Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Inhaltsanalyse"
  1. Raieli, R.: ¬The semantic hole : enthusiasm and caution around multimedia information retrieval (2012) 0.09
    0.085595116 = product of:
      0.17119023 = sum of:
        0.17119023 = sum of:
          0.12199747 = weight(_text_:multimedia in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12199747 = score(doc=4888,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.2381132 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.6372695 = idf(docFreq=1163, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051347714 = queryNorm
              0.51235074 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                4.6372695 = idf(docFreq=1163, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
          0.049192756 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049192756 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17981094 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051347714 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper centres on the tools for the management of new digital documents, which are not only textual, but also visual-video, audio or multimedia in the full sense. Among the aims is to demonstrate that operating within the terms of generic Information Retrieval through textual language only is limiting, and it is instead necessary to consider ampler criteria, such as those of MultiMedia Information Retrieval, according to which, every type of digital document can be analyzed and searched by the proper elements of language for its proper nature. MMIR is presented as the organic complex of the systems of Text Retrieval, Visual Retrieval, Video Retrieval, and Audio Retrieval, each of which has an approach to information management that handles the concrete textual, visual, audio, or video content of the documents directly, here defined as content-based. In conclusion, the limits of this content-based objective access to documents is underlined. The discrepancy known as the semantic gap is that which occurs between semantic-interpretive access and content-based access. Finally, the integration of these conceptions is explained, gathering and composing the merits and the advantages of each of the approaches and of the systems to access to information.
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:02:10
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.13-22
    Theme
    Multimedia
  2. Berinstein, P.: Moving multimedia : the information value in images (1997) 0.02
    0.024399493 = product of:
      0.048798986 = sum of:
        0.048798986 = product of:
          0.09759797 = sum of:
            0.09759797 = weight(_text_:multimedia in 2489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09759797 = score(doc=2489,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2381132 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6372695 = idf(docFreq=1163, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051347714 = queryNorm
                0.40988058 = fieldWeight in 2489, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6372695 = idf(docFreq=1163, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2489)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Rowe, N.C.: Inferring depictions in natural-language captions for efficient access to picture data (1994) 0.02
    0.021349557 = product of:
      0.042699113 = sum of:
        0.042699113 = product of:
          0.08539823 = sum of:
            0.08539823 = weight(_text_:multimedia in 7296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08539823 = score(doc=7296,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2381132 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6372695 = idf(docFreq=1163, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051347714 = queryNorm
                0.3586455 = fieldWeight in 7296, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6372695 = idf(docFreq=1163, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7296)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Multimedia data can require significant examination time to find desired features ('content analysis'). An alternative is using natural-language captions to describe the data, and matching captions to English queries. But it is hard to include everything in the caption of a complicated datum, so significant content analysis may still seem required. We discuss linguistic clues in captions, both syntactic and semantic, that can simplify or eliminate content analysis. We introduce the notion of content depiction and ruled for depiction inference. Our approach is implemented in an expert system which demonstrated significant increases in recall in experiments
  4. Zarri, G.P.: Indexing and querying of narrative documents, a knowledge representation approach (2003) 0.02
    0.021349557 = product of:
      0.042699113 = sum of:
        0.042699113 = product of:
          0.08539823 = sum of:
            0.08539823 = weight(_text_:multimedia in 2691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08539823 = score(doc=2691,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2381132 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6372695 = idf(docFreq=1163, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051347714 = queryNorm
                0.3586455 = fieldWeight in 2691, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6372695 = idf(docFreq=1163, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2691)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    We describe here NKRL (Narrative Knowledge Representation Language), a semantic formalism for taking into account the characteristics of narrative multimedia documents. In these documents, the information content consists in the description of 'events' that relate the real or intended behaviour of some 'actors' (characters, personages, etc.). Narrative documents of an economic interest correspond to news stories, corporate documents, normative and legal texts, intelligence messages, representation of patient's medical records, etc. NKRL is characterised by the use of several knowledge representation principles and several high-level inference tools.
  5. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.02
    0.017392267 = product of:
      0.034784533 = sum of:
        0.034784533 = product of:
          0.069569066 = sum of:
            0.069569066 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069569066 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17981094 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051347714 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
  6. Bertola, F.; Patti, V.: Ontology-based affective models to organize artworks in the social semantic web (2016) 0.02
    0.0152496835 = product of:
      0.030499367 = sum of:
        0.030499367 = product of:
          0.060998734 = sum of:
            0.060998734 = weight(_text_:multimedia in 2669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060998734 = score(doc=2669,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2381132 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6372695 = idf(docFreq=1163, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051347714 = queryNorm
                0.25617537 = fieldWeight in 2669, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6372695 = idf(docFreq=1163, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2669)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper, we focus on applying sentiment analysis to resources from online art collections, by exploiting, as information source, tags intended as textual traces that visitors leave to comment artworks on social platforms. We present a framework where methods and tools from a set of disciplines, ranging from Semantic and Social Web to Natural Language Processing, provide us the building blocks for creating a semantic social space to organize artworks according to an ontology of emotions. The ontology is inspired by the Plutchik's circumplex model, a well-founded psychological model of human emotions. Users can be involved in the creation of the emotional space, through a graphical interactive interface. The development of such semantic space enables new ways of accessing and exploring art collections. The affective categorization model and the emotion detection output are encoded into W3C ontology languages. This gives us the twofold advantage to enable tractable reasoning on detected emotions and related artworks, and to foster the interoperability and integration of tools developed in the Semantic Web and Linked Data community. The proposal has been evaluated against a real-word case study, a dataset of tagged multimedia artworks from the ArsMeteo Italian online collection, and validated through a user study.
  7. Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992) 0.01
    0.013913812 = product of:
      0.027827624 = sum of:
        0.027827624 = product of:
          0.05565525 = sum of:
            0.05565525 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05565525 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17981094 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051347714 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:08
  8. Hauff-Hartig, S.: Automatische Transkription von Videos : Fernsehen 3.0: Automatisierte Sentimentanalyse und Zusammenstellung von Kurzvideos mit hohem Aufregungslevel KI-generierte Metadaten: Von der Technologiebeobachtung bis zum produktiven Einsatz (2021) 0.01
    0.013913812 = product of:
      0.027827624 = sum of:
        0.027827624 = product of:
          0.05565525 = sum of:
            0.05565525 = weight(_text_:22 in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05565525 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17981094 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051347714 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  9. Weimer, K.H.: ¬The nexus of subject analysis and bibliographic description : the case of multipart videos (1996) 0.01
    0.010435359 = product of:
      0.020870717 = sum of:
        0.020870717 = product of:
          0.041741434 = sum of:
            0.041741434 = weight(_text_:22 in 6525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041741434 = score(doc=6525,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17981094 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051347714 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6525, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6525)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.5-18
  10. Chen, S.-J.; Lee, H.-L.: Art images and mental associations : a preliminary exploration (2014) 0.01
    0.010435359 = product of:
      0.020870717 = sum of:
        0.020870717 = product of:
          0.041741434 = sum of:
            0.041741434 = weight(_text_:22 in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041741434 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17981094 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051347714 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  11. White, M.D.; Marsh, E.E.: Content analysis : a flexible methodology (2006) 0.01
    0.010435359 = product of:
      0.020870717 = sum of:
        0.020870717 = product of:
          0.041741434 = sum of:
            0.041741434 = weight(_text_:22 in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041741434 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17981094 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051347714 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library trends. 55(2006) no.1, S.22-45
  12. Sauperl, A.: Subject determination during the cataloging process : the development of a system based on theoretical principles (2002) 0.01
    0.0052176793 = product of:
      0.010435359 = sum of:
        0.010435359 = product of:
          0.020870717 = sum of:
            0.020870717 = weight(_text_:22 in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020870717 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17981094 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051347714 = queryNorm
                0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 9.2005 14:22:19
  13. Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002) 0.00
    0.003478453 = product of:
      0.006956906 = sum of:
        0.006956906 = product of:
          0.013913812 = sum of:
            0.013913812 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013913812 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17981094 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051347714 = queryNorm
                0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05