Search (27 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Inhaltsanalyse"
  1. Marshall, L.: Specific and generic subject headings : increasing subject access to library materials (2003) 0.04 
    0.03614488 = product of:
  0.0903622 = sum of:
    0.079369515 = weight(_text_:2003 in 5497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.079369515 = score(doc=5497,freq=5.0), product of:
        0.14955263 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034459375 = queryNorm
        0.53071296 = fieldWeight in 5497, product of:
          2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
            5.0 = termFreq=5.0
          4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5497)
    0.010992682 = product of:
      0.032978043 = sum of:
        0.032978043 = weight(_text_:29 in 5497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032978043 = score(doc=5497,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1212173 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034459375 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5497, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5497)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    30. 7.2006 14:29:04
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 36(2003) no.2, S.59-87
    Year
    2003
  2. Jens-Erik Mai, J.-E.: ¬The role of documents, domains and decisions in indexing (2004) 0.01 
    0.013986371 = product of:
  0.03496593 = sum of:
    0.028684396 = weight(_text_:2003 in 2653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028684396 = score(doc=2653,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14955263 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034459375 = queryNorm
        0.19180135 = fieldWeight in 2653, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2653)
    0.0062815323 = product of:
      0.018844597 = sum of:
        0.018844597 = weight(_text_:29 in 2653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018844597 = score(doc=2653,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1212173 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034459375 = queryNorm
            0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 2653, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2653)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    1. Introduction The document at hand is often regarded as the most important entity for analysis in the indexing situation. The indexer's focus is directed to the "entity and its faithful description" (Soergel, 1985, 227) and the indexer is advised to "stick to the text and the author's claims" (Lancaster, 2003, 37). The indexer's aim is to establish the subject matter based an an analysis of the document with the goal of representing the document as truthfully as possible and to ensure the subject representation's validity by remaining neutral and objective. To help indexers with their task they are guided towards particular and important attributes of the document that could help them determine the document's subject matter. The exact attributes the indexer is recommended to examine varies, but typical examples are: the title, the abstract, the table of contents, chapter headings, chapter subheadings, preface, introduction, foreword, the text itself, bibliographical references, index entries, illustrations, diagrams, and tables and their captions. The exact recommendations vary according to the type of document that is being indexed (monographs vs. periodical articles, for instance). It is clear that indexers should provide faithful descriptions, that indexers should represent the author's claims, and that the document's attributes are helpful points of analysis. However, indexers need much more guidance when determining the subject than simply the documents themselves. One approach that could be taken to handle the Situation is a useroriented approach in which it is argued that the indexer should ask, "how should I make this document ... visible to potential users? What terms should I use to convey its knowledge to those interested?" (Albrechtsen, 1993, 222). The basic idea is that indexers need to have the users' information needs and terminology in mind when determining the subject matter of documents as well as when selecting index terms.
    Date
    29. 8.2004 15:13:08
  3. Marsh, E.E.; White, M.D.: ¬A taxonomy of relationships between images and text (2003) 0.01 
    0.013606205 = product of:
  0.06803102 = sum of:
    0.06803102 = weight(_text_:2003 in 4444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06803102 = score(doc=4444,freq=5.0), product of:
        0.14955263 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034459375 = queryNorm
        0.45489684 = fieldWeight in 4444, product of:
          2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
            5.0 = termFreq=5.0
          4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4444)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 59(2003) no.6, S.647-672
    Year
    2003
  4. Zarri, G.P.: Indexing and querying of narrative documents, a knowledge representation approach (2003) 0.01 
    0.012295873 = product of:
  0.061479364 = sum of:
    0.061479364 = weight(_text_:2003 in 2691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061479364 = score(doc=2691,freq=3.0), product of:
        0.14955263 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034459375 = queryNorm
        0.4110885 = fieldWeight in 2691, product of:
          1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
            3.0 = termFreq=3.0
          4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2691)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Year
    2003
  5. Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002) 0.01 
    0.010739503 = product of:
  0.026848758 = sum of:
    0.014342198 = weight(_text_:2003 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014342198 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14955263 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034459375 = queryNorm
        0.09590068 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
    0.0125065595 = product of:
      0.01875984 = sum of:
        0.0094222985 = weight(_text_:29 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0094222985 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1212173 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034459375 = queryNorm
            0.07773064 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
        0.00933754 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00933754 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12067086 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034459375 = queryNorm
            0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Footnote
    Rez. in JASIST 54(2003) no.4, S.356-357 (S.J. Lincicum): "Reliance upon shared cataloging in academic libraries in the United States has been driven largely by the need to reduce the expense of cataloging operations without muck regard for the Impact that this approach might have an the quality of the records included in local catalogs. In recent years, ever increasing pressures have prompted libraries to adopt practices such as "rapid" copy cataloging that purposely reduce the scrutiny applied to bibliographic records downloaded from shared databases, possibly increasing the number of errors that slip through unnoticed. Errors in bibliographic records can lead to serious problems for library catalog users. If the data contained in bibliographic records is inaccurate, users will have difficulty discovering and recognizing resources in a library's collection that are relevant to their needs. Thus, it has become increasingly important to understand the extent and nature of errors that occur in the records found in large shared bibliographic databases, such as OCLC WorldCat, to develop cataloging practices optimized for the shared cataloging environment. Although this monograph raises a few legitimate concerns about recent trends in cataloging practice, it fails to provide the "detailed look" at misinformation in library catalogs arising from linguistic errors and mistakes in subject analysis promised by the publisher. A basic premise advanced throughout the text is that a certain amount of linguistic and subject knowledge is required to catalog library materials effectively. The author emphasizes repeatedly that most catalogers today are asked to catalog an increasingly diverse array of materials, and that they are often required to work in languages or subject areas of which they have little or no knowledge. He argues that the records contributed to shared databases are increasingly being created by catalogers with inadequate linguistic or subject expertise. This adversely affects the quality of individual library catalogs because errors often go uncorrected as records are downloaded from shared databases to local catalogs by copy catalogers who possess even less knowledge. Calling misinformation an "evil phenomenon," Bade states that his main goal is to discuss, "two fundamental types of misinformation found in bibliographic and authority records in library catalogs: that arising from linguistic errors, and that caused by errors in subject analysis, including missing or wrong subject headings" (p. 2). After a superficial discussion of "other" types of errors that can occur in bibliographic records, such as typographical errors and errors in the application of descriptive cataloging rules, Bade begins his discussion of linguistic errors. He asserts that sharing bibliographic records created by catalogers with inadequate linguistic or subject knowledge has, "disastrous effects an the library community" (p. 6). To support this bold assertion, Bade provides as evidence little more than a laundry list of errors that he has personally observed in bibliographic records over the years. When he eventually cites several studies that have addressed the availability and quality of records available for materials in languages other than English, he fails to describe the findings of these studies in any detail, let alone relate the findings to his own observations in a meaningful way. Bade claims that a lack of linguistic expertise among catalogers is the "primary source for linguistic misinformation in our databases" (p. 10), but he neither cites substantive data from existing studies nor provides any new data regarding the overall level of linguistic knowledge among catalogers to support this claim. The section concludes with a brief list of eight sensible, if unoriginal, suggestions for coping with the challenge of cataloging materials in unfamiliar languages.
    Arguing that catalogers need to work both quickly and accurately, Bade maintains that employing specialists is the most efficient and effective way to achieve this outcome. Far less compelling than these arguments are Bade's concluding remarks, in which he offers meager suggestions for correcting the problems as he sees them. Overall, this essay is little more than a curmudgeon's diatribe. Addressed primarily to catalogers and library administrators, the analysis presented is too superficial to assist practicing catalogers or cataloging managers in developing solutions to any systemic problems in current cataloging practice, and it presents too little evidence of pervasive problems to convince budget-conscious library administrators of a need to alter practice or to increase their investment in local cataloging operations. Indeed, the reliance upon anecdotal evidence and the apparent nit-picking that dominate the essay might tend to reinforce a negative image of catalogers in the minds of some. To his credit, Bade does provide an important reminder that it is the intellectual contributions made by thousands of erudite catalogers that have made shared cataloging a successful strategy for improving cataloging efficiency. This is an important point that often seems to be forgotten in academic libraries when focus centers an cutting costs. Had Bade focused more narrowly upon the issue of deintellectualization of cataloging and written a carefully structured essay to advance this argument, this essay might have been much more effective." - KO 29(2002) nos.3/4, S.236-237 (A. Sauperl)
  6. Sauperl, A.: Subject determination during the cataloging process : the development of a system based on theoretical principles (2002) 0.01 
    0.010472827 = product of:
  0.026182067 = sum of:
    0.021513296 = weight(_text_:2003 in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021513296 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14955263 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034459375 = queryNorm
        0.14385101 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
    0.0046687694 = product of:
      0.014006308 = sum of:
        0.014006308 = weight(_text_:22 in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014006308 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12067086 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034459375 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    27. 9.2005 14:22:19
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 30(2003) no.2, S.114-115 (M. Hudon); "This most interesting contribution to the literature of subject cataloguing originates in the author's doctoral dissertation, prepared under the direction of jerry Saye at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. In seven highly readable chapters, Alenka Sauperl develops possible answers to her principal research question: How do cataloguers determine or identify the topic of a document and choose appropriate subject representations? Specific questions at the source of this research an a process which has not been a frequent object of study include: Where do cataloguers look for an overall sense of what a document is about? How do they get an overall sense of what a document is about, especially when they are not familiar with the discipline? Do they consider only one or several possible interpretations? How do they translate meanings in appropriate and valid class numbers and subject headings? Using a strictly qualitative methodology, Dr. Sauperl's research is a study of twelve cataloguers in reallife situation. The author insists an the holistic rather than purely theoretical understanding of the process she is targeting. Participants in the study were professional cataloguers, with at least one year experience in their current job at one of three large academic libraries in the Southeastern United States. All three libraries have a large central cataloguing department, and use OCLC sources and the same automated system; the context of cataloguing tasks is thus considered to be reasonably comparable. All participants were volunteers in this study which combined two datagathering techniques: the think-aloud method and time-line interviews. A model of the subject cataloguing process was first developed from observations of a group of six cataloguers who were asked to independently perform original cataloguing an three nonfiction, non-serial items selected from materials regularly assigned to them for processing. The model was then used for follow-up interviews. Each participant in the second group of cataloguers was invited to reflect an his/her work process for a recent challenging document they had catalogued. Results are presented in 12 stories describing as many personal approaches to subject cataloguing. From these stories a summarization is offered and a theoretical model of subject cataloguing is developed which, according to the author, represents a realistic approach to subject cataloguing. Stories alternate comments from the researcher and direct quotations from the observed or interviewed cataloguers. Not surprisingly, the participants' stories reveal similarities in the sequence and accomplishment of several tasks in the process of subject cataloguing. Sauperl's proposed model, described in Chapter 5, includes as main stages: 1) Examination of the book and subject identification; 2) Search for subject headings; 3) Classification. Chapter 6 is a hypothetical Gase study, using the proposed model to describe the various stages of cataloguing a hypothetical resource. ...
  7. Lebrecht, H.: Methoden und Probleme der Bilderschließung am Beispiel des verteilten digitalen Bildarchivs Prometheus (2003) 0.01 
    0.008782767 = product of:
  0.043913834 = sum of:
    0.043913834 = weight(_text_:2003 in 2508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043913834 = score(doc=2508,freq=3.0), product of:
        0.14955263 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034459375 = queryNorm
        0.29363465 = fieldWeight in 2508, product of:
          1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
            3.0 = termFreq=3.0
          4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2508)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Year
    2003
  8. Lebrecht, H.: Methoden und Probleme der Bilderschließung (2003) 0.01 
    0.008782767 = product of:
  0.043913834 = sum of:
    0.043913834 = weight(_text_:2003 in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043913834 = score(doc=2871,freq=3.0), product of:
        0.14955263 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034459375 = queryNorm
        0.29363465 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
          1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
            3.0 = termFreq=3.0
          4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Year
    2003
  9. Hjoerland, B.: Subject (of documents) (2016) 0.01 
    0.0071710995 = product of:
  0.0358555 = sum of:
    0.0358555 = weight(_text_:2003 in 3182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0358555 = score(doc=3182,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14955263 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034459375 = queryNorm
        0.2397517 = fieldWeight in 3182, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3182)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Contents: 1. Introduction; 2. Theoretical views: 2.1 Charles Ammi Cutter (1837-1903), 2.2 S. R. Ranganathan (1892-1972), 2.3 Patrick Wilson (1927-2003), 2.4 "Content oriented" versus "request oriented" views, 2.5 Issues of subjectivity and objectivity, 2.6 The subject knowledge view, 2.7 Other views and definitions; 3. Related concepts: 3.1 Words versus concepts versus subjects, 3.2 Aboutness, 3.3 Topic, 3.4 Isness, 3.5 Ofness, 3.6 Theme.
  10. Laffal, J.: ¬A concept analysis of Jonathan Swift's 'Tale of a tub' and 'Gulliver's travels' (1995) 0.01 
    0.0053300573 = product of:
  0.026650287 = sum of:
    0.026650287 = product of:
      0.07995086 = sum of:
        0.07995086 = weight(_text_:29 in 6362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07995086 = score(doc=6362,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1212173 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034459375 = queryNorm
            0.6595664 = fieldWeight in 6362, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6362)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    8. 3.1997 10:05:29
    Source
    Computers and the humanities. 29(1995) no.5, S.339-361
  11. Martindale, C.; McKenzie, D.: On the utility of content analysis in author attribution : 'The federalist' (1995) 0.01 
    0.0053300573 = product of:
  0.026650287 = sum of:
    0.026650287 = product of:
      0.07995086 = sum of:
        0.07995086 = weight(_text_:29 in 822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07995086 = score(doc=822,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1212173 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034459375 = queryNorm
            0.6595664 = fieldWeight in 822, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=822)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    8. 3.1997 10:05:29
    Source
    Computers and the humanities. 29(1995) no.4, S.259-270
  12. Gardin, J.C.: Document analysis and linguistic theory (1973) 0.01 
    0.005025226 = product of:
  0.02512613 = sum of:
    0.02512613 = product of:
      0.07537839 = sum of:
        0.07537839 = weight(_text_:29 in 2387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07537839 = score(doc=2387,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1212173 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034459375 = queryNorm
            0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 2387, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2387)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 29(1973) no.2, S.137-168
  13. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.00 
    0.0031125133 = product of:
  0.015562566 = sum of:
    0.015562566 = product of:
      0.046687696 = sum of:
        0.046687696 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046687696 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12067086 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034459375 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
  14. Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992) 0.00 
    0.0024900108 = product of:
  0.012450053 = sum of:
    0.012450053 = product of:
      0.03735016 = sum of:
        0.03735016 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03735016 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12067086 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034459375 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:08
  15. Hauff-Hartig, S.: Automatische Transkription von Videos : Fernsehen 3.0: Automatisierte Sentimentanalyse und Zusammenstellung von Kurzvideos mit hohem Aufregungslevel KI-generierte Metadaten: Von der Technologiebeobachtung bis zum produktiven Einsatz (2021) 0.00 
    0.0024900108 = product of:
  0.012450053 = sum of:
    0.012450053 = product of:
      0.03735016 = sum of:
        0.03735016 = weight(_text_:22 in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03735016 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12067086 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034459375 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  16. Raieli, R.: ¬The semantic hole : enthusiasm and caution around multimedia information retrieval (2012) 0.00 
    0.0022008792 = product of:
  0.011004396 = sum of:
    0.011004396 = product of:
      0.033013187 = sum of:
        0.033013187 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033013187 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12067086 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034459375 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:02:10
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.13-22
  17. Hjoerland, B.: Towards a theory of aboutness, subject, topicality, theme, domain, field, content ... and relevance (2001) 0.00 
    0.0021985364 = product of:
  0.010992682 = sum of:
    0.010992682 = product of:
      0.032978043 = sum of:
        0.032978043 = weight(_text_:29 in 6032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032978043 = score(doc=6032,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1212173 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034459375 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 6032, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6032)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    29. 9.2001 14:03:14
  18. Chen, H.: ¬An analysis of image queries in the field of art history (2001) 0.00 
    0.0021985364 = product of:
  0.010992682 = sum of:
    0.010992682 = product of:
      0.032978043 = sum of:
        0.032978043 = weight(_text_:29 in 5187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032978043 = score(doc=5187,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1212173 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034459375 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5187, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5187)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Chen arranged with an Art History instructor to require 20 medieval art images in papers received from 29 students. Participants completed a self administered presearch and postsearch questionnaire, and were interviewed after questionnaire analysis, in order to collect both the keywords and phrases they planned to use, and those actually used. Three MLIS student reviewers then mapped the queries to Enser and McGregor's four categories, Jorgensen's 12 classes, and Fidel's 12 feature data and object poles providing a degree of match on a seven point scale (one not at all to 7 exact). The reviewers give highest scores to Enser and McGregor;'s categories. Modifications to both the Enser and McGregor and Jorgensen schemes are suggested
  19. Shatford, S.: Analyzing the subject of a picture : a theoretical approach (1986) 0.00 
    0.0021985364 = product of:
  0.010992682 = sum of:
    0.010992682 = product of:
      0.032978043 = sum of:
        0.032978043 = weight(_text_:29 in 354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032978043 = score(doc=354,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1212173 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034459375 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 354, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=354)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    7. 1.2007 13:00:29
  20. Früh, W.: Inhaltsanalyse (2001) 0.00 
    0.0018844598 = product of:
  0.0094222985 = sum of:
    0.0094222985 = product of:
      0.028266896 = sum of:
        0.028266896 = weight(_text_:29 in 1751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028266896 = score(doc=1751,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1212173 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034459375 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1751, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1751)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    24. 3.2008 12:29:34

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 23
  • d 4

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications