Search (36 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  1. Liddy, E.D.: ¬The art of back-of-the-book indexes (1991-92) 0.01
    0.014932535 = product of:
      0.05973014 = sum of:
        0.05973014 = weight(_text_:data in 6357) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05973014 = score(doc=6357,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03823278 = queryNorm
            0.49407038 = fieldWeight in 6357, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6357)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    A mail survey of 433 authors produced data on the status of the indexers of their books. The collection of reliable data was to determine whether differences are discernable among indexes according to the status who created them
  2. Booth, D.: Indexing parish registers by computer (1993) 0.01
    0.010558897 = product of:
      0.042235587 = sum of:
        0.042235587 = weight(_text_:data in 6622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042235587 = score(doc=6622,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03823278 = queryNorm
            0.34936053 = fieldWeight in 6622, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6622)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a new version of PRINDEX computer programme which takes parish register transcript files from word processing files and produces edited indices of person, places and trades. Describes the computerized indexing which has three stages: parsing transcripts into lists of names, places; polishing the lists to remove errors, duplicates; presenting the data as edited indices
  3. Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000) 0.01
    0.010360028 = product of:
      0.04144011 = sum of:
        0.04144011 = product of:
          0.08288022 = sum of:
            0.08288022 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08288022 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03823278 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
  4. Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001) 0.01
    0.010360028 = product of:
      0.04144011 = sum of:
        0.04144011 = product of:
          0.08288022 = sum of:
            0.08288022 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08288022 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03823278 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
  5. Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000) 0.01
    0.010360028 = product of:
      0.04144011 = sum of:
        0.04144011 = product of:
          0.08288022 = sum of:
            0.08288022 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08288022 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03823278 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
  6. Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001) 0.01
    0.010360028 = product of:
      0.04144011 = sum of:
        0.04144011 = product of:
          0.08288022 = sum of:
            0.08288022 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08288022 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03823278 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
  7. Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978) 0.01
    0.009065025 = product of:
      0.0362601 = sum of:
        0.0362601 = product of:
          0.0725202 = sum of:
            0.0725202 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0725202 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03823278 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
  8. Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001) 0.01
    0.009065025 = product of:
      0.0362601 = sum of:
        0.0362601 = product of:
          0.0725202 = sum of:
            0.0725202 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0725202 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03823278 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
  9. Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001) 0.01
    0.009065025 = product of:
      0.0362601 = sum of:
        0.0362601 = product of:
          0.0725202 = sum of:
            0.0725202 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0725202 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03823278 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
  10. Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000) 0.01
    0.009065025 = product of:
      0.0362601 = sum of:
        0.0362601 = product of:
          0.0725202 = sum of:
            0.0725202 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0725202 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03823278 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
  11. Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000) 0.01
    0.009065025 = product of:
      0.0362601 = sum of:
        0.0362601 = product of:
          0.0725202 = sum of:
            0.0725202 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0725202 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03823278 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
  12. Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000) 0.01
    0.009065025 = product of:
      0.0362601 = sum of:
        0.0362601 = product of:
          0.0725202 = sum of:
            0.0725202 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0725202 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03823278 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
  13. Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001) 0.01
    0.009065025 = product of:
      0.0362601 = sum of:
        0.0362601 = product of:
          0.0725202 = sum of:
            0.0725202 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0725202 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03823278 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
  14. Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001) 0.01
    0.009065025 = product of:
      0.0362601 = sum of:
        0.0362601 = product of:
          0.0725202 = sum of:
            0.0725202 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0725202 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03823278 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
  15. Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004) 0.01
    0.009065025 = product of:
      0.0362601 = sum of:
        0.0362601 = product of:
          0.0725202 = sum of:
            0.0725202 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0725202 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03823278 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    17.10.2005 13:54:22
  16. Hedden, H.: Creating an index for your Web site to make info easier to see (2006) 0.01
    0.008447117 = product of:
      0.03378847 = sum of:
        0.03378847 = weight(_text_:data in 2189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03378847 = score(doc=2189,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03823278 = queryNorm
            0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 2189, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2189)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Most libraries have long had their own Web sites. The longer a library has had a Web site the more likely it is that the number of pages, and the amount of information within those pages, has grown beyond what users can find simply with the navigation menu. Building a site index is a great way to help seekers find all those bits of data they might otherwise miss.
  17. Bell, H.K.: Indexing biographies, and other stories of human lives (1992) 0.01
    0.0077700205 = product of:
      0.031080082 = sum of:
        0.031080082 = product of:
          0.062160164 = sum of:
            0.062160164 = weight(_text_:22 in 5396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062160164 = score(doc=5396,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03823278 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5396, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5396)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.46-47 (R. Fugmann)
  18. Lathrop, L.: ¬An indexer's guide to the Internet (1999) 0.01
    0.0077700205 = product of:
      0.031080082 = sum of:
        0.031080082 = product of:
          0.062160164 = sum of:
            0.062160164 = weight(_text_:22 in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062160164 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03823278 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Indexer 22(2000) no.1, S.51 (R. Davis)
  19. Gardner, R.; Gardner, E.: Indexing The Canadian Encyclopedia second edition (1988) 0.01
    0.0073912274 = product of:
      0.02956491 = sum of:
        0.02956491 = weight(_text_:data in 652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02956491 = score(doc=652,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03823278 = queryNorm
            0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 652, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=652)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The index to the second edition of The Canadian Encyclopedia was prepared on an IBM PC-XT personal computer using the IBM Professional Editor, custom programs written in IBM Pascal, and TeX a high quality typesetting program developed by Donald E. Knuth of Stanford University in California. The entries were chosen and keyed in by the indexer, and then alphabetized, formatted, and typeset by the computer. An unusual data entry format together with good typesetting software made possible the delivery to the printer of the 372 page camera ready index less than two weeks after the indexer received the final pages of text. TeX provides fully automatic pagination.
  20. Bernhardt, R.: Erstellung von Registern (1971) 0.01
    0.0073912274 = product of:
      0.02956491 = sum of:
        0.02956491 = weight(_text_:data in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02956491 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03823278 = queryNorm
            0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The paper deals with procedures and problems arising when computers are used as tools in the production of indexes. The following steps of the procedure are explained and studied: 1) Correction of machine-readable records; 2) Production of index entries. Here, various methods and forms (KWIC, KWOC, rotation method) and dictionary use are described and discussed, and information about their advantages and disadvantages is given; 3) Sorting and cumulation of index entries; 4) Output and setting, output feasibilities are detailed. Emphasis is also laid on the problems arising from the non-satisfactory links of the processing chain: data recording, limited fonts, and choice of index terms.