Search (3652 results, page 1 of 183)

0.46632314 = product of:
  0.9326463 = sum of:
    0.9326463 = product of:
      1.8652925 = sum of:
        1.8652925 = weight(_text_:hummingbird in 2516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          1.8652925 = score(doc=2516,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.44880816 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            4.156102 = fieldWeight in 2516, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2516)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

Hummingbird -> Google Hummingbird

0.18842301 = product of:
  0.37684602 = sum of:
    0.37684602 = product of:
      0.75369203 = sum of:
        0.75369203 = weight(_text_:hummingbird in 2521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.75369203 = score(doc=2521,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.44880816 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            1.6793189 = fieldWeight in 2521, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2521)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Im September 2013 verkündete Google den schon einen Monat vorher ausgerollten völlig neuen Algorithmus mit dem Namen "Hummingbird". Der Name wurde bewusst gewählt. Schließlich zeichnet den "Kolibri" seine äußerst schnelle und dabei doch präzise Methodik aus. Searchmetrics hat analysiert, wie sich der neue Algorithmus auf die SERPs auswirkt. Ergebnis: Die Diversität der Suchergebnisse hat abgenommen. Google zeigt zunehmend "gleichere" Resultate für semantisch äquivalente Queries an.

Object

Google Hummingbird

Source

http://www.searchmetrics.com/de/knowledge-base/hummingbird/

0.16654399 = product of:
  0.33308798 = sum of:
    0.33308798 = product of:
      0.66617596 = sum of:
        0.66617596 = weight(_text_:hummingbird in 2517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.66617596 = score(doc=2517,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.44880816 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            1.4843223 = fieldWeight in 2517, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2517)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

Google Hummingbird

0.16487013 = product of:
  0.32974026 = sum of:
    0.32974026 = product of:
      0.6594805 = sum of:
        0.6594805 = weight(_text_:hummingbird in 2522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.6594805 = score(doc=2522,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.44880816 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            1.469404 = fieldWeight in 2522, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2522)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Pünktlich zum 15. Geburtstag der Google Suche verkündete Google gestern auf einer Pressekonferenz in der "Gründungs-Garage", dass das bedeutendste Google Update seit dem Caffeine Update im Jahr 2010 und größte Algorithmus-Update seit 2001 schon seit ca. einem Monat aktiv ist. Das aktuelle Update heißt Hummingbird zu deutsch Kollibri. Es soll ca. 90% aller Suchanfragen betreffen und soll im Vergleich zu Caffeine ein echtes Algorithmus-Update sein. Es soll dabei helfen komplexere Suchanfragen besser zu deuten und noch besser die eigentliche Suchintention bzw. Fragestellung hinter einer Suchanfrage zu erkennen sowie passende Dokumente dazu anzubieten. Auch auf Dokumentenebene soll die eigentliche Intention hinter dem Content besser mit der Suchanfrage gematcht werden.

Object

Google Hummingbird

Source

http://www.sem-deutschland.de/seo-tipps/hummingbird-bedeutenstes-google/

0.1579975 = product of:
  0.315995 = sum of:
    0.315995 = product of:
      0.63199 = sum of:
        0.63199 = weight(_text_:hummingbird in 2520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.63199 = score(doc=2520,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.44880816 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            1.4081517 = fieldWeight in 2520, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2520)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Google hat mit "Hummingbird" einen neuen Suchalgorithmus entwickelt und bereits eingeführt. Dabei handelt es sich laut Google um eine der größten Veränderungen der Suchmaschine, die rund 90 Prozent aller Suchanfragen betrifft. Im Rahmen einer kleinen Veranstaltung zum 15. Geburtstag der Suchmaschine hat Google in die Garage geladen, in der das Unternehmen gegründet wurde. Dabei enthüllte Google eine der bisher größten Veränderungen an der Suchmaschine: Ohne dass Nutzer etwas davon mitbekamen, hat Google vor rund einem Monat seinen Suchalgorithmus ausgetauscht. Der neue Suchalgorithmus mit Codenamen "Hummingbird" soll es Google ermöglichen, Suchanfragen und Beziehungen zwischen Dingen besser zu verstehen. Das soll die Suchmaschine in die Lage versetzen, komplexere Suchanfragen zu verarbeiten, die von Nutzern immer häufiger gestellt werden - auch, weil immer mehr Nutzer Google auf dem Smartphone per Spracheingabe nutzen. Früher versuchte Google lediglich, die Schlüsselwörter in einer Suchanfrage in Webseiten wiederzufinden. Doch seit geraumer Zeit arbeitet Google daran, die Suchanfragen besser zu verstehen, um bessere Suchergebnisse anzuzeigen.

Object

Google Hummingbird

Source

http://www.golem.de/news/hummingbird-neuer-suchalgorithmus-bei-google-1309-101828.html

0.1579975 = product of:
  0.315995 = sum of:
    0.315995 = product of:
      0.63199 = sum of:
        0.63199 = weight(_text_:hummingbird in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.63199 = score(doc=2546,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.44880816 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            1.4081517 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Sometimes I think that us SEOs could be wonderful characters for a Woody Allen movie: We are stressed, nervous, paranoid, we have a tendency for sudden changes of mood...okay, maybe I am exaggerating a little bit, but that's how we tend to (over)react whenever Google announces something. One thing that doesn't help is the lack of clarity coming from Google, which not only never mentions Hummingbird in any official document (for example, in the post of its 15th anniversary), but has also shied away from details of this epochal update in the "off-the-record" declarations of Amit Singhal. In fact, in some ways those statements partly contributed to the confusion. When Google announces an update-especially one like Hummingbird-the best thing to do is to avoid trying to immediately understand what it really is based on intuition alone. It is better to wait until the dust falls to the ground, recover the original documents, examine those related to them (and any variants), take the time to see the update in action, calmly investigate, and then after all that try to find the most plausible answers.

Object

Google Hummingbird

Source

https://moz.com/blog/hummingbird-unleashed

0.14131726 = product of:
  0.28263453 = sum of:
    0.28263453 = product of:
      0.56526905 = sum of:
        0.56526905 = weight(_text_:hummingbird in 2542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.56526905 = score(doc=2542,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.44880816 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            1.2594892 = fieldWeight in 2542, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2542)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

If you're reading the Moz blog, then you probably have a decent understanding of Google and its algorithm changes. However, there is probably a good percentage of the Moz audience that is still confused about the effects that Panda, Penguin, and Hummingbird can have on your site. I did write a post last year about the main differences between Penguin and a Manual Unnautral Links Penalty, and if you haven't read that, it'll give you a good primer. The point of this article is to explain very simply what each of these algorithms are meant to do. It is hopefully a good reference that you can point your clients to if you want to explain an algorithm change and not overwhelm them with technical details about 301s, canonicals, crawl errors, and other confusing SEO terminologies.

Object

Google Hummingbird

Source

https://moz.com/blog/google-algorithm-cheat-sheet-panda-penguin-hummingbird

0.09424001 = sum of:
  0.07503702 = product of:
    0.22511104 = sum of:
      0.22511104 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.22511104 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4005406 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047244642 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.01920299 = product of:
    0.03840598 = sum of:
      0.03840598 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03840598 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047244642 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.

Date

8. 1.2013 10:22:32

0.082435064 = product of:
  0.16487013 = sum of:
    0.16487013 = product of:
      0.32974026 = sum of:
        0.32974026 = weight(_text_:hummingbird in 2519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.32974026 = score(doc=2519,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44880816 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.734702 = fieldWeight in 2519, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2519)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

Google Hummingbird

0.07853334 = sum of:
  0.062530845 = product of:
    0.18759254 = sum of:
      0.18759254 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18759254 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4005406 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047244642 = queryNorm
          0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.016002493 = product of:
    0.032004986 = sum of:
      0.032004986 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032004986 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047244642 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968

0.07503702 = product of:
  0.15007403 = sum of:
    0.15007403 = product of:
      0.45022207 = sum of:
        0.45022207 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.45022207 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4005406 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.06336664 = product of:
  0.12673327 = sum of:
    0.12673327 = product of:
      0.25346655 = sum of:
        0.25346655 = weight(_text_:22 in 219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25346655 = score(doc=219,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 219, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=219)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 5.1998 20:02:22

0.06336664 = product of:
  0.12673327 = sum of:
    0.12673327 = product of:
      0.25346655 = sum of:
        0.25346655 = weight(_text_:22 in 1386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25346655 = score(doc=1386,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 1386, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=1386)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 5.1998 20:02:22

0.06336664 = product of:
  0.12673327 = sum of:
    0.12673327 = product of:
      0.25346655 = sum of:
        0.25346655 = weight(_text_:22 in 2102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25346655 = score(doc=2102,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 2102, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2102)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 5.1998 20:02:22

0.062530845 = product of:
  0.12506169 = sum of:
    0.12506169 = product of:
      0.37518507 = sum of:
        0.37518507 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.37518507 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4005406 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

0.05002468 = product of:
  0.10004936 = sum of:
    0.10004936 = product of:
      0.30014807 = sum of:
        0.30014807 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30014807 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4005406 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.

0.05002468 = product of:
  0.10004936 = sum of:
    0.10004936 = product of:
      0.30014807 = sum of:
        0.30014807 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30014807 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4005406 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H

0.04480698 = product of:
  0.08961396 = sum of:
    0.08961396 = product of:
      0.17922792 = sum of:
        0.17922792 = weight(_text_:22 in 2433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17922792 = score(doc=2433,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            1.0833232 = fieldWeight in 2433, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2433)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

4. 9.2011 12:28:22

0.04480698 = product of:
  0.08961396 = sum of:
    0.08961396 = product of:
      0.17922792 = sum of:
        0.17922792 = weight(_text_:22 in 2818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17922792 = score(doc=2818,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            1.0833232 = fieldWeight in 2818, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2818)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 5.1998 19:49:25

0.04480698 = product of:
  0.08961396 = sum of:
    0.08961396 = product of:
      0.17922792 = sum of:
        0.17922792 = weight(_text_:22 in 4315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17922792 = score(doc=4315,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            1.0833232 = fieldWeight in 4315, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=4315)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 5.1998 19:49:25