Search (71 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Avram, H.D.: Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC): 1961-1974 (2009) 0.07
    0.06693571 = product of:
      0.10040356 = sum of:
        0.076371044 = weight(_text_:book in 3844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.076371044 = score(doc=3844,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.34138763 = fieldWeight in 3844, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3844)
        0.02403252 = product of:
          0.04806504 = sum of:
            0.04806504 = weight(_text_:22 in 3844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04806504 = score(doc=3844,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3844, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3844)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:53
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/book/10.1081/E-ELIS3.
  2. Green, B.: Towards international standards for book sector EDI (1995) 0.06
    0.058187462 = product of:
      0.17456238 = sum of:
        0.17456238 = weight(_text_:book in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17456238 = score(doc=3895,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.78031456 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the work of the British and European book industry communication stadards organizations BIC (Book Industry Communication) in the UK, EDItEUR (its pan-European counterpart), and BISAC (Book Industry Systems Advisory Committe). The work of the organisations enables collaboration between the publishing, bookselling, library and manufacturing sectors of the industry worldwide. Discusses Electronic Data Interchange (EDI); TeleOrdering; the international EDIFACT standard, EDI with SGML; and published lists of mandatory and recommended data elements for publishers' bibliographic databases
  3. McCallum, S.H.: Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC): 1975-2007 (2009) 0.06
    0.05737347 = product of:
      0.0860602 = sum of:
        0.0654609 = weight(_text_:book in 3841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0654609 = score(doc=3841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.29261798 = fieldWeight in 3841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3841)
        0.020599304 = product of:
          0.041198608 = sum of:
            0.041198608 = weight(_text_:22 in 3841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041198608 = score(doc=3841,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3841, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3841)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Digital unter: http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/E-ELIS3-120044392, Vgl.: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/book/10.1081/E-ELIS3.
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:38
  4. Leeves, J.: EDIBIB: harmonising standards for bibliographic data interchange : a report prepared for Book Industry Communication (1993) 0.05
    0.050391823 = product of:
      0.15117547 = sum of:
        0.15117547 = weight(_text_:book in 9) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15117547 = score(doc=9,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.6757723 = fieldWeight in 9, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=9)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Report commissioned by Book Industry Communications (BIC) and funded by the British National Bibliography Research Fund and the Britsh National Bibliographic Service. The aims of the project were: to review the provisions for bibliographic data within EDIFACT (Electronic Data Interchange for Administration, Commerce and Transport); to compare those provisions with the BIC draft standards for bibliographic databases and the book publishing industry, and to examine the implications for MARC based databases, such as UKMARC
  5. METS: an overview & tutorial : Metadata Encoding & Transmission Standard (METS) (2001) 0.04
    0.0436406 = product of:
      0.1309218 = sum of:
        0.1309218 = weight(_text_:book in 1323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1309218 = score(doc=1323,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.58523595 = fieldWeight in 1323, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1323)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Maintaining a library of digital objects of necessaryy requires maintaining metadata about those objects. The metadata necessary for successful management and use of digital objeets is both more extensive than and different from the metadata used for managing collections of printed works and other physical materials. While a library may record descriptive metadata regarding a book in its collection, the book will not dissolve into a series of unconnected pages if the library fails to record structural metadata regarding the book's organization, nor will scholars be unable to evaluate the book's worth if the library fails to note that the book was produced using a Ryobi offset press. The Same cannot be said for a digital version of the saure book. Without structural metadata, the page image or text files comprising the digital work are of little use, and without technical metadata regarding the digitization process, scholars may be unsure of how accurate a reflection of the original the digital version provides. For internal management purposes, a library must have access to appropriate technical metadata in order to periodically refresh and migrate the data, ensuring the durability of valuable resources.
  6. Maxwell, R.L.: Bibliographic control (2009) 0.03
    0.030858565 = product of:
      0.09257569 = sum of:
        0.09257569 = weight(_text_:book in 3750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09257569 = score(doc=3750,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.41382432 = fieldWeight in 3750, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3750)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliographic control is the process of creation, exchange, preservation, and use of data about information resources. Formal bibliographic control has been practiced for millennia, but modern techniques began to be developed and implemented in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. A series of cataloging codes characterized this period. These codes governed the creation of library catalogs, first in book form, then on cards, and finally in electronic formats, including MAchine-Readable Cataloging (MARC). The period was also characterized by the rise of shared cataloging programs, allowing the development of resource-saving copy cataloging procedures. Such programs were assisted by the development of cataloging networks such as OCLC and RLG. The twentieth century saw progress in the theory of bibliographic control, including the 1961 Paris Principles, culminating with the early twenty-first century Statement of International Cataloguing Principles and IFLA's Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR). Toward the end of the period bibliographic control began to be applied to newly invented electronic media, as "metadata." Trends point toward continued development of collaborative and international approaches to bibliographic control.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/book/10.1081/E-ELIS3.
  7. Eliot, J.: MARC and OPAC systems : discussion document (1994) 0.03
    0.029093731 = product of:
      0.08728119 = sum of:
        0.08728119 = weight(_text_:book in 10) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08728119 = score(doc=10,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.39015728 = fieldWeight in 10, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=10)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    A discussion document produced following a meeting the Users of Book Industry Standards (UBIS) Bibliographic Standards Working Group at the University of London as part of a project to consider the Survey on the use of UK-MARC by Russell Sweeney published in 1991 by the British Library National Bibliographic Service. Considers the suitability, or otherwise, of the UKMARC format for use in OPACs. Summarizes the issues involved, discussing: the UKMARC exchange format, tagging and coding structure (record complexity, analytical entries, non filing indicators), data content (statements of responsibility, main versus added entry) and records standards
  8. German, L.: Bibliographic utilities (2009) 0.03
    0.029093731 = product of:
      0.08728119 = sum of:
        0.08728119 = weight(_text_:book in 3858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08728119 = score(doc=3858,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.39015728 = fieldWeight in 3858, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3858)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Digital unter: http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/E-ELIS3-120044472. Vgl.: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/book/10.1081/E-ELIS3.
  9. Mönch, C.; Aalberg, T.: Automatic conversion from MARC to FRBR (2003) 0.03
    0.027387565 = product of:
      0.08216269 = sum of:
        0.08216269 = sum of:
          0.047830522 = weight(_text_:search in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047830522 = score(doc=2422,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17614716 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050679956 = queryNorm
              0.27153727 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
          0.034332175 = weight(_text_:22 in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034332175 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050679956 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Catalogs have for centuries been the main tool that enabled users to search for items in a library by author, title, or subject. A catalog can be interpreted as a set of bibliographic records, where each record acts as a surrogate for a publication. Every record describes a specific publication and contains the data that is used to create the indexes of search systems and the information that is presented to the user. Bibliographic records are often captured and exchanged by the use of the MARC format. Although there are numerous rdquodialectsrdquo of the MARC format in use, they are usually crafted on the same basis and are interoperable with each other -to a certain extent. The data model of a MARC-based catalog, however, is rdquo[...] extremely non-normalized with excessive replication of datardquo [1]. For instance, a literary work that exists in numerous editions and translations is likely to yield a large result set because each edition or translation is represented by an individual record, that is unrelated to other records that describe the same work.
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
  10. Frias, J.A.: Revisiones, desarollo y perspectivas de la ISBD (1996) 0.02
    0.0218203 = product of:
      0.0654609 = sum of:
        0.0654609 = weight(_text_:book in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0654609 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.29261798 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    An examination of the chief developments over the last decade, covering the revisions of the standards for monographs (M), serials (S), cartographic materials (CM); and non-book materials (NBM) published in 1987; and revisions of antiquarian (A) and printed music (PM) standards published in 1991. The process of development of new standards for computer files (CF) and component parts (CP), and the creation of a concise version for mongraphy, is discussed in detail, in the overall perspective of illustrating why ISBD has gained international acceptance. The consultative process of creation and willingness to accomodate diverse cultural, linguistic and bibliographical traditions is the basis, together with universal recognition of the need for standardisation for conversion and use of computerised data. Future developments will focus on standardisation of exchange formats (MARC)
  11. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.02
    0.019421212 = product of:
      0.058263633 = sum of:
        0.058263633 = product of:
          0.11652727 = sum of:
            0.11652727 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11652727 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  12. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02
    0.018310493 = product of:
      0.054931477 = sum of:
        0.054931477 = product of:
          0.10986295 = sum of:
            0.10986295 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10986295 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  13. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02
    0.01602168 = product of:
      0.04806504 = sum of:
        0.04806504 = product of:
          0.09613008 = sum of:
            0.09613008 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09613008 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  14. Geißelmann, F.: Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000) 0.02
    0.01602168 = product of:
      0.04806504 = sum of:
        0.04806504 = product of:
          0.09613008 = sum of:
            0.09613008 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09613008 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    26. 8.2000 19:22:35
  15. Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001) 0.02
    0.01602168 = product of:
      0.04806504 = sum of:
        0.04806504 = product of:
          0.09613008 = sum of:
            0.09613008 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09613008 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
  16. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.02
    0.01602168 = product of:
      0.04806504 = sum of:
        0.04806504 = product of:
          0.09613008 = sum of:
            0.09613008 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09613008 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  17. Byrne, D.J.: MARC manual : understanding and using MARC records (1998) 0.01
    0.013732869 = product of:
      0.041198608 = sum of:
        0.041198608 = product of:
          0.082397215 = sum of:
            0.082397215 = weight(_text_:22 in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.082397215 = score(doc=6077,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    2. 8.2001 16:22:33
  18. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.01
    0.012947474 = product of:
      0.03884242 = sum of:
        0.03884242 = product of:
          0.07768484 = sum of:
            0.07768484 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07768484 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  19. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.01
    0.012947474 = product of:
      0.03884242 = sum of:
        0.03884242 = product of:
          0.07768484 = sum of:
            0.07768484 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07768484 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  20. Paulus, W.; Weishaupt, K.: Bibliotheksdaten werden mehr wert : LibLink wertet bibliothekarische Dienstleistung auf (1996) 0.01
    0.011444058 = product of:
      0.034332175 = sum of:
        0.034332175 = product of:
          0.06866435 = sum of:
            0.06866435 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06866435 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 9.1996 18:58:22

Years

Languages

  • e 54
  • d 12
  • sp 2
  • f 1
  • pl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 62
  • s 5
  • el 3
  • b 2
  • m 2
  • n 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…