Search (2202 results, page 1 of 111)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. ¬Der Google Hummingbird Algorithmus : semantisch-holistische Suche (2013) 0.19 
    0.18842301 = product of:
  0.37684602 = sum of:
    0.37684602 = product of:
      0.75369203 = sum of:
        0.75369203 = weight(_text_:hummingbird in 2521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.75369203 = score(doc=2521,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.44880816 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            1.6793189 = fieldWeight in 2521, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2521)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Im September 2013 verkündete Google den schon einen Monat vorher ausgerollten völlig neuen Algorithmus mit dem Namen "Hummingbird". Der Name wurde bewusst gewählt. Schließlich zeichnet den "Kolibri" seine äußerst schnelle und dabei doch präzise Methodik aus. Searchmetrics hat analysiert, wie sich der neue Algorithmus auf die SERPs auswirkt. Ergebnis: Die Diversität der Suchergebnisse hat abgenommen. Google zeigt zunehmend "gleichere" Resultate für semantisch äquivalente Queries an.
    Object
    Google Hummingbird
    Source
    http://www.searchmetrics.com/de/knowledge-base/hummingbird/
  2. Oreskovic, A.: Google introduces new 'Hummingbird' search algorithm (2013) 0.17 
    0.16654399 = product of:
  0.33308798 = sum of:
    0.33308798 = product of:
      0.66617596 = sum of:
        0.66617596 = weight(_text_:hummingbird in 2517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.66617596 = score(doc=2517,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.44880816 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            1.4843223 = fieldWeight in 2517, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2517)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Object
    Google Hummingbird
  3. Kopp, O.: Google Hummingbird-Algorithmus-Update : Infos & Hintergründe (2013) 0.16 
    0.16487013 = product of:
  0.32974026 = sum of:
    0.32974026 = product of:
      0.6594805 = sum of:
        0.6594805 = weight(_text_:hummingbird in 2522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.6594805 = score(doc=2522,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.44880816 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            1.469404 = fieldWeight in 2522, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2522)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Pünktlich zum 15. Geburtstag der Google Suche verkündete Google gestern auf einer Pressekonferenz in der "Gründungs-Garage", dass das bedeutendste Google Update seit dem Caffeine Update im Jahr 2010 und größte Algorithmus-Update seit 2001 schon seit ca. einem Monat aktiv ist. Das aktuelle Update heißt Hummingbird zu deutsch Kollibri. Es soll ca. 90% aller Suchanfragen betreffen und soll im Vergleich zu Caffeine ein echtes Algorithmus-Update sein. Es soll dabei helfen komplexere Suchanfragen besser zu deuten und noch besser die eigentliche Suchintention bzw. Fragestellung hinter einer Suchanfrage zu erkennen sowie passende Dokumente dazu anzubieten. Auch auf Dokumentenebene soll die eigentliche Intention hinter dem Content besser mit der Suchanfrage gematcht werden.
    Object
    Google Hummingbird
    Source
    http://www.sem-deutschland.de/seo-tipps/hummingbird-bedeutenstes-google/
  4. Hummingbird Neuer Suchalgorithmus bei Google (2013) 0.16 
    0.1579975 = product of:
  0.315995 = sum of:
    0.315995 = product of:
      0.63199 = sum of:
        0.63199 = weight(_text_:hummingbird in 2520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.63199 = score(doc=2520,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.44880816 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            1.4081517 = fieldWeight in 2520, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2520)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Google hat mit "Hummingbird" einen neuen Suchalgorithmus entwickelt und bereits eingeführt. Dabei handelt es sich laut Google um eine der größten Veränderungen der Suchmaschine, die rund 90 Prozent aller Suchanfragen betrifft. Im Rahmen einer kleinen Veranstaltung zum 15. Geburtstag der Suchmaschine hat Google in die Garage geladen, in der das Unternehmen gegründet wurde. Dabei enthüllte Google eine der bisher größten Veränderungen an der Suchmaschine: Ohne dass Nutzer etwas davon mitbekamen, hat Google vor rund einem Monat seinen Suchalgorithmus ausgetauscht. Der neue Suchalgorithmus mit Codenamen "Hummingbird" soll es Google ermöglichen, Suchanfragen und Beziehungen zwischen Dingen besser zu verstehen. Das soll die Suchmaschine in die Lage versetzen, komplexere Suchanfragen zu verarbeiten, die von Nutzern immer häufiger gestellt werden - auch, weil immer mehr Nutzer Google auf dem Smartphone per Spracheingabe nutzen. Früher versuchte Google lediglich, die Schlüsselwörter in einer Suchanfrage in Webseiten wiederzufinden. Doch seit geraumer Zeit arbeitet Google daran, die Suchanfragen besser zu verstehen, um bessere Suchergebnisse anzuzeigen.
    Object
    Google Hummingbird
    Source
    http://www.golem.de/news/hummingbird-neuer-suchalgorithmus-bei-google-1309-101828.html
  5. Fiorelli, G.: Hummingbird unleashed (2013) 0.16 
    0.1579975 = product of:
  0.315995 = sum of:
    0.315995 = product of:
      0.63199 = sum of:
        0.63199 = weight(_text_:hummingbird in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.63199 = score(doc=2546,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.44880816 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            1.4081517 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Sometimes I think that us SEOs could be wonderful characters for a Woody Allen movie: We are stressed, nervous, paranoid, we have a tendency for sudden changes of mood...okay, maybe I am exaggerating a little bit, but that's how we tend to (over)react whenever Google announces something. One thing that doesn't help is the lack of clarity coming from Google, which not only never mentions Hummingbird in any official document (for example, in the post of its 15th anniversary), but has also shied away from details of this epochal update in the "off-the-record" declarations of Amit Singhal. In fact, in some ways those statements partly contributed to the confusion. When Google announces an update-especially one like Hummingbird-the best thing to do is to avoid trying to immediately understand what it really is based on intuition alone. It is better to wait until the dust falls to the ground, recover the original documents, examine those related to them (and any variants), take the time to see the update in action, calmly investigate, and then after all that try to find the most plausible answers.
    Object
    Google Hummingbird
    Source
    https://moz.com/blog/hummingbird-unleashed
  6. Haynes, M.: Your Google algorithm cheat sheet : Panda, Penguin, and Hummingbird (2013) 0.14 
    0.14131726 = product of:
  0.28263453 = sum of:
    0.28263453 = product of:
      0.56526905 = sum of:
        0.56526905 = weight(_text_:hummingbird in 2542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.56526905 = score(doc=2542,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.44880816 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            1.2594892 = fieldWeight in 2542, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2542)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    If you're reading the Moz blog, then you probably have a decent understanding of Google and its algorithm changes. However, there is probably a good percentage of the Moz audience that is still confused about the effects that Panda, Penguin, and Hummingbird can have on your site. I did write a post last year about the main differences between Penguin and a Manual Unnautral Links Penalty, and if you haven't read that, it'll give you a good primer. The point of this article is to explain very simply what each of these algorithms are meant to do. It is hopefully a good reference that you can point your clients to if you want to explain an algorithm change and not overwhelm them with technical details about 301s, canonicals, crawl errors, and other confusing SEO terminologies.
    Object
    Google Hummingbird
    Source
    https://moz.com/blog/google-algorithm-cheat-sheet-panda-penguin-hummingbird
  7. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.09 
    0.09424001 = sum of:
  0.07503702 = product of:
    0.22511104 = sum of:
      0.22511104 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.22511104 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4005406 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047244642 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.01920299 = product of:
    0.03840598 = sum of:
      0.03840598 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03840598 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047244642 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  8. Miller, C.C.: Google alters search to handle more complex queries (2013) 0.08 
    0.082435064 = product of:
  0.16487013 = sum of:
    0.16487013 = product of:
      0.32974026 = sum of:
        0.32974026 = weight(_text_:hummingbird in 2519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.32974026 = score(doc=2519,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44880816 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.734702 = fieldWeight in 2519, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2519)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Object
    Google Hummingbird
  9. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.06 
    0.062530845 = product of:
  0.12506169 = sum of:
    0.12506169 = product of:
      0.37518507 = sum of:
        0.37518507 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.37518507 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4005406 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  10. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.05 
    0.05002468 = product of:
  0.10004936 = sum of:
    0.10004936 = product of:
      0.30014807 = sum of:
        0.30014807 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30014807 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4005406 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  11. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.04 
    0.043771595 = product of:
  0.08754319 = sum of:
    0.08754319 = product of:
      0.26262957 = sum of:
        0.26262957 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26262957 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4005406 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  12. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.04 
    0.03751851 = product of:
  0.07503702 = sum of:
    0.07503702 = product of:
      0.22511104 = sum of:
        0.22511104 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22511104 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4005406 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  13. Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents 0.04 
    0.03751851 = product of:
  0.07503702 = sum of:
    0.07503702 = product of:
      0.22511104 = sum of:
        0.22511104 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22511104 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4005406 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
  14. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.04 
    0.03751851 = product of:
  0.07503702 = sum of:
    0.07503702 = product of:
      0.22511104 = sum of:
        0.22511104 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22511104 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4005406 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  15. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.04 
    0.03751851 = product of:
  0.07503702 = sum of:
    0.07503702 = product of:
      0.22511104 = sum of:
        0.22511104 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22511104 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4005406 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  16. Jascó, P.: Searching for images by similarity online (1998) 0.04 
    0.03620951 = product of:
  0.07241902 = sum of:
    0.07241902 = product of:
      0.14483804 = sum of:
        0.14483804 = weight(_text_:22 in 393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14483804 = score(doc=393,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 393, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=393)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    29.11.2004 13:03:22
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.99-102
  17. Hawking, D.; Robertson, S.: On collection size and retrieval effectiveness (2003) 0.04 
    0.03620951 = product of:
  0.07241902 = sum of:
    0.07241902 = product of:
      0.14483804 = sum of:
        0.14483804 = weight(_text_:22 in 4109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14483804 = score(doc=4109,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4109, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4109)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    14. 8.2005 14:22:22
  18. Buzydlowski, J.W.; White, H.D.; Lin, X.: Term Co-occurrence Analysis as an Interface for Digital Libraries (2002) 0.03 
    0.033260558 = product of:
  0.066521116 = sum of:
    0.066521116 = product of:
      0.13304223 = sum of:
        0.13304223 = weight(_text_:22 in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13304223 = score(doc=1339,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.804159 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.2003 17:25:39
    22. 2.2003 18:16:22
  19. Dahlberg, I.: Conceptual definitions for INTERCONCEPT (1981) 0.03 
    0.032004986 = product of:
  0.06400997 = sum of:
    0.06400997 = product of:
      0.12801994 = sum of:
        0.12801994 = weight(_text_:22 in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12801994 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    International classification. 8(1981), S.16-22
  20. Pietris, M.K.D.: LCSH update (1988) 0.03 
    0.032004986 = product of:
  0.06400997 = sum of:
    0.06400997 = product of:
      0.12801994 = sum of:
        0.12801994 = weight(_text_:22 in 2798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12801994 = score(doc=2798,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 2798, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=2798)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 13(1988), S.19-22

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 1928
  • m 151
  • s 97
  • el 76
  • b 31
  • r 10
  • x 8
  • i 3
  • n 2
  • p 2
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications