-
Abad-García, M.-F.; González-Teruel, A.; González-Llinares, J.: Effectiveness of OpenAIRE, BASE, Recolecta, and Google Scholar at finding spanish articles in repositories (2018)
0.05
0.051521752 = product of:
0.103043504 = sum of:
0.103043504 = product of:
0.20608701 = sum of:
0.20608701 = weight(_text_:scholar in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20608701 = score(doc=4185,freq=6.0), product of:
0.327981 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
0.049943898 = queryNorm
0.62835044 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper explores the usefulness of OpenAIRE, BASE, Recolecta, and Google Scholar (GS) for evaluating open access (OA) policies that demand a deposit in a repository. A case study was designed focusing on 762 financed articles with a project of FIS-2012 of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, the Spanish national health service's main management body for health research. Its finance is therefore subject to the Spanish Government OA mandate. A search was carried out for full-text OA copies of the 762 articles using the four tools being evaluated and with identification of the repository housing these items. Of the 762 articles concerned, 510 OA copies were found of 353 unique articles (46.3%) in 68 repositories. OA copies were found of 81.9% of the articles in PubMed Central and copies of 49.5% of the articles in an institutional repository (IR). BASE and GS identified 93.5% of the articles and OpenAIRE 86.7%. Recolecta identified just 62.2% of the articles deposited in a Spanish IR. BASE achieved the greatest success, by locating copies deposited in IR, while GS found those deposited in disciplinary repositories. None of the tools identified copies of all the articles, so they need to be used in a complementary way when evaluating OA policies.
- Object
- Google Scholar
-
Moore, S.A.: Revisiting "the 1990s debutante" : scholar-led publishing and the prehistory of the open access movement (2020)
0.04
0.04206733 = product of:
0.08413466 = sum of:
0.08413466 = product of:
0.16826932 = sum of:
0.16826932 = weight(_text_:scholar in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16826932 = score(doc=5920,freq=4.0), product of:
0.327981 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
0.049943898 = queryNorm
0.51304597 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The movement for open access publishing (OA) is often said to have its roots in the scientific disciplines, having been popularized by scientific publishers and formalized through a range of top-down policy interventions. But there is an often-neglected prehistory of OA that can be found in the early DIY publishers of the late 1980s and early 1990s. Managed entirely by working academics, these journals published research in the humanities and social sciences and stand out for their unique set of motivations and practices. This article explores this separate lineage in the history of the OA movement through a critical-theoretical analysis of the motivations and practices of the early scholar-led publishers. Alongside showing the involvement of the humanities and social sciences in the formation of OA, the analysis reveals the importance that these journals placed on experimental practices, critique of commercial publishing, and the desire to reach new audiences. Understood in today's context, this research is significant for adding complexity to the history of OA, which policymakers, advocates, and publishing scholars should keep in mind as OA goes mainstream.
-
Poworoznek, E.L.: current practices in online physical sciences journals : Linking of errata: (2003)
0.04
0.03569531 = product of:
0.07139062 = sum of:
0.07139062 = product of:
0.14278124 = sum of:
0.14278124 = weight(_text_:scholar in 1874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14278124 = score(doc=1874,freq=2.0), product of:
0.327981 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
0.049943898 = queryNorm
0.4353339 = fieldWeight in 1874, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1874)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reader awareness of article corrections can be of critical importance in the physical and biomedical sciences. Comparison of errata and corrigenda in online versions of high-impact physical sciences journals across titles and publishers yielded surprising variability. Of 43 online journals surveyed, 17 had no links between original articles and later corrections. When present, hyperlinks between articles and errata showed patterns in presentation style, but lacked consistency. Variability in the presentation, linking, and availability of online errata indicates that practices are not evenly developed across the field. Comparison of finding tools showed excellent coverage of errata by Science Citation Index, lack of indexing in INSPEC, and lack of retrieval with SciFinder Scholar. The development of standards for the linking of original articles to errata is recommended.
-
Brembs, B.: So your institute went cold turkey on publisher X : what now? (2016)
0.04
0.03569531 = product of:
0.07139062 = sum of:
0.07139062 = product of:
0.14278124 = sum of:
0.14278124 = weight(_text_:scholar in 3562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14278124 = score(doc=3562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.327981 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
0.049943898 = queryNorm
0.4353339 = fieldWeight in 3562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- With the start of the new year 2017, about 60 universities and other research institutions in Germany are set to lose subscription access to one of the main STEM publishers, Elsevier. The reason being negotiations of the DEAL consortium (600 institutions in total) with the publisher. In the run-up to these negotiations, all members of the consortium were urged to not renew their individual subscriptions with the publisher and most institutions apparently followed this call. As the first Elsevier offer was rejected by DEAL and further negotiations have been postponed until 2017, the participating institutions whose individual contract runs out this year will be without continued subscription access - as long as they don't cave in and broker new individual contracts. At first, this may seem like a massive problem for all students and faculty at these institutions. However, there are now so many alternative access strategies, that the well-informed scholar may not even notice much of a difference. Here are ten different options, in no particular order.
-
Veittes, M.: Electronic Book (1995)
0.03
0.033833545 = product of:
0.06766709 = sum of:
0.06766709 = product of:
0.13533418 = sum of:
0.13533418 = weight(_text_:22 in 3204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13533418 = score(doc=3204,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17489502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049943898 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 3204, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3204)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- RRZK-Kompass. 1995, Nr.65, S.21-22
-
Nicholas, D.; Huntington, P.; Jamali, H.R.; Rowlands, I.; Dobrowolski, T.; Tenopir, C.: Viewing and reading behaviour in a virtual environment : the full-text download and what can be read into it (2008)
0.03
0.029746095 = product of:
0.05949219 = sum of:
0.05949219 = product of:
0.11898438 = sum of:
0.11898438 = weight(_text_:scholar in 1911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11898438 = score(doc=1911,freq=2.0), product of:
0.327981 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
0.049943898 = queryNorm
0.36277828 = fieldWeight in 1911, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1911)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - This article aims to focus on usage data in respect to full-text downloads of journal articles, which is considered an important usage (satisfaction) metric by librarians and publishers. The purpose is to evaluate the evidence regarding full-text viewing by pooling together data on the full-text viewing of tens of thousands of users studied as part of a number of investigations of e-journal databases conducted during the Virtual Scholar research programme. Design/methodology/approach - The paper reviews the web logs of a number of electronic journal libraries including OhioLINK and ScienceDirect using Deep Log Analysis, which is a more sophisticated form of transactional log analysis. The frequency, characteristics and diversity of full-text viewing are examined. The article also features an investigation into the time spent online viewing full-text articles in order to get a clearer understanding of the significance of full-text viewing, especially in regard to reading. Findings - The main findings are that there is a great deal of variety amongst scholars in their full-text viewing habits and that a large proportion of views are very cursory in nature, although there is survey evidence to suggest that reading goes on offline. Originality/value - This is the first time that full-text viewing evidence is studied on such a large scale.
-
Cabanac, G.: Bibliogifts in LibGen? : a study of a text-sharing platform driven by biblioleaks and crowdsourcing (2016)
0.03
0.029746095 = product of:
0.05949219 = sum of:
0.05949219 = product of:
0.11898438 = sum of:
0.11898438 = weight(_text_:scholar in 2850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11898438 = score(doc=2850,freq=2.0), product of:
0.327981 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
0.049943898 = queryNorm
0.36277828 = fieldWeight in 2850, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.5669885 = idf(docFreq=168, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2850)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Research articles disseminate the knowledge produced by the scientific community. Access to this literature is crucial for researchers and the general public. Apparently, "bibliogifts" are available online for free from text-sharing platforms. However, little is known about such platforms. What is the size of the underlying digital libraries? What are the topics covered? Where do these documents originally come from? This article reports on a study of the Library Genesis platform (LibGen). The 25 million documents (42 terabytes) it hosts and distributes for free are mostly research articles, textbooks, and books in English. The article collection stems from isolated, but massive, article uploads (71%) in line with a "biblioleaks" scenario, as well as from daily crowdsourcing (29%) by worldwide users of platforms such as Reddit Scholar and Sci-Hub. By relating the DOIs registered at CrossRef and those cached at LibGen, this study reveals that 36% of all DOI articles are available for free at LibGen. This figure is even higher (68%) for three major publishers: Elsevier, Springer, and Wiley. More research is needed to understand to what extent researchers and the general public have recourse to such text-sharing platforms and why.
-
Zschunke, P.; Svensson, P.: Bücherbrett für alle Fälle : Geräte-Speicher fassen Tausende von Seiten (2000)
0.03
0.028708715 = product of:
0.05741743 = sum of:
0.05741743 = product of:
0.11483486 = sum of:
0.11483486 = weight(_text_:22 in 4823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11483486 = score(doc=4823,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17489502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049943898 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4823, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4823)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 5.1997 8:44:22
18. 6.2000 9:11:22
-
Leuser, P.: SGML-Einsatz bei Duden und Brockhaus : ein Verlag auf neuem Weg (1993)
0.03
0.027066834 = product of:
0.05413367 = sum of:
0.05413367 = product of:
0.10826734 = sum of:
0.10826734 = weight(_text_:22 in 5919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10826734 = score(doc=5919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17489502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049943898 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5919)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Infodoc. 19(1993) H.3, S.20-22
-
Polatscheck, K.: Elektronische Versuchung : Test des Sony Data Discman: eine digitale Konkurrenz für Taschenbücher? (1992)
0.03
0.027066834 = product of:
0.05413367 = sum of:
0.05413367 = product of:
0.10826734 = sum of:
0.10826734 = weight(_text_:22 in 6381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10826734 = score(doc=6381,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17489502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049943898 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6381, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6381)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Zeit. Nr.xx vom ???, S.22
-
Desmarais, N.: Data preparation for electronic publications (1998)
0.03
0.027066834 = product of:
0.05413367 = sum of:
0.05413367 = product of:
0.10826734 = sum of:
0.10826734 = weight(_text_:22 in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10826734 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17489502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049943898 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Advances in librarianship. 22(1998), S.59-75
-
Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017)
0.02
0.023923928 = product of:
0.047847856 = sum of:
0.047847856 = product of:
0.09569571 = sum of:
0.09569571 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09569571 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17489502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049943898 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 4.2017 10:42:05
22. 4.2017 10:48:38
-
Dechsling, R.: Softwaretypen : Datenbank, Hypertext oder linearer Text? (1994)
0.02
0.023683479 = product of:
0.047366958 = sum of:
0.047366958 = product of:
0.094733916 = sum of:
0.094733916 = weight(_text_:22 in 8074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094733916 = score(doc=8074,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17489502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049943898 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8074, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8074)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Börsenblatt. Nr.50 vom 24.6.1994, S.19-22
-
Electronic publishing and electronic information communication (1996)
0.02
0.023683479 = product of:
0.047366958 = sum of:
0.047366958 = product of:
0.094733916 = sum of:
0.094733916 = weight(_text_:22 in 6664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094733916 = score(doc=6664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17489502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049943898 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6664)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.3, S.181-247
-
Schmitz, H.: Lese- und Lernstoff allerwege : NuvoMedia bietet 'RocketBook' an, Bertelsmann ist dabei (1998)
0.02
0.023683479 = product of:
0.047366958 = sum of:
0.047366958 = product of:
0.094733916 = sum of:
0.094733916 = weight(_text_:22 in 1267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094733916 = score(doc=1267,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17489502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049943898 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1267, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1267)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 12. 2.1996 22:34:46
-
Swiaczny, F.: Elektronisches Publizieren bei MATEO (1998)
0.02
0.020300126 = product of:
0.04060025 = sum of:
0.04060025 = product of:
0.0812005 = sum of:
0.0812005 = weight(_text_:22 in 2356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0812005 = score(doc=2356,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17489502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049943898 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2356, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2356)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.1, S.35-38
-
Friesel, U.: ¬Das Buch wie Cola aus dem Automaten : Book-on-Demand: Gedruckt aus dem Internet, was gewünscht wird, und zwar sofort (1999)
0.02
0.020300126 = product of:
0.04060025 = sum of:
0.04060025 = product of:
0.0812005 = sum of:
0.0812005 = weight(_text_:22 in 3902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0812005 = score(doc=3902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17489502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049943898 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3902)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17. 7.1996 9:33:22
-
Oßwald, A.: Proaktives Wissensmanagement für Fachbereiche, Hochschule und externe Partner : Bibliotheksdienstleistungen als Brücke zur Praxis (2000)
0.02
0.020300126 = product of:
0.04060025 = sum of:
0.04060025 = product of:
0.0812005 = sum of:
0.0812005 = weight(_text_:22 in 4711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0812005 = score(doc=4711,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17489502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049943898 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4711, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4711)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27.10.2001 12:22:54
-
ap: Virtuelle Bibliotheken überall hin mitnehmen : Geräte-Speicher fassen Tausende von Seiten (2000)
0.02
0.020300126 = product of:
0.04060025 = sum of:
0.04060025 = product of:
0.0812005 = sum of:
0.0812005 = weight(_text_:22 in 747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0812005 = score(doc=747,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17489502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049943898 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 747, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=747)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 5.1997 8:44:22
-
Loos, A.: ¬Die Million ist geknackt (2015)
0.02
0.020300126 = product of:
0.04060025 = sum of:
0.04060025 = product of:
0.0812005 = sum of:
0.0812005 = weight(_text_:22 in 4208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0812005 = score(doc=4208,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17489502 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049943898 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4208, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4208)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7. 4.2015 17:22:03
