-
Sheridan, P.; Ballerini, J.P.; Schäuble, P.: Building a large multilingual test collection from comparable news documents (1998)
0.05
0.046397857 = product of:
0.092795715 = sum of:
0.092795715 = product of:
0.18559143 = sum of:
0.18559143 = weight(_text_:news in 6298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18559143 = score(doc=6298,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
0.05094824 = queryNorm
0.6949563 = fieldWeight in 6298, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6298)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Fuhr, N.; Niewelt, B.: ¬Ein Retrievaltest mit automatisch indexierten Dokumenten (1984)
0.02
0.02415974 = product of:
0.04831948 = sum of:
0.04831948 = product of:
0.09663896 = sum of:
0.09663896 = weight(_text_:22 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09663896 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05094824 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20.10.2000 12:22:23
-
Tomaiuolo, N.G.; Parker, J.: Maximizing relevant retrieval : keyword and natural language searching (1998)
0.02
0.02415974 = product of:
0.04831948 = sum of:
0.04831948 = product of:
0.09663896 = sum of:
0.09663896 = weight(_text_:22 in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09663896 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05094824 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.57-58
-
Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.: Overview of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6) (2000)
0.02
0.02415974 = product of:
0.04831948 = sum of:
0.04831948 = product of:
0.09663896 = sum of:
0.09663896 = weight(_text_:22 in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09663896 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05094824 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 11. 8.2001 16:22:19
-
Dalrymple, P.W.: Retrieval by reformulation in two library catalogs : toward a cognitive model of searching behavior (1990)
0.02
0.02415974 = product of:
0.04831948 = sum of:
0.04831948 = product of:
0.09663896 = sum of:
0.09663896 = weight(_text_:22 in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09663896 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05094824 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:43:54
-
Tseng, Y.-H.: Solving vocabulary problems with interactive query expansion (1998)
0.02
0.01933244 = product of:
0.03866488 = sum of:
0.03866488 = product of:
0.07732976 = sum of:
0.07732976 = weight(_text_:news in 5159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07732976 = score(doc=5159,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
0.05094824 = queryNorm
0.28956512 = fieldWeight in 5159, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5159)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- One of the major causes of search failures in information retrieval systems is vocabulary mismatch. Presents a solution to the vocabulary problem through 2 strategies known as term suggestion (TS) and term relevance feedback (TRF). In TS, collection specific terms are extracted from the text collection. These terms and their frequencies constitute the keyword database for suggesting terms in response to users' queries. One effect of this term suggestion is that it functions as a dynamic directory if the query is a general term that contains broad meaning. In term relevance feedback, terms extracted from the top ranked documents retrieved from the previous query are shown to users for relevance feedback. In the experiment, interactive TS provides very high precision rates while achieving similar recall rates as n-gram matching. Local TRF achieves improvement in both precision and recall rate in a full text news database and degrades slightly in recall rate in bibliographic databases due to the very limited source of information for feedback. In terms of Rijsbergen's combined measure of recall and precision, both TS and TRF achieve better performance than n-gram matching, which implies that the greater improvement in precision rate compensates the slight degradation in recall rate for TS and TRF
-
Allan, J.; Callan, J.P.; Croft, W.B.; Ballesteros, L.; Broglio, J.; Xu, J.; Shu, H.: INQUERY at TREC-5 (1997)
0.02
0.017256958 = product of:
0.034513917 = sum of:
0.034513917 = product of:
0.06902783 = sum of:
0.06902783 = weight(_text_:22 in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06902783 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05094824 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 2.1999 20:55:22
-
Ng, K.B.; Loewenstern, D.; Basu, C.; Hirsh, H.; Kantor, P.B.: Data fusion of machine-learning methods for the TREC5 routing tak (and other work) (1997)
0.02
0.017256958 = product of:
0.034513917 = sum of:
0.034513917 = product of:
0.06902783 = sum of:
0.06902783 = weight(_text_:22 in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06902783 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05094824 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 2.1999 20:59:22
-
Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983)
0.02
0.017256958 = product of:
0.034513917 = sum of:
0.034513917 = product of:
0.06902783 = sum of:
0.06902783 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06902783 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05094824 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.22-25
-
Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬A test for the separation of relevant and non-relevant documents in experimental retrieval collections (1973)
0.01
0.013805566 = product of:
0.027611133 = sum of:
0.027611133 = product of:
0.055222265 = sum of:
0.055222265 = weight(_text_:22 in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055222265 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05094824 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 19. 3.1996 11:22:12
-
Sanderson, M.: ¬The Reuters test collection (1996)
0.01
0.013805566 = product of:
0.027611133 = sum of:
0.027611133 = product of:
0.055222265 = sum of:
0.055222265 = weight(_text_:22 in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055222265 = score(doc=6971,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05094824 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
-
Lespinasse, K.: TREC: une conference pour l'evaluation des systemes de recherche d'information (1997)
0.01
0.013805566 = product of:
0.027611133 = sum of:
0.027611133 = product of:
0.055222265 = sum of:
0.055222265 = weight(_text_:22 in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055222265 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05094824 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
¬The Fifth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-5) (1997)
0.01
0.013805566 = product of:
0.027611133 = sum of:
0.027611133 = product of:
0.055222265 = sum of:
0.055222265 = weight(_text_:22 in 3087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055222265 = score(doc=3087,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05094824 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3087, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3087)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Proceedings of the 5th TREC-confrerence held in Gaithersburgh, Maryland, Nov 20-22, 1996. Aim of the conference was discussion on retrieval techniques for large test collections. Different research groups used different techniques, such as automated thesauri, term weighting, natural language techniques, relevance feedback and advanced pattern matching, for information retrieval from the same large database. This procedure makes it possible to compare the results. The proceedings include papers, tables of the system results, and brief system descriptions including timing and storage information
-
Pemberton, J.K.; Ojala, M.; Garman, N.: Head to head : searching the Web versus traditional services (1998)
0.01
0.013805566 = product of:
0.027611133 = sum of:
0.027611133 = product of:
0.055222265 = sum of:
0.055222265 = weight(_text_:22 in 3572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055222265 = score(doc=3572,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05094824 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3572, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3572)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Online. 22(1998) no.3, S.24-26,28
-
Dresel, R.; Hörnig, D.; Kaluza, H.; Peter, A.; Roßmann, A.; Sieber, W.: Evaluation deutscher Web-Suchwerkzeuge : Ein vergleichender Retrievaltest (2001)
0.01
0.013805566 = product of:
0.027611133 = sum of:
0.027611133 = product of:
0.055222265 = sum of:
0.055222265 = weight(_text_:22 in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055222265 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05094824 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Die deutschen Suchmaschinen, Abacho, Acoon, Fireball und Lycos sowie die Web-Kataloge Web.de und Yahoo! werden einem Qualitätstest nach relativem Recall, Precision und Availability unterzogen. Die Methoden der Retrievaltests werden vorgestellt. Im Durchschnitt werden bei einem Cut-Off-Wert von 25 ein Recall von rund 22%, eine Precision von knapp 19% und eine Verfügbarkeit von 24% erreicht
-
Ellis, D.: Progress and problems in information retrieval (1996)
0.01
0.013805566 = product of:
0.027611133 = sum of:
0.027611133 = product of:
0.055222265 = sum of:
0.055222265 = weight(_text_:22 in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055222265 = score(doc=789,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05094824 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26. 7.2002 20:22:46
-
¬The Eleventh Text Retrieval Conference, TREC 2002 (2003)
0.01
0.013805566 = product of:
0.027611133 = sum of:
0.027611133 = product of:
0.055222265 = sum of:
0.055222265 = weight(_text_:22 in 4049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055222265 = score(doc=4049,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05094824 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4049, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4049)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Proceedings of the llth TREC-conference held in Gaithersburg, Maryland (USA), November 19-22, 2002. Aim of the conference was discussion an retrieval and related information-seeking tasks for large test collection. 93 research groups used different techniques, for information retrieval from the same large database. This procedure makes it possible to compare the results. The tasks are: Cross-language searching, filtering, interactive searching, searching for novelty, question answering, searching for video shots, and Web searching.
-
Cross-language information retrieval (1998)
0.01
0.0136701 = product of:
0.0273402 = sum of:
0.0273402 = product of:
0.0546804 = sum of:
0.0546804 = weight(_text_:news in 6299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0546804 = score(doc=6299,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
0.05094824 = queryNorm
0.20475346 = fieldWeight in 6299, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=6299)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: GREFENSTETTE, G.: The Problem of Cross-Language Information Retrieval; DAVIS, M.W.: On the Effective Use of Large Parallel Corpora in Cross-Language Text Retrieval; BALLESTEROS, L. u. W.B. CROFT: Statistical Methods for Cross-Language Information Retrieval; Distributed Cross-Lingual Information Retrieval; Automatic Cross-Language Information Retrieval Using Latent Semantic Indexing; EVANS, D.A. u.a.: Mapping Vocabularies Using Latent Semantics; PICCHI, E. u. C. PETERS: Cross-Language Information Retrieval: A System for Comparable Corpus Querying; YAMABANA, K. u.a.: A Language Conversion Front-End for Cross-Language Information Retrieval; GACHOT, D.A. u.a.: The Systran NLP Browser: An Application of Machine Translation Technology in Cross-Language Information Retrieval; HULL, D.: A Weighted Boolean Model for Cross-Language Text Retrieval; SHERIDAN, P. u.a. Building a Large Multilingual Test Collection from Comparable News Documents; OARD; D.W. u. B.J. DORR: Evaluating Cross-Language Text Filtering Effectiveness
- Footnote
- The retrieved output from a query including the phrase 'big rockets' may be, for instance, a sentence containing 'giant rocket' which is semantically ranked above 'military ocket'. David Hull (Xerox Research Centre, Grenoble) describes an implementation of a weighted Boolean model for Spanish-English CLIR. Users construct Boolean-type queries, weighting each term in the query, which is then translated by an on-line dictionary before being applied to the database. Comparisons with the performance of unweighted free-form queries ('vector space' models) proved encouraging. Two contributions consider the evaluation of CLIR systems. In order to by-pass the time-consuming and expensive process of assembling a standard collection of documents and of user queries against which the performance of an CLIR system is manually assessed, Páriac Sheridan et al (ETH Zurich) propose a method based on retrieving 'seed documents'. This involves identifying a unique document in a database (the 'seed document') and, for a number of queries, measuring how fast it is retrieved. The authors have also assembled a large database of multilingual news documents for testing purposes. By storing the (fairly short) documents in a structured form tagged with descriptor codes (e.g. for topic, country and area), the test suite is easily expanded while remaining consistent for the purposes of testing. Douglas Ouard and Bonne Dorr (University of Maryland) describe an evaluation methodology which appears to apply LSI techniques in order to filter and rank incoming documents designed for testing CLIR systems. The volume provides the reader an excellent overview of several projects in CLIR. It is well supported with references and is intended as a secondary text for researchers and practitioners. It highlights the need for a good, general tutorial introduction to the field."
-
Blagden, J.F.: How much noise in a role-free and link-free co-ordinate indexing system? (1966)
0.01
0.01207987 = product of:
0.02415974 = sum of:
0.02415974 = product of:
0.04831948 = sum of:
0.04831948 = weight(_text_:22 in 2718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04831948 = score(doc=2718,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05094824 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2718, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2718)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 22(1966), S.203-209
-
Smithson, S.: Information retrieval evaluation in practice : a case study approach (1994)
0.01
0.01207987 = product of:
0.02415974 = sum of:
0.02415974 = product of:
0.04831948 = sum of:
0.04831948 = weight(_text_:22 in 7302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04831948 = score(doc=7302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05094824 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7302)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The evaluation of information retrieval systems is an important yet difficult operation. This paper describes an exploratory evaluation study that takes an interpretive approach to evaluation. The longitudinal study examines evaluation through the information-seeking behaviour of 22 case studies of 'real' users. The eclectic approach to data collection produced behavioral data that is compared with relevance judgements and satisfaction ratings. The study demonstrates considerable variations among the cases, among different evaluation measures within the same case, and among the same measures at different stages within a single case. It is argued that those involved in evaluation should be aware of the difficulties, and base any evaluation on a good understanding of the cases in question
