Search (119 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Siddiqui, M.A.: ¬A bibliometric study of authorship characteristics in four international information science journals (1997) 0.12
    0.12386726 = product of:
      0.24773452 = sum of:
        0.24773452 = sum of:
          0.20817676 = weight(_text_:assistant in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20817676 = score(doc=853,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.39091346 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.033325 = idf(docFreq=38, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048661474 = queryNorm
              0.53253925 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.033325 = idf(docFreq=38, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
          0.039557748 = weight(_text_:22 in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.039557748 = score(doc=853,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1704042 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.048661474 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a bibliometric study of the authorship characteristics of articles published in 4 major information science periodicals: JASIS, Information technology and libraries, Journal of information science, and Program. The aim was to determine the details of their authors, such as: sex, occupation, affiliation, geographic distribution, and institutional affiliation. A total of 163 articles published in 1993 and written by 294 authors were analyzed. Results indicate that: men (206 or 70%) publish 3.0 times more articles than women (69 or 23,5%). Schools of library and information science contributed the most authors. The majority of authors came from the USA (148 or 50,3%), with the Midwest region claiming the largest share (110 or 25,0%). Academic libraries (110 or 37,4%) account for the major share of library publication. 12 schools of library and information science, in the USA, contributed 32 authors (50,0%) and assistant professors (25 or 39,1%) publish the most in these library schools. Male school of library and information science authors publish 1,6 times more than their female counterparts
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.3, S.3-23
  2. Craven, T.C.: Determining authorship of Web pages (2006) 0.06
    0.060718216 = product of:
      0.12143643 = sum of:
        0.12143643 = product of:
          0.24287286 = sum of:
            0.24287286 = weight(_text_:assistant in 1498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24287286 = score(doc=1498,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39091346 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.033325 = idf(docFreq=38, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048661474 = queryNorm
                0.62129575 = fieldWeight in 1498, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.033325 = idf(docFreq=38, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1498)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Assignability of authors to Web pages using either normal browsing procedures or browsing assisted by simple automatic extraction was investigated. Candidate strings for 1000 pages were extracted automatically from title elements, meta-tags, and address-like and copyright-like passages; 539 of the pages produced at least one candidate: 310 candidates from titles, 66 from meta-tags, 91 from address-like passages, and 259 from copyright-like passages. An assistant attempted to identify personal authors for 943 pages by examining the pages themselves and related pages; this added 90 pages with authors to the pages from which no candidate strings were extracted. Specific problems are noted and some refinements to the extraction methods are suggested.
  3. Nkereuwem, E.E.: Accrediting knowledge : the ranking of library and information science journals (1997) 0.05
    0.05204419 = product of:
      0.10408838 = sum of:
        0.10408838 = product of:
          0.20817676 = sum of:
            0.20817676 = weight(_text_:assistant in 786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20817676 = score(doc=786,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39091346 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.033325 = idf(docFreq=38, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048661474 = queryNorm
                0.53253925 = fieldWeight in 786, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.033325 = idf(docFreq=38, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=786)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes how a representative sample of librarians was surveyed to carry out a comparative evaluation of selected journals in library and information science. Respondents were asked to rate each journal on a scale from poor to outstanding (0-10), in terms of their visibility and the quality of articles they publish. Such evaluation should assist librarians in journal selection and in determining the quality of journals to which they send their research papers for publication. Reports the findings of the survey which discovered that some journals such as Library Waves, Assistant Librarian and Library Journal get low ratings because of low visibility and irregular publication. Others such as African Journal of Library Archives and Information Science and Journal of Information Science are rated highly because of familiarity and accessibility. Argues that the results of the study should help librarians determine the quality of journals and will subsequently enhance their utilization and subscription.
  4. Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986) 0.03
    0.026371833 = product of:
      0.052743666 = sum of:
        0.052743666 = product of:
          0.10548733 = sum of:
            0.10548733 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10548733 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1704042 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048661474 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
  5. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.03
    0.026371833 = product of:
      0.052743666 = sum of:
        0.052743666 = product of:
          0.10548733 = sum of:
            0.10548733 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10548733 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1704042 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048661474 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  6. Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987) 0.03
    0.026371833 = product of:
      0.052743666 = sum of:
        0.052743666 = product of:
          0.10548733 = sum of:
            0.10548733 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10548733 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1704042 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048661474 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
  7. Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998) 0.02
    0.023309628 = product of:
      0.046619255 = sum of:
        0.046619255 = product of:
          0.09323851 = sum of:
            0.09323851 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09323851 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1704042 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048661474 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:22:35
  8. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.02
    0.023309628 = product of:
      0.046619255 = sum of:
        0.046619255 = product of:
          0.09323851 = sum of:
            0.09323851 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09323851 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1704042 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048661474 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  9. Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994) 0.02
    0.023075353 = product of:
      0.046150707 = sum of:
        0.046150707 = product of:
          0.09230141 = sum of:
            0.09230141 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09230141 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1704042 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048661474 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
  10. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990) 0.02
    0.023075353 = product of:
      0.046150707 = sum of:
        0.046150707 = product of:
          0.09230141 = sum of:
            0.09230141 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09230141 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1704042 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048661474 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:29
  11. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990) 0.02
    0.023075353 = product of:
      0.046150707 = sum of:
        0.046150707 = product of:
          0.09230141 = sum of:
            0.09230141 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09230141 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1704042 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048661474 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:55
  12. Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005) 0.02
    0.019778874 = product of:
      0.039557748 = sum of:
        0.039557748 = product of:
          0.079115495 = sum of:
            0.079115495 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.079115495 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1704042 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048661474 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2007 17:02:22
  13. Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014) 0.02
    0.019778874 = product of:
      0.039557748 = sum of:
        0.039557748 = product of:
          0.079115495 = sum of:
            0.079115495 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.079115495 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1704042 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048661474 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18. 3.2014 19:13:22
  14. Raan, A.F.J. van: Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators : research group indicator distributions and correlations (2006) 0.01
    0.013985777 = product of:
      0.027971555 = sum of:
        0.027971555 = product of:
          0.05594311 = sum of:
            0.05594311 = weight(_text_:22 in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05594311 = score(doc=5275,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1704042 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048661474 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:20:22
  15. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.01
    0.013985777 = product of:
      0.027971555 = sum of:
        0.027971555 = product of:
          0.05594311 = sum of:
            0.05594311 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05594311 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1704042 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048661474 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  16. Li, T.-C.: Reference sources in periodicals : research note (1995) 0.01
    0.0131859165 = product of:
      0.026371833 = sum of:
        0.026371833 = product of:
          0.052743666 = sum of:
            0.052743666 = weight(_text_:22 in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052743666 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1704042 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048661474 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a list of 53 periodicals in 22 subject fields which regularly provide bibliographies of theses, research in progress and patents in their particular subject field. The fields of business, economics, history and literature have most periodical listings of dissertations and theses. Also lists 63 periodicals in 25 sub-disciplines which provide rankings or ratings. Rankings and ratings information predominates in the fields of business, sports and games, finance and banking, and library and information science
  17. Pichappan, P.; Sangaranachiyar, S.: Ageing approach to scientific eponyms (1996) 0.01
    0.0131859165 = product of:
      0.026371833 = sum of:
        0.026371833 = product of:
          0.052743666 = sum of:
            0.052743666 = weight(_text_:22 in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052743666 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1704042 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048661474 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Report presented at the 16th National Indian Association of Special Libraries and Information Centres Seminar Special Interest Group Meeting on Informatrics in Bombay, 19-22 Dec 94
  18. Mommoh, O.M.: Subject analysis of post-graduate theses in library, archival and information science at Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria (1995/96) 0.01
    0.0131859165 = product of:
      0.026371833 = sum of:
        0.026371833 = product of:
          0.052743666 = sum of:
            0.052743666 = weight(_text_:22 in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052743666 = score(doc=673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1704042 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048661474 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library focus. 13/14(1995/96), S.22-25
  19. Chongde, W.; Zhe, W.: Evaluation of the models for Bradford's law (1998) 0.01
    0.0131859165 = product of:
      0.026371833 = sum of:
        0.026371833 = product of:
          0.052743666 = sum of:
            0.052743666 = weight(_text_:22 in 3688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052743666 = score(doc=3688,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1704042 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048661474 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3688, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3688)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:12:28
  20. Tijssen, R.J.W.; Wijk, E. van: ¬The global science base of information and communication technologies : bibliometric analysis of ICT research papers (1998) 0.01
    0.0131859165 = product of:
      0.026371833 = sum of:
        0.026371833 = product of:
          0.052743666 = sum of:
            0.052743666 = weight(_text_:22 in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052743666 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1704042 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048661474 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:26:54

Years

Languages

  • e 110
  • d 8
  • ro 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 117
  • m 2
  • el 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…