Search (19 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  1. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.03 
    0.026569044 = product of:
  0.05313809 = sum of:
    0.05313809 = product of:
      0.15941426 = sum of:
        0.15941426 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15941426 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42546922 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05018503 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
  2. Hauer, M.: Mehrsprachige semantische Netze leichter entwickeln (2002) 0.02 
    0.021780789 = product of:
  0.043561578 = sum of:
    0.043561578 = product of:
      0.087123156 = sum of:
        0.087123156 = weight(_text_:lexikon in 3894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.087123156 = score(doc=3894,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31453675 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.2675414 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05018503 = queryNorm
            0.2769888 = fieldWeight in 3894, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.2675414 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3894)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    AGI - Information Management Consultants liefern seit nunmehr 16 Jahren eine Software zur Entwicklung von Thesauri und Klassifikationen, ehemals bezeichnet als INDEX, seit zweieinhalb Jahren als IC INDEX neu entwickelt. Solche Terminologien werden oft auch als Glossar, Lexikon, Topic Maps, RDF, semantisches Netz, Systematik, Aktenplan oder Nomenklatur bezeichnet. Die Software erlaubt zwar schon immer, dass solche terminologischen Werke mehrsprachig angelegt sind, doch es gab keine speziellen Werkzeuge, um die Übersetzung zu erleichtern. Die Globalisierung führt zunehmend auch zur Mehrsprachigkeit von Fachterminologien, wie laufende Projekte belegen. In IC INDEX 5.08 wurde deshalb ein spezieller Workflow für die Übersetzung implementiert, der Wortfelder bearbeitet und dabei weitgehend automatisch, aber vom Übersetzer kontrolliert, die richtigen Verbindungen zwischen den Termen in den anderen Sprachen erzeugt. Bereits dieser Workflow beschleunigt wesentlich die Übersetzungstätigkeit. Doch es geht noch schneller: der eTranslation Server von Linguatec generiert automatisch Übersetzungsvorschläge für Deutsch/English und Deutsch/Französisch. Demnächst auch Deutsch/Spanisch und Deutsch/Italienisch. Gerade bei Mehrwortbegriffen, Klassenbezeichnungen und Komposita spielt die automatische Übersetzung gegenüber dem Wörterbuch-Lookup ihre Stärke aus. Der Rückgriff ins Wörterbuch ist selbstverständlich auch implementiert, sowohl auf das Linguatec-Wörterbuch und zusätzlich jedes beliebige über eine URL adressierbare Wörterbuch. Jeder Übersetzungsvorschlag muss vom Terminologie-Entwickler bestätigt werden. Im Rahmen der Oualitätskontrolle haben wir anhand vorliegender mehrsprachiger Thesauri getestet mit dem Ergebnis, dass die automatischen Vorschläge oft gleich und fast immer sehr nahe an der gewünschten Übersetzung waren. Worte, die für durchschnittlich gebildete Menschen nicht mehr verständlich sind, bereiten auch der maschinellen Übersetzung Probleme, z.B. Fachbegriffe aus Medizin, Chemie und anderen Wissenschaften. Aber auch ein Humanübersetzer wäre hier ohne einschlägige Fachausbildung überfordert. Also, ohne Fach- und ohne Sprachkompetenz geht es nicht, aber mit geht es ziemlich flott. IC INDEX basiert auf Lotus Notes & Domino 5.08. Beliebige Relationen zwischen Termen sind zulässig, die ANSI-Normen sind implementiert und um zusätzliche Relationen ergänzt, 26 Relationen gehören zum Lieferumfang. Ausgaben gemäß Topic Maps oder RDF - zwei eng verwandte Normen-werden bei Nachfrage entwickelt. Ausgaben sind in HMTL, XML, eine ansprechende Druckversion unter MS Word 2000 und für verschiedene Search-Engines vorhanden. AGI - Information Management Consultants, Neustadt an der Weinstraße, beraten seit 1983 Unternehmen und Organisationen im dem heute als Knowledge Management bezeichneten Feld. Seit 1994 liefern sie eine umfassende, hochintegrative Lösung: "Information Center" - darin ist IC INDEX ein eigenständiges Modul zur Unterstützung von mehrsprachiger Indexierung und mehrsprachigem semantischem Retrieval. Linguatec, München, ist einstmals aus den linguistischen Forschungslabors von IBM hervorgegangen und ist über den Personal Translator weithin bekannt.
  3. Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007) 0.02 
    0.016998447 = product of:
  0.033996895 = sum of:
    0.033996895 = product of:
      0.06799379 = sum of:
        0.06799379 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06799379 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17573942 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05018503 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:07
  4. Haller, S.H.M.: Mappingverfahren zur Wissensorganisation (2002) 0.02 
    0.016998447 = product of:
  0.033996895 = sum of:
    0.033996895 = product of:
      0.06799379 = sum of:
        0.06799379 = weight(_text_:22 in 3406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06799379 = score(doc=3406,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17573942 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05018503 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3406, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3406)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    30. 5.2010 16:22:35
  5. Moustafid, Y. El: Semantic Web Techniken für E-Learning (2003) 0.02 
    0.016335592 = product of:
  0.032671183 = sum of:
    0.032671183 = product of:
      0.06534237 = sum of:
        0.06534237 = weight(_text_:lexikon in 585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06534237 = score(doc=585,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31453675 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.2675414 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05018503 = queryNorm
            0.2077416 = fieldWeight in 585, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.2675414 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=585)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Im fünften Kapitel wurden die neuen Suchmaschinen, die ausschließlich auf dem Konzept der Topic Maps basieren und diese Technik auch tatsächlich verwenden, angesprochen und mit Beispielanfragen erläutert. In dieser Diplomarbeit wurden wegen dem großen Einsatzpotential von Topic Maps, viele Gebiete angesprochen, angefangen bei den Webkatalogen über Suchmaschinen bis hin zum E-Learning. Mit XML Topic Maps gibt man den Beziehungen zwischen den verschiedenen Topics die Chance sich auszuzeichnen. Damit erreicht die Suche eine neue, bis dahin unmögliche Qualität. Mit einer Topic Map lassen sich beispielsweise die klassischen Navigationselemente technischer Dokumentation (Inhalt, Index, Glossar etc.) in einheitlicher Weise beschreiben; eine andere Topic Map könnte die inhaltliche Vernetzung von Artikeln in einem Lexikon ausdrücken (z.B. Person A wurde geboren in Stadt B, B liegt in Land C, Oper D wurde komponiert von A, Person E war Zeitgenosse von A) und für "siehe auch"-Verweise sorgen (andere Werke dieses Komponisten, andere Städte in diesem Land etc.). Es klingt wie die Lösung aller Suchprobleme. Allerdings nur in der Theorie. Denn Tools, die in der Lage sind, das Wissen oder die Riesendaten in Topicmaps automatisch zu generieren, sind noch Mangelware, was die Ausbreitung von Topic Maps hemmt. Der Aufbau solcher Netze erfordert sehr viel Zeit und sehr viel "Handarbeit" - und damit auch viel Geld, was viele Firmen davon abhält Topic Maps zu benutzen.
  6. Synak, M.; Dabrowski, M.; Kruk, S.R.: Semantic Web and ontologies (2009) 0.01 
    0.013598758 = product of:
  0.027197516 = sum of:
    0.027197516 = product of:
      0.05439503 = sum of:
        0.05439503 = weight(_text_:22 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05439503 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17573942 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05018503 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    31. 7.2010 16:58:22
  7. OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004) 0.01 
    0.013598758 = product of:
  0.027197516 = sum of:
    0.027197516 = product of:
      0.05439503 = sum of:
        0.05439503 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05439503 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17573942 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05018503 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    14. 8.2011 13:33:22
  8. Priss, U.: Faceted information representation (2000) 0.01 
    0.0118989125 = product of:
  0.023797825 = sum of:
    0.023797825 = product of:
      0.04759565 = sum of:
        0.04759565 = weight(_text_:22 in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04759565 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17573942 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05018503 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:47:06
  9. Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie (2005) 0.01 
    0.0118989125 = product of:
  0.023797825 = sum of:
    0.023797825 = product of:
      0.04759565 = sum of:
        0.04759565 = weight(_text_:22 in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04759565 = score(doc=1852,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17573942 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05018503 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    11. 2.2011 18:22:58
  10. Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie : Ontologie-basiertes Information-Filtering und -Retrieval mit relationalen Datenbanken (2005) 0.01 
    0.0118989125 = product of:
  0.023797825 = sum of:
    0.023797825 = product of:
      0.04759565 = sum of:
        0.04759565 = weight(_text_:22 in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04759565 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17573942 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05018503 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    11. 2.2011 18:22:25
  11. Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (2003) 0.01 
    0.010199068 = product of:
  0.020398136 = sum of:
    0.020398136 = product of:
      0.040796272 = sum of:
        0.040796272 = weight(_text_:22 in 1652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040796272 = score(doc=1652,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17573942 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05018503 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1652, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1652)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    6. 8.2010 14:22:28
  12. Gendt, M. van; Isaac, I.; Meij, L. van der; Schlobach, S.: Semantic Web techniques for multiple views on heterogeneous collections : a case study (2006) 0.01 
    0.010199068 = product of:
  0.020398136 = sum of:
    0.020398136 = product of:
      0.040796272 = sum of:
        0.040796272 = weight(_text_:22 in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040796272 = score(doc=2418,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17573942 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05018503 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
  13. Renear, A.H.; Wickett, K.M.; Urban, R.J.; Dubin, D.; Shreeves, S.L.: Collection/item metadata relationships (2008) 0.01 
    0.010199068 = product of:
  0.020398136 = sum of:
    0.020398136 = product of:
      0.040796272 = sum of:
        0.040796272 = weight(_text_:22 in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040796272 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17573942 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05018503 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  14. Kruk, S.R.; Kruk, E.; Stankiewicz, K.: Evaluation of semantic and social technologies for digital libraries (2009) 0.01 
    0.010199068 = product of:
  0.020398136 = sum of:
    0.020398136 = product of:
      0.040796272 = sum of:
        0.040796272 = weight(_text_:22 in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040796272 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17573942 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05018503 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1. 8.2010 12:35:22
  15. Bittner, T.; Donnelly, M.; Winter, S.: Ontology and semantic interoperability (2006) 0.01 
    0.010199068 = product of:
  0.020398136 = sum of:
    0.020398136 = product of:
      0.040796272 = sum of:
        0.040796272 = weight(_text_:22 in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040796272 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17573942 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05018503 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    3.12.2016 18:39:22
  16. Beppler, F.D.; Fonseca, F.T.; Pacheco, R.C.S.: Hermeneus: an architecture for an ontology-enabled information retrieval (2008) 0.01 
    0.010199068 = product of:
  0.020398136 = sum of:
    0.020398136 = product of:
      0.040796272 = sum of:
        0.040796272 = weight(_text_:22 in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040796272 = score(doc=3261,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17573942 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05018503 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    28.11.2016 12:43:22
  17. Zeng, M.L.; Fan, W.; Lin, X.: SKOS for an integrated vocabulary structure (2008) 0.01 
    0.009615773 = product of:
  0.019231547 = sum of:
    0.019231547 = product of:
      0.038463093 = sum of:
        0.038463093 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038463093 = score(doc=2654,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17573942 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05018503 = queryNorm
            0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In order to transfer the Chinese Classified Thesaurus (CCT) into a machine-processable format and provide CCT-based Web services, a pilot study has been conducted in which a variety of selected CCT classes and mapped thesaurus entries are encoded with SKOS. OWL and RDFS are also used to encode the same contents for the purposes of feasibility and cost-benefit comparison. CCT is a collected effort led by the National Library of China. It is an integration of the national standards Chinese Library Classification (CLC) 4th edition and Chinese Thesaurus (CT). As a manually created mapping product, CCT provides for each of the classes the corresponding thesaurus terms, and vice versa. The coverage of CCT includes four major clusters: philosophy, social sciences and humanities, natural sciences and technologies, and general works. There are 22 main-classes, 52,992 sub-classes and divisions, 110,837 preferred thesaurus terms, 35,690 entry terms (non-preferred terms), and 59,738 pre-coordinated headings (Chinese Classified Thesaurus, 2005) Major challenges of encoding this large vocabulary comes from its integrated structure. CCT is a result of the combination of two structures (illustrated in Figure 1): a thesaurus that uses ISO-2788 standardized structure and a classification scheme that is basically enumerative, but provides some flexibility for several kinds of synthetic mechanisms Other challenges include the complex relationships caused by differences of granularities of two original schemes and their presentation with various levels of SKOS elements; as well as the diverse coordination of entries due to the use of auxiliary tables and pre-coordinated headings derived from combining classes, subdivisions, and thesaurus terms, which do not correspond to existing unique identifiers. The poster reports the progress, shares the sample SKOS entries, and summarizes problems identified during the SKOS encoding process. Although OWL Lite and OWL Full provide richer expressiveness, the cost-benefit issues and the final purposes of encoding CCT raise questions of using such approaches.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  18. Müller, T.: Wissensrepräsentation mit semantischen Netzen im Bereich Luftfahrt (2006) 0.01 
    0.008499224 = product of:
  0.016998447 = sum of:
    0.016998447 = product of:
      0.033996895 = sum of:
        0.033996895 = weight(_text_:22 in 1670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033996895 = score(doc=1670,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17573942 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05018503 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1670, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1670)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    26. 9.2006 21:00:22
  19. Dobrev, P.; Kalaydjiev, O.; Angelova, G.: From conceptual structures to semantic interoperability of content (2007) 0.01 
    0.008499224 = product of:
  0.016998447 = sum of:
    0.016998447 = product of:
      0.033996895 = sum of:
        0.033996895 = weight(_text_:22 in 4607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033996895 = score(doc=4607,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17573942 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05018503 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4607, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4607)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Conceptual structures: knowledge architectures for smart applications: 15th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2007, Sheffield, UK, July 22 - 27, 2007 ; proceedings. Eds.: U. Priss u.a

Authors

Languages

  • e 13
  • d 6

Types

Themes