Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Bianchini, C."
  1. Bianchini, C.: Colon Classification and Nuovo Soggettario : the case of the Library of the Natural History Museum of Udine, Italy (2012) 0.06
    0.056243166 = product of:
      0.11248633 = sum of:
        0.11248633 = sum of:
          0.07010528 = weight(_text_:classification in 4889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07010528 = score(doc=4889,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 4889, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4889)
          0.04238106 = weight(_text_:22 in 4889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04238106 = score(doc=4889,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4889, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4889)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The paper presents the results of five years of application of Colon Classification (CC), 6. ed., in the Library of the Natural History Museum of Udine, Italy. Research confirms that CC still presents those positive characteristics that gave fame to it. The paper compares CC and the Dewey Decimal Classification by means of a special indicator (resolution power), and it shows how the use of CC could greatly help Italian cataloguers using Nuovo Soggettario, the new thesaurus developed and used at the Biblioteca Centrale Nazionale di Firenze, where Bibliografia Nazionale Italiana is also produced. Use of CC6 during these five years demonstrated that a faceted classification offers great advantages in organizing documents in a modern library, even if CC is surely in need of updating and revision.
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:05:47
  2. Bianchini, C.; Bargioni, S.: Automated classification using linked open data : a case study on faceted classification and Wikidata (2021) 0.03
    0.030671056 = product of:
      0.061342113 = sum of:
        0.061342113 = product of:
          0.122684225 = sum of:
            0.122684225 = weight(_text_:classification in 724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.122684225 = score(doc=724,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.7389137 = fieldWeight in 724, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=724)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Wikidata gadget, CCLitBox, for the automated classification of literary authors and works by a faceted classification and using Linked Open Data (LOD) is presented. The tool reproduces the classification algorithm of class O Literature of the Colon Classification and uses data freely available in Wikidata to create Colon Classification class numbers. CCLitBox is totally free and enables any user to classify literary authors and their works; it is easily accessible to everybody; it uses LOD from Wikidata but missing data for classification can be freely added if necessary; it is readymade for any cooperative and networked project.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 59(2021) no.8, p.835-852
  3. Bianchini, C.: Arrangement of FRBR entities in Colon Classification call numbers (2012) 0.02
    0.01752632 = product of:
      0.03505264 = sum of:
        0.03505264 = product of:
          0.07010528 = sum of:
            0.07010528 = weight(_text_:classification in 1914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07010528 = score(doc=1914,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 1914, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1914)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper analyzes similarities and differences between FRBR entities and their representation in the Colon classification call numbers. Dealing with lack of organization in library shelves and in the lists of bibliographic records resulting from users' searches in our present online catalogues, the paper discusses the chance to organize bibliographic resources by FRBR entities using the model of the facet formula provided for call numbers in Colon Classification and by means of relevant, ready and useable extant data. Main results of this analysis are: correspondences between FRBR entities and categories expressed in Ranganathan's bibliographic system can be found; a sound but not completely FRBRized bibliographic arrangement can be reached by call numbers also in catalogues not structurally capable to satisfy FRBR model; in Ranganathan's classified catalogue semantic and semiotic cataloguing are perfectly integrated, giving access to bibliographic universe as a whole; facet formula for call numbers could be used as identifying device.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 50(2012) no.5/7, S.473-493
  4. Bianchini, C.; Guerrini, M.: From bibliographic models to cataloguing rules : remarks on FRBR, ICP, ISBD, and RDA and the relationships between them (2009) 0.01
    0.010223686 = product of:
      0.020447372 = sum of:
        0.020447372 = product of:
          0.040894743 = sum of:
            0.040894743 = weight(_text_:classification in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040894743 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 47(2009) no.2, S.xx-xx
  5. Bianchini, C.; Willer, M.: ISBD resource and Its description in the context of the Semantic Web (2014) 0.01
    0.010223686 = product of:
      0.020447372 = sum of:
        0.020447372 = product of:
          0.040894743 = sum of:
            0.040894743 = weight(_text_:classification in 1998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040894743 = score(doc=1998,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 1998, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1998)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 52(2014) no.8, S.869-887
  6. Bianchini, C.; Zappalà, P.: ISBD and mechanical musical devices : a case study of the Department of Musicology and Cultural Heritage, University of Pavia, Italy (2014) 0.01
    0.010223686 = product of:
      0.020447372 = sum of:
        0.020447372 = product of:
          0.040894743 = sum of:
            0.040894743 = weight(_text_:classification in 2002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040894743 = score(doc=2002,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 2002, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2002)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 52(2014) no.8, S.940-960
  7. Bianchini, C.; Guerrini, M.: ¬A turning point for catalogs : Ranganathan's possible point of view (2015) 0.01
    0.00876316 = product of:
      0.01752632 = sum of:
        0.01752632 = product of:
          0.03505264 = sum of:
            0.03505264 = weight(_text_:classification in 2006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03505264 = score(doc=2006,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 2006, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2006)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 53(2015) no.3/4, S.341-351
  8. Bianchini, C.; Guerrini, M.: International cataloguing tradition and Italian rules : common ground and specific features (2007) 0.01
    0.0073026326 = product of:
      0.014605265 = sum of:
        0.014605265 = product of:
          0.02921053 = sum of:
            0.02921053 = weight(_text_:classification in 258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02921053 = score(doc=258,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 258, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=258)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 44(2007) nos.1/2, S.131-150