
    0.014322878 = product of:
      0.05729151 = sum of:
        0.05729151 = weight(_text_:space in 1479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05729151 = score(doc=1479,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24842183 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2183776 = idf(docFreq=650, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047605187 = queryNorm
            0.23062189 = fieldWeight in 1479, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2183776 = idf(docFreq=650, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1479)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: General Classification, Colon Classification, Edition7, Philosophy, Conference, Literature Survey, Features, History. Countries and Areas , Theoru, Design of Classification, Classification Problems , Research in Classification, Trends in Classification, Depth Classification, Automatic Classification, Uses of Classification, Practical Classification, Application of Classification, Standards, Glossary.Teminology, classification and Reference Service, Classificationand Documentation, Classification and Communication, Classification and Retrieval, Comparison to Other Schemes, Canons, Isolates, Common Isolates , Space Isolates, Time Isolates, Special Isolates, Postulates, Fundamental Categories, Facet Formula, Optionl Facets, Rounds and Levels, Basic Subjects, Notation and Symbols, Array and Chanin, Devices, Mnemonics, Phase Relation, Systems and Specials, Book Number, Cooperative Calssification, Teaching of Classification, Classification of Specific Subjects, Book Science, Bibliography, Library and Information Science, Classification, Cataloguing, Mathematics, Cybernetics, Engineering, Computer, Chemistry, Crystallography, Technology. Food Technology, Corrosion, Parasitism, Geology , Agriculture, Zoology, Animal Husbandry, Medicine, Useful Arts, Military Science, Creative Arts, Aiterature, Sanskrit, Marathi, Tamil, Calssics, Linguistics, Philosophy, Ssocial Science, Geography, Maps, History , Political Science, Economics, Sociology, Law,
  4. Enser, P.G.B.: Visual image retrieval (2008) 0.01
    0.012899691 = product of:
      0.051598765 = sum of:
        0.051598765 = product of:
          0.10319753 = sum of:
            0.10319753 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10319753 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16670525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:01:26
  5. Morris, S.A.: Mapping research specialties (2008) 0.01
    0.012899691 = product of:
      0.051598765 = sum of:
        0.051598765 = product of:
          0.10319753 = sum of:
            0.10319753 = weight(_text_:22 in 3962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10319753 = score(doc=3962,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16670525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3962, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3962)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 9:30:22
  6. Fallis, D.: Social epistemology and information science (2006) 0.01
    0.012899691 = product of:
      0.051598765 = sum of:
        0.051598765 = product of:
          0.10319753 = sum of:
            0.10319753 = weight(_text_:22 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10319753 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16670525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:22:28
  7. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.01
    0.012899691 = product of:
      0.051598765 = sum of:
        0.051598765 = product of:
          0.10319753 = sum of:
            0.10319753 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10319753 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16670525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  8. Metz, A.: Community service : a bibliography (1996) 0.01
    0.012899691 = product of:
      0.051598765 = sum of:
        0.051598765 = product of:
          0.10319753 = sum of:
            0.10319753 = weight(_text_:22 in 5341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10319753 = score(doc=5341,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16670525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5341, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5341)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    17.10.1996 14:22:33
  9. Belkin, N.J.; Croft, W.B.: Retrieval techniques (1987) 0.01
    0.012899691 = product of:
      0.051598765 = sum of:
        0.051598765 = product of:
          0.10319753 = sum of:
            0.10319753 = weight(_text_:22 in 334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10319753 = score(doc=334,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16670525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 334, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=334)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.109-145
  10. Smith, L.C.: Artificial intelligence and information retrieval (1987) 0.01
    0.012899691 = product of:
      0.051598765 = sum of:
        0.051598765 = product of:
          0.10319753 = sum of:
            0.10319753 = weight(_text_:22 in 335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10319753 = score(doc=335,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16670525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 335, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=335)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.41-77
  11. Warner, A.J.: Natural language processing (1987) 0.01
    0.012899691 = product of:
      0.051598765 = sum of:
        0.051598765 = product of:
          0.10319753 = sum of:
            0.10319753 = weight(_text_:22 in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10319753 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16670525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.79-108
  12. Grudin, J.: Human-computer interaction (2011) 0.01
    0.011287229 = product of:
      0.045148917 = sum of:
        0.045148917 = product of:
          0.09029783 = sum of:
            0.09029783 = weight(_text_:22 in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09029783 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16670525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    27.12.2014 18:54:22
  13. Rothenberg, D.: Information technology in education (1994) 0.01
    0.010998109 = product of:
      0.043992437 = sum of:
        0.043992437 = product of:
          0.087984875 = sum of:
            0.087984875 = weight(_text_:model in 1111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.087984875 = score(doc=1111,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.48065326 = fieldWeight in 1111, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1111)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    State of the art review of the application of information technology in teacher education, teaching and education in the period 1991 to 1993. Notes that as schools move away from the information accumulation model of education to the learning by doing model, the use of information technology in education will become increasingly considered an essential part of school reform. Virtually all US schools use microcomputers, most use CD-ROM, about half have local area networks development
  14. Liu, X.; Croft, W.B.: Statistical language modeling for information retrieval (2004) 0.01
    0.010868462 = product of:
      0.043473847 = sum of:
        0.043473847 = product of:
          0.086947694 = sum of:
            0.086947694 = weight(_text_:model in 4277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.086947694 = score(doc=4277,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.4749872 = fieldWeight in 4277, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4277)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This chapter reviews research and applications in statistical language modeling for information retrieval (IR), which has emerged within the past several years as a new probabilistic framework for describing information retrieval processes. Generally speaking, statistical language modeling, or more simply language modeling (LM), involves estimating a probability distribution that captures statistical regularities of natural language use. Applied to information retrieval, language modeling refers to the problem of estimating the likelihood that a query and a document could have been generated by the same language model, given the language model of the document either with or without a language model of the query. The roots of statistical language modeling date to the beginning of the twentieth century when Markov tried to model letter sequences in works of Russian literature (Manning & Schütze, 1999). Zipf (1929, 1932, 1949, 1965) studied the statistical properties of text and discovered that the frequency of works decays as a Power function of each works rank. However, it was Shannon's (1951) work that inspired later research in this area. In 1951, eager to explore the applications of his newly founded information theory to human language, Shannon used a prediction game involving n-grams to investigate the information content of English text. He evaluated n-gram models' performance by comparing their crossentropy an texts with the true entropy estimated using predictions made by human subjects. For many years, statistical language models have been used primarily for automatic speech recognition. Since 1980, when the first significant language model was proposed (Rosenfeld, 2000), statistical language modeling has become a fundamental component of speech recognition, machine translation, and spelling correction.
  15. Ding, Y.: Scholarly communication and bibliometrics : Part 1: The scholarly communication model: literature review (1998) 0.01
    0.009721047 = product of:
      0.03888419 = sum of:
        0.03888419 = product of:
          0.07776838 = sum of:
            0.07776838 = weight(_text_:model in 3995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07776838 = score(doc=3995,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.42484146 = fieldWeight in 3995, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3995)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  16. Harter, S.P.; Hert, C.A.: Evaluation of information retrieval systems : approaches, issues, and methods (1997) 0.01
    0.009623346 = product of:
      0.038493384 = sum of:
        0.038493384 = product of:
          0.07698677 = sum of:
            0.07698677 = weight(_text_:model in 2264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07698677 = score(doc=2264,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.4205716 = fieldWeight in 2264, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2264)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    State of the art review of information retrieval systems, defined as systems retrieving documents a sopposed to numerical data. Explains the classic Cranfield studies that have served as a standard for retrieval testing since the 1960s and discusses the Cranfield model and its relevance based measures of retrieval effectiveness. Details sosme of the problems with the Cranfield instruments and issues of validity and reliability, generalizability, usefulness and basic concepts. Discusses the evaluation of the Internet search engines in light of the Cranfield model, noting the very real differences between batch systems (Cranfield) and interactive systems (Internet). Because the Internet collection is not fixed, it is impossible to determine recall as a measure of retrieval effectiveness. considers future directions in evaluating information retrieval systems
  17. Rader, H.B.: Library orientation and instruction - 1993 (1994) 0.01
    0.008062307 = product of:
      0.032249227 = sum of:
        0.032249227 = product of:
          0.064498454 = sum of:
            0.064498454 = weight(_text_:22 in 209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064498454 = score(doc=209,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16670525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 209, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=209)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Reference services review. 22(1994) no.4, S.81-
  18. Hsueh, D.C.: Recon road maps : retrospective conversion literature, 1980-1990 (1992) 0.01
    0.0064498456 = product of:
      0.025799382 = sum of:
        0.025799382 = product of:
          0.051598765 = sum of:
            0.051598765 = weight(_text_:22 in 2193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051598765 = score(doc=2193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16670525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2193)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 14(1992) nos.3/4, S.5-22
  19. Gabbard, R.: Recent literature shows accelerated growth in hypermedia tools : an annotated bibliography (1994) 0.01
    0.0064498456 = product of:
      0.025799382 = sum of:
        0.025799382 = product of:
          0.051598765 = sum of:
            0.051598765 = weight(_text_:22 in 8460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051598765 = score(doc=8460,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16670525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 8460, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8460)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Reference services review. 22(1994) no.2, S.31-40
  20. Buckland, M.K.; Liu, Z.: History of information science (1995) 0.01
    0.0064498456 = product of:
      0.025799382 = sum of:
        0.025799382 = product of:
          0.051598765 = sum of:
            0.051598765 = weight(_text_:22 in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051598765 = score(doc=4226,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16670525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    13. 6.1996 19:22:20