Search (149 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchmaschinen"
  1. ¬Der Google Hummingbird Algorithmus : semantisch-holistische Suche (2013) 0.19 
    0.18842301 = product of:
  0.37684602 = sum of:
    0.37684602 = product of:
      0.75369203 = sum of:
        0.75369203 = weight(_text_:hummingbird in 2521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.75369203 = score(doc=2521,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.44880816 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            1.6793189 = fieldWeight in 2521, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2521)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Im September 2013 verkündete Google den schon einen Monat vorher ausgerollten völlig neuen Algorithmus mit dem Namen "Hummingbird". Der Name wurde bewusst gewählt. Schließlich zeichnet den "Kolibri" seine äußerst schnelle und dabei doch präzise Methodik aus. Searchmetrics hat analysiert, wie sich der neue Algorithmus auf die SERPs auswirkt. Ergebnis: Die Diversität der Suchergebnisse hat abgenommen. Google zeigt zunehmend "gleichere" Resultate für semantisch äquivalente Queries an.
    Object
    Google Hummingbird
    Source
    http://www.searchmetrics.com/de/knowledge-base/hummingbird/
  2. Kopp, O.: Google Hummingbird-Algorithmus-Update : Infos & Hintergründe (2013) 0.16 
    0.16487013 = product of:
  0.32974026 = sum of:
    0.32974026 = product of:
      0.6594805 = sum of:
        0.6594805 = weight(_text_:hummingbird in 2522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.6594805 = score(doc=2522,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.44880816 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            1.469404 = fieldWeight in 2522, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2522)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Pünktlich zum 15. Geburtstag der Google Suche verkündete Google gestern auf einer Pressekonferenz in der "Gründungs-Garage", dass das bedeutendste Google Update seit dem Caffeine Update im Jahr 2010 und größte Algorithmus-Update seit 2001 schon seit ca. einem Monat aktiv ist. Das aktuelle Update heißt Hummingbird zu deutsch Kollibri. Es soll ca. 90% aller Suchanfragen betreffen und soll im Vergleich zu Caffeine ein echtes Algorithmus-Update sein. Es soll dabei helfen komplexere Suchanfragen besser zu deuten und noch besser die eigentliche Suchintention bzw. Fragestellung hinter einer Suchanfrage zu erkennen sowie passende Dokumente dazu anzubieten. Auch auf Dokumentenebene soll die eigentliche Intention hinter dem Content besser mit der Suchanfrage gematcht werden.
    Object
    Google Hummingbird
    Source
    http://www.sem-deutschland.de/seo-tipps/hummingbird-bedeutenstes-google/
  3. Fiorelli, G.: Hummingbird unleashed (2013) 0.16 
    0.1579975 = product of:
  0.315995 = sum of:
    0.315995 = product of:
      0.63199 = sum of:
        0.63199 = weight(_text_:hummingbird in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.63199 = score(doc=2546,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.44880816 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            1.4081517 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Sometimes I think that us SEOs could be wonderful characters for a Woody Allen movie: We are stressed, nervous, paranoid, we have a tendency for sudden changes of mood...okay, maybe I am exaggerating a little bit, but that's how we tend to (over)react whenever Google announces something. One thing that doesn't help is the lack of clarity coming from Google, which not only never mentions Hummingbird in any official document (for example, in the post of its 15th anniversary), but has also shied away from details of this epochal update in the "off-the-record" declarations of Amit Singhal. In fact, in some ways those statements partly contributed to the confusion. When Google announces an update-especially one like Hummingbird-the best thing to do is to avoid trying to immediately understand what it really is based on intuition alone. It is better to wait until the dust falls to the ground, recover the original documents, examine those related to them (and any variants), take the time to see the update in action, calmly investigate, and then after all that try to find the most plausible answers.
    Object
    Google Hummingbird
    Source
    https://moz.com/blog/hummingbird-unleashed
  4. Haynes, M.: Your Google algorithm cheat sheet : Panda, Penguin, and Hummingbird (2013) 0.14 
    0.14131726 = product of:
  0.28263453 = sum of:
    0.28263453 = product of:
      0.56526905 = sum of:
        0.56526905 = weight(_text_:hummingbird in 2542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.56526905 = score(doc=2542,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.44880816 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            1.2594892 = fieldWeight in 2542, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2542)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    If you're reading the Moz blog, then you probably have a decent understanding of Google and its algorithm changes. However, there is probably a good percentage of the Moz audience that is still confused about the effects that Panda, Penguin, and Hummingbird can have on your site. I did write a post last year about the main differences between Penguin and a Manual Unnautral Links Penalty, and if you haven't read that, it'll give you a good primer. The point of this article is to explain very simply what each of these algorithms are meant to do. It is hopefully a good reference that you can point your clients to if you want to explain an algorithm change and not overwhelm them with technical details about 301s, canonicals, crawl errors, and other confusing SEO terminologies.
    Object
    Google Hummingbird
    Source
    https://moz.com/blog/google-algorithm-cheat-sheet-panda-penguin-hummingbird
  5. Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents 0.04 
    0.03751851 = product of:
  0.07503702 = sum of:
    0.07503702 = product of:
      0.22511104 = sum of:
        0.22511104 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22511104 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4005406 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
  6. Großjohann, K.: Gathering-, Harvesting-, Suchmaschinen (1996) 0.03 
    0.027157132 = product of:
  0.054314263 = sum of:
    0.054314263 = product of:
      0.10862853 = sum of:
        0.10862853 = weight(_text_:22 in 3227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10862853 = score(doc=3227,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 3227, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3227)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    7. 2.1996 22:38:41
    Pages
    22 S
  7. Höfer, W.: Detektive im Web (1999) 0.03 
    0.027157132 = product of:
  0.054314263 = sum of:
    0.054314263 = product of:
      0.10862853 = sum of:
        0.10862853 = weight(_text_:22 in 4007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10862853 = score(doc=4007,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4007, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4007)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 8.1999 20:22:06
  8. Rensman, J.: Blick ins Getriebe (1999) 0.03 
    0.027157132 = product of:
  0.054314263 = sum of:
    0.054314263 = product of:
      0.10862853 = sum of:
        0.10862853 = weight(_text_:22 in 4009) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10862853 = score(doc=4009,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4009, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4009)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 8.1999 21:22:59
  9. Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Recherchieren im Internet (2004) 0.03 
    0.025603987 = product of:
  0.051207975 = sum of:
    0.051207975 = product of:
      0.10241595 = sum of:
        0.10241595 = weight(_text_:22 in 4686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10241595 = score(doc=4686,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4686, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4686)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    27.11.2005 18:04:22
  10. MacLeod, R.: Promoting a subject gateway : a case study from EEVL (Edinburgh Engineering Virtual Library) (2000) 0.02 
    0.022630941 = product of:
  0.045261882 = sum of:
    0.045261882 = product of:
      0.090523764 = sum of:
        0.090523764 = weight(_text_:22 in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.090523764 = score(doc=4872,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:40:22
  11. Vidmar, D.J.: Darwin on the Web : the evolution of search tools (1999) 0.02 
    0.02240349 = product of:
  0.04480698 = sum of:
    0.04480698 = product of:
      0.08961396 = sum of:
        0.08961396 = weight(_text_:22 in 3175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08961396 = score(doc=3175,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3175, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3175)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Computers in libraries. 19(1999) no.5, S.22-28
  12. Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000) 0.02 
    0.02240349 = product of:
  0.04480698 = sum of:
    0.04480698 = product of:
      0.08961396 = sum of:
        0.08961396 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08961396 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    25. 8.2005 17:42:22
  13. ap: Suchmaschinen in neuem Gewand : Metaspinner kennt 600 Millionen Seiten (1999) 0.02 
    0.02240349 = product of:
  0.04480698 = sum of:
    0.04480698 = product of:
      0.08961396 = sum of:
        0.08961396 = weight(_text_:22 in 4224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08961396 = score(doc=4224,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4224, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4224)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
  14. Dunning, A.: Do we still need search engines? (1999) 0.02 
    0.02240349 = product of:
  0.04480698 = sum of:
    0.04480698 = product of:
      0.08961396 = sum of:
        0.08961396 = weight(_text_:22 in 6021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08961396 = score(doc=6021,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6021, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6021)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Ariadne. 1999, no.22
  15. Bawden, D.: Google and the universe of knowledge (2008) 0.02 
    0.02240349 = product of:
  0.04480698 = sum of:
    0.04480698 = product of:
      0.08961396 = sum of:
        0.08961396 = weight(_text_:22 in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08961396 = score(doc=844,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    7. 6.2008 16:22:20
  16. Auf der Suche nach Suchmaschinen (1996) 0.02 
    0.01920299 = product of:
  0.03840598 = sum of:
    0.03840598 = product of:
      0.07681196 = sum of:
        0.07681196 = weight(_text_:22 in 5583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07681196 = score(doc=5583,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5583, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5583)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Cogito. 12(1996) H.5, S.19-22
  17. Birmingham, J.: Internet search engines (1996) 0.02 
    0.01920299 = product of:
  0.03840598 = sum of:
    0.03840598 = product of:
      0.07681196 = sum of:
        0.07681196 = weight(_text_:22 in 5664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07681196 = score(doc=5664,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5664, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5664)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10.11.1996 16:36:22
  18. Bager, J.: Weniger ist mehr : Internet-Suchmaschinen richtig einsetzen (1998) 0.02 
    0.01920299 = product of:
  0.03840598 = sum of:
    0.03840598 = product of:
      0.07681196 = sum of:
        0.07681196 = weight(_text_:22 in 1489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07681196 = score(doc=1489,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1489, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1489)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    29.12.1998 11:22:00
  19. Lob, S.: Per Mausklick auf die neusten Nachrichten : Internet-Suchmaschinen liefern Presse-Überblicke und stellen persönliche Zeitungen zusammen (1998) 0.02 
    0.01920299 = product of:
  0.03840598 = sum of:
    0.03840598 = product of:
      0.07681196 = sum of:
        0.07681196 = weight(_text_:22 in 1622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07681196 = score(doc=1622,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1622, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1622)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    29.12.1998 11:22:25
  20. Hannemann, M.: Online ins Schlaraffenland der Wissenschaft : Literatur-Recherche im Internet ist ein teures Unterfangen ohne Erfolgsgarantie - Doch wer systematisch sucht, gelangt zügig ans Ziel (1999) 0.02 
    0.01920299 = product of:
  0.03840598 = sum of:
    0.03840598 = product of:
      0.07681196 = sum of:
        0.07681196 = weight(_text_:22 in 3106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07681196 = score(doc=3106,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3106, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3106)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22

Authors

Years

Languages

  • d 79
  • e 68
  • f 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 131
  • el 12
  • m 6
  • p 2
  • x 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications