Search (168 results, page 1 of 9)

0.18842301 = product of:
  0.37684602 = sum of:
    0.37684602 = product of:
      0.75369203 = sum of:
        0.75369203 = weight(_text_:hummingbird in 2521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.75369203 = score(doc=2521,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.44880816 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            1.6793189 = fieldWeight in 2521, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2521)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Im September 2013 verkündete Google den schon einen Monat vorher ausgerollten völlig neuen Algorithmus mit dem Namen "Hummingbird". Der Name wurde bewusst gewählt. Schließlich zeichnet den "Kolibri" seine äußerst schnelle und dabei doch präzise Methodik aus. Searchmetrics hat analysiert, wie sich der neue Algorithmus auf die SERPs auswirkt. Ergebnis: Die Diversität der Suchergebnisse hat abgenommen. Google zeigt zunehmend "gleichere" Resultate für semantisch äquivalente Queries an.

Object

Google Hummingbird

Source

http://www.searchmetrics.com/de/knowledge-base/hummingbird/

0.16654399 = product of:
  0.33308798 = sum of:
    0.33308798 = product of:
      0.66617596 = sum of:
        0.66617596 = weight(_text_:hummingbird in 2517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.66617596 = score(doc=2517,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.44880816 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            1.4843223 = fieldWeight in 2517, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2517)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

Google Hummingbird

0.16487013 = product of:
  0.32974026 = sum of:
    0.32974026 = product of:
      0.6594805 = sum of:
        0.6594805 = weight(_text_:hummingbird in 2522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.6594805 = score(doc=2522,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.44880816 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            1.469404 = fieldWeight in 2522, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2522)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Pünktlich zum 15. Geburtstag der Google Suche verkündete Google gestern auf einer Pressekonferenz in der "Gründungs-Garage", dass das bedeutendste Google Update seit dem Caffeine Update im Jahr 2010 und größte Algorithmus-Update seit 2001 schon seit ca. einem Monat aktiv ist. Das aktuelle Update heißt Hummingbird zu deutsch Kollibri. Es soll ca. 90% aller Suchanfragen betreffen und soll im Vergleich zu Caffeine ein echtes Algorithmus-Update sein. Es soll dabei helfen komplexere Suchanfragen besser zu deuten und noch besser die eigentliche Suchintention bzw. Fragestellung hinter einer Suchanfrage zu erkennen sowie passende Dokumente dazu anzubieten. Auch auf Dokumentenebene soll die eigentliche Intention hinter dem Content besser mit der Suchanfrage gematcht werden.

Object

Google Hummingbird

Source

http://www.sem-deutschland.de/seo-tipps/hummingbird-bedeutenstes-google/

0.1579975 = product of:
  0.315995 = sum of:
    0.315995 = product of:
      0.63199 = sum of:
        0.63199 = weight(_text_:hummingbird in 2520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.63199 = score(doc=2520,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.44880816 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            1.4081517 = fieldWeight in 2520, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2520)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Google hat mit "Hummingbird" einen neuen Suchalgorithmus entwickelt und bereits eingeführt. Dabei handelt es sich laut Google um eine der größten Veränderungen der Suchmaschine, die rund 90 Prozent aller Suchanfragen betrifft. Im Rahmen einer kleinen Veranstaltung zum 15. Geburtstag der Suchmaschine hat Google in die Garage geladen, in der das Unternehmen gegründet wurde. Dabei enthüllte Google eine der bisher größten Veränderungen an der Suchmaschine: Ohne dass Nutzer etwas davon mitbekamen, hat Google vor rund einem Monat seinen Suchalgorithmus ausgetauscht. Der neue Suchalgorithmus mit Codenamen "Hummingbird" soll es Google ermöglichen, Suchanfragen und Beziehungen zwischen Dingen besser zu verstehen. Das soll die Suchmaschine in die Lage versetzen, komplexere Suchanfragen zu verarbeiten, die von Nutzern immer häufiger gestellt werden - auch, weil immer mehr Nutzer Google auf dem Smartphone per Spracheingabe nutzen. Früher versuchte Google lediglich, die Schlüsselwörter in einer Suchanfrage in Webseiten wiederzufinden. Doch seit geraumer Zeit arbeitet Google daran, die Suchanfragen besser zu verstehen, um bessere Suchergebnisse anzuzeigen.

Object

Google Hummingbird

Source

http://www.golem.de/news/hummingbird-neuer-suchalgorithmus-bei-google-1309-101828.html

0.1579975 = product of:
  0.315995 = sum of:
    0.315995 = product of:
      0.63199 = sum of:
        0.63199 = weight(_text_:hummingbird in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.63199 = score(doc=2546,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.44880816 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            1.4081517 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Sometimes I think that us SEOs could be wonderful characters for a Woody Allen movie: We are stressed, nervous, paranoid, we have a tendency for sudden changes of mood...okay, maybe I am exaggerating a little bit, but that's how we tend to (over)react whenever Google announces something. One thing that doesn't help is the lack of clarity coming from Google, which not only never mentions Hummingbird in any official document (for example, in the post of its 15th anniversary), but has also shied away from details of this epochal update in the "off-the-record" declarations of Amit Singhal. In fact, in some ways those statements partly contributed to the confusion. When Google announces an update-especially one like Hummingbird-the best thing to do is to avoid trying to immediately understand what it really is based on intuition alone. It is better to wait until the dust falls to the ground, recover the original documents, examine those related to them (and any variants), take the time to see the update in action, calmly investigate, and then after all that try to find the most plausible answers.

Object

Google Hummingbird

Source

https://moz.com/blog/hummingbird-unleashed

0.14131726 = product of:
  0.28263453 = sum of:
    0.28263453 = product of:
      0.56526905 = sum of:
        0.56526905 = weight(_text_:hummingbird in 2542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.56526905 = score(doc=2542,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.44880816 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            1.2594892 = fieldWeight in 2542, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2542)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

If you're reading the Moz blog, then you probably have a decent understanding of Google and its algorithm changes. However, there is probably a good percentage of the Moz audience that is still confused about the effects that Panda, Penguin, and Hummingbird can have on your site. I did write a post last year about the main differences between Penguin and a Manual Unnautral Links Penalty, and if you haven't read that, it'll give you a good primer. The point of this article is to explain very simply what each of these algorithms are meant to do. It is hopefully a good reference that you can point your clients to if you want to explain an algorithm change and not overwhelm them with technical details about 301s, canonicals, crawl errors, and other confusing SEO terminologies.

Object

Google Hummingbird

Source

https://moz.com/blog/google-algorithm-cheat-sheet-panda-penguin-hummingbird

0.082435064 = product of:
  0.16487013 = sum of:
    0.16487013 = product of:
      0.32974026 = sum of:
        0.32974026 = weight(_text_:hummingbird in 2519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.32974026 = score(doc=2519,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44880816 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.734702 = fieldWeight in 2519, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2519)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

Google Hummingbird

0.062530845 = product of:
  0.12506169 = sum of:
    0.12506169 = product of:
      0.37518507 = sum of:
        0.37518507 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.37518507 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4005406 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

0.05002468 = product of:
  0.10004936 = sum of:
    0.10004936 = product of:
      0.30014807 = sum of:
        0.30014807 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30014807 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4005406 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H

0.031265423 = product of:
  0.062530845 = sum of:
    0.062530845 = product of:
      0.18759254 = sum of:
        0.18759254 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18759254 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4005406 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.

0.031265423 = product of:
  0.062530845 = sum of:
    0.062530845 = product of:
      0.18759254 = sum of:
        0.18759254 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18759254 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4005406 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

"Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."

0.025603987 = product of:
  0.051207975 = sum of:
    0.051207975 = product of:
      0.10241595 = sum of:
        0.10241595 = weight(_text_:22 in 5449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10241595 = score(doc=5449,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5449, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5449)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 2.1997 19:26:34

0.025603987 = product of:
  0.051207975 = sum of:
    0.051207975 = product of:
      0.10241595 = sum of:
        0.10241595 = weight(_text_:22 in 5837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10241595 = score(doc=5837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5837)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

30.11.1996 13:22:37

0.025603987 = product of:
  0.051207975 = sum of:
    0.051207975 = product of:
      0.10241595 = sum of:
        0.10241595 = weight(_text_:22 in 4085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10241595 = score(doc=4085,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4085, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4085)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

7.11.1999 18:22:39

0.025047863 = product of:
  0.050095726 = sum of:
    0.050095726 = product of:
      0.10019145 = sum of:
        0.10019145 = weight(_text_:22 in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10019145 = score(doc=1936,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.6055961 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Dewey Decimal Classification and Relative Index, Edition 22 (DDC 22) will be issued simultaneously in print and web versions in July 2003. The new edition is the first full print update to the Dewey Decimal Classification system in seven years-it includes several significant updates and many new numbers and topics. DDC 22 also features some fundamental structural changes that have been introduced with the goals of promoting classifier efficiency and improving the DDC for use in a variety of applications in the web environment. Most importantly, the content of the new edition has been shaped by the needs and recommendations of Dewey users around the world. The worldwide user community has an important role in shaping the future of the DDC.

Object

DDC-22

0.022630941 = product of:
  0.045261882 = sum of:
    0.045261882 = product of:
      0.090523764 = sum of:
        0.090523764 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.090523764 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 7.2006 15:22:28

0.022630941 = product of:
  0.045261882 = sum of:
    0.045261882 = product of:
      0.090523764 = sum of:
        0.090523764 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.090523764 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 4.2017 10:42:05
22. 4.2017 10:48:38

0.02240349 = product of:
  0.04480698 = sum of:
    0.04480698 = product of:
      0.08961396 = sum of:
        0.08961396 = weight(_text_:22 in 8365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08961396 = score(doc=8365,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8365, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8365)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 6.2015 16:08:38

0.02240349 = product of:
  0.04480698 = sum of:
    0.04480698 = product of:
      0.08961396 = sum of:
        0.08961396 = weight(_text_:22 in 4084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08961396 = score(doc=4084,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4084, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4084)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

7.11.1999 18:22:54

0.02240349 = product of:
  0.04480698 = sum of:
    0.04480698 = product of:
      0.08961396 = sum of:
        0.08961396 = weight(_text_:22 in 6021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08961396 = score(doc=6021,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16544269 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047244642 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6021, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6021)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Ariadne. 1999, no.22