Search (2338 results, page 1 of 117)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Hafter, R.: ¬The performance of card catalogs : a review of research (1979) 0.19 
    0.1914923 = product of:
  0.47873074 = sum of:
    0.37029427 = weight(_text_:card in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.37029427 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05002192 = queryNorm
        1.1439468 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
    0.10843648 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10843648 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17516825 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05002192 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    3.10.2000 20:48:22
  2. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.11 
    0.111603156 = product of:
  0.27900788 = sum of:
    0.2383442 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2383442 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4240864 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05002192 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.04066368 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04066368 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17516825 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05002192 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  3. Hendley, T.: Digital mass storage options (1993) 0.10 
    0.09574615 = product of:
  0.23936537 = sum of:
    0.18514714 = weight(_text_:card in 5080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18514714 = score(doc=5080,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05002192 = queryNorm
        0.5719734 = fieldWeight in 5080, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5080)
    0.05421824 = weight(_text_:22 in 5080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05421824 = score(doc=5080,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17516825 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05002192 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5080, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5080)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Examines the options currently available for mass storage of digital media, technical and standards issues and how to compare them. Lists criteria for grouping storage media. Examines: seminconductor storage, hard magnetic discs, diskette/flexible disc storage, costs of mastering read-only discs, WORM optical dics storage, rewritable optical disc storage, optical tape storage, optical card storage. Reviews mass storage systems and describes optical disc jukeboxes
    Source
    Information management and technology. 26(1993) no.1, S.22-32
  4. Griffith, C.: CDMARC serials : the CONSER database goes CD-ROM (1993) 0.10 
    0.09574615 = product of:
  0.23936537 = sum of:
    0.18514714 = weight(_text_:card in 6293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18514714 = score(doc=6293,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05002192 = queryNorm
        0.5719734 = fieldWeight in 6293, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6293)
    0.05421824 = weight(_text_:22 in 6293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05421824 = score(doc=6293,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17516825 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05002192 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6293, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6293)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    CDMARC serials is the Cooperative Online Serials (CONSER) database on Cd-ROM. The CONSER database is probably the most exhaustice source of serial titles ever assembled and fits onto a single CD. The hardware requirements are a CD-ROM drive recognising MSCDEX, a PC/XT or higher, 5 MB of free hard disc space and 530 K of free RAM. Reviews searching procedures. Records come in catalogue and card image, MARC tagged, custom labelled or custom tagged formats
    Source
    Information today. 10(1993) no.2, S.22-23
  5. Dunlop, P.: Main entry : the argument against the irrelevance of the main entry concept (1996) 0.10 
    0.09574615 = product of:
  0.23936537 = sum of:
    0.18514714 = weight(_text_:card in 7194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18514714 = score(doc=7194,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05002192 = queryNorm
        0.5719734 = fieldWeight in 7194, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7194)
    0.05421824 = weight(_text_:22 in 7194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05421824 = score(doc=7194,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17516825 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05002192 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7194, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7194)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Discusses the underlying principles regarding cataloguing and catalogues. Main entry became largely irrelevant when the unit card and multiple access for works evolved. The title entry unit bibliographic record can maintain, if not improve, standardization and existing principles, and main entry is irrelevant to the catalogue user. Economic issues play a strong hand in suggesting its demise
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.1/2, S.26-33
  6. Fu, J.Z.: Making urban and regional documents available to the public : classifying and converting a specialized collection (1996) 0.10 
    0.09574615 = product of:
  0.23936537 = sum of:
    0.18514714 = weight(_text_:card in 7232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18514714 = score(doc=7232,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05002192 = queryNorm
        0.5719734 = fieldWeight in 7232, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7232)
    0.05421824 = weight(_text_:22 in 7232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05421824 = score(doc=7232,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17516825 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05002192 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7232, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7232)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Discusses the complex nature of urban, regional and local documents management, the decision making process of an in house classification system, and problems of converting a manual card cataloguing system to an computerized information retrieval system at Florida International University Library. The principles of this in house classification system can be used for any specialized collection
    Footnote
    Paper presented at conference on 'Local documents, a new classification scheme' at the Research Caucus of the Florida Library Association Annual Conference, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 22 Apr 95
  7. Nuttall, H.D.; McAbee, S.L.: Pathfinders on-line : adding pathfinders to a NOTIS on-line system (1997) 0.10 
    0.09574615 = product of:
  0.23936537 = sum of:
    0.18514714 = weight(_text_:card in 510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18514714 = score(doc=510,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05002192 = queryNorm
        0.5719734 = fieldWeight in 510, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=510)
    0.05421824 = weight(_text_:22 in 510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05421824 = score(doc=510,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17516825 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05002192 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 510, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=510)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    For decades print pathfinders have complemented card catalogues and been useful reference tools. They are overlooked as components of online catalogues, even though they can extend the depth of the catalogue. To encourage librarians to consider integrating pathfinders into online catalogues discusses problems in OPAC searching, describes the value and styles of pathfinders, and illustrates how to include them in a NOTIS system
    Date
    27.11.1995 17:07:22
  8. Gray, B.: Cataloging the special collections of Allegheny college (2005) 0.08 
    0.08377789 = product of:
  0.20944472 = sum of:
    0.16200376 = weight(_text_:card in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16200376 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05002192 = queryNorm
        0.5004767 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
    0.047440957 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047440957 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17516825 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05002192 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Scholars have long noted the significance of Allegheny College's special collections to American cultural and educational history. Special collections have value to colleges and universities as publicity devices to draw scholars, students, and funding to the institution. Catalogers have an important role to play in marketing the library and the college through improved bibliographic access to these collections. Rare book and manuscript cataloging presents many challenges to catalogers, especially at smaller institutions. This report traces the evolution of Allegheny College's catalog, from book format in 1823, through card format, and finally to online. It also explores the bibliographic challenges created as the library moved from one format to another.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  9. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.08 
    0.07944807 = product of:
  0.39724034 = sum of:
    0.39724034 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.39724034 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.4240864 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05002192 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  10. Dousa, T.M.: Categories and the architectonics of system in Julius Otto Kaiser's method of systematic indexing (2014) 0.08 
    0.079013966 = product of:
  0.1975349 = sum of:
    0.1636485 = weight(_text_:card in 1418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1636485 = score(doc=1418,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05002192 = queryNorm
        0.50555784 = fieldWeight in 1418, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1418)
    0.0338864 = weight(_text_:22 in 1418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0338864 = score(doc=1418,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17516825 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05002192 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1418, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1418)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Categories, or concepts of high generality representing the most basic kinds of entities in the world, have long been understood to be a fundamental element in the construction of knowledge organization systems (KOSs), particularly faceted ones. Commentators on facet analysis have tended to foreground the role of categories in the structuring of controlled vocabularies and the construction of compound index terms, and the implications of this for subject representation and information retrieval. Less attention has been paid to the variety of ways in which categories can shape the overall architectonic framework of a KOS. This case study explores the range of functions that categories took in structuring various aspects of an early analytico-synthetic KOS, Julius Otto Kaiser's method of Systematic Indexing (SI). Within SI, categories not only functioned as mechanisms to partition an index vocabulary into smaller groupings of terms and as elements in the construction of compound index terms but also served as means of defining the units of indexing, or index items, incorporated into an index; determining the organization of card index files and the articulation of the guide card system serving as a navigational aids thereto; and setting structural constraints to the establishment of cross-references between terms. In all these ways, Kaiser's system of categories contributed to the general systematicity of SI.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  11. Knutson, G.: ¬A comparison on online and card catalog accurary (1990) 0.07 
    0.07405885 = product of:
  0.37029427 = sum of:
    0.37029427 = weight(_text_:card in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.37029427 = score(doc=351,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05002192 = queryNorm
        1.1439468 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  12. Holley, R.P.: Constraints of the 3 x 5 card (1984) 0.07 
    0.07405885 = product of:
  0.37029427 = sum of:
    0.37029427 = weight(_text_:card in 2794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.37029427 = score(doc=2794,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05002192 = queryNorm
        1.1439468 = fieldWeight in 2794, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2794)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  13. Uricchio, W.: From card catalog to OPAC : using CD-ROM to cross the great divide (1993) 0.07 
    0.07405885 = product of:
  0.37029427 = sum of:
    0.37029427 = weight(_text_:card in 4081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.37029427 = score(doc=4081,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05002192 = queryNorm
        1.1439468 = fieldWeight in 4081, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4081)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  14. Kerr, W.: ¬The professor looks at the card catalog (1942) 0.07 
    0.07405885 = product of:
  0.37029427 = sum of:
    0.37029427 = weight(_text_:card in 6189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.37029427 = score(doc=6189,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05002192 = queryNorm
        1.1439468 = fieldWeight in 6189, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6189)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  15. Penalosa, F.: ¬A card catalog : a failure in communication (1956) 0.07 
    0.07405885 = product of:
  0.37029427 = sum of:
    0.37029427 = weight(_text_:card in 6235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.37029427 = score(doc=6235,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05002192 = queryNorm
        1.1439468 = fieldWeight in 6235, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6235)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  16. Stone, A.T.: ¬An old card catalog goes to the Smithsonian (1996) 0.07 
    0.07405885 = product of:
  0.37029427 = sum of:
    0.37029427 = weight(_text_:card in 7376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.37029427 = score(doc=7376,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05002192 = queryNorm
        1.1439468 = fieldWeight in 7376, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7376)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Discusses the falling into disuse of the card catalogue in the face of the online catalogue, briefly tracing the history of the card catalogue. Describes an attempt to find a representative card catalogue to donate to the Smithsonian Institute in Washington, D.C., as an object of historical and scientific interest. The attempt was successful when one from the Union Theological Seminary in Virginia provided an excellent example which the Smithsonian accepted
  17. Alexander, B.B.; Gyeszly, S.D.: OPAC or card catalog : patrons preference in an academic library (1991) 0.07 
    0.07245028 = product of:
  0.3622514 = sum of:
    0.3622514 = weight(_text_:card in 2226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3622514 = score(doc=2226,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05002192 = queryNorm
        1.1191 = fieldWeight in 2226, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2226)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Since the closing of the Sterling C. Evans Library author/title card catalog on march 6, 1989, librarians have observed a number of patrons who continued to use that catalog, even though NOTIS, the OPAC offered more comprehensive and current access to library holdings. To determine the reasons for this use, the authors prepared a one-page questionnaire, focusing on the users' preference for an inadequate card catalog in an environment which offers a superior OPAC. Card catalog patrons were then surveyed in order to gather data and build a user profile. Survey results were tabulated and analyzed, revealing the underlying reasons for users' preference for the card or online catalog. Conclusions will provide direction for improvements in users' access to online catalogs
  18. Fattahi, R.: ¬A comparison between the online catalogue and the card catalogue : some considerations for redesigning bibliographic standards (1995) 0.07 
    0.07245028 = product of:
  0.3622514 = sum of:
    0.3622514 = weight(_text_:card in 3828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3622514 = score(doc=3828,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05002192 = queryNorm
        1.1191 = fieldWeight in 3828, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3828)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Suggests that an appropriate approach in comparing online and card catalogues is to compare the 2 in relation to the processes in which bibliographic records are created (the input stage), manipulated (the storage stage) and retrieved (the output stage). Studies the concepts underlying these processes and reveals major differences between online and card catalogues. These differences are multiplied and widened when moving from input to output to such an extent that online catalogues can be considered as a significant departure from manual catalogues. The redesign for use in an online environment of bibliographical standards which are based on the card catalogue should be based on conceptual as well as practical differences between the online and card catalogues
  19. Zhang, Y.: Developing a holistic model for digital library evaluation (2010) 0.07 
    0.07180961 = product of:
  0.17952403 = sum of:
    0.13886036 = weight(_text_:card in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13886036 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05002192 = queryNorm
        0.42898005 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
    0.04066368 = weight(_text_:22 in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04066368 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17516825 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05002192 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This article reports the author's recent research in developing a holistic model for various levels of digital library (DL) evaluation in which perceived important criteria from heterogeneous stakeholder groups are organized and presented. To develop such a model, the author applied a three-stage research approach: exploration, confirmation, and verification. During the exploration stage, a literature review was conducted followed by an interview, along with a card sorting technique, to collect important criteria perceived by DL experts. Then the criteria identified were used for developing an online survey during the confirmation stage. Survey respondents (431 in total) from 22 countries rated the importance of the criteria. A holistic DL evaluation model was constructed using statistical techniques. Eventually, the verification stage was devised to test the reliability of the model in the context of searching and evaluating an operational DL. The proposed model fills two lacunae in the DL domain: (a) the lack of a comprehensive and flexible framework to guide and benchmark evaluations, and (b) the uncertainty about what divergence exists among heterogeneous DL stakeholders, including general users.
  20. Renjilian, J.: HyperCard - the poor librarian's online card catalog (1993) 0.07 
    0.0654594 = product of:
  0.327297 = sum of:
    0.327297 = weight(_text_:card in 7316) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.327297 = score(doc=7316,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05002192 = queryNorm
        1.0111157 = fieldWeight in 7316, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7316)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    A HyperCard based online card catalogue to the indexes of collected literary criticism and anthologies of short stories, poetry and plays was developed at the New Canaan High School library. The indexes were scanned into the hypercard system. Details the development of the system

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 2063
  • m 156
  • s 99
  • el 74
  • b 31
  • r 11
  • x 9
  • i 3
  • n 2
  • p 2
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications