Search (4218 results, page 2 of 211)

0.089474946 = product of:
  0.17894989 = sum of:
    0.17894989 = sum of:
      0.12372762 = weight(_text_:news in 4960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12372762 = score(doc=4960,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05094824 = queryNorm
          0.4633042 = fieldWeight in 4960, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4960)
      0.055222265 = weight(_text_:22 in 4960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055222265 = score(doc=4960,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05094824 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4960, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4960)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Provides a background to UMI, formerly known as University Microflims International. Describes ProQuest Direct, a new online service from UMI that merges indexing and abstracting. ASCII and image full text, wide subject coverage, and multiple document delivery options, into a uniform document search and delivery system. ProQuest covers nearly 4.000 titles and is a composite of UMI's electronic database including ABI/INFORM, Periodical Abstracts; Newspaper Abstracts, Business Dateline, Accounting and Tax Database, Banking Information Source, and Pharmaceitical News Index. Describes search methods and document delivery

Source

Information today. 13(1996) no.4, S.22-24

0.089474946 = product of:
  0.17894989 = sum of:
    0.17894989 = sum of:
      0.12372762 = weight(_text_:news in 5007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12372762 = score(doc=5007,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05094824 = queryNorm
          0.4633042 = fieldWeight in 5007, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5007)
      0.055222265 = weight(_text_:22 in 5007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055222265 = score(doc=5007,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05094824 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5007, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5007)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: College and research libraries news 57(1996) no.5, S.311 (G.M. Eberhart); Journal of acaedemic librarianship 22(1996) no.5, S.401 (J.K. Chisman)

0.089474946 = product of:
  0.17894989 = sum of:
    0.17894989 = sum of:
      0.12372762 = weight(_text_:news in 6751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12372762 = score(doc=6751,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05094824 = queryNorm
          0.4633042 = fieldWeight in 6751, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6751)
      0.055222265 = weight(_text_:22 in 6751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055222265 = score(doc=6751,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05094824 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6751, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6751)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Presents a system for summarizing quantitative data in natural language, focusing on the use of a corpus of basketball game summaries, drawn from online news services, to empirically shape the system design and to evaluate the approach. Initial corpus analysis revealed characteristics of textual summaries that challenge the capabilities of current language generation systems. A revision based corpus analysis was used to identify and encode the revision rules of the system. Presents a quantitative evaluation, using several test corpora, to measure the robustness of the new revision based model

Date

6. 3.1997 16:22:15

0.089474946 = product of:
  0.17894989 = sum of:
    0.17894989 = sum of:
      0.12372762 = weight(_text_:news in 7268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12372762 = score(doc=7268,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05094824 = queryNorm
          0.4633042 = fieldWeight in 7268, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7268)
      0.055222265 = weight(_text_:22 in 7268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055222265 = score(doc=7268,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05094824 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7268, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7268)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

First of a 3 part series discussing how to access and use Web search engines on the Internet. Distinguishes between FTP sites, Gopher sites, Usenet News sites and Web sites. Considers subject searching versus keyword; how to improve search strategies and success rates; bookmarks; Yahoo!, Lycos; InfoSeek; Magellan; Excite; Inktomi; HotBot and AltaVista

Date

6. 3.1997 16:22:15

0.089474946 = product of:
  0.17894989 = sum of:
    0.17894989 = sum of:
      0.12372762 = weight(_text_:news in 6092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12372762 = score(doc=6092,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05094824 = queryNorm
          0.4633042 = fieldWeight in 6092, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6092)
      0.055222265 = weight(_text_:22 in 6092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055222265 = score(doc=6092,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05094824 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6092, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6092)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: Knowledge organization 24(1997) no.4, S.255-258 (H. Löckenhoff); FID news bulletin 47(1997) nos.7/8, S.208-209 (K. Kalseth)

0.089474946 = product of:
  0.17894989 = sum of:
    0.17894989 = sum of:
      0.12372762 = weight(_text_:news in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12372762 = score(doc=3904,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05094824 = queryNorm
          0.4633042 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
      0.055222265 = weight(_text_:22 in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055222265 = score(doc=3904,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05094824 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Library and information research news. 22(1998) no.71, S.24-33

0.089474946 = product of:
  0.17894989 = sum of:
    0.17894989 = sum of:
      0.12372762 = weight(_text_:news in 4901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12372762 = score(doc=4901,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05094824 = queryNorm
          0.4633042 = fieldWeight in 4901, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4901)
      0.055222265 = weight(_text_:22 in 4901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055222265 = score(doc=4901,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05094824 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4901, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4901)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

19. 1.2019 17:42:22

0.08468972 = sum of:
  0.06743276 = product of:
    0.20229828 = sum of:
      0.20229828 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.20229828 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.43193975 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05094824 = queryNorm
          0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.017256958 = product of:
    0.034513917 = sum of:
      0.034513917 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034513917 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05094824 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968

0.084226504 = product of:
  0.16845301 = sum of:
    0.16845301 = sum of:
      0.13393909 = weight(_text_:news in 3815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13393909 = score(doc=3815,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05094824 = queryNorm
          0.50154155 = fieldWeight in 3815, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3815)
      0.034513917 = weight(_text_:22 in 3815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034513917 = score(doc=3815,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05094824 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3815, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3815)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

"Bei der Suche nach Politikern und Parteien über Suchmaschinen wie Google spielt Personalisierung einem Forschungsprojekt zufolge eine geringere Rolle als bisher angenommen. Bei der Eingabe von Politikernamen erhalten verschiedene Nutzer größtenteils die gleichen Ergebnisse angezeigt, lautet ein gestern veröffentlichtes Zwischenergebnis einer Analyse im Auftrag der Landesmedienanstalten. Die Ergebnisse stammen aus dem Forschungsprojekt "#Datenspende: Google und die Bundestagswahl2017" der Initiative AIgorithmWatch und der Technischen Universität Kaiserslautern. Im Durchschnitt erhalten zwei unterschiedliche Nutzer demnach bei insgesamt neun Suchergebnissen sieben bis acht identische Treffer, wenn sie mit Google nach Spitzenkandidaten der Parteien im Bundestagswahlkampf suchen. Die Suchergebnisse zu Parteien unterscheiden sich allerdings stärker. Bei neun Suchanfragen gebe es hier nur fünf bis sechs gemeinsame Suchergebnisse, fanden die Wissenschaftler heraus. Die Informatikprofessorin Katharina Zweig von der TU Kaiserslautern zeigte sich überrascht, dass die Suchergebisse verschiedener Nutzer sich so wenig unterscheiden. "Das könnte allerdings morgen schon wieder anders aussehen", warnte sie, Die Studie beweise erstmals, dass es grundsätzlich möglich sei, Algorithmen von Intermediären wie Suchmaschinen im Verdachtsfall nachvollziehbar zu machen. Den Ergebnissen zufolge gibt es immer wieder kleine Nutzergruppen mit stark abweichenden Ergebnislisten. Eine abschließende, inhaltliche Bewertung stehe noch aus. Für das Projekt haben nach Angaben der Medienanstalt bisher fast 4000 freiwillige Nutzer ein von den Forschern programmiertes Plug-ln auf ihrem Computer- installiert. Bisher seien damitdrei Millionen gespendete Datensätze gespeichert worden. Das Projekt wird finanziert von den Landesmedienanstalten Bayern, Berlin-Brandenburg, Hessen, Rheinland-Pfalz, Saarland und Sachsen." Vgl. auch: https://www.swr.de/swraktuell/rp/kaiserslautern/forschung-in-kaiserslautern-beeinflusst-google-die-bundestagswahl/-/id=1632/did=20110680/nid=1632/1mohmie/index.html. https://www.uni-kl.de/aktuelles/news/news/detail/News/aufruf-zur-datenspende-welche-nachrichten-zeigt-die-suchmaschine-google-zur-bundestagswahl-an/.

Date

22. 7.2004 9:42:33

0.08091931 = product of:
  0.16183862 = sum of:
    0.16183862 = product of:
      0.48551586 = sum of:
        0.48551586 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.48551586 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43193975 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05094824 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.078290574 = product of:
  0.15658115 = sum of:
    0.15658115 = sum of:
      0.10826167 = weight(_text_:news in 4548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10826167 = score(doc=4548,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05094824 = queryNorm
          0.40539116 = fieldWeight in 4548, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4548)
      0.04831948 = weight(_text_:22 in 4548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04831948 = score(doc=4548,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05094824 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4548, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4548)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 7.1996 19:53:48

Source

Library Hi Tech News. 1995, no.128, S.1-4

0.078290574 = product of:
  0.15658115 = sum of:
    0.15658115 = sum of:
      0.10826167 = weight(_text_:news in 3534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10826167 = score(doc=3534,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05094824 = queryNorm
          0.40539116 = fieldWeight in 3534, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3534)
      0.04831948 = weight(_text_:22 in 3534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04831948 = score(doc=3534,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05094824 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3534, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3534)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Library and information research news. 22(1998) no.71, S.34-39

0.078290574 = product of:
  0.15658115 = sum of:
    0.15658115 = sum of:
      0.10826167 = weight(_text_:news in 3663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10826167 = score(doc=3663,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05094824 = queryNorm
          0.40539116 = fieldWeight in 3663, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3663)
      0.04831948 = weight(_text_:22 in 3663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04831948 = score(doc=3663,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05094824 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3663, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3663)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This is the era of social networking, collective intelligence, participation, collaborative creation, and borderless distribution. Every day we are bombarded with more publicity about collaborative environments, news feeds, blogs, wikis, podcasting, webcasting, folksonomies, social bookmarking, social citations, collaborative filtering, recommender systems, media sharing, massive multiplayer online games, virtual worlds, and mash-ups. This sort of anarchic environment appeals to the digital natives, but which of these so-called 'Web 2.0' technologies are going to have a real business impact? This paper addresses the impact that issues such as quality control, security, privacy and bandwidth may have on the implementation of social networking in hide-bound, large organizations.

Date

8. 7.2010 19:24:22

0.07732976 = product of:
  0.15465952 = sum of:
    0.15465952 = product of:
      0.30931905 = sum of:
        0.30931905 = weight(_text_:news in 5932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30931905 = score(doc=5932,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05094824 = queryNorm
            1.1582605 = fieldWeight in 5932, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=5932)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

FID news bulletin. 42(1992) no.11, S.248

0.07655256 = product of:
  0.15310512 = sum of:
    0.15310512 = product of:
      0.30621025 = sum of:
        0.30621025 = weight(_text_:news in 2994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30621025 = score(doc=2994,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05094824 = queryNorm
            1.1466194 = fieldWeight in 2994, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2994)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Bericht über Gründung eines 'UDC Consortium'. - Vgl. auch den Bericht in FID News Bulletin 42(1992) S.248

Source

FID news bulletin. 41(1991) no.11, S.194

0.07233536 = product of:
  0.14467072 = sum of:
    0.14467072 = product of:
      0.28934145 = sum of:
        0.28934145 = weight(_text_:news in 1342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28934145 = score(doc=1342,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05094824 = queryNorm
            1.0834534 = fieldWeight in 1342, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1342)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Are our memories of the world well described by the international news coverage in our country? If so, sources central to international news may also be central to international recall patterns; in particular, they may reflect an American-centric focus, given the previously proposed central U.S. position in the news marketplace. We asked people of four different nationalities (China, Israel, Switzerland, and the United States) to list all the countries they could name. We also constructed a network representation of the world for each nation based on the co-occurrence pattern of countries in the news. To compare news and memories, we developed a computational model that predicts the recall order of countries based on the news networks. Consistent with previous reports, the U.S. news was central to the news networks overall. However, although national recall patterns reflected their corresponding national news sources, the Chinese news was substantially better than other national news sources at predicting both individual and aggregate memories across nations. Our results suggest that news and memories are related but may also reflect biases in the way information is transferred to long-term memory, potentially biased against the transient coverage of more "free" presses. We discuss possible explanations for this "Chinese news effect" in relation to prominent cognitive and communications theories.

0.07193736 = product of:
  0.14387472 = sum of:
    0.14387472 = sum of:
      0.1093608 = weight(_text_:news in 2598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1093608 = score(doc=2598,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05094824 = queryNorm
          0.40950692 = fieldWeight in 2598, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2598)
      0.034513917 = weight(_text_:22 in 2598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034513917 = score(doc=2598,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05094824 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2598, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2598)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyze the disciplinary orientation of scientific publications that were mentioned on different social media platforms, focussing on their differences and similarities with citation counts. Design/methodology/approach - Social media metrics and readership counts, associated with 500,216 publications and their citation data from the Web of Science database, were collected from Altmetric.com and Mendeley. Results are presented through descriptive statistical analyses together with science maps generated with VOSviewer. Findings - The results confirm Mendeley as the most prevalent social media source with similar characteristics to citations in their distribution across fields and their density in average values per publication. The humanities, natural sciences, and engineering disciplines have a much lower presence of social media metrics. Twitter has a stronger focus on general medicine and social sciences. Other sources (blog, Facebook, Google+, and news media mentions) are more prominent in regards to multidisciplinary journals. Originality/value - This paper reinforces the relevance of Mendeley as a social media source for analytical purposes from a disciplinary perspective, being particularly relevant for the social sciences (together with Twitter). Key implications for the use of social media metrics on the evaluation of research performance (e.g. the concentration of some social media metrics, such as blogs, news items, etc., around multidisciplinary journals) are identified.

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

0.07193736 = product of:
  0.14387472 = sum of:
    0.14387472 = sum of:
      0.1093608 = weight(_text_:news in 5844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1093608 = score(doc=5844,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05094824 = queryNorm
          0.40950692 = fieldWeight in 5844, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5844)
      0.034513917 = weight(_text_:22 in 5844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034513917 = score(doc=5844,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17841205 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05094824 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5844, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5844)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Purpose This paper investigates how school teachers look for informational texts for their classrooms. Access to current, varied and authentic informational texts improves learning outcomes for K-12 students, but many teachers lack resources to expand and update readings. The Web offers freely available resources, but finding suitable ones is time-consuming. This research lays the groundwork for building tools to ease that burden. Design/methodology/approach This paper reports qualitative findings from a study in two stages: (1) a set of semistructured interviews, based on the critical incident technique, eliciting teachers' information-seeking practices and challenges; and (2) observations of teachers using a prototype teaching-oriented news search tool under a think-aloud protocol. Findings Teachers articulated different objectives and ways of using readings in their classrooms, goals and self-reported practices varied by experience level. Teachers struggled to formulate queries that are likely to return readings on specific course topics, instead searching directly for abstract topics. Experience differences did not translate into observable differences in search skill or success in the lab study. Originality/value There is limited work on teachers' information-seeking practices, particularly on how teachers look for texts for classroom use. This paper describes how teachers look for information in this context, setting the stage for future development and research on how to support this use case. Understanding and supporting teachers looking for information is a rich area for future research, due to the complexity of the information need and the fact that teachers are not looking for information for themselves.

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

0.06970411 = product of:
  0.13940822 = sum of:
    0.13940822 = product of:
      0.27881643 = sum of:
        0.27881643 = weight(_text_:news in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27881643 = score(doc=444,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05094824 = queryNorm
            1.0440419 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

News is information about recent events of general interest, especially as currently reportes by newspapers, periodicals, radio or television. News is the quintessential multimedia data. While newspaper editors (human and/or algorithmic) may still define the core content of electronic news, new communication technologies will enable the integration of news from a wide variety of sources and provide access to supplemental material from enormous archives of electronic news data (text, photos, and video) in digital libraries as well as the continual streams of newly created data. The goal of electronic news delivery within this context is, however, distiguishable from both news news groups and document retrieval. Electronic news promises to deliver to the reader an edited collage of recent events from wide domains in a manner that is both comprehensive and personalized. As part of a long-term research project into the design of future news delivery systems, we have developed an overall architecture and several prototypes. These prototypes are presented in the article, along with a discussion of issues related to the presentation metaphor and to the functionality of electronic news delivery services. A prototype was demonstrated at the 1995 G-7 Economic Summit in Halifax, Canada, integrating newspaper text and photographs with television news video clips across an ATM network

0.06970411 = product of:
  0.13940822 = sum of:
    0.13940822 = product of:
      0.27881643 = sum of:
        0.27881643 = weight(_text_:news in 3595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27881643 = score(doc=3595,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.26705483 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05094824 = queryNorm
            1.0440419 = fieldWeight in 3595, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3595)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Prominent news sites on the web provide hundreds of news articles daily. The abundance of news content competing to attract online attention, coupled with the manual effort involved in article selection, necessitates the timely prediction of future popularity of these news articles. The future popularity of a news article can be estimated using signals indicating the article's penetration in social media (e.g., number of tweets) in addition to traditional web analytics (e.g., number of page views). In practice, it is important to make such estimations as early as possible, preferably before the article is made available on the news site (i.e., at cold start). In this paper we perform a study on cold-start news popularity prediction using a collection of 13,319 news articles obtained from Yahoo News, a major news provider. We characterize the popularity of news articles through a set of online metrics and try to predict their values across time using machine learning techniques on a large collection of features obtained from various sources. Our findings indicate that predicting news popularity at cold start is a difficult task, contrary to the findings of a prior work on the same topic. Most articles' popularity may not be accurately anticipated solely on the basis of content features, without having the early-stage popularity values.