Search (1458 results, page 1 of 73)

  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Berndt, M.: ¬Der Göttinger Schlagwortkatalog und die Zukunft der verbalen Sacherschließung in der SUB (1991) 0.14
    0.14361922 = product of:
      0.35904807 = sum of:
        0.27772072 = weight(_text_:card in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27772072 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05002192 = queryNorm
            0.8579601 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
        0.08132736 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08132736 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17516825 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05002192 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    It was decided to close the Göttingen card catalogue for jubjects and continue withe the PICA Basisklassifikation and SWD
    Source
    SUB-Kultur. 1(1991) Nr.1, S.20-22
  2. Hendley, T.: Digital mass storage options (1993) 0.10
    0.09574615 = product of:
      0.23936537 = sum of:
        0.18514714 = weight(_text_:card in 5080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18514714 = score(doc=5080,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05002192 = queryNorm
            0.5719734 = fieldWeight in 5080, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5080)
        0.05421824 = weight(_text_:22 in 5080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05421824 = score(doc=5080,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17516825 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05002192 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5080, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5080)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the options currently available for mass storage of digital media, technical and standards issues and how to compare them. Lists criteria for grouping storage media. Examines: seminconductor storage, hard magnetic discs, diskette/flexible disc storage, costs of mastering read-only discs, WORM optical dics storage, rewritable optical disc storage, optical tape storage, optical card storage. Reviews mass storage systems and describes optical disc jukeboxes
    Source
    Information management and technology. 26(1993) no.1, S.22-32
  3. Griffith, C.: CDMARC serials : the CONSER database goes CD-ROM (1993) 0.10
    0.09574615 = product of:
      0.23936537 = sum of:
        0.18514714 = weight(_text_:card in 6293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18514714 = score(doc=6293,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05002192 = queryNorm
            0.5719734 = fieldWeight in 6293, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6293)
        0.05421824 = weight(_text_:22 in 6293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05421824 = score(doc=6293,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17516825 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05002192 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6293, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6293)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    CDMARC serials is the Cooperative Online Serials (CONSER) database on Cd-ROM. The CONSER database is probably the most exhaustice source of serial titles ever assembled and fits onto a single CD. The hardware requirements are a CD-ROM drive recognising MSCDEX, a PC/XT or higher, 5 MB of free hard disc space and 530 K of free RAM. Reviews searching procedures. Records come in catalogue and card image, MARC tagged, custom labelled or custom tagged formats
    Source
    Information today. 10(1993) no.2, S.22-23
  4. Dunlop, P.: Main entry : the argument against the irrelevance of the main entry concept (1996) 0.10
    0.09574615 = product of:
      0.23936537 = sum of:
        0.18514714 = weight(_text_:card in 7194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18514714 = score(doc=7194,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05002192 = queryNorm
            0.5719734 = fieldWeight in 7194, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7194)
        0.05421824 = weight(_text_:22 in 7194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05421824 = score(doc=7194,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17516825 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05002192 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7194, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7194)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the underlying principles regarding cataloguing and catalogues. Main entry became largely irrelevant when the unit card and multiple access for works evolved. The title entry unit bibliographic record can maintain, if not improve, standardization and existing principles, and main entry is irrelevant to the catalogue user. Economic issues play a strong hand in suggesting its demise
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.1/2, S.26-33
  5. Fu, J.Z.: Making urban and regional documents available to the public : classifying and converting a specialized collection (1996) 0.10
    0.09574615 = product of:
      0.23936537 = sum of:
        0.18514714 = weight(_text_:card in 7232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18514714 = score(doc=7232,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05002192 = queryNorm
            0.5719734 = fieldWeight in 7232, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7232)
        0.05421824 = weight(_text_:22 in 7232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05421824 = score(doc=7232,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17516825 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05002192 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7232, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7232)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the complex nature of urban, regional and local documents management, the decision making process of an in house classification system, and problems of converting a manual card cataloguing system to an computerized information retrieval system at Florida International University Library. The principles of this in house classification system can be used for any specialized collection
    Footnote
    Paper presented at conference on 'Local documents, a new classification scheme' at the Research Caucus of the Florida Library Association Annual Conference, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 22 Apr 95
  6. Nuttall, H.D.; McAbee, S.L.: Pathfinders on-line : adding pathfinders to a NOTIS on-line system (1997) 0.10
    0.09574615 = product of:
      0.23936537 = sum of:
        0.18514714 = weight(_text_:card in 510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18514714 = score(doc=510,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05002192 = queryNorm
            0.5719734 = fieldWeight in 510, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=510)
        0.05421824 = weight(_text_:22 in 510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05421824 = score(doc=510,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17516825 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05002192 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 510, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=510)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    For decades print pathfinders have complemented card catalogues and been useful reference tools. They are overlooked as components of online catalogues, even though they can extend the depth of the catalogue. To encourage librarians to consider integrating pathfinders into online catalogues discusses problems in OPAC searching, describes the value and styles of pathfinders, and illustrates how to include them in a NOTIS system
    Date
    27.11.1995 17:07:22
  7. Maurer, H.; Scherbakov, N.: Multimedia authoring for presentation and education : the official guide to HM-card (1996) 0.09
    0.09164316 = product of:
      0.4582158 = sum of:
        0.4582158 = weight(_text_:card in 3945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4582158 = score(doc=3945,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05002192 = queryNorm
            1.4155619 = fieldWeight in 3945, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3945)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    There are many multimedia authoring packages available under MS Windows. There is none with as many outstanding features as HM-Card: HM-Card does all you expect from a modern multimedia authoring system: it allows you to combine als kinds of media: text, graphics, pictures, audio-and videoclips, and arbitrary executable files created by other programs to give you all the freedom of the world
    Content
    Enthält die Kapitel: Introduction / First steps with HM-Card / The HM-Card editor / The HM-Card Linker / The HM-Card Viewer / Practical hints and pedagogical issues / Technical aspects / Annotated references
    Object
    HM-Card
  8. Dijk, J.v.: Foundation, de basis voor een successvolle klantenbenadering : nieuw catalogusconcept op basis van wensprofielen (1995) 0.08
    0.08377789 = product of:
      0.20944472 = sum of:
        0.16200376 = weight(_text_:card in 4696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16200376 = score(doc=4696,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05002192 = queryNorm
            0.5004767 = fieldWeight in 4696, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4696)
        0.047440957 = weight(_text_:22 in 4696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047440957 = score(doc=4696,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17516825 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05002192 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4696, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4696)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    At Limburg Provincial Central Library and Information Service in the Netherlands the online public catalogue has been replaced by a new system, Foundation. The OPAC network was an automated version of the card catalogue, whereas Foundation has been developed entirely from scratch. The system runs on Windows software and assists even inexperienced users to formulate suitable search strategies. The system accepts online catalogue records from other sources and has attracted considerable intersts from several areas, including the publishing industry
    Source
    Bibliotheek en samenleving. 23(1995) no.6, S.20-22
  9. Naftzger, K.S.; Pandora, C.P.: In loving memory of the purple card catalog (1997) 0.08
    0.08017107 = product of:
      0.40085533 = sum of:
        0.40085533 = weight(_text_:card in 1432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.40085533 = score(doc=1432,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05002192 = queryNorm
            1.2383587 = fieldWeight in 1432, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1432)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Describes how the media library specialists in a school in Ohio weaned their users off dependence on their card catalogue, once the catalogue had been automated, and then proceeded to dispose of the card catalog
  10. Knutson, G.: ¬A comparison on online and card catalog accurary (1990) 0.07
    0.07405885 = product of:
      0.37029427 = sum of:
        0.37029427 = weight(_text_:card in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.37029427 = score(doc=351,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05002192 = queryNorm
            1.1439468 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  11. Uricchio, W.: From card catalog to OPAC : using CD-ROM to cross the great divide (1993) 0.07
    0.07405885 = product of:
      0.37029427 = sum of:
        0.37029427 = weight(_text_:card in 4081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.37029427 = score(doc=4081,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05002192 = queryNorm
            1.1439468 = fieldWeight in 4081, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4081)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  12. Stone, A.T.: ¬An old card catalog goes to the Smithsonian (1996) 0.07
    0.07405885 = product of:
      0.37029427 = sum of:
        0.37029427 = weight(_text_:card in 7376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.37029427 = score(doc=7376,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05002192 = queryNorm
            1.1439468 = fieldWeight in 7376, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7376)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the falling into disuse of the card catalogue in the face of the online catalogue, briefly tracing the history of the card catalogue. Describes an attempt to find a representative card catalogue to donate to the Smithsonian Institute in Washington, D.C., as an object of historical and scientific interest. The attempt was successful when one from the Union Theological Seminary in Virginia provided an excellent example which the Smithsonian accepted
  13. Alexander, B.B.; Gyeszly, S.D.: OPAC or card catalog : patrons preference in an academic library (1991) 0.07
    0.07245028 = product of:
      0.3622514 = sum of:
        0.3622514 = weight(_text_:card in 2226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3622514 = score(doc=2226,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05002192 = queryNorm
            1.1191 = fieldWeight in 2226, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2226)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Since the closing of the Sterling C. Evans Library author/title card catalog on march 6, 1989, librarians have observed a number of patrons who continued to use that catalog, even though NOTIS, the OPAC offered more comprehensive and current access to library holdings. To determine the reasons for this use, the authors prepared a one-page questionnaire, focusing on the users' preference for an inadequate card catalog in an environment which offers a superior OPAC. Card catalog patrons were then surveyed in order to gather data and build a user profile. Survey results were tabulated and analyzed, revealing the underlying reasons for users' preference for the card or online catalog. Conclusions will provide direction for improvements in users' access to online catalogs
  14. Fattahi, R.: ¬A comparison between the online catalogue and the card catalogue : some considerations for redesigning bibliographic standards (1995) 0.07
    0.07245028 = product of:
      0.3622514 = sum of:
        0.3622514 = weight(_text_:card in 3828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3622514 = score(doc=3828,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05002192 = queryNorm
            1.1191 = fieldWeight in 3828, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3828)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Suggests that an appropriate approach in comparing online and card catalogues is to compare the 2 in relation to the processes in which bibliographic records are created (the input stage), manipulated (the storage stage) and retrieved (the output stage). Studies the concepts underlying these processes and reveals major differences between online and card catalogues. These differences are multiplied and widened when moving from input to output to such an extent that online catalogues can be considered as a significant departure from manual catalogues. The redesign for use in an online environment of bibliographical standards which are based on the card catalogue should be based on conceptual as well as practical differences between the online and card catalogues
  15. Renjilian, J.: HyperCard - the poor librarian's online card catalog (1993) 0.07
    0.0654594 = product of:
      0.327297 = sum of:
        0.327297 = weight(_text_:card in 7316) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.327297 = score(doc=7316,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05002192 = queryNorm
            1.0111157 = fieldWeight in 7316, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7316)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    A HyperCard based online card catalogue to the indexes of collected literary criticism and anthologies of short stories, poetry and plays was developed at the New Canaan High School library. The indexes were scanned into the hypercard system. Details the development of the system
  16. Barry, J.: ¬The catalogue revolution (1997) 0.07
    0.0654594 = product of:
      0.327297 = sum of:
        0.327297 = weight(_text_:card in 914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.327297 = score(doc=914,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05002192 = queryNorm
            1.0111157 = fieldWeight in 914, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=914)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the purpose of catalogues, how card catalogues first fulfilled that purpose and how computers represented a superior and inevitable replacement for the card catalogue, ultimately providing electronic access to information anywhere in the world. Describes recent developments in cataloguing and their implications for the future
  17. Robertson, G.G.; Card, S.K.; Mackinlay, J.D.: Information visualization using 3D interactive animation (1993) 0.06
    0.06480151 = product of:
      0.3240075 = sum of:
        0.3240075 = weight(_text_:card in 7307) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3240075 = score(doc=7307,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05002192 = queryNorm
            1.0009534 = fieldWeight in 7307, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7307)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  18. Retrospective conversion : conversion of card catalogues in German university libraries (1995) 0.06
    0.06480151 = product of:
      0.3240075 = sum of:
        0.3240075 = weight(_text_:card in 4845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3240075 = score(doc=4845,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05002192 = queryNorm
            1.0009534 = fieldWeight in 4845, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4845)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  19. Calk, J.; Persing, B.: From catalog card to MARC : USMARC bibliographic self defence (1998) 0.06
    0.06480151 = product of:
      0.3240075 = sum of:
        0.3240075 = weight(_text_:card in 3198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3240075 = score(doc=3198,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05002192 = queryNorm
            1.0009534 = fieldWeight in 3198, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3198)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  20. Carpenter, K.E.: ¬The great catalog-card to-do (1994) 0.06
    0.064136855 = product of:
      0.32068428 = sum of:
        0.32068428 = weight(_text_:card in 569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.32068428 = score(doc=569,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.32369888 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05002192 = queryNorm
            0.990687 = fieldWeight in 569, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.4711404 = idf(docFreq=185, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=569)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the many advantages of online library catalogues over their cabinet predecessors. Stimulated by an article in the New Yorker which complained about the destruction of the card catalogues of America's great libraries, points out that the Widener library card catalogue at Harvard University is in fact to be retained alongside its electronic successor. Hopes the article will foster more public debate about libraries and librarians

Languages

Types

  • a 1237
  • m 126
  • s 68
  • el 18
  • i 13
  • r 8
  • b 7
  • x 6
  • ? 5
  • d 3
  • p 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • n 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications