Search (20 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval"
  1. Frommeyer, J.: Chronological terms and period subdivisions in LCSH, RAMEAU, and RSWK : development of an integrative model for time retrieval across various online catalogs (2004) 0.03
    0.029879589 = product of:
      0.119518355 = sum of:
        0.119518355 = sum of:
          0.08081928 = weight(_text_:model in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08081928 = score(doc=131,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047605187 = queryNorm
              0.44150823 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
          0.03869907 = weight(_text_:22 in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03869907 = score(doc=131,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16670525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047605187 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    After a fundamental examination of the phenomenon of time, this paper presents the history, authority, and structure of period subdivisions and chronological terms in the three subject heading languages LCSH (Library of Congress Subject Headings), RAMEAU (Répertoire d'Autorité Matière Encyclopédique et Alphabétique Unifié), and RSWK (Regeln für den Schlagwortkatalog). Their usefulness in online searching is demonstrated using the online catalogs of the Library of Congress, the Bibliothèque nationale de France, and the Deutsche Bibliothek and is compared to the search options in selected digital encyclopedias (Encyclopaedia Britannica, Encarta, Brockhaus-Enzyklopädie). The author develops a model for common time retrieval across all three online catalogs, outlines the conditions for that model (time period code, chronological code, and chronology authority file), and proposes a search interface.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. Tudhope, D.; Binding, C.; Blocks, D.; Cuncliffe, D.: Representation and retrieval in faceted systems (2003) 0.02
    0.017903598 = product of:
      0.07161439 = sum of:
        0.07161439 = weight(_text_:space in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07161439 = score(doc=2703,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24842183 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2183776 = idf(docFreq=650, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047605187 = queryNorm
            0.28827736 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2183776 = idf(docFreq=650, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses two inter-related themes: the retrieval potential of faceted thesauri and XML representations of fundamental facets. Initial findings are discussed from the ongoing 'FACET' project, in collaboration with the National Museum of Science and Industry. The work discussed seeks to take advantage of the structure afforded by faceted systems for multi-term queries and flexible matching, focusing in this paper an the Art and Architecture Thesaurus. A multi-term matching function yields ranked results with partial matches via semantic term expansion, based an a measure of distance over the semantic index space formed by thesaurus relationships. Our intention is to drive the system from general representations and a common query structure and interface. To this end, we are developing an XML representation based an work by the Classification Research Group an fundamental facets or categories. The XML representation maps categories to particular thesauri and hierarchies. The system interface, which is configured by the mapping, incorporates a thesaurus browser with navigation history together with a term search facility and drag and drop query builder.
  3. Bates, M.J.: Subject access in online catalogs: a design model (1986) 0.01
    0.013609466 = product of:
      0.054437865 = sum of:
        0.054437865 = product of:
          0.10887573 = sum of:
            0.10887573 = weight(_text_:model in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10887573 = score(doc=120,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.59477806 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  4. Devadason, F.J.; Intaraksa, N.; Patamawongjariya, P.; Desai, K.: Faceted indexing based system for organizing and accessing Internet resources (2002) 0.01
    0.012532518 = product of:
      0.050130073 = sum of:
        0.050130073 = weight(_text_:space in 97) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050130073 = score(doc=97,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24842183 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2183776 = idf(docFreq=650, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047605187 = queryNorm
            0.20179415 = fieldWeight in 97, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2183776 = idf(docFreq=650, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=97)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    An interesting but somewhat confusing article telling how the writers described web pages with Dublin Core metadata, including a faceted classification, and built a system that lets users browse the collection through the facets. They seem to want to cover too much in a short article, and unnecessary space is given over to screen shots showing how Dublin Core metadata was entered. The screen shots of the resulting browsable system are, unfortunately, not as enlightening as one would hope, and there is no discussion of how the system was actually written or the technology behind it. Still, it could be worth reading as an example of such a system and how it is treated in journals.
  5. Intelligent information systems: progress and prospects (1986) 0.01
    0.006804733 = product of:
      0.027218932 = sum of:
        0.027218932 = product of:
          0.054437865 = sum of:
            0.054437865 = weight(_text_:model in 1050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054437865 = score(doc=1050,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.29738903 = fieldWeight in 1050, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1050)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: SOMMERVILLE, I., M. WOOD: A software components catalogue; COELHO, H.: Library manager: a case study in knowledge engineering; DAVIES, R.: Cataloguing as a domain for an expert system; POLLITT, A.S.: A rule-base system as an intermediary for searching cancer therapy literature on MEDLINE; LEBOWITZ, M.: An experiment in intelligent information systems: RESEARCHER; VICKERY, A., H.M. BROOKS u. B.C. VICKERY: An expert system for referral: the PLEXUS project; RICH, E.: Users are individuals: individualizing user models; INGWERSEN, P.: Cognitive analysis and the role of the intermediary in information retrieval; SHAW, M.L.G. u. B.R. GAINES: A cognitive model for intelligent information systems; DAVIES, R.: Classification and ratiocination: a perennial quest
  6. Nicholson, J.; Lake, S.: Implementation of FAST in two digital repositories : breaking silos, unifying subject practices (2023) 0.01
    0.006804733 = product of:
      0.027218932 = sum of:
        0.027218932 = product of:
          0.054437865 = sum of:
            0.054437865 = weight(_text_:model in 1174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054437865 = score(doc=1174,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.29738903 = fieldWeight in 1174, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1174)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This study traces evolving approaches to the use of the FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology) in digital repositories at Atkins Library at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, where changes in staffing, the launch of an institutional repository, and efforts to address problematic language in metadata have necessitated a shift from an in-depth indexing approach to FAST to a lightweight "tagging" model more suited to present-day metadata needs. Despite the subject schema's apparent simplicity, Atkins' experience with FAST has shown that it still requires significant time, effort, and experimentation in order to deploy it to best effect.
  7. Lambert, N.: Of thesauri and computers : reflections on the need for thesauri (1995) 0.01
    0.0064498456 = product of:
      0.025799382 = sum of:
        0.025799382 = product of:
          0.051598765 = sum of:
            0.051598765 = weight(_text_:22 in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051598765 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16670525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Searcher. 3(1995) no.8, S.18-22
  8. Lucarelli, A.: Semantic authority control and New Soggettario (2004) 0.01
    0.0058326283 = product of:
      0.023330513 = sum of:
        0.023330513 = product of:
          0.046661027 = sum of:
            0.046661027 = weight(_text_:model in 5674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046661027 = score(doc=5674,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.25490487 = fieldWeight in 5674, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5674)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The project of the renewal of the Subject Headings for Italian Library Catalogues (Soggettario), financed by the National Central Library in Florence, proposes a pre-coordinated language, both analytic and synthetic, complying with international rules on vocabulary control and structure, based on category analysis of semantic relationships. It envisages a strict distinction between semantic relationships and syntactic ones, and bases its citation order of subject strings on the analysis model for logical relationships. Thanks to its features, the new Soggettario agrees both with the logic of Guidelines for Subject Authority and Reference Entries and of UNIMARC. Authorities, and with FRBR (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records). The rigorous structure of the thesaurus will facilitate the transfer of controlled terminology to lists or authority files and archives. The Italian National Bibliography (BNI) will have to play a leading role on the control of coherence of semantic access points. It will validate the strings created by other libraries and control their coherence according to the syntax rules envisaged in the new method.
  9. Dean, R.J.: FAST: development of simplified headings for metadata (2004) 0.01
    0.0058326283 = product of:
      0.023330513 = sum of:
        0.023330513 = product of:
          0.046661027 = sum of:
            0.046661027 = weight(_text_:model in 5682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046661027 = score(doc=5682,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.25490487 = fieldWeight in 5682, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5682)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress Subject Headings schema (LCSH) is the most commonly used and widely accepted subject vocabulary for general application. It is the de facto universal controlled vocabulary and has been a model for developing subject heading systems by many countries. However, LCSH's complex syntax and rules for constructing headings restrict its application by requiring highly skilled personnel and limit the effectiveness of automated authority control. Recent trends, driven to a large extent by the rapid growth of the Web, are forcing changes in bibliographic control systems to make them easier to use, understand, and apply, and subject headings are no exception. The purpose of adapting the LCSH with a simplified syntax to create FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology) headings is to retain the very rich vocabulary of LCSH while making the schema easier to understand, control, apply, and use. The schema maintains compatibility with LCSH--any valid Library of Congress subject heading can be converted to FAST headings.
  10. Stone, A.T.: Up-ending Cutter's pyramid : the case for making subject references to broader terms (1996) 0.01
    0.0056436146 = product of:
      0.022574458 = sum of:
        0.022574458 = product of:
          0.045148917 = sum of:
            0.045148917 = weight(_text_:22 in 7238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045148917 = score(doc=7238,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16670525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7238, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7238)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 4.1997 20:43:23
  11. Broughton, V.: Structural, linguistic and mathematical elements in indexing languages and search engines : implications for the use of index languages in electronic and non-LIS environments (2000) 0.00
    0.0048605236 = product of:
      0.019442094 = sum of:
        0.019442094 = product of:
          0.03888419 = sum of:
            0.03888419 = weight(_text_:model in 96) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03888419 = score(doc=96,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.21242073 = fieldWeight in 96, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=96)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The paper looks at ways in which traditional classification and indexing tools have dealt with the relationships between constituent terms; variations in these are examined and compared with the methods used in machine searching, particularly of the Internet and World Wide Web. Apparent correspondences with features of index languages are identified, and further methods of applying classification and indexing theory to machine retrieval are proposed. There are various ways in which indexing and retrieval systems, both conventional and electronic, deal with the problem of searching for documents on a subject basis, and various approaches to the analysis and processing of a query. There appear to be three basic models; the taxonomic or structural system, in which the user is offered a map of the `universe of knowledge'; the language based system, which offers a vocabulary of the subject and a grammar for dealing with compound statements; and the mathematical model using the language of symbolic logic or the algebra of set theory
  12. Losee, R.M.: Improving collection browsing : small world networking and Gray code ordering (2017) 0.00
    0.0048605236 = product of:
      0.019442094 = sum of:
        0.019442094 = product of:
          0.03888419 = sum of:
            0.03888419 = weight(_text_:model in 5148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03888419 = score(doc=5148,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.21242073 = fieldWeight in 5148, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5148)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Documents in digital and paper libraries may be arranged, based on their topics, in order to facilitate browsing. It may seem intuitively obvious that ordering documents by their subject should improve browsing performance; the results presented in this article suggest that ordering library materials by their Gray code values and through using links consistent with the small world model of document relationships is consistent with improving browsing performance. Below, library circulation data, including ordering with Library of Congress Classification numbers and Library of Congress Subject Headings, are used to provide information useful in generating user-centered document arrangements, as well as user-independent arrangements. Documents may be linearly arranged so they can be placed in a line by topic, such as on a library shelf, or in a list on a computer display. Crossover links, jumps between a document and another document to which it is not adjacent, can be used in library databases to allow additional paths that one might take when browsing. The improvement that is obtained with different combinations of document orderings and different crossovers is examined and applications suggested.
  13. Julien, C.-A.; Guastavino, C.; Bouthillier, F.: Capitalizing on information organization and information visualization for a new-generation catalogue (2012) 0.00
    0.0048605236 = product of:
      0.019442094 = sum of:
        0.019442094 = product of:
          0.03888419 = sum of:
            0.03888419 = weight(_text_:model in 5567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03888419 = score(doc=5567,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.21242073 = fieldWeight in 5567, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5567)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Subject searching is difficult with traditional text-based online public access library catalogues (OPACs), and the next-generation discovery layers are keyword searching and result filtering tools that offer little support for subject browsing. Next-generation OPACs ignore the rich network of relations offered by controlled subject vocabulary, which can facilitate subject browsing. A new generation of OPACs could leverage existing information-organization investments and offer online searchers a novel browsing and searching environment. This is a case study of the design and development of a virtual reality subject browsing and information retrieval tool. The functional prototype shows that the Library of Congress subject headings (LCSH) can be shaped into a useful and usable tree structure serving as a visual metaphor that contains a real world collection from the domain of science and engineering. Formative tests show that users can effectively browse the LCSH tree and carve it up based on their keyword search queries. This study uses a complex information-organization structure as a defining characteristic of an OPAC that goes beyond the standard keyword search model, toward the cutting edge of online search tools.
  14. Chan, L.M.; Hodges, T.: Entering the millennium : a new century for LCSH (2000) 0.00
    0.004837384 = product of:
      0.019349536 = sum of:
        0.019349536 = product of:
          0.03869907 = sum of:
            0.03869907 = weight(_text_:22 in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03869907 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16670525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    27. 5.2001 16:22:21
  15. Leissing, U.; Rädler, K.; Hauer, M.: Query-Expansion durch Fachthesauri : Erfahrungsbericht zu dandelon.com, Vorarlberger Parlamentsinformationssystem und vorarlberg.at (2010) 0.00
    0.004837384 = product of:
      0.019349536 = sum of:
        0.019349536 = product of:
          0.03869907 = sum of:
            0.03869907 = weight(_text_:22 in 3728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03869907 = score(doc=3728,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16670525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3728, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3728)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  16. Anderson, J.D.; Pérez-Carballo, J.: Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) (2009) 0.00
    0.004837384 = product of:
      0.019349536 = sum of:
        0.019349536 = product of:
          0.03869907 = sum of:
            0.03869907 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03869907 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16670525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:13
  17. Milstead, J.L.: Thesauri in a full-text world (1998) 0.00
    0.0040311534 = product of:
      0.016124614 = sum of:
        0.016124614 = product of:
          0.032249227 = sum of:
            0.032249227 = weight(_text_:22 in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032249227 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16670525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  18. Wiesenmüller, H.: Verbale Erschließung in Katalogen und Discovery-Systemen : Überlegungen zur Qualität (2021) 0.00
    0.0040311534 = product of:
      0.016124614 = sum of:
        0.016124614 = product of:
          0.032249227 = sum of:
            0.032249227 = weight(_text_:22 in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032249227 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16670525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    24. 9.2021 12:22:02
  19. Geißelmann, F. (Hrsg.): Sacherschließung in Online-Katalogen (1994) 0.00
    0.0039906385 = product of:
      0.015962554 = sum of:
        0.015962554 = product of:
          0.03192511 = sum of:
            0.03192511 = weight(_text_:22 in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03192511 = score(doc=4360,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16670525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.19150631 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    15. 7.2018 16:22:16
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Mitteilungen VÖB 48(1995) H.1, S.66-68 (K. Niedermair) - Vgl. auch Lepsky, K. in: Bibliotheksdienst 29(1995) H.3, S.500-519; Bibliothek: Forschung u. Praxis 19(1995) H.2, S.251-254 (G. Hartwieg; auch in: LDV-Forum Bd. 12, Nr. 2, Jg. 1995, S.22-29 [unter: http://www.jlcl.org/1995_Heft2/Rezensionen_19-27.pdf]) .
  20. Nuovo soggettario : guida al sistema italiano di indicizzazione per soggetto, prototipo del thesaurus (2007) 0.00
    0.0019442094 = product of:
      0.007776838 = sum of:
        0.007776838 = product of:
          0.015553676 = sum of:
            0.015553676 = weight(_text_:model in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015553676 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1830527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047605187 = queryNorm
                0.08496829 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.845226 = idf(docFreq=2569, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Now BNI is beginning to use the new language, pointing the way for the adoption of Nuovo soggettario in Italian libraries: a difficult challenge whose success is not assured. To name only one issue: including all fields of study requires particular care in treating terms with different specialized meanings; cooperation of other libraries and institutions is foreseen. At the same time, efforts are being made to assure the system's interoperability outside the library world. It is clear that a great commitment is required. "Too complex a system!" say the naysayers. "Only at the beginning," the proponents reply. The new system goes against the mainstream, compared with the imitation of the easy way offered by search engines - but we know that they must enrich their devices to improve quality, just repeating the work on semantic and syntactic relationships that leads formal expressions to the meanings they are intended to communicate - and also compared with research to create automated devices supporting human work, for the need to simplify cataloguing. Here AI is not involved, but automation is widely used to facilitate and to support the conscious work of indexers guided by rules as clear as possible. The advantage of Nuovo soggettario is its combination of a thesaurus (a much-appreciated tool used across the world) with the equally widespread technique of subject-string construction, which is to say: the rational and predictable combination of the terms used. The appearance of this original, unparalleled working model may well be a great occasion in the international development of indexing, as, on one hand, the Nuovo soggettario uses a recognized tool (the thesaurus) and, on the other, by permitting both pre-coordination and post-coordination, it attempts to overcome the fragmentation of increasingly complex and specialized subjects into isolated, single-term descriptors. This is a serious proposition that merits consideration from both theoretical and practical points of view - and outside Italy, too."

Years

Languages

Types