-
Parka, A.L.; Panchyshyn, R.S.: ¬The path to an RDA hybridized catalog : lessons from the Kent State University Libraries' RDA enrichment project (2016)
0.04
0.0421196 = product of:
0.0842392 = sum of:
0.06610915 = weight(_text_:data in 2632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06610915 = score(doc=2632,freq=10.0), product of:
0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.5468357 = fieldWeight in 2632, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2632)
0.01813005 = product of:
0.0362601 = sum of:
0.0362601 = weight(_text_:22 in 2632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0362601 = score(doc=2632,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2632, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2632)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This article describes in detail the library implementation of a Resource Description and Access (RDA) Enrichment project. The library "hybridized," or enriched legacy data from Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules bibliographic records by the addition of specific RDA elements. The project also cleaned up various other elements in the bibliographic data that were not directly RDA-related. There were over 28 million changes and edits made to these records, changes that would never have been made otherwise because the library lacked the resources to do them independently. The enrichment project made the bibliographic data consistent, and helped prepared the data for its eventual transition to a linked data environment.
- Date
- 21. 1.2016 19:08:22
-
Münnich, M.: Katalogisieren auf dem PC : ein Pflichtenheft für die Formalkatalogisierung (1988)
0.04
0.0396217 = product of:
0.0792434 = sum of:
0.058523346 = weight(_text_:data in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058523346 = score(doc=2502,freq=6.0), product of:
0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.48408815 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
0.020720055 = product of:
0.04144011 = sum of:
0.04144011 = weight(_text_:22 in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04144011 = score(doc=2502,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Examines a simpler cataloguing format offered by PCs, without disturbing compatibility, using A-Z cataloguing rules for data input, category codes for tagging and computer-supported data input through windows. Gives numerous examples of catalogue entries, basing techniques on certain category schemes set out by Klaus Haller and Hans Popst. Examines catalogue entries in respect of categories of data bases for authors and corporate names, titles, single volume works, serial issues of collected works, and limited editions of works in several volumes.
- Source
- Bibliotheksdienst. 22(1988) H.9, S.841-856
-
Eversberg, B.: ADV und Zetteldruck : ein Widerspruch? (1975)
0.04
0.0396217 = product of:
0.0792434 = sum of:
0.058523346 = weight(_text_:data in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058523346 = score(doc=4431,freq=6.0), product of:
0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.48408815 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
0.020720055 = product of:
0.04144011 = sum of:
0.04144011 = weight(_text_:22 in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04144011 = score(doc=4431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- A method is outlined which would permit a large number of libraries of all types to use centralised cataloguing facilities without the need for their own automatic data processing equipment and outlay. The method is seen as an alternative to the OCLC on-line data bank, and permits the ordering of printed catalogue cards by machine-readable but hand-prepared data cards, such as the loan cards which readers at the Münster library are at present required to complete. The proposed sequence of ordering is set out in 11 stages
- Source
- Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 22(1975) H.5, S.387-390
-
Lee, S.; Jacob, E.K.: ¬An integrated approach to metadata interoperability : construction of a conceptual structure between MARC and FRBR (2011)
0.04
0.03610251 = product of:
0.07220502 = sum of:
0.056664985 = weight(_text_:data in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056664985 = score(doc=302,freq=10.0), product of:
0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.46871632 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
0.015540041 = product of:
0.031080082 = sum of:
0.031080082 = weight(_text_:22 in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031080082 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC) is currently the most broadly used bibliographic standard for encoding and exchanging bibliographic data. However, MARC may not fully support representation of the dynamic nature and semantics of digital resources because of its rigid and single-layered linear structure. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) model, which is designed to overcome the problems of MARC, does not provide sufficient data elements and adopts a predetermined hierarchy. A flexible structure for bibliographic data with detailed data elements is needed. Integrating MARC format with the hierarchical structure of FRBR is one approach to meet this need. The purpose of this research is to propose an approach that can facilitate interoperability between MARC and FRBR by providing a conceptual structure that can function as a mediator between MARC data elements and FRBR attributes.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Spillane, J.L.: Comparison of required introductory cataloging courses, 1986 to 1998 (1999)
0.03
0.03425208 = product of:
0.06850416 = sum of:
0.04778411 = weight(_text_:data in 4946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04778411 = score(doc=4946,freq=4.0), product of:
0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.3952563 = fieldWeight in 4946, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4946)
0.020720055 = product of:
0.04144011 = sum of:
0.04144011 = weight(_text_:22 in 4946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04144011 = score(doc=4946,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4946, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4946)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Cataloging is an important part of library education. Concerns about the declining number of required introductory cataloging courses led to this study in which data collected from library school bulletins were compared to data gathered in a similar 1986 study. Results indicate that the number of required iniroductory cataloging courses has dropped.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Becker, S.: Ein Regelwerk für alle? : RDA im Archiv des Deutschen Literaturarchivs Marbach (2015)
0.03
0.033383917 = product of:
0.13353567 = sum of:
0.13353567 = weight(_text_:becker in 3204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13353567 = score(doc=3204,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25693014 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.51973534 = fieldWeight in 3204, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3204)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Becker, H.-G.; Höhner, K.: ¬Die ORCID-Integration der Technischen Universität Dortmund (2019)
0.03
0.033383917 = product of:
0.13353567 = sum of:
0.13353567 = weight(_text_:becker in 5347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13353567 = score(doc=5347,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25693014 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.51973534 = fieldWeight in 5347, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5347)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Lee, E.: Cataloguing (and reference) at the crossroads (1996)
0.03
0.027254261 = product of:
0.054508522 = sum of:
0.03378847 = weight(_text_:data in 499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03378847 = score(doc=499,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 499, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=499)
0.020720055 = product of:
0.04144011 = sum of:
0.04144011 = weight(_text_:22 in 499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04144011 = score(doc=499,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 499, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=499)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Alerts librarians to directions in research in artificial intelligence relevant to information retrieval which will change current technology and user expectations and consequently the requirements for data provision and access at the base level. Predicts a reevaluation of priorities for using the expertise of cataloguers (and reference librarians) and of cataloguing methodologies. Debates the future of cataloguing, arguing for the need to monitor developments in adjacent research areas and to plan with these in mind
- Source
- Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.68-75
-
Burrows, T.: ¬The virtual catalogue : bibliographic access for the virtual library (1993)
0.03
0.027254261 = product of:
0.054508522 = sum of:
0.03378847 = weight(_text_:data in 5286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03378847 = score(doc=5286,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 5286, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5286)
0.020720055 = product of:
0.04144011 = sum of:
0.04144011 = weight(_text_:22 in 5286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04144011 = score(doc=5286,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5286, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5286)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Proposes a new model for bibliographic access, the virtual catalogue, to serve the virtual library. Suggests the use of current software and networks to build links between bibliographic databases of all kinds, including full text, to enable the user to search a specified subset of databases. Suggests that local data be limited to holdings information linked to, but separate from, bibliographic databases both local and remote
- Date
- 8.10.2000 14:47:22
-
Morris, D.E.; Hobert, C.B.; Osmus, L.; Wool, G.: Cataloging staff costs revisited (2000)
0.03
0.027254261 = product of:
0.054508522 = sum of:
0.03378847 = weight(_text_:data in 171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03378847 = score(doc=171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=171)
0.020720055 = product of:
0.04144011 = sum of:
0.04144011 = weight(_text_:22 in 171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04144011 = score(doc=171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Staff costs for cataloging have declined at Iowa State University Library. This is demonstrated by data from a longitudinal time and cost study begun in 1987. We discuss the national developments, technological advancements, and reengineering efforts that have supported greater cataloging effectiveness and quality. We use the ISU findings as an example of a nationwide phenomenon resulting from the remarkable ability of catalogers to share work through national bibliographic utilities.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
McCain, C.; Shorten, J.: Cataloging efficiency and effectiveness (2002)
0.03
0.025689062 = product of:
0.051378123 = sum of:
0.035838082 = weight(_text_:data in 163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035838082 = score(doc=163,freq=4.0), product of:
0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.29644224 = fieldWeight in 163, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=163)
0.015540041 = product of:
0.031080082 = sum of:
0.031080082 = weight(_text_:22 in 163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031080082 = score(doc=163,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 163, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=163)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Efficiency and effectiveness of technical services units are difficult to measure, analyze, and compare, partly because operations are complex and vary substantially from one library to another. Cost studies have been widely conducted as a means of measuring the cost efficiency of specific technical services tasks. Since data on costs are not necessarily comparable among institutions, other quantifiable measures of efficiency and effectiveness would enhance managerial decision-making. This article reports the analysis of data compiled from a survey of twenty-six academic libraries. It seeks to supplement the findings of cost studies by providing measures of efficiency and effectiveness for cataloging departments based on reported productivity, number of staff, task distribution, and quality measures such as backlogs, authority control, and database maintenance. Benchmark productivity levels for six libraries with best practices are identified.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Patton, G.: Local creation / global use : bibliographic data in the international arena (2000)
0.03
0.025689062 = product of:
0.051378123 = sum of:
0.035838082 = weight(_text_:data in 183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035838082 = score(doc=183,freq=4.0), product of:
0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.29644224 = fieldWeight in 183, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=183)
0.015540041 = product of:
0.031080082 = sum of:
0.031080082 = weight(_text_:22 in 183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031080082 = score(doc=183,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 183, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=183)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- OCLC has grown from the original group of Ohio academic libraries to 27,000 libraries located in North America, Europe, Asia, Latin American, and South Africa. Each of the records in WorldCat (the OCLC Online Union Catalog) is a local creation that is available for use across the globe for different purposes. Common issues that must be faced with the expansion of a bibliographic utility include cataloging standards, subject access in languages appropriate to the user, local needs versus global usefulness, and character sets. Progress has been made with the cooperative creation of an international name authority file and the uniform application of ISBD principles. A method of linking various subject vocabularies and an improved infrastructure of MARC formats and character sets are needed. Librarians need new automated tools to provide preliminary access to date available in electronic form and to assist them in organizing and storing that data.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Genereux, C.: Building connections : a review of the serials literature 2004 through 2005 (2007)
0.03
0.025689062 = product of:
0.051378123 = sum of:
0.035838082 = weight(_text_:data in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035838082 = score(doc=2548,freq=4.0), product of:
0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.29644224 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
0.015540041 = product of:
0.031080082 = sum of:
0.031080082 = weight(_text_:22 in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031080082 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This review of 2004 and 2005 serials literature covers the themes of cost, management, and access. Interwoven through the serials literature of these two years are the importance of collaboration, communication, and linkages between scholars, publishers, subscription agents and other intermediaries, and librarians. The emphasis in the literature is on electronic serials and their impact on publishing, libraries, and vendors. In response to the crisis of escalating journal prices and libraries' dissatisfaction with the Big Deal licensing agreements, Open Access journals and publishing models were promoted. Libraries subscribed to or licensed increasing numbers of electronic serials. As a result, libraries sought ways to better manage licensing and subscription data (not handled by traditional integrated library systems) by implementing electronic resources management systems. In order to provide users with better, faster, and more current information on and access to electronic serials, libraries implemented tools and services to provide A-Z title lists, title by title coverage data, MARC records, and OpenURL link resolvers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Delsey, T.: ¬The Making of RDA (2016)
0.03
0.025689062 = product of:
0.051378123 = sum of:
0.035838082 = weight(_text_:data in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035838082 = score(doc=2946,freq=4.0), product of:
0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.29644224 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
0.015540041 = product of:
0.031080082 = sum of:
0.031080082 = weight(_text_:22 in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031080082 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The author revisits the development of RDA from its inception in 2005 through to its initial release in 2010. The development effort is set in the context of an evolving digital environment that was transforming both the production and dissemination of information resources and the technologies used to create, store, and access data describing those resources. The author examines the interplay between strategic commitments to align RDA with new conceptual models, emerging database structures, and metadata developments in allied communities, on the one hand, and compatibility with AACR2 legacy databases on the other. Aspects of the development effort examined include the structuring of RDA as a resource description language, organizing the new standard as a working tool, and refining guidelines and instructions for recording RDA data.
- Date
- 17. 5.2016 19:22:40
-
Das, S.; Paik, J.H.: Gender tagging of named entities using retrieval-assisted multi-context aggregation : an unsupervised approach (2023)
0.03
0.025689062 = product of:
0.051378123 = sum of:
0.035838082 = weight(_text_:data in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035838082 = score(doc=941,freq=4.0), product of:
0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.29644224 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
0.015540041 = product of:
0.031080082 = sum of:
0.031080082 = weight(_text_:22 in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031080082 = score(doc=941,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Inferring the gender of named entities present in a text has several practical applications in information sciences. Existing approaches toward name gender identification rely exclusively on using the gender distributions from labeled data. In the absence of such labeled data, these methods fail. In this article, we propose a two-stage model that is able to infer the gender of names present in text without requiring explicit name-gender labels. We use coreference resolution as the backbone for our proposed model. To aid coreference resolution where the existing contextual information does not suffice, we use a retrieval-assisted context aggregation framework. We demonstrate that state-of-the-art name gender inference is possible without supervision. Our proposed method matches or outperforms several supervised approaches and commercially used methods on five English language datasets from different domains.
- Date
- 22. 3.2023 12:00:14
-
Beall, J.; Kafadar, K.: ¬The effectiveness of copy cotaloging at eliminating typographical errors in shared bibliographic records (2004)
0.02
0.02384748 = product of:
0.04769496 = sum of:
0.02956491 = weight(_text_:data in 4849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02956491 = score(doc=4849,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 4849, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4849)
0.01813005 = product of:
0.0362601 = sum of:
0.0362601 = weight(_text_:22 in 4849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0362601 = score(doc=4849,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4849, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4849)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Typographical errors in bibliographic records can cause retrieval problems in online catalogs. This study examined one hundred typographical errors in records in the OCLC WorldCat database. The local catalogs of five libraries holding the items described by the bibliographic records with typographical errors were searched to determine whether each library had corrected the errors. The study found that only 35.8 percent of the errors had been corrected. Knowledge of copy cataloging error rates can help underscore the importance of quality data in bibliographic utilities and, further, can serve as an indication to libraries whether they need to pay more attention to correcting types in the copy cataloging process.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Bothmann, R.: Cataloging electronic books (2004)
0.02
0.02384748 = product of:
0.04769496 = sum of:
0.02956491 = weight(_text_:data in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02956491 = score(doc=129,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
0.01813005 = product of:
0.0362601 = sum of:
0.0362601 = weight(_text_:22 in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0362601 = score(doc=129,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Papers on the cataloging of electronic resources have focused on electronic journals and Internet resources such as Web sites and not on electronic books. Electronic books are nonserial monographic resources accessed with a computer either directly or remotely. Rules and standards for cataloging electronic resources have changed and continue to change. This article discusses the electronic book as a unique manifestation and provides practical instruction on the application of current cataloging rules. The cataloging elements covered are control fields and variable data fields, including classification, uniform titles, title information, edition information, type and extent of the resource, publication and distribution information, physical description, series statements, notes, and subject analysis.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Brunt, R.: Old rules for a new game : Cutter revisited (1998)
0.02
0.02384748 = product of:
0.04769496 = sum of:
0.02956491 = weight(_text_:data in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02956491 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
0.01813005 = product of:
0.0362601 = sum of:
0.0362601 = weight(_text_:22 in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0362601 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- It is contended that while there are considerable numbers of people interested in the application of information retrieval (IR) software on their home computers in their professional, working and recreational activities, they are not very well served in using it to best advantage. Describes the writer's attempts to transfer some of the recorded good practice of the first information managers to contemporary problems. Data input standards devoted to library organisation may be developed to establish a set of principles to encourage the consistent organisation of the entire range of objects which might be represented in databases. Specific areas of difficulty are examined.
- Date
- 24. 1.2007 19:38:22
-
Stephens, O.: Introduction to OpenRefine (2014)
0.02
0.023704663 = product of:
0.09481865 = sum of:
0.09481865 = weight(_text_:data in 2884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09481865 = score(doc=2884,freq=28.0), product of:
0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.7843124 = fieldWeight in 2884, product of:
5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
28.0 = termFreq=28.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2884)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- OpenRefine is described as a tool for working with 'messy' data - but what does this mean? It is probably easiest to describe the kinds of data OpenRefine is good at working with and the sorts of problems it can help you solve. OpenRefine is most useful where you have data in a simple tabular format but with internal inconsistencies either in data formats, or where data appears, or in terminology used. It can help you: Get an overview of a data set Resolve inconsistencies in a data set Help you split data up into more granular parts Match local data up to other data sets Enhance a data set with data from other sources Some common scenarios might be: 1. Where you want to know how many times a particular value appears in a column in your data. 2. Where you want to know how values are distributed across your whole data set. 3. Where you have a list of dates which are formatted in different ways, and want to change all the dates in the list to a single common date format.
-
Münnich, M.: REUSE or rule harmonization : just a project? (2000)
0.02
0.021407552 = product of:
0.042815104 = sum of:
0.02986507 = weight(_text_:data in 192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02986507 = score(doc=192,freq=4.0), product of:
0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.24703519 = fieldWeight in 192, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=192)
0.012950035 = product of:
0.02590007 = sum of:
0.02590007 = weight(_text_:22 in 192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02590007 = score(doc=192,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03823278 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 192, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=192)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- German academic libraries acquire a large number of books from British and American publishers. The bibliographic records of the Library of Congress and the British National Bibliography are offered in most German library networks. Thus, projects REUSE and REUSE+ were undertaken when there was a demand for harmonization of Germany cataloging rules with AACR2 (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules). Experts in the United States and Germany systematically analyzed bibliographic data and compared the codes on which the data were based. Major and minor differences in cataloging rules were identified. The REUSE group proposed German participation in international authority files and changes in RAK, the German cataloging rules. In REUSE+ the different types of hierarchical bibliographic structures in USMARC and MAB2 and other German formats were analyzed. The German project group made suggestions concerning both the German formats and the USMARC format. Steps toward rule alignment and harmonization of online requirements were made when the German Cataloging Rules Conference made decisions on resolutions prepared by the Working Groups on Descriptive Cataloging that dealt with titles, encoding of form titles and conference terms, prefixes in names, hierarchies, entries under persons and corporate bodies, and the conceptual basis of RAK2 in the context of harmonization. Although problems remain, German rule makers have made progress toward internationality.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
