Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Rowlands, I."
  1. Nicholas, D.; Huntington, P.; Jamali, H.R.; Rowlands, I.; Fieldhouse, M.: Student digital information-seeking behaviour in context (2009) 0.09
    0.09169075 = product of:
      0.1833815 = sum of:
        0.1833815 = sum of:
          0.14278124 = weight(_text_:scholar in 2680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14278124 = score(doc=2680,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.327981 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049943898 = queryNorm
              0.4353339 = fieldWeight in 2680, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2680)
          0.04060025 = weight(_text_:22 in 2680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04060025 = score(doc=2680,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17489502 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049943898 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2680, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2680)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This study provides evidence on the actual information-seeking behaviour of students in a digital scholarly environment, not what they thought they did. It also compares student information-seeking behaviour with that of other academic communities, and, in some cases, for practitioners. Design/methodology/approach - Data were gathered as part of CIBER's ongoing Virtual Scholar programme. In particular log data from two digital journals libraries, Blackwell Synergy and OhioLINK, and one e-book collection (Oxford Scholarship Online) are utilized. Findings - The study showed a distinctive form of information-seeking behaviour associated with students and differences between them and other members of the academic community. For example, students constituted the biggest users in terms of sessions and pages viewed, and they were more likely to undertake longer online sessions. Undergraduates and postgraduates were the most likely users of library links to access scholarly databases, suggesting an important "hot link" role for libraries. Originality/value - Few studies have focused on the actual (rather than perceived) information-seeking behaviour of students. The study fills that gap.
    Date
    23. 2.2009 17:22:41
  2. Nicholas, D.; Huntington, P.; Jamali, H.R.; Rowlands, I.; Dobrowolski, T.; Tenopir, C.: Viewing and reading behaviour in a virtual environment : the full-text download and what can be read into it (2008) 0.03
    0.029746095 = product of:
      0.05949219 = sum of:
        0.05949219 = product of:
          0.11898438 = sum of:
            0.11898438 = weight(_text_:scholar in 1911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11898438 = score(doc=1911,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.327981 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049943898 = queryNorm
                0.36277828 = fieldWeight in 1911, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1911)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This article aims to focus on usage data in respect to full-text downloads of journal articles, which is considered an important usage (satisfaction) metric by librarians and publishers. The purpose is to evaluate the evidence regarding full-text viewing by pooling together data on the full-text viewing of tens of thousands of users studied as part of a number of investigations of e-journal databases conducted during the Virtual Scholar research programme. Design/methodology/approach - The paper reviews the web logs of a number of electronic journal libraries including OhioLINK and ScienceDirect using Deep Log Analysis, which is a more sophisticated form of transactional log analysis. The frequency, characteristics and diversity of full-text viewing are examined. The article also features an investigation into the time spent online viewing full-text articles in order to get a clearer understanding of the significance of full-text viewing, especially in regard to reading. Findings - The main findings are that there is a great deal of variety amongst scholars in their full-text viewing habits and that a large proportion of views are very cursory in nature, although there is survey evidence to suggest that reading goes on offline. Originality/value - This is the first time that full-text viewing evidence is studied on such a large scale.
  3. Rowlands, I.; Bawden, D.: Building the digital library on solid research foundations (1999) 0.01
    0.0118417395 = product of:
      0.023683479 = sum of:
        0.023683479 = product of:
          0.047366958 = sum of:
            0.047366958 = weight(_text_:22 in 730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047366958 = score(doc=730,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17489502 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049943898 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 730, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=730)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    21. 1.2007 12:03:22
  4. Rowlands, I.: Understanding information policy : concepts, frameworks and research tools (1996) 0.01
    0.010150063 = product of:
      0.020300126 = sum of:
        0.020300126 = product of:
          0.04060025 = sum of:
            0.04060025 = weight(_text_:22 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04060025 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17489502 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049943898 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.13-25