Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Theorie verbaler Dokumentationssprachen"
  1. Jia, J.: From data to knowledge : the relationships between vocabularies, linked data and knowledge graphs (2021) 0.04
    0.04454566 = product of:
      0.08909132 = sum of:
        0.07614129 = weight(_text_:data in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07614129 = score(doc=106,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03823278 = queryNorm
            0.6298187 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
        0.012950035 = product of:
          0.02590007 = sum of:
            0.02590007 = weight(_text_:22 in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02590007 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03823278 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify the concepts, component parts and relationships between vocabularies, linked data and knowledge graphs (KGs) from the perspectives of data and knowledge transitions. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses conceptual analysis methods. This study focuses on distinguishing concepts and analyzing composition and intercorrelations to explore data and knowledge transitions. Findings Vocabularies are the cornerstone for accurately building understanding of the meaning of data. Vocabularies provide for a data-sharing model and play an important role in supporting the semantic expression of linked data and defining the schema layer; they are also used for entity recognition, alignment and linkage for KGs. KGs, which consist of a schema layer and a data layer, are presented as cubes that organically combine vocabularies, linked data and big data. Originality/value This paper first describes the composition of vocabularies, linked data and KGs. More importantly, this paper innovatively analyzes and summarizes the interrelatedness of these factors, which comes from frequent interactions between data and knowledge. The three factors empower each other and can ultimately empower the Semantic Web.
    Date
    22. 1.2021 14:24:32
  2. Maniez, J.: Fusion de banques de donnees documentaires at compatibilite des languages d'indexation (1997) 0.03
    0.029716276 = product of:
      0.05943255 = sum of:
        0.04389251 = weight(_text_:data in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04389251 = score(doc=2246,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03823278 = queryNorm
            0.3630661 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
        0.015540041 = product of:
          0.031080082 = sum of:
            0.031080082 = weight(_text_:22 in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031080082 = score(doc=2246,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03823278 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the apparently unattainable goal of compatibility of information languages. While controlled languages can improve retrieval performance within a single system, they make cooperation across different systems more difficult. The Internet and downloading accentuate this adverse outcome and the acceleration of data exchange aggravates the problem of compatibility. Defines this familiar concept and demonstrates that coherence is just as necessary as it was for indexing languages, the proliferation of which has created confusion in grouped data banks. Describes 2 types of potential solutions, similar to those applied to automatic translation of natural languages: - harmonizing the information languages themselves, both difficult and expensive, or, the more flexible solution involving automatic harmonization of indexing formulae based on pre established concordance tables. However, structural incompatibilities between post coordinated languages and classifications may lead any harmonization tools up a blind alley, while the paths of a universal concordance model are rare and narrow
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Integration of information data banks and compatibility of indexing languages
  3. Ruge, G.: ¬A spreading activation network for automatic generation of thesaurus relationships (1991) 0.01
    0.009065025 = product of:
      0.0362601 = sum of:
        0.0362601 = product of:
          0.0725202 = sum of:
            0.0725202 = weight(_text_:22 in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0725202 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03823278 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    8.10.2000 11:52:22
  4. Mikacic, M.: Statistical system for subject designation (SSSD) for libraries in Croatia (1996) 0.01
    0.007325646 = product of:
      0.029302584 = sum of:
        0.029302584 = product of:
          0.058605168 = sum of:
            0.058605168 = weight(_text_:22 in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058605168 = score(doc=2943,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03823278 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    31. 7.2006 14:22:21
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.77-93
  5. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996) 0.01
    0.0064750174 = product of:
      0.02590007 = sum of:
        0.02590007 = product of:
          0.05180014 = sum of:
            0.05180014 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05180014 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03823278 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Pages
    S.11-22
  6. Compatibility and integration of order systems : Research Seminar Proceedings of the TIP/ISKO Meeting, Warsaw, 13-15 September 1995 (1996) 0.01
    0.0052794483 = product of:
      0.021117793 = sum of:
        0.021117793 = weight(_text_:data in 6050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021117793 = score(doc=6050,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03823278 = queryNorm
            0.17468026 = fieldWeight in 6050, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6050)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: SCHMITZ-ESSER, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility; RIESTHUIS, G.: Theory of compatibility of information languages; DAHLBERG, I.: The compatibility guidelines - a re-evaluation; SOERGEL, D.: Data structure and software support for integrated thesauri; MURASZKIEWICZ, M., H. RYBINSKI u. W. STRUK: Software problems of merging multilingual thesauri; CHMIELEWSKA-GORCZYCA, E.: Compatibility of indexing tools in multidatabase environment; NEGRINI, G.: Towards structural compatibility between concept systems; SCIBOR, E.: Some remarks on the establishment of concordances between a universal classification system and an interdisciplinary thesaurus; HOPPE, S.: The UMLS - a model for knowledge integration in a subject field; DEXTRE-CLARKE, S.: Integrating thesauri in the agricultural sciences; ROULIN, C.: Bringing multilingual thesauri together: a feasibility study; ZIMMERMANN, H.: Conception and application possibilities of classification concordances in an OPAC environment; SOSINSKA-KALATA, B.: The Universal Decimal Classification as an international standard for knowledge organization in bibliographic databases and library catalogues; WOZNIAK, J. u. T. GLOWACKA: KABA Subject Authority File - an example of an integrated Polish-French-English subject headings system; BABIK, W.: Terminology as a level for the compatibility of indexing languages - some remarks; STANCIKOVA, P.: International integrated database systems linked to multilingual thesauri covering the field of environment and agriculture; SAMEK, T.: Indexing languages integration and the EUROVOC Thesaurus in the Czech Republic; SIWEK, K.: Compatibility discrepancies between Polish and foreign databases; GLINSKI, W. u. M. MURASZKIEWICZ: An intelligent front-end processor for accessing information systems
  7. ¬The semantics of relationships : an interdisciplinary perspective (2002) 0.01
    0.0052794483 = product of:
      0.021117793 = sum of:
        0.021117793 = weight(_text_:data in 1430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021117793 = score(doc=1430,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03823278 = queryNorm
            0.17468026 = fieldWeight in 1430, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1430)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Work on relationships takes place in many communities, including, among others, data modeling, knowledge representation, natural language processing, linguistics, and information retrieval. Unfortunately, continued disciplinary splintering and specialization keeps any one person from being familiar with the full expanse of that work. By including contributions form experts in a variety of disciplines and backgrounds, this volume demonstrates both the parallels that inform work on relationships across a number of fields and the singular emphases that have yet to be fully embraced, The volume is organized into 3 parts: (1) Types of relationships (2) Relationships in knowledge representation and reasoning (3) Applications of relationships
  8. Broughton, V.: Language related problems in the construction of faceted terminologies and their automatic management (2008) 0.01
    0.0052794483 = product of:
      0.021117793 = sum of:
        0.021117793 = weight(_text_:data in 2497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021117793 = score(doc=2497,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.120893985 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03823278 = queryNorm
            0.17468026 = fieldWeight in 2497, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2497)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    The paper describes current work on the generation of a thesaurus format from the schedules of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification 2nd edition (BC2). The practical problems that occur in moving from a concept based approach to a terminological approach cluster around issues of vocabulary control that are not fully addressed in a systematic structure. These difficulties can be exacerbated within domains in the humanities because large numbers of culture specific terms may need to be accommodated in any thesaurus. The ways in which these problems can be resolved within the context of a semi-automated approach to the thesaurus generation have consequences for the management of classification data in the source vocabulary. The way in which the vocabulary is marked up for the purpose of machine manipulation is described, and some of the implications for editorial policy are discussed and examples given. The value of the classification notation as a language independent representation and mapping tool should not be sacrificed in such an exercise.
  9. Degez, D.: Compatibilité des langages d'indexation mariage, cohabitation ou fusion? : Quelques examples concrèts (1998) 0.00
    0.0045325123 = product of:
      0.01813005 = sum of:
        0.01813005 = product of:
          0.0362601 = sum of:
            0.0362601 = weight(_text_:22 in 2245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0362601 = score(doc=2245,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03823278 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2245, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2245)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  10. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001) 0.00
    0.0045325123 = product of:
      0.01813005 = sum of:
        0.01813005 = product of:
          0.0362601 = sum of:
            0.0362601 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0362601 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03823278 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:45:57
  11. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010) 0.00
    0.0045325123 = product of:
      0.01813005 = sum of:
        0.01813005 = product of:
          0.0362601 = sum of:
            0.0362601 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0362601 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03823278 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  12. Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985) 0.00
    0.0022662561 = product of:
      0.009065025 = sum of:
        0.009065025 = product of:
          0.01813005 = sum of:
            0.01813005 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01813005 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13388468 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03823278 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.