Search (21810 results, page 1 of 1091)

  1. Neumann. M.: HAL: Hyperspace Analogue to Language (2012) 0.57
    0.5734334 = product of:
      0.76457787 = sum of:
        0.6675729 = weight(_text_:analogue in 966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.6675729 = score(doc=966,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.4091858 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            1.6314665 = fieldWeight in 966, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=966)
        0.02914453 = weight(_text_:to in 966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02914453 = score(doc=966,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.34088457 = fieldWeight in 966, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=966)
        0.067860395 = product of:
          0.13572079 = sum of:
            0.13572079 = weight(_text_:language in 966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13572079 = score(doc=966,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18449916 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04702661 = queryNorm
                0.7356174 = fieldWeight in 966, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=966)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Object
    Hyperspace Analogue to Language
  2. Lund, K.; Burgess, C.; Atchley, R.A.: Semantic and associative priming in high-dimensional semantic space (1995) 0.30
    0.29998872 = product of:
      0.39998496 = sum of:
        0.27535978 = weight(_text_:analogue in 2151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27535978 = score(doc=2151,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4091858 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.6729456 = fieldWeight in 2151, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2151)
        0.02404301 = weight(_text_:to in 2151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02404301 = score(doc=2151,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.28121543 = fieldWeight in 2151, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2151)
        0.10058216 = sum of:
          0.055981968 = weight(_text_:language in 2151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055981968 = score(doc=2151,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18449916 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04702661 = queryNorm
              0.30342668 = fieldWeight in 2151, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2151)
          0.044600192 = weight(_text_:22 in 2151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044600192 = score(doc=2151,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16467917 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04702661 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2151, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2151)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    We present a model of semantic memory that utilizes a high dimensional semantic space constructed from a co-occurrence matrix. This matrix was formed by analyzing a lot) million word corpus. Word vectors were then obtained by extracting rows and columns of this matrix, These vectors were subjected to multidimensional scaling. Words were found to cluster semantically. suggesting that interword distance may be interpretable as a measure of semantic similarity, In attempting to replicate with our simulation the semantic and ...
    Object
    Hyperspace Analogue to Language
    Source
    Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society: July 22 - 25, 1995, University of Pittsburgh / ed. by Johanna D. Moore and Jill Fain Lehmann
  3. Lund, K.; Burgess, C.: Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence (1996) 0.30
    0.29696298 = product of:
      0.39595062 = sum of:
        0.33378646 = weight(_text_:analogue in 1704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.33378646 = score(doc=1704,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.4091858 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.81573325 = fieldWeight in 1704, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1704)
        0.020608293 = weight(_text_:to in 1704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020608293 = score(doc=1704,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.24104178 = fieldWeight in 1704, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1704)
        0.04155584 = product of:
          0.08311168 = sum of:
            0.08311168 = weight(_text_:language in 1704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08311168 = score(doc=1704,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.18449916 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04702661 = queryNorm
                0.45047188 = fieldWeight in 1704, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1704)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    A procedure that processes a corpus of text and produces numeric vectors containing information about its meanings for each word is presented. This procedure is applied to a large corpus of natural language text taken from Usenet, and the resulting vectors are examined to determine what information is contained within them. These vectors provide the coordinates in a high-dimensional space in which word relationships can be analyzed. Analyses of both vector similarity and multidimensional scaling demonstrate that there is significant semantic information carried in the vectors. A comparison of vector similarity with human reaction times in a single-word priming experiment is presented. These vectors provide the basis for a representational model of semantic memory, hyperspace analogue to language (HAL).
    Object
    Hyperspace Analogue to Language
  4. Yan, X.; Li, X.; Song, D.: ¬A correlation analysis on LSA and HAL semantic space models (2004) 0.30
    0.29623416 = product of:
      0.39497888 = sum of:
        0.33378646 = weight(_text_:analogue in 2152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.33378646 = score(doc=2152,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.4091858 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.81573325 = fieldWeight in 2152, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2152)
        0.02726221 = weight(_text_:to in 2152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02726221 = score(doc=2152,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.3188683 = fieldWeight in 2152, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2152)
        0.033930197 = product of:
          0.067860395 = sum of:
            0.067860395 = weight(_text_:language in 2152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.067860395 = score(doc=2152,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18449916 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04702661 = queryNorm
                0.3678087 = fieldWeight in 2152, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2152)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper, we compare a well-known semantic spacemodel, Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) with another model, Hyperspace Analogue to Language (HAL) which is widely used in different area, especially in automatic query refinement. We conduct this comparative analysis to prove our hypothesis that with respect to ability of extracting the lexical information from a corpus of text, LSA is quite similar to HAL. We regard HAL and LSA as black boxes. Through a Pearson's correlation analysis to the outputs of these two black boxes, we conclude that LSA highly co-relates with HAL and thus there is a justification that LSA and HAL can potentially play a similar role in the area of facilitating automatic query refinement. This paper evaluates LSA in a new application area and contributes an effective way to compare different semantic space models.
    Object
    Hypertspace Analogue to Language
  5. Bernier-Colborne, G.: Identifying semantic relations in a specialized corpus through distributional analysis of a cooccurrence tensor (2014) 0.27
    0.2745872 = product of:
      0.3661163 = sum of:
        0.3146969 = weight(_text_:analogue in 2153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3146969 = score(doc=2153,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4091858 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.7690807 = fieldWeight in 2153, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2153)
        0.019429686 = weight(_text_:to in 2153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019429686 = score(doc=2153,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.22725637 = fieldWeight in 2153, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2153)
        0.031989697 = product of:
          0.063979395 = sum of:
            0.063979395 = weight(_text_:language in 2153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.063979395 = score(doc=2153,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18449916 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04702661 = queryNorm
                0.34677336 = fieldWeight in 2153, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2153)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    We describe a method of encoding cooccurrence information in a three-way tensor from which HAL-style word space models can be derived. We use these models to identify semantic relations in a specialized corpus. Results suggest that the tensor-based methods we propose are more robust than the basic HAL model in some respects.
    Object
    Hyperspace Analogue to Language
  6. Digital Object Identifiers (1998) 0.21
    0.2126142 = product of:
      0.4252284 = sum of:
        0.3933711 = weight(_text_:analogue in 1903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3933711 = score(doc=1903,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4091858 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.96135086 = fieldWeight in 1903, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1903)
        0.031857282 = product of:
          0.063714564 = sum of:
            0.063714564 = weight(_text_:22 in 1903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.063714564 = score(doc=1903,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16467917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04702661 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1903, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1903)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The DOI is a unique and permanent identifying number for a piece of information content, registered with an online directory system, as an electronic analogue of ISBNs and ISSNs. Discusses the application of DOIs, particularly in the context of information available via the Internet and WWW
    Source
    Online and CD-ROM review. 22(1998) no.2, S.115-118
  7. Blandy, S.G.: Endings/beginnings : some convenient thoughts about cyberinstruction (1997) 0.21
    0.21155831 = product of:
      0.42311662 = sum of:
        0.3933711 = weight(_text_:analogue in 689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3933711 = score(doc=689,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4091858 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.96135086 = fieldWeight in 689, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=689)
        0.029745512 = weight(_text_:to in 689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029745512 = score(doc=689,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.34791386 = fieldWeight in 689, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=689)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Uses the analogue digital phenomenon to explore the responsibility of the librarians to train students in lifetime critical thinking skills, even as the students are assisted in learning to navigate the Internet for the moment's ephemeral answer
  8. Brabazon, T.: ¬The Google effect : Googling, Blogging, Wikis and the flattening of expertise (2006) 0.21
    0.20863336 = product of:
      0.27817783 = sum of:
        0.23602268 = weight(_text_:analogue in 1658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23602268 = score(doc=1658,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4091858 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.57681054 = fieldWeight in 1658, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1658)
        0.023040773 = weight(_text_:to in 1658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023040773 = score(doc=1658,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.26949292 = fieldWeight in 1658, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1658)
        0.019114368 = product of:
          0.038228735 = sum of:
            0.038228735 = weight(_text_:22 in 1658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038228735 = score(doc=1658,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16467917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04702661 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1658, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1658)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents the consequences to librarians and teachers for the flattening of expertise, or the Google Effect. As blogs continue to fill the Web with the bizarre daily rituals and opinions of people who we would never bother speaking to at a party, let alone invite into our homes, there has never been a greater need to stress the importance of intelligence, education, credentials and credibility. The problem is not only accuracy, but also the mediocrity initiated through the Google Effect. The concern is not with the banality of information - there has always been a plurality of sources in the analogue environment. The concern is the lack of literacy skills and strategies to sort the trash from the relevant. This paper addresses not only the social choices about computer use and information literacy, but the intellectual choices we make in our professional lives as teachers and librarians. In such a time, the Google Effect raises stark questions about the value of reading, research, writing and scholarship.
    Date
    16. 3.2019 16:22:08
  9. Zimmer, H.D.: Modalitätsspezifische Systeme der Repräsentation und Verarbeitung von Information (1993) 0.20
    0.20071952 = product of:
      0.40143904 = sum of:
        0.38941753 = weight(_text_:analogue in 3294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.38941753 = score(doc=3294,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.4091858 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.95168877 = fieldWeight in 3294, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3294)
        0.012021505 = weight(_text_:to in 3294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012021505 = score(doc=3294,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.14060771 = fieldWeight in 3294, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3294)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    It is discussed what is underlying the assumption of modality-specific processing systems and representations. Starting from the information processing approach relevant aspects of mental representations and their physiological realizations are discussed. Then 3 different forms of modality-specific systems are distinguished: as stimulus specific processing, as specific informational formats, and as modular part systems. Parallel to that 3 kinds of analogue systems are differentiated: as holding an analogue-relation, as having a specific informational format and as a set of specific processing constraints. These different aspects of the assumption of modality-specific systems are demonstrated in the example of visual and spatial information processing. It is concluded that postulating information-specific systems is not a superfluous assumption, but it is necessary, and even more likely it is inevitable consequence of an optimization of stimulus processing
  10. Reis, M.: Long-time preservation (2009) 0.18
    0.18321489 = product of:
      0.36642978 = sum of:
        0.34066942 = weight(_text_:analogue in 3380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.34066942 = score(doc=3380,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.4091858 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.83255434 = fieldWeight in 3380, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3380)
        0.025760366 = weight(_text_:to in 3380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025760366 = score(doc=3380,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.30130222 = fieldWeight in 3380, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3380)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Our society produces more and more information every day and also tends to be increasingly dependent on it. Although some information is less/more costly to create or less/more relevant to our environment, some of it is definitely worth saving and may be of great value for next generations. Libraries (as well as similar institutions like archives) have the legal responsibility to safeguard long-term access to our scientific, social, and cultural heritage. The need for long-term preservation however is not necessarily limited to libraries and similar institutions, but is also relevant for governments, businesses, and even for individuals, e.g. in order to keep a photo album or important documents accessible for a longer period of time. Information artifacts can be both of analogue (e.g.: documents/photos/etc. on paper or microfilm) or digital (digital data stored on appropriate media) form with a clear increase of the latter and a decrease of the former. Over the last decades digitization of analogue assets started to play an increasingly important role over analogue preservation (paper, microfilm, etc.), among other reasons due to miniaturization and improved storage. Libraries have thus invested billions1 of Euros over the last decade(s) in the digitization of their assets.
  11. Huang, M.-H.: Developing an ideal online thesaurus display format (1994) 0.15
    0.1497014 = product of:
      0.2994028 = sum of:
        0.27535978 = weight(_text_:analogue in 4030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27535978 = score(doc=4030,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4091858 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.6729456 = fieldWeight in 4030, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4030)
        0.02404301 = weight(_text_:to in 4030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02404301 = score(doc=4030,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.28121543 = fieldWeight in 4030, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4030)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a design for ideal online subject and author thesauri. The subject thesaurus is a graphic thesaurus with a semantic network, so the spread activation assumption can be applied. The hierarchical relationship is broken into 3 specific relations, so automated inheritance can be performed. The associated relationship is separated with several specific relationships, so spatial recognition can function well. This thesaurus will provide variety and complexity to deal with uncertainty and will be a user constructed, user enhanced hyperthesaurus that serves as an analogue of the human mind. The author thesaurus is designed to show all authors which are alphabetically adjacent to a given author as well as other authors whose subject area is close to that of the given author
  12. Leonhard, J.-F.: Project: digital archives for historical sound documents : online databases for information and documents (1997) 0.14
    0.14369065 = product of:
      0.2873813 = sum of:
        0.27535978 = weight(_text_:analogue in 5216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27535978 = score(doc=5216,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4091858 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.6729456 = fieldWeight in 5216, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5216)
        0.012021505 = weight(_text_:to in 5216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012021505 = score(doc=5216,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.14060771 = fieldWeight in 5216, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5216)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Using diagrams as well as detailed descriptions of equipment and systems, the future strategies for storing and disseminating sound documents in the German Broadcasting Archives are outlined. Reasons for the choice of a digital storage and transfer system are discussed under headings such as data security and integration with other archive media. The escalating costs of continuing to use analogue technology are contrasted with the medium and long term reduction of costs envisaged with digital technology
  13. Benking, H.: Concept and context mapping : towards common frames of reference (1996) 0.13
    0.1306313 = product of:
      0.2612626 = sum of:
        0.23602268 = weight(_text_:analogue in 6322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23602268 = score(doc=6322,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4091858 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.57681054 = fieldWeight in 6322, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6322)
        0.025239902 = weight(_text_:to in 6322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025239902 = score(doc=6322,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.29521468 = fieldWeight in 6322, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6322)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Based on the need for overview and the 'whole picture' a conceptual space-scape or conceptual superstructure is proposed for universal ordering systems, to organize, explore and manipulate synthetic locations or areas/domains analogue to physical models. Beside the assimilation potential of visual access, some focus is laid on cognitive models, how to carry meaning and use metaphors in a repeatable and shared way. Ways are proposed to bridge cultural and conceptual barriers and finding understanding by comparison, integration, and morphing of views and metaphors, inviting and triggering mental mobility and sharing viewpoints. One central concern is how to deal with and exchange tacit knowledge, as we often have an idea in our minds' eye and know intuitively on first inspection, but do not know how to share it
  14. Herzner, W.; Kummer, M.; Thuswald, M.: DVS: a system for recording, archiving and retrieval of digital video in security environments (1997) 0.13
    0.12529747 = product of:
      0.25059494 = sum of:
        0.23602268 = weight(_text_:analogue in 728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23602268 = score(doc=728,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4091858 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.57681054 = fieldWeight in 728, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=728)
        0.014572265 = weight(_text_:to in 728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014572265 = score(doc=728,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.17044228 = fieldWeight in 728, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=728)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Analogue video has been used for monitoring critical areas like counter halls or airports since several decades, where both realtime observation and recording for later analysis are key issues. Since such traditional video surveillance system are limited in flexibility if many cameras are involved, with the advent of hardware powerful and cheap enough to support parallel processing of several video streams, the development of computer-based digital video systems becomes of viable interest. This paper describes a digital video system (DVS) for capturing, recording, displaying, archiving, and retrieval of video images from up to several hundred cameras in a PC-oriented environment, which can be configured as a stand-alone system as well as a part of the security management systems CSS
  15. Morris, V.: Automated language identification of bibliographic resources (2020) 0.11
    0.11384356 = product of:
      0.22768712 = sum of:
        0.0336532 = weight(_text_:to in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0336532 = score(doc=5749,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.39361957 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
        0.19403392 = sum of:
          0.14306228 = weight(_text_:language in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14306228 = score(doc=5749,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.18449916 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04702661 = queryNorm
              0.77540886 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
          0.05097165 = weight(_text_:22 in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05097165 = score(doc=5749,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16467917 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04702661 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes experiments in the use of machine learning techniques at the British Library to assign language codes to catalog records, in order to provide information about the language of content of the resources described. In the first phase of the project, language codes were assigned to 1.15 million records with 99.7% confidence. The automated language identification tools developed will be used to contribute to future enhancement of over 4 million legacy records.
    Date
    2. 3.2020 19:04:22
  16. Ryan, M.J.; Frater, M.R.: Communications and information systems (2002) 0.11
    0.107943095 = product of:
      0.21588619 = sum of:
        0.19668555 = weight(_text_:analogue in 9) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19668555 = score(doc=9,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4091858 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.48067543 = fieldWeight in 9, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=9)
        0.019200644 = weight(_text_:to in 9) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019200644 = score(doc=9,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.22457743 = fieldWeight in 9, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=9)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    As the use of information gathered across communications networks becomes all-pervasive in the office, factory and home, a basic understanding of the underlying technology is increasingly important. Communications and Information Systems explains the basic technology of communications and information systemsproviding a comprehensive, accessible source of information without resorting to explanations that are either trivial or misleading. The book is ideally suited for university courses that introduce communications and information systems, particularly to non-technical students. Electrical engineers and computer scientists may also find this book useful, however, as a complement to the mathematical explanations of communications and information systems technology emphasised in university engineering courses. Topics covered include: Communications systems model, analogue and digital signals, source coding, channel coding, encryption, modulation, multiplexing, multiple access and frequency spreading, transmitters and receivers, transmission media, radio wave propagation, antennas, types of communication systems, networking, internetworking, mobile communications systems, satellite communications systems, information management, information systems, operating systems, software, and databases. A complete presentation package is available for instructors who prescribe this book as a course text. If you do not wish to receive emails from the Argos Press, please reply to this message with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject line.
  17. Lor, P.J.; Britz, J.J.: ¬An ethical perspective on political-economic issues in the long-term preservation of digital heritage (2012) 0.11
    0.10692956 = product of:
      0.21385913 = sum of:
        0.19668555 = weight(_text_:analogue in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19668555 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4091858 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.48067543 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
        0.017173579 = weight(_text_:to in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017173579 = score(doc=487,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.20086816 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The article provides an overview of the main ethical and associated political-economic aspects of the preservation of born-digital content and the digitization of analogue content for purposes of preservation. The term "heritage" is used broadly to include scientific and scholarly publications and data. Although the preservation of heritage is generally seen as inherently "good," this activity implies the exercise of difficult moral choices. The ethical complexity of the preservation of digital heritage is illustrated by means of two hypothetical cases. The first deals with the harvesting and preservation in a wealthy country of political websites originating in a less affluent country. The second deals with a project initiated by a wealthy country to digitize the cultural heritage of a less affluent country. The ethical reflection that follows is structured within the framework of social justice and a set of information rights that are identified as corollaries of generally recognized human rights. The main moral agents, that is, the parties that have an interest, and may be entitled to exercise rights, in relation to digital preservation, are identified. The responsibilities that those who preserve digital content have toward these parties, and the political-economic considerations that arise, are then analyzed.
  18. Electronic publishing practice in the UK (1994) 0.11
    0.105779156 = product of:
      0.21155831 = sum of:
        0.19668555 = weight(_text_:analogue in 8028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19668555 = score(doc=8028,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4091858 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.48067543 = fieldWeight in 8028, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=8028)
        0.014872756 = weight(_text_:to in 8028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014872756 = score(doc=8028,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.17395693 = fieldWeight in 8028, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=8028)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Report of a project commissioned by British Library Research and Development Department (BLRDD) from Electronic Publishing Services Ltd designed to provide factual input about electronic publishing in the UK for a worlking party convened by the British Library as part of a follow up to the Information 2000 exercise, completed in 1991. The working party will consider the possible impacts on the library community of the development of electronic publishing. For the purpose of this study, electronic publishing was defined as including: online services (including videotex); magnetic tape services; magnetic disk products; CD-ROM and other optical disc products; ROM cards; and electronic periodicals. The main conclusions were: that the dominant position of Reuters and other financial information services means that online information retrieval still accounts for the vast majority of electronic publishing revenues; that CD-ROM is experiencing high growth, but growth from a small base and coming later than predicted; that network publishing is still in the experimental stage and almost entirely funded from the public sector; that ROM cards, which provide the medium for hand held electronic reference books are still present in the market and represent the only mass market channel; and that other electronic media (magnetic tape, magnetic disk, analogue videodisc) are not seen as having a significant part to play
  19. Yazdani, M.; Maeling, S.: Communicating through pictures (1995) 0.10
    0.0969944 = product of:
      0.1939888 = sum of:
        0.017173579 = weight(_text_:to in 3676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017173579 = score(doc=3676,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.20086816 = fieldWeight in 3676, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3676)
        0.17681523 = sum of:
          0.11310066 = weight(_text_:language in 3676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11310066 = score(doc=3676,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18449916 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04702661 = queryNorm
              0.6130145 = fieldWeight in 3676, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3676)
          0.063714564 = weight(_text_:22 in 3676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.063714564 = score(doc=3676,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16467917 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04702661 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3676, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3676)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Presents desing consideration for a visual language which may allow users with different linguistic backgrounds to communicate freely. This cross language communication uses icons which are graphically clear, semantically unambiguous, adaptable and, above all, simple
    Date
    30. 3.1996 19:22:06
  20. Schubert, K.: Parameters for the design of an intermediate language for multilingual thesauri (1995) 0.10
    0.09691135 = product of:
      0.1938227 = sum of:
        0.02404301 = weight(_text_:to in 2092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02404301 = score(doc=2092,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04702661 = queryNorm
            0.28121543 = fieldWeight in 2092, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2092)
        0.16977969 = sum of:
          0.1251795 = weight(_text_:language in 2092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1251795 = score(doc=2092,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.18449916 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04702661 = queryNorm
              0.6784828 = fieldWeight in 2092, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2092)
          0.044600192 = weight(_text_:22 in 2092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044600192 = score(doc=2092,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16467917 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04702661 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2092, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2092)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The architecture of multilingual software systems is sometimes centred around an intermediate language. The question is analyzed to what extent this approach can be useful for multilingual thesauri, in particular regarding the functionality the thesaurus is designed to fulfil. Both the runtime use, and the construction and maintenance of the system is taken into consideration. Using the perspective of general language technology enables to draw on experience from a broader range of fields beyond thesaurus design itself as well as to consider the possibility of using a thesaurus as a knowledge module in various systems which process natural language. Therefore the features which thesauri and other natural-language processing systems have in common are emphasized, especially at the level of systems design and their core functionality
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) nos.3/4, S.136-140

Authors

Languages

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications