Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Ding, Y."
  1. Song, M.; Kim, S.Y.; Zhang, G.; Ding, Y.; Chambers, T.: Productivity and influence in bioinformatics : a bibliometric analysis using PubMed central (2014) 0.02 
    0.020979557 = product of:
  0.05244889 = sum of:
    0.043026593 = weight(_text_:2003 in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043026593 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14955263 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034459375 = queryNorm
        0.28770202 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
    0.0094222985 = product of:
      0.028266896 = sum of:
        0.028266896 = weight(_text_:29 in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028266896 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1212173 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034459375 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Bioinformatics is a fast-growing field based on the optimal use of "big data" gathered in genomic, proteomics, and functional genomics research. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive and in-depth bibliometric analysis of the field of bioinformatics by extracting citation data from PubMed Central full-text. Citation data for the period 2000 to 2011, comprising 20,869 papers with 546,245 citations, was used to evaluate the productivity and influence of this emerging field. Four measures were used to identify productivity; most productive authors, most productive countries, most productive organizations, and most popular subject terms. Research impact was analyzed based on the measures of most cited papers, most cited authors, emerging stars, and leading organizations. Results show the overall trends between the periods 2000 to 2003 and 2004 to 2007 were dissimilar, while trends between the periods 2004 to 2007 and 2008 to 2011 were similar. In addition, the field of bioinformatics has undergone a significant shift, co-evolving with other biomedical disciplines.
    Date
    29. 1.2014 16:40:41
  2. Lin, N.; Li, D.; Ding, Y.; He, B.; Qin, Z.; Tang, J.; Li, J.; Dong, T.: ¬The dynamic features of Delicious, Flickr, and YouTube (2012) 0.01 
    0.0071710995 = product of:
  0.0358555 = sum of:
    0.0358555 = weight(_text_:2003 in 4970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0358555 = score(doc=4970,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14955263 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034459375 = queryNorm
        0.2397517 = fieldWeight in 4970, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4970)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This article investigates the dynamic features of social tagging vocabularies in Delicious, Flickr, and YouTube from 2003 to 2008. Three algorithms are designed to study the macro- and micro-tag growth as well as the dynamics of taggers' activities, respectively. Moreover, we propose a Tagger Tag Resource Latent Dirichlet Allocation (TTR-LDA) model to explore the evolution of topics emerging from those social vocabularies. Our results show that (a) at the macro level, tag growth in all the three tagging systems obeys power law distribution with exponents lower than 1; at the micro level, the tag growth of popular resources in all three tagging systems follows a similar power law distribution; (b) the exponents of tag growth vary in different evolving stages of resources; (c) the growth of number of taggers associated with different popular resources presents a feature of convergence over time; (d) the active level of taggers has a positive correlation with the macro-tag growth of different tagging systems; and (e) some topics evolve into several subtopics over time while others experience relatively stable stages in which their contents do not change much, and certain groups of taggers continue their interests in them.
  3. Ding, Y.: Scholarly communication and bibliometrics : Part 1: The scholarly communication model: literature review (1998) 0.00 
    0.0031407666 = product of:
  0.015703833 = sum of:
    0.015703833 = product of:
      0.047111496 = sum of:
        0.047111496 = weight(_text_:29 in 3995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047111496 = score(doc=3995,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1212173 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034459375 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 3995, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3995)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 23(1998) no.2, S.20-29
  4. Ding, Y.: Applying weighted PageRank to author citation networks (2011) 0.00 
    0.002178759 = product of:
  0.010893796 = sum of:
    0.010893796 = product of:
      0.032681387 = sum of:
        0.032681387 = weight(_text_:22 in 4188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032681387 = score(doc=4188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12067086 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034459375 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4188)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:02:21
  5. Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chambers, T.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis : the next generation of citation analysis (2014) 0.00 
    0.0018675078 = product of:
  0.009337539 = sum of:
    0.009337539 = product of:
      0.028012617 = sum of:
        0.028012617 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028012617 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12067086 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034459375 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 8.2014 16:52:04
  6. Min, C.; Ding, Y.; Li, J.; Bu, Y.; Pei, L.; Sun, J.: Innovation or imitation : the diffusion of citations (2018) 0.00 
    0.0015703833 = product of:
  0.007851916 = sum of:
    0.007851916 = product of:
      0.023555748 = sum of:
        0.023555748 = weight(_text_:29 in 4445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023555748 = score(doc=4445,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1212173 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034459375 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4445, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4445)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    29. 9.2018 13:24:10
  7. Liu, M.; Bu, Y.; Chen, C.; Xu, J.; Li, D.; Leng, Y.; Freeman, R.B.; Meyer, E.T.; Yoon, W.; Sung, M.; Jeong, M.; Lee, J.; Kang, J.; Min, C.; Zhai, Y.; Song, M.; Ding, Y.: Pandemics are catalysts of scientific novelty : evidence from COVID-19 (2022) 0.00 
    0.0015703833 = product of:
  0.007851916 = sum of:
    0.007851916 = product of:
      0.023555748 = sum of:
        0.023555748 = weight(_text_:29 in 633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023555748 = score(doc=633,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1212173 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034459375 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 633, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=633)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Scientific novelty drives the efforts to invent new vaccines and solutions during the pandemic. First-time collaboration and international collaboration are two pivotal channels to expand teams' search activities for a broader scope of resources required to address the global challenge, which might facilitate the generation of novel ideas. Our analysis of 98,981 coronavirus papers suggests that scientific novelty measured by the BioBERT model that is pretrained on 29 million PubMed articles, and first-time collaboration increased after the outbreak of COVID-19, and international collaboration witnessed a sudden decrease. During COVID-19, papers with more first-time collaboration were found to be more novel and international collaboration did not hamper novelty as it had done in the normal periods. The findings suggest the necessity of reaching out for distant resources and the importance of maintaining a collaborative scientific community beyond nationalism during a pandemic.

Authors

Years

Types

Themes