Search (18 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Bestandsaufstellung"
  1. Steele, T.D.; Foote, J.B.: Reclassification in academic research libraries : is it still relevant in an e-book world? (2011) 0.07
    0.0666973 = product of:
      0.10004594 = sum of:
        0.076371044 = weight(_text_:book in 4167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.076371044 = score(doc=4167,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.34138763 = fieldWeight in 4167, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4167)
        0.0236749 = product of:
          0.0473498 = sum of:
            0.0473498 = weight(_text_:search in 4167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0473498 = score(doc=4167,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17614716 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.2688082 = fieldWeight in 4167, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4167)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article examines whether academic libraries are still reclassifying materials, how they are doing so, and if the acquisition of electronic materials has an impact on reclassification efforts. An online survey was sent to the heads of cataloging units at libraries belonging to the Association of Research Libraries to answer these questions. Almost one-third of libraries are currently involved in reclassification projects. Most respondents reported they do not believe that purchasing e-books has affected their decisions about reclassification. The article also examines the faceted search capability of next-generation catalogs and their possible impact on patrons' use of classification.
  2. Frigerio, L.: From disorder to order : a challenge for the philosopher and the librarian (Milan, Italy) (2009) 0.05
    0.04764092 = product of:
      0.07146138 = sum of:
        0.05455074 = weight(_text_:book in 3270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05455074 = score(doc=3270,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.2438483 = fieldWeight in 3270, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3270)
        0.016910642 = product of:
          0.033821285 = sum of:
            0.033821285 = weight(_text_:search in 3270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033821285 = score(doc=3270,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17614716 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.19200584 = fieldWeight in 3270, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3270)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Philosophy Library at the University of Milan was born in the fifties by the merger of the two Institutes of Philosophy and the History of Philosophy. Once the restoration had been completed, it was necessary to devise a suitable classification system in order to arrange the books and to meet the new research needs of the Institutes. The project was untrusted to Prof. Corrado Mangione and Prof. Maria Assunta del Torre, with the theoretical contribution of Giuliana Sapori, chief Director of Central Library of the Faculty of Laws and Humanities. The model had been conceived as completely anew, without any reference toother existing classification systems. The inspiring principles were from one hand the choice for an open shelving system, from the other one the idea that the orientation criteria and the book search had to be user-friendly for everyone. This paper provides an in-depth analysis of the making-up of the call number as applied to each section of the collection, and how the scheme has been developed over the past fifty years. Points of strenght and weakness of the scheme are also discussed at the light of the technological innovations which have gradually affected the whole of the library activities, notably with the introduction of the electronic catalogue. The original classification scheme has maintened its coherence and functionality over time, in spite of the expansion of the collection and the automation of all stages of the classification process. This is the main reason to keep using it in the future.
  3. Zhao, L.: Save space for "newcomers" : analyzing problems in book number assignment under the LCC system (2004) 0.04
    0.03779387 = product of:
      0.11338161 = sum of:
        0.11338161 = weight(_text_:book in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11338161 = score(doc=3081,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.50682926 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    With more than a million books published each year, thousands of books will be cataloged and shelved in libraries. Assigning book numbers efficiently and balancing the distribution of main entries over the LC Cutter Table entries have become critical issues for shelving later entries in libraries using the Library of Congress Classification (LCC) system. This paper aims to explore and discuss the problems in assigning book numbers (Cutter numbers) to printed materials under the LCC System. The existing problems have blocked or invaded the usage of some numbers and letters ruled by the LC Cutter Table. The reason is either not following the LC Cutter Table well, or confusion in using the Table. Directly downloading the LC record to the local database adds more questions to the issue.
  4. Lin, W.; Yueh, H.-P.; Wu, H.-Y.; Fu, L.-C.: Developing a service robot for a children's library : a design-based research approach (2014) 0.04
    0.03779387 = product of:
      0.11338161 = sum of:
        0.11338161 = weight(_text_:book in 1198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11338161 = score(doc=1198,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.50682926 = fieldWeight in 1198, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1198)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Understanding book-locating behavior in libraries is important and leads to more effective services that support patrons throughout the book-locating process. This study adopted a design-based approach to incorporate robotic assistance in investigating the book-locating behaviors of child patrons, and developed a service robot for child patrons in library settings. We describe the iterative cycles and process to develop a robot to assist with locating resources in libraries. Stakeholders, including child patrons and librarians, were consulted about their needs, preferences, and performance in locating library resources with robotic assistance. Their needs were analyzed and incorporated into the design of the library robot to provide comprehensive support. The results of the study suggest that the library robot was effective as a mobile and humanoid service agent for providing motivation and knowledgeable guidance to help child patrons in the initially complicated sequence of locating resources.
  5. Martínez-Ávila, D.; San Segundo, R.; Olson, H.A.: ¬The use of BISAC in libraries as new cases of Reader-Interest Classifications (2014) 0.04
    0.036001656 = product of:
      0.108004965 = sum of:
        0.108004965 = weight(_text_:book in 1973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.108004965 = score(doc=1973,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.48279503 = fieldWeight in 1973, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In the recent years, several libraries in the United States have been experimenting with Book Industry Standards and Communications (BISAC), the classification system of the book industry, as an alternative to the Dewey Decimal Classification. Although rarely discussed, these cases of implementation of BISAC arguably resemble other past cases of replacement of traditional classifications that received the name of reader-interest classifications. In this article, a comparison of the BISAC cases to the previous cases of reader-interest classifications is taken in order to determine if the current application of BISAC to libraries is susceptible to the same problems, dangers, and ends as occurred in the past.
  6. Chen, K.-n.: Dynamic subject numbers replace traditional classification numbers (2013) 0.03
    0.030858565 = product of:
      0.09257569 = sum of:
        0.09257569 = weight(_text_:book in 787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09257569 = score(doc=787,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.41382432 = fieldWeight in 787, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=787)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents a new idea on shelving printed books and finding books in libraries. The author advocates that traditional book classification number (TBCN) systems should be replaced by a better indexing method for books in libraries. The author proposes a new way of seeking books for library users wishing to locate them called a 'dynamic book subject number' (DBSN) system. The new system combines new indexing rules and automated system technology to create settings in which a book's 'subject number' can change rather than having a particular permanent classification number assigned to it. The new way encourages library users to seek books through a user-friendly cataloging system by choosing subjects from the embedded database. The database contains thousands of subjects with their corresponding Arabic codes. For printed books, the DBSN ushers in a new era in the relationship between library users and the books.
  7. Saarti, J.: Experiments with categorising fiction in Lohtajy Library (1992) 0.01
    0.009155246 = product of:
      0.027465738 = sum of:
        0.027465738 = product of:
          0.054931477 = sum of:
            0.054931477 = weight(_text_:22 in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054931477 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Scandinavian public library quarterly. 25(1992) no.4, S.22-24,29
  8. Whelan, J.A.: Public access compact shelving in an academic branch library (1996) 0.01
    0.009155246 = product of:
      0.027465738 = sum of:
        0.027465738 = product of:
          0.054931477 = sum of:
            0.054931477 = weight(_text_:22 in 344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054931477 = score(doc=344,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 344, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=344)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Colorado libraries. 22(1996) no.1, S.29-32
  9. Tiggelen, N. van: ¬Een landelijk systeem zou ideaal zijn : bibliotheken van Leerdam en Weert experimenteren met alternatieve plaatsing (1998) 0.01
    0.009155246 = product of:
      0.027465738 = sum of:
        0.027465738 = product of:
          0.054931477 = sum of:
            0.054931477 = weight(_text_:22 in 4494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054931477 = score(doc=4494,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4494, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4494)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    BibliotheekBlad. 2(1998) no.10/11, S.22-24
  10. Thornton, G.A.: Physical access to periodical literature : the dilemma revisited and a brief look at the future (1991) 0.01
    0.00901901 = product of:
      0.027057027 = sum of:
        0.027057027 = product of:
          0.054114055 = sum of:
            0.054114055 = weight(_text_:search in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054114055 = score(doc=2851,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17614716 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.30720934 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The debate over how periodical collections are best organised has simmered since the 1940s. Describes Univ. of North Texas Libraries' review of its alphabetically arranged periodical collections and a proposal to classify them. A literature search revealed little information concerning implications or cost of a classification project and few alternate solutions. The topic was developed into a 1990 NASIG workshop, with a participant survey concerning serials organisation. Briefly looks at current developments for improving access to periodical literature
  11. Rotten, C. v.d.: oderzoek naar alternatieve plaatsing : Bijna net zoveel systemen als bibliotheken (1995) 0.01
    0.00801084 = product of:
      0.02403252 = sum of:
        0.02403252 = product of:
          0.04806504 = sum of:
            0.04806504 = weight(_text_:22 in 4660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04806504 = score(doc=4660,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4660, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4660)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheek en samenleving. 23(1995) no.11, S.20-22
  12. Schössow, T.; Christoffersen, A.; Norlem, E.; Christensen, S.: Art in the children's library (1992) 0.01
    0.00801084 = product of:
      0.02403252 = sum of:
        0.02403252 = product of:
          0.04806504 = sum of:
            0.04806504 = weight(_text_:22 in 913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04806504 = score(doc=913,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 913, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=913)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Scandinavian public library quarterly. 25(1992) no.1, S.20-22
  13. Stokmans, M.; Oomens, A.: Meer grasduinen door genreplaatsing? : genre- of alfabetische plaatsing: onderzoek naar verschillen in gebruikersgedrag (1997) 0.01
    0.00801084 = product of:
      0.02403252 = sum of:
        0.02403252 = product of:
          0.04806504 = sum of:
            0.04806504 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04806504 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    BibliotheekBlad. 1(1997) no.21, S.22-23
  14. Lowisch, M.: Gesamthochschulbibliotheken und Klassifikationsentwicklung im Spannungsfeld zwischen Kooperation und lokalen Bedürfnissen (2017) 0.01
    0.00801084 = product of:
      0.02403252 = sum of:
        0.02403252 = product of:
          0.04806504 = sum of:
            0.04806504 = weight(_text_:22 in 5116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04806504 = score(doc=5116,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5116, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5116)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    17. 3.2019 16:22:59
  15. Shorten, J.; Seikel, M.; Ahrberg, J.H.: Why do you still use dewey? : Academic libraries that continue with dewey decimal classification (2005) 0.01
    0.0068664346 = product of:
      0.020599304 = sum of:
        0.020599304 = product of:
          0.041198608 = sum of:
            0.041198608 = weight(_text_:22 in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041198608 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  16. Manzi, S.: Classifying philosophy at the Library of the Scuola Normale Superiore (Pisa, Italy) : Part B: evaluation and experience (2009) 0.01
    0.0068664346 = product of:
      0.020599304 = sum of:
        0.020599304 = product of:
          0.041198608 = sum of:
            0.041198608 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041198608 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    9. 1.2010 14:22:20
  17. Müller-Dreier, A.: Einheitsklassifikation : die Geschichte einer fortwirkenden Idee (1994) 0.01
    0.005722029 = product of:
      0.017166087 = sum of:
        0.017166087 = product of:
          0.034332175 = sum of:
            0.034332175 = weight(_text_:22 in 2052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034332175 = score(doc=2052,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2052, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2052)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Mitteilungsblatt VdB NW N.F. 45(1995) H.3, S.332-333 (H. Lohse) [Auch wenn H. Lohse meint, das Buch bzw. die zugrundeliegende Assessorarbeit hätte nicht geschrieben werden müssen, so liefert doch gerade seine Rezension den Beweis, wie notwendig diese Arbeit war]; BuB 47(1995) H.10, S.955-959 (I. Nöther) ["Diese von einem Berufsanfänger vorgelegte Arbeit ist eine Spitzenleistung, ein Meisterwerk, auf das der Autor, seine Ausbildungsstätte sowie der Verlag und der Herausgeber der Reihe sotz sein können. Für jeden, der sich heute und in Zukunft mit Fragen der Klassifikation befaßt, ist die Lektüre dieses Buches Pflicht"]; Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis 20(1996) H.1, S.134-135 (W. Gödert); Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.3/4, S.178 (B. Lorenz); Journal of documentation 51(1995) no.4, S.434-437 (J.S. Andrews)
  18. Bonse, C.; Fischer, N.: So wird die Sucheffizienz gesteigert : Stadtbibliothek Siegburg stellt nach Kundenbefragung den Bestand fast komplett um (2008) 0.00
    0.00400542 = product of:
      0.01201626 = sum of:
        0.01201626 = product of:
          0.02403252 = sum of:
            0.02403252 = weight(_text_:22 in 1827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02403252 = score(doc=1827,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1827, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1827)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    11. 5.2008 15:11:22