Search (21 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Kataloganreicherung"
  1. Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978) 0.13
    0.13387142 = product of:
      0.20080712 = sum of:
        0.15274209 = weight(_text_:book in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15274209 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.68277526 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
        0.04806504 = product of:
          0.09613008 = sum of:
            0.09613008 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09613008 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
  2. DeHart, F.E.; Matthews, K.: Subject enhancements and OPACs : planning ahead (1990) 0.08
    0.07622548 = product of:
      0.11433822 = sum of:
        0.08728119 = weight(_text_:book in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08728119 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.39015728 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
        0.027057027 = product of:
          0.054114055 = sum of:
            0.054114055 = weight(_text_:search in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054114055 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17614716 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.30720934 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    As librarians plan ahead to make subject enhancements available to online searchers in various possible file locations and formats, they may want to base their decisions on implications for online searching. This paper explores some of these implications with respect to unique and misleading terminology in tables of contents, Choice abstracts, and reviews from Computing reviews for thirty-six books on information and computer science chosen from the 1987 issues of Choice. It also discusses possible interacting functions in the search process served by these subject enhancements, assigned LCSH, and book title terminology
  3. Wormell, I.: Subject Access Project : the use of book indexes for subject retrieval systems in libraries (1981) 0.05
    0.05091403 = product of:
      0.15274209 = sum of:
        0.15274209 = weight(_text_:book in 3116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15274209 = score(doc=3116,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.68277526 = fieldWeight in 3116, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3116)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  4. Makinen, R.H.; Friesen B.: Enhancing online bibliographic records to improve retrieval of reference collection monographs (1995) 0.04
    0.036367163 = product of:
      0.10910148 = sum of:
        0.10910148 = weight(_text_:book in 1700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10910148 = score(doc=1700,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.4876966 = fieldWeight in 1700, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1700)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports a project to enhance the records of the reference book collection, held on the online catalogue of the Minnesota University, Bio-Medical Library, with tables of contents or summaries; and to keyword index the enhancement fields to improve searching
  5. Mandel, C.: Enriching the library catalog record for subject access (1985) 0.03
    0.029093731 = product of:
      0.08728119 = sum of:
        0.08728119 = weight(_text_:book in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08728119 = score(doc=1067,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.39015728 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper analyzes proposals for augmenting library bibliographic records for improved subject searching in online catalogs. Possible fields for enrichment are described and their likely value assessed. The assessment determines that the main value of enriched records would be to provide access to parts of books. The paper presents arguments for and against adding book content indexing to the online catalog and analyzes the feasibility of eleven alternatives for providing such information
  6. Beatty, S.: Subject enrichment using contents or index terms : the Australian Defence Force Academy experience (1992) 0.03
    0.025457015 = product of:
      0.076371044 = sum of:
        0.076371044 = weight(_text_:book in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.076371044 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.34138763 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In 1986, all titles added to the collection at the Australian Defence Force Academy Library, are processed through their OPAC via a subject enhancement procedure (ESP). The procedure used for subject enhancement is based on the techniques developed by P.A. Atherton and B. Settel during the Subject Access Project at Syracuse Univ., 1977. Terms are selected from contents pages or the index of the book, depending on whether the terms are content bearing, and whether the terms refer to 5 or more pages of text. This results in the addition of an average of 73 words or 20 phrases to each MARC record. The terms are keyed into the MARC field 653 using in house modifications of the library's URICA system
  7. Weintraub, T.S.; Shimoguchi, W.: Catalog record contents enhancement (1993) 0.03
    0.025457015 = product of:
      0.076371044 = sum of:
        0.076371044 = weight(_text_:book in 4650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.076371044 = score(doc=4650,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.34138763 = fieldWeight in 4650, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4650)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Contents enhancement of catalog records may increase access to books in collections and aid in effective resource sharing by providing more detailed descriptions about library holdings in the catalog. A sample of monographs in San Diego State Univ. Library was studied to determine the extent to which information in books from parts of the collection could be represented better by content notes, and to determine how much of this information has subject or analytical applications. The study revealed that approximately 23% of the books contain discrete content information not already represented in catalog records that could be added. Of those, 52% would be citation-based enhancements and 48% would be subject-based. Nearly 65% would require fewer than 25 enhancements, with an average of 8.03 enhancements per book for the total population
  8. Cousins, S.A.: Enhancing subject access to OPACs : controlled vocabulary vs. natural language (1992) 0.02
    0.0218203 = product of:
      0.0654609 = sum of:
        0.0654609 = weight(_text_:book in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0654609 = score(doc=2230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.29261798 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Experimental evidence suggests that enhancing the subject content of OPAC records can improve retrieval performance. This is based on the use of natural language index terms derived from the table of contents and back-of-the-book index of documents. The research reported here investigates the alternative approach of translating these natural language terms into controlled vocabulary. Subject queries were collected by interview at the catalogue, and indexing of the queries demonstrated the impressive ability of PRECIS, and to a lesser extent LCSH, to represent users' information needs. DDC performed poorly in this respect. The assumption was made that an index language adequately specific to represent users' queries should be adequate to represent document contents. Searches were carried out on three test databases, and both natural language and PRECIS enhancement of MARC records increased the number of relevant documents found, with PRECIS showing the better performance. However, with weak stemming the advantage of PRECIS was lost. Consideration must also be given to the potential advantages of controlled vocabulary, over and above basic retrieval performance measures
  9. Diodato, V.: Tables of contents and book indexes : how well do they match readers' descriptions of books? (1986) 0.02
    0.0218203 = product of:
      0.0654609 = sum of:
        0.0654609 = weight(_text_:book in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0654609 = score(doc=376,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2237077 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.29261798 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  10. Barnes, S.; McCue, J.: Linking library records to bibliographic databases : an analysis of common data elements in BIOSIS, Agricola, and the OPAC (1991) 0.02
    0.018174257 = product of:
      0.054522768 = sum of:
        0.054522768 = sum of:
          0.027057027 = weight(_text_:search in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027057027 = score(doc=520,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17614716 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050679956 = queryNorm
              0.15360467 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
          0.027465738 = weight(_text_:22 in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027465738 = score(doc=520,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050679956 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Myriad new information resources are available to contemporary library users. While print remains the foundation of most collections, libraries are also beginning to provide access to an array of bibliographic, numeric, and full-text databases. As more and more information is produced in electronic form and presented at computer workstations, the library catalog is being given an expanded role. The expanded catalog will play a crucial part in organizing information in electronic libraries, and in providing navigational assistance to library users. Like the traditional card catalog, the expanded catalog will not only lead to specific items or groups of sources, but also will provide connections to related materials. These connections will uses standard data elements to link the results of a search in one database with related material in another. For example, links will show local library holdings of sources in citation databases. Cornell University's Mann Library serves the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, the College of Human Ecology, and the Division of Biological Sciences. As part of electronic library development, Mann staff have been analyzing issues involved in making it possible for Agricola and BIOSIS users to see, automatically, which of their retrieved citations are from sources available in the Cornell libraries. Samples of citations from Agricola and BIOSIS were drawn, and data elements present in these records were compared with bibliographic records of the library's holdings. In some cases, links would be provided by ISSNs. The study shows, however, that the presence of standard identifiers such as ISSN, USBN, or CODEN cannot be assumed, and other linking algorithms must be developed. This article presents study results, provides an overview of several linking systems, and identifies some of the difficulties caused by lack of standardization between different bibliographic databases. It is clear that the concept of an expanded catalog will require not only links between information resources but agreements among information professionals on standard data elements.
    Date
    8. 1.2007 17:22:25
  11. Ingwersen, P.; Wormell, I.: Modern indexing and retrieval techniques matching different types of information needs (1989) 0.02
    0.01602168 = product of:
      0.04806504 = sum of:
        0.04806504 = product of:
          0.09613008 = sum of:
            0.09613008 = weight(_text_:22 in 7322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09613008 = score(doc=7322,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7322, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7322)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 14(1989), S.17-22
  12. Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Colenbrander-Dijkman, A.-M.: Subject access to central catalogues : incompatibility issues of library classification systems and subject headings in subject cataloguing (1986) 0.01
    0.011716037 = product of:
      0.03514811 = sum of:
        0.03514811 = product of:
          0.07029622 = sum of:
            0.07029622 = weight(_text_:search in 3926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07029622 = score(doc=3926,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.17614716 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.39907667 = fieldWeight in 3926, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3926)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Traditional subject cataloguing hampers subject retrieval in central catalogues, because of the lack of a common indexing and retrieval language in these catalogues. This study investigates the possibilities to use the various individual subject access systems, present in the catalogues, for subject access. A search procedure based on 'citation pearl growing' and 'user relevance feedback', which can be applied in a public access interface to central data bases, has been developed. From an experiment it can be concluded, that automated expert assistance, provided with a search strategy, will improve search response for unexperienced searchers. It reduces the number of zero-hits and increases the number of relevant items retrieved
  13. Wu, S.: Implementing bibliographic enhancement data in academic library catalogs : an empirical study (2024) 0.01
    0.007891634 = product of:
      0.0236749 = sum of:
        0.0236749 = product of:
          0.0473498 = sum of:
            0.0473498 = weight(_text_:search in 1159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0473498 = score(doc=1159,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17614716 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.2688082 = fieldWeight in 1159, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1159)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This study examines users' needs for bibliographic enhancement data (BIBED) in academic library catalogs. Qualitative data were collected through 30 academic users' activity logs and follow-up interviews. These 30 participants were recruited from a public university in the United States that has over 19,000 students enrolled and over 600 full-time faculty members. This study identified 19 types of BIBED useful for supporting the five user tasks proposed in the IFLA Library Reference Model and in seven other contexts, such as enhancing one's understanding, offering search instructions, and providing readers' advisory. Findings suggest that adopting BIBFRAME and Semantic Web technologies may enable academic library catalogs to provide BIBED to better meet user needs in various contexts.
  14. Lam, V.-T.: Enhancing subject access to monographs in Online Public Access Catalogs : table of contents added to bibliographic records (2000) 0.01
    0.0068664346 = product of:
      0.020599304 = sum of:
        0.020599304 = product of:
          0.041198608 = sum of:
            0.041198608 = weight(_text_:22 in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041198608 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  15. Leissing, U.; Rädler, K.; Hauer, M.: Query-Expansion durch Fachthesauri : Erfahrungsbericht zu dandelon.com, Vorarlberger Parlamentsinformationssystem und vorarlberg.at (2010) 0.01
    0.0068664346 = product of:
      0.020599304 = sum of:
        0.020599304 = product of:
          0.041198608 = sum of:
            0.041198608 = weight(_text_:22 in 3728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041198608 = score(doc=3728,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3728, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3728)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  16. Kartus, E.: ¬A fully automated cataloguing workbench with enhanced subject access : the cataloguer's dream or nightmare? (1993) 0.01
    0.006764257 = product of:
      0.02029277 = sum of:
        0.02029277 = product of:
          0.04058554 = sum of:
            0.04058554 = weight(_text_:search in 4651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04058554 = score(doc=4651,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17614716 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.230407 = fieldWeight in 4651, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4651)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the Intelligent Literature Search Assistant (ILSA) which demonstrates the possibilities of a fully automated cataloguing workbench in an object orientated environment. Although developed with OPAC users in mind, it can be very useful to cataloguers in aiding both classification and subject heading access. Also describes work done at the University of Strathclyde in the area of machine learning and knowledge based systems, the Structured Information Management: Processing and Retrieval project (SIMPR). Advocates the use of uncontrolled vocabulary headings in conjunction with systems like ILSA, a layered approach rather than direct first point access, in order to make subject cataloguing easier and more relevant and the subject catalogue more useful to others
  17. Hauer, M.: Neue OPACs braucht das Land ... dandelon.com (2006) 0.01
    0.006764257 = product of:
      0.02029277 = sum of:
        0.02029277 = product of:
          0.04058554 = sum of:
            0.04058554 = weight(_text_:search in 6047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04058554 = score(doc=6047,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17614716 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.230407 = fieldWeight in 6047, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6047)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In dandelon.com werden im Gegensatz zu den bisherigen Federated Search-Portal-Ansätzen die Titel von Medien neu mittels intelligentCAPTURE dezentral und kollaborativ erschlossen und inhaltlich stark erweitert. intelligentCAPTURE erschließt maschinell bisher Buchinhaltsverzeichnisse, Bücher, Klappentexte, Aufsätze und Websites, übernimmt bibliografische Daten aus Bibliotheken (XML, Z.39.50), von Verlagen (ONIX + Cover Pages), Zeitschriftenagenturen (Swets) und Buchhandel (SOAP) und exportierte maschinelle Indexate und aufbereitete Dokumente an die Bibliothekskataloge (MAB, MARC, XML) oder Dokumentationssysteme, an dandelon.com und teils auch an Fachportale. Die Daten werden durch Scanning und OCR, durch Import von Dateien und Lookup auf Server und durch Web-Spidering/-Crawling gewonnen. Die Qualität der Suche in dandelon.com ist deutlich besser als in bisherigen Bibliothekssystemen. Die semantische, multilinguale Suche mit derzeit 1,2 Millionen Fachbegriffen trägt zu den guten Suchergebnissen stark bei.
  18. Rädler, K.: Kataloganreicherung mit digitalen Inhaltsverzeichnissen eröffnet neue Geschäftsfelder : Erfahrungen aus der Vorarlberger Landesbibliothek (2008) 0.01
    0.005722029 = product of:
      0.017166087 = sum of:
        0.017166087 = product of:
          0.034332175 = sum of:
            0.034332175 = weight(_text_:22 in 1942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034332175 = score(doc=1942,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1942, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1942)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2008 17:14:24
  19. Hauer, M.: Collaborative Catalog Enrichment : Digitalisierung und Information Retrieval (2011) 0.01
    0.005722029 = product of:
      0.017166087 = sum of:
        0.017166087 = product of:
          0.034332175 = sum of:
            0.034332175 = weight(_text_:22 in 160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034332175 = score(doc=160,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 160, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=160)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  20. Ikas, W.-V.; Litten, F.: World Wide Web und Catalogue Enrichment : Möglichkeiten des verbesserten Nachweises von mikroverfilmten Handschriften und Inkunabeln (2007) 0.00
    0.004577623 = product of:
      0.013732869 = sum of:
        0.013732869 = product of:
          0.027465738 = sum of:
            0.027465738 = weight(_text_:22 in 323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027465738 = score(doc=323,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679956 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 323, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=323)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2007 11:19:21