Search (75 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Suchmaschinen"
  1. Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000) 0.16
    0.15658115 = product of:
      0.3131623 = sum of:
        0.3131623 = sum of:
          0.21652333 = weight(_text_:news in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.21652333 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05094824 = queryNorm
              0.8107823 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
          0.09663896 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09663896 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05094824 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25. 8.2005 17:42:22
    Source
    Library and information research news. 24(2000) no.77, S.30-34
  2. Duval, B.K.; Main, L.: Searching on the Net : general overview (1996) 0.09
    0.089474946 = product of:
      0.17894989 = sum of:
        0.17894989 = sum of:
          0.12372762 = weight(_text_:news in 7268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12372762 = score(doc=7268,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05094824 = queryNorm
              0.4633042 = fieldWeight in 7268, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7268)
          0.055222265 = weight(_text_:22 in 7268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055222265 = score(doc=7268,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05094824 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7268, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7268)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    First of a 3 part series discussing how to access and use Web search engines on the Internet. Distinguishes between FTP sites, Gopher sites, Usenet News sites and Web sites. Considers subject searching versus keyword; how to improve search strategies and success rates; bookmarks; Yahoo!, Lycos; InfoSeek; Magellan; Excite; Inktomi; HotBot and AltaVista
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  3. Duval, B.K.; Main, L.: Searching the Internet : part 2 trail-blazers (1997) 0.07
    0.0671062 = product of:
      0.1342124 = sum of:
        0.1342124 = sum of:
          0.092795715 = weight(_text_:news in 858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.092795715 = score(doc=858,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05094824 = queryNorm
              0.34747815 = fieldWeight in 858, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=858)
          0.041416697 = weight(_text_:22 in 858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041416697 = score(doc=858,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05094824 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 858, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=858)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a guide to searching for information on the Internet covering Research-It; familiar quotations: a collection of passages, phrases and proverbs traced to their sources in ancient and modern literature by John Bartlett; the Internet Public Library Reference Center; SearchERIC Database; Britannica Online; Britannica's Lives; The complete works of William Shakespeare; Flicks/Movie Schedules and Reviews; the Electronic Newsstand; CNN Interactive; Time Warner's Pathfinder; Electronic Newspapers from all 50 States; Yahoo, News; Newspapers; Techweb; ZDNet; the On-line Books Page; Columbia University Bartleby Library; the Children's Literature Web Guide; National Institutes of Health; US Census Bureau; Earthquake Info; US Postal Service Zip+4 Lookup; the Federal Web Locator; World Wide Web Virtual Library; US Government Information Sources; Index of the Constitution of the US; US States Code; Find California Code; Dearch for Bills; California Tenant's Rights; The Online Career Center; QuickAID Home Page; City.Net; Netscape's Destinations Button; International Telephone Directory; World Alumni Net; Archives of Adoptees and Birth Parents; and World Wide Registry Matching Adoptees with Birth Parents
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  4. Keith, S.: Searching for news headlines : connections between unresolved hyperlinking issues and a new battle over copyright online (2007) 0.05
    0.054130834 = product of:
      0.10826167 = sum of:
        0.10826167 = product of:
          0.21652333 = sum of:
            0.21652333 = weight(_text_:news in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21652333 = score(doc=351,freq=32.0), product of:
                0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05094824 = queryNorm
                0.8107823 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
                  5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                    32.0 = termFreq=32.0
                  5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In March 2005, the Paris-based news service Agence France Presse (AFP) sued Google Inc. in an American court, charging that the search engine's news aggregator program had illegally infringed the wire service's copyright. The lawsuit, filed in the u.s. District Court for the District of Columbia, claimed that Google News had engaged in the infringement since its launch in September 2002 by »reproducing and publicly displaying AFP's photographs, headlines, and story leads« . The claim also said that Google News had ignored requests that it cease and desist the infringement, and it asked for more than $17 million (about 13.6 million Euros) in damages. Within a few days, Google News was removing links t0 Agence France Presse news articles and photographs.1 However, Agence France Presse said it would still pursue the lawsuit because 0f the licensing fees it was owed as a result of what it claimed was Google's past copyright infringement. The case, which was still pending in early 2007, as the sides struggled to reconstruct and evaluate specific past Google News pageso, was interesting for several reasons. First, it pitted the company that owns the world's most popular search engine against the world's oldest news service; Agence France Presse was founded in Paris in 1835 by Charles-Louis Havas, sometimes known as the father of global journalismo. Second, the copyright-infringement allegations made by AFP had not been made by most of the 4,500 or so other news organizations whose material is used in exactly the same way on Google News every day, though Google did lose somewhat similar cases in German and Belgian courts in 2004 and 2006, respectively. Third, AFP's assertions and Google's counter claims offer an intriguing argument about the nature of key components of traditional and new-media journalism, especially news headlines. Finally, the case warrants further examination because it is essentially an argument over the fundamental nature of Internet hyperlinking. Some commentators have noted that a ruling against Google could be disastrous for blogs, which also often quote news storieso, while other commentators have concluded that a victory for Agence France Presse would call into question the future of online news aggregatorso. This chapter uses the Agence France Presse lawsuit as a way to examine arguments about the legality of news aggregator links to copyrighted material. Using traditional legal research methods, it attempts to put the case into context by referring to key u.s. and European Internet hyperlinking lawsuits from the 1990s through 2006. The chapter also discusses the nature of specific traditional journalistic forms such as headlines and story leads and whether they can be copyrighted. Finally, the chapter argues that out-of-court settlements and conflicting court rulings have left considerable ambiguity around the intersection of copyright, free speech, and information-cataloging concerns, leaving Google News and other aggregators vulnerable to claims of copyright infringement.
  5. Webber, S.: Search engines and news services : developments on the Internet (1998) 0.05
    0.051874384 = product of:
      0.10374877 = sum of:
        0.10374877 = product of:
          0.20749754 = sum of:
            0.20749754 = weight(_text_:news in 5103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20749754 = score(doc=5103,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05094824 = queryNorm
                0.7769848 = fieldWeight in 5103, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5103)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Focuses on some issues relating to Internet search engines, (such as Alta Vista, HotBot and Yahoo!) and their use in news information Web sites on the Internet, some of the ways in which search engine providers are trying to improve searching performance and some of the choices facing information providers. Reviews ways in which search engine providers are responding to the challenge of improving searching, including: adding a selective, browsable database as an alternative; including only home pages (producing fewer hits) and browsability; adding company information; adjusting the weightings on their relevance rankings; building up searches; and allowing Boolean logic and field searching. Also examines the options facing providers of news information on the Internet, particularly primary sources such as newspapers, news agencies and television companies. Discusses issues such as: whether or not to charge; the types of hyperlinks to provide; whether or not to partner and become a portal; the desirability of electronic mail alert; and the acceptability of news aggregation
  6. Brenner, E.: Search engine conference looks to the future (1998) 0.05
    0.046397857 = product of:
      0.092795715 = sum of:
        0.092795715 = product of:
          0.18559143 = sum of:
            0.18559143 = weight(_text_:news in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18559143 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05094824 = queryNorm
                0.6949563 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech news. 1998, no.153, S.14,30
  7. Notess, G.R.: ¬The InfoSeek databases (1995) 0.04
    0.043744322 = product of:
      0.087488644 = sum of:
        0.087488644 = product of:
          0.17497729 = sum of:
            0.17497729 = weight(_text_:news in 3380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17497729 = score(doc=3380,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05094824 = queryNorm
                0.6552111 = fieldWeight in 3380, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3380)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    InfoSeek is a new full text search service that enabling searching of the WWW pages, USENET News, over 50 computer magazoines, newspaper newswires and press releases, company profiles, movie reviews, and technical support databases. It is aiming the Internet and computer user market, combining computer news and business databases with an easy interface and competitive pricing. Describes the databases offered, and pricing structure. The WWW Pages Database is the most heavily used database
  8. Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents 0.04
    0.040459655 = product of:
      0.08091931 = sum of:
        0.08091931 = product of:
          0.24275793 = sum of:
            0.24275793 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24275793 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.43193975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05094824 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
  9. Vise, D.A.; Malseed, M.: ¬The Google story (2005) 0.04
    0.039145287 = product of:
      0.078290574 = sum of:
        0.078290574 = sum of:
          0.054130834 = weight(_text_:news in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.054130834 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05094824 = queryNorm
              0.20269558 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
          0.02415974 = weight(_text_:22 in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02415974 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05094824 = queryNorm
              0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Social phenomena happen, and the historians follow. So it goes with Google, the latest star shooting through the universe of trend-setting businesses. This company has even entered our popular lexicon: as many note, "Google" has moved beyond noun to verb, becoming an action which most tech-savvy citizens at the turn of the twenty-first century recognize and in fact do, on a daily basis. It's this wide societal impact that fascinated authors David Vise and Mark Malseed, who came to the book with well-established reputations in investigative reporting. Vise authored the bestselling The Bureau and the Mole, and Malseed contributed significantly to two Bob Woodward books, Bush at War and Plan of Attack. The kind of voluminous research and behind-the-scenes insight in which both writers specialize, and on which their earlier books rested, comes through in The Google Story. The strength of the book comes from its command of many small details, and its focus on the human side of the Google story, as opposed to the merely academic one. Some may prefer a dryer, more analytic approach to Google's impact on the Internet, like The Search or books that tilt more heavily towards bits and bytes on the spectrum between technology and business, like The Singularity is Near. Those wanting to understand the motivations and personal growth of founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin and CEO Eric Schmidt, however, will enjoy this book. Vise and Malseed interviewed over 150 people, including numerous Google employees, Wall Street analysts, Stanford professors, venture capitalists, even Larry Page's Cub Scout leader, and their comprehensiveness shows. As the narrative unfolds, readers learn how Google grew out of the intellectually fertile and not particularly directed friendship between Page and Brin; how the founders attempted to peddle early versions of their search technology to different Silicon Valley firms for $1 million; how Larry and Sergey celebrated their first investor's check with breakfast at Burger King; how the pair initially housed their company in a Palo Alto office, then eventually moved to a futuristic campus dubbed the "Googleplex"; how the company found its financial footing through keyword-targeted Web ads; how various products like Google News, Froogle, and others were cooked up by an inventive staff; how Brin and Page proved their mettle as tough businessmen through negotiations with AOL Europe and their controversial IPO process, among other instances; and how the company's vision for itself continues to grow, such as geographic expansion to China and cooperation with Craig Venter on the Human Genome Project. Like the company it profiles, The Google Story is a bit of a wild ride, and fun, too. Its first appendix lists 23 "tips" which readers can use to get more utility out of Google. The second contains the intelligence test which Google Research offers to prospective job applicants, and shows the sometimes zany methods of this most unusual business. Through it all, Vise and Malseed synthesize a variety of fascinating anecdotes and speculation about Google, and readers seeking a first draft of the history of the company will enjoy an easy read.
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
  10. Northern Light demonstrates Industry Search (1998) 0.04
    0.03866488 = product of:
      0.07732976 = sum of:
        0.07732976 = product of:
          0.15465952 = sum of:
            0.15465952 = weight(_text_:news in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15465952 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05094824 = queryNorm
                0.57913023 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Northern Light Technology have demonstrated Industry Search, an enhancement to its Northern Light service providing full text coverage of company and industry news, management practices and market research information via the WWW
  11. Force, R.: Keeping up with Google : Resources and strategies for staying ahead of the pack (2005) 0.04
    0.03827628 = product of:
      0.07655256 = sum of:
        0.07655256 = product of:
          0.15310512 = sum of:
            0.15310512 = weight(_text_:news in 352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15310512 = score(doc=352,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05094824 = queryNorm
                0.5733097 = fieldWeight in 352, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=352)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Librarians need to be the Google experts in their community since it enables librarians to be more competent in educating users. To keep up with the developments of Google the authors reviewed eleven Web sites and blogs and create a strategy for keeping up using these sites. Three are highly recommended for a keeping-up regimen. The authors also suggest that librarians either use search engine alerting services or RSS technology to deliver news feeds into a news aggregator in their keeping-up regimen.
  12. Peek, R.: Wanting to be everything to everyone : Web search engines/directories battle to be your portal of choice (1998) 0.03
    0.027065417 = product of:
      0.054130834 = sum of:
        0.054130834 = product of:
          0.10826167 = sum of:
            0.10826167 = weight(_text_:news in 3520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10826167 = score(doc=3520,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05094824 = queryNorm
                0.40539116 = fieldWeight in 3520, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3520)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    One difference between a portal and a mere search engine is that portals are now the recipients of investments from major media interests, a trend which may have important ramifications for the Web publishing. Points to AOL as a successful portal, quotes a compilation of 10 favourite Web activities and examines the contents of a portal, typically a search engine or directory plus free e-mail but also news services. A significant trend is for portals to replicate themselves in different languages. Presents a list of the big portal players
  13. MacLeod, R.: Promoting a subject gateway : a case study from EEVL (Edinburgh Engineering Virtual Library) (2000) 0.02
    0.024405023 = product of:
      0.048810046 = sum of:
        0.048810046 = product of:
          0.09762009 = sum of:
            0.09762009 = weight(_text_:22 in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09762009 = score(doc=4872,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05094824 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:40:22
  14. Vidmar, D.J.: Darwin on the Web : the evolution of search tools (1999) 0.02
    0.02415974 = product of:
      0.04831948 = sum of:
        0.04831948 = product of:
          0.09663896 = sum of:
            0.09663896 = weight(_text_:22 in 3175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09663896 = score(doc=3175,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05094824 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3175, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3175)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Computers in libraries. 19(1999) no.5, S.22-28
  15. Dunning, A.: Do we still need search engines? (1999) 0.02
    0.02415974 = product of:
      0.04831948 = sum of:
        0.04831948 = product of:
          0.09663896 = sum of:
            0.09663896 = weight(_text_:22 in 6021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09663896 = score(doc=6021,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05094824 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6021, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6021)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Ariadne. 1999, no.22
  16. Bawden, D.: Google and the universe of knowledge (2008) 0.02
    0.02415974 = product of:
      0.04831948 = sum of:
        0.04831948 = product of:
          0.09663896 = sum of:
            0.09663896 = weight(_text_:22 in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09663896 = score(doc=844,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05094824 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7. 6.2008 16:22:20
  17. Bladow, N.; Dorey, C.; Frederickson, L.; Grover, P.; Knudtson, Y.; Krishnamurthy, S.; Lazarou, V.: What's the Buzz about? : An empirical examination of Search on Yahoo! (2005) 0.02
    0.023198929 = product of:
      0.046397857 = sum of:
        0.046397857 = product of:
          0.092795715 = sum of:
            0.092795715 = weight(_text_:news in 3072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.092795715 = score(doc=3072,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05094824 = queryNorm
                0.34747815 = fieldWeight in 3072, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3072)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    We present an analysis of the Yahoo Buzz Index over a period of 45 weeks. Our key findings are that: (1) It is most common for a search term to show up on the index for one week, followed by two weeks, three weeks, etc. Only two terms persist for all 45 weeks studied - Britney Spears and Jennifer Lopez. Search term longevity follows a power-law distribution or a winner-take-all structure; (2) Most search terms focus on entertainment. Search terms related to serious topics are found less often. The Buzz Index does not necessarily follow the "news cycle"; and, (3) We provide two ways to determine "star power" of various search terms - one that emphasizes staying power on the Index and another that emphasizes rank. In general, the methods lead to dramatically different results. Britney Spears performs well in both methods. We conclude that the data available on the Index is symptomatic of a celebrity-crazed, entertainment-centered culture.
  18. Birmingham, J.: Internet search engines (1996) 0.02
    0.020708349 = product of:
      0.041416697 = sum of:
        0.041416697 = product of:
          0.082833394 = sum of:
            0.082833394 = weight(_text_:22 in 5664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.082833394 = score(doc=5664,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05094824 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5664, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5664)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10.11.1996 16:36:22
  19. Hock, R.E.: How to do field searching in Web search engines : a field trip (1998) 0.02
    0.01952402 = product of:
      0.03904804 = sum of:
        0.03904804 = product of:
          0.07809608 = sum of:
            0.07809608 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07809608 = score(doc=3601,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05094824 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.3, S.18-22
  20. Calishain, T.; Dornfest, R.; Adam, D.J.: Google Pocket Guide (2003) 0.02
    0.01933244 = product of:
      0.03866488 = sum of:
        0.03866488 = product of:
          0.07732976 = sum of:
            0.07732976 = weight(_text_:news in 6) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07732976 = score(doc=6,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05094824 = queryNorm
                0.28956512 = fieldWeight in 6, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: CD Info. 2003, H.10, S.12: "Der Aufwand bei der Internet-Recherche hat sich mit guten Suchmaschinen wie Google verringert. Trotzdem verbringt der Computeranwender eine Menge Zeit mit dem Öffnen und Schließen von Webseiten, die er nie benötigt hätte. Wer die Arbeitsweise und die Möglichkeiten von Google kennt, kann die Suche besser eingrenzen und gelangt oft direkter zur gewünschten Homepage. Der Google Pocket Guide erläutert die Funktionsweise des am meisten verwendeten Suchtools, gibt Tipps zur optimalen Nutzung und liefert gleich einige konkrete Beispiele für deren Verwendung. Neben den Optionen der Erweiterten Suche widmet sich das kleine Taschenbuch auch der Syntax der Website, sodass die Befehle direkt in die Suchmaske eingegeben werden können. Auch Zusatz-Features wie die Bildersuche, der Webkatalog, die Newsgroup-Datenbank sowie der seit Kurzem auch in deutscher Sprache verfügbare News-Bereich werden behandelt. Der Google Pocket Guide erläutert kurz und bündig die wichtigsten Techniken und hilft Zeit und Aufwand zu sparen. Der brandneue Titel ist derzeit leider nur in Englisch verfügbar."

Types

  • a 69
  • el 7
  • m 3
  • More… Less…