-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.S.: ¬The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact (2019)
0.02
0.020945653 = product of:
0.052364133 = sum of:
0.043026593 = weight(_text_:2003 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043026593 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14955263 = queryWeight, product of:
4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
0.034459375 = queryNorm
0.28770202 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.009337539 = product of:
0.028012617 = sum of:
0.028012617 = weight(_text_:22 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028012617 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12067086 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034459375 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- A recent publication in Nature reports that public R&D funding is only weakly correlated with the citation impact of a nation's articles as measured by the field-weighted citation index (FWCI; defined by Scopus). On the basis of the supplementary data, we up-scaled the design using Web of Science data for the decade 2003-2013 and OECD funding data for the corresponding decade assuming a 2-year delay (2001-2011). Using negative binomial regression analysis, we found very small coefficients, but the effects of international collaboration are positive and statistically significant, whereas the effects of government funding are negative, an order of magnitude smaller, and statistically nonsignificant (in two of three analyses). In other words, international collaboration improves the impact of research articles, whereas more government funding tends to have a small adverse effect when comparing OECD countries.
- Date
- 8. 1.2019 18:22:45
-
Bornmann, L.: How much does the expected number of citations for a publication change if it contains the address of a specific scientific institute? : a new approach for the analysis of citation data on the institutional level based on regression models (2016)
0.01
0.0071710995 = product of:
0.0358555 = sum of:
0.0358555 = weight(_text_:2003 in 3095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0358555 = score(doc=3095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14955263 = queryWeight, product of:
4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
0.034459375 = queryNorm
0.2397517 = fieldWeight in 3095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3095)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Citation data for institutes are generally provided as numbers of citations or as relative citation rates (as, for example, in the Leiden Ranking). These numbers can then be compared between the institutes. This study aims to present a new approach for the evaluation of citation data at the institutional level, based on regression models. As example data, the study includes all articles and reviews from the Web of Science for the publication year 2003 (n?=?886,416 papers). The study is based on an in-house database of the Max Planck Society. The study investigates how much the expected number of citations for a publication changes if it contains the address of an institute. The calculation of the expected values allows, on the one hand, investigating how the citation impact of the papers of an institute appears in comparison with the total of all papers. On the other hand, the expected values for several institutes can be compared with one another or with a set of randomly selected publications. Besides the institutes, the regression models include factors which can be assumed to have a general influence on citation counts (e.g., the number of authors).
-
Bornmann, L.: On the function of university rankings (2014)
0.00
0.0037689195 = product of:
0.018844597 = sum of:
0.018844597 = product of:
0.05653379 = sum of:
0.05653379 = weight(_text_:29 in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05653379 = score(doc=1188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1212173 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.034459375 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 29. 1.2014 16:55:03
-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014)
0.00
0.0037350156 = product of:
0.018675078 = sum of:
0.018675078 = product of:
0.056025233 = sum of:
0.056025233 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056025233 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12067086 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034459375 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 18. 3.2014 19:13:22
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014)
0.00
0.0024900108 = product of:
0.012450053 = sum of:
0.012450053 = product of:
0.03735016 = sum of:
0.03735016 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03735016 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12067086 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034459375 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:05:18
-
Bornmann, L.; Marx, W.: Distributions instead of single numbers : percentiles and beam plots for the assessment of single researchers (2014)
0.00
0.0021985364 = product of:
0.010992682 = sum of:
0.010992682 = product of:
0.032978043 = sum of:
0.032978043 = weight(_text_:29 in 1190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032978043 = score(doc=1190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1212173 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.034459375 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1190)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 29. 1.2014 15:58:21
-
Bornmann, L.: How to analyze percentile citation impact data meaningfully in bibliometrics : the statistical analysis of distributions, percentile rank classes, and top-cited papers (2013)
0.00
0.0018675078 = product of:
0.009337539 = sum of:
0.009337539 = product of:
0.028012617 = sum of:
0.028012617 = weight(_text_:22 in 656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028012617 = score(doc=656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12067086 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034459375 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=656)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:44:17
-
Bornmann, L.; Schier, H.; Marx, W.; Daniel, H.-D.: Is interactive open access publishing able to identify high-impact submissions? : a study on the predictive validity of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics by using percentile rank classes (2011)
0.00
0.0015703833 = product of:
0.007851916 = sum of:
0.007851916 = product of:
0.023555748 = sum of:
0.023555748 = weight(_text_:29 in 4132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023555748 = score(doc=4132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1212173 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.034459375 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4132)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 8. 1.2011 18:29:40
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor : normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science (2011)
0.00
0.0015562567 = product of:
0.007781283 = sum of:
0.007781283 = product of:
0.023343848 = sum of:
0.023343848 = weight(_text_:22 in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023343848 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12067086 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.034459375 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 12:51:07
