-
Holley, R.P.: Subject access tools in English for Canadian topics : Canadian extensions to U.S. subject access tools (2008)
0.05
0.05027034 = product of:
0.10054068 = sum of:
0.10054068 = sum of:
0.050594125 = weight(_text_:classification in 2553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050594125 = score(doc=2553,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.3047229 = fieldWeight in 2553, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2553)
0.049946558 = weight(_text_:22 in 2553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049946558 = score(doc=2553,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2553, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2553)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Canada has a long history of adapting United States subject access tools, including the Library of Congress Classification (LCC), Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), the Dewey Decimal Classification, and the Sears List of Subject Headings, to meet the specific needs of Canadians. This paper addresses the extensions to these American tools for English-speaking Canadians. While the United States and Canada have many similarities, differences exist that require changing terminology and providing greater depth and precision in subject headings and classification for specifically Canadian topics. The major effort has been for Library and Archives Canada (LAC) systematically to provide extensions for LCC and LCSH for use within its cataloging records. This paper examines the history and philosophy of these Canadian efforts to provide enhanced subject access. Paradoxically, French-speaking Canadians may have found it easier to start from scratch with the Repertoire de vedettes-matiere because of the difficult decisions for English-language tools on how much change to implement in an environment where most Canadian libraries use the American subject access tools. Canadian studies scholars around the world can use Canadian records, especially those maintained by LAC, to obtain superior subject access for Canadian topics even if they obtain the documents from other sources.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
19. 6.2010 19:22:18
-
Holley, R.P.: Report from the section on classification and indexing : 1988-89 (1989)
0.02
0.023368426 = product of:
0.04673685 = sum of:
0.04673685 = product of:
0.0934737 = sum of:
0.0934737 = weight(_text_:classification in 425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0934737 = score(doc=425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=425)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Holley, R.P.: Classification in the USA (1985)
0.02
0.023368426 = product of:
0.04673685 = sum of:
0.04673685 = product of:
0.0934737 = sum of:
0.0934737 = weight(_text_:classification in 1730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0934737 = score(doc=1730,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 1730, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1730)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Holley, R.P.: Constraints of the 3 x 5 card (1984)
0.02
0.023368426 = product of:
0.04673685 = sum of:
0.04673685 = product of:
0.0934737 = sum of:
0.0934737 = weight(_text_:classification in 2794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0934737 = score(doc=2794,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 2794, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2794)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 4(1983) no.1, S.29-35
-
Holley, R.P.: Classification in the USA (1986)
0.02
0.022860859 = product of:
0.045721717 = sum of:
0.045721717 = product of:
0.091443434 = sum of:
0.091443434 = weight(_text_:classification in 1524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.091443434 = score(doc=1524,freq=10.0), product of:
0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.55075383 = fieldWeight in 1524, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1524)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- United States libraries use classification to provide subject browsing in open stacks. The DDC used by 85% of American libraries, is a theoretical, universal attempt to organize all knowledge. The LCC lacks intellectual consistency since it was based upon library warrant to organize materials in one collection. Many academic libraries use LCC because the Library of Congress' shared bibliographic records with the LCC call numbers reflect the collecting interests of academic libraries. LCC is more hospitable to change than DDC whoese phoenix schedules have encountered resistance throughout the world. Classification currently receives less attention than subject headings since United States librarians place great hope in the computer to resolve subject heading problems while remaining conservative about classification
- Source
- International classification. 13(1986), S.73-78
-
Holley, R.P.: Subject access in the online catalog (1989)
0.02
0.020447372 = product of:
0.040894743 = sum of:
0.040894743 = product of:
0.081789486 = sum of:
0.081789486 = weight(_text_:classification in 445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.081789486 = score(doc=445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=445)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 10(1989) nos.1/2, S.3-8
-
Holley, R.P.; Drabenstott, K.M.: ¬An interview with Karen M. Drabenstott (2001)
0.02
0.02023765 = product of:
0.0404753 = sum of:
0.0404753 = product of:
0.0809506 = sum of:
0.0809506 = weight(_text_:classification in 5432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0809506 = score(doc=5432,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 5432, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5432)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In an interview with Robert P. Holley, Karen M. Drabenstott provides a history of a professional career that has focused on subject access to information. Since her early work with Pauline Cochrane, she has strongly supported enhanced bibliographic records as a way to improve user access in the online catalog. Her Dewey Decimal Classification Online project showed that the classification offers increased subject retrieval. Her current projects include improved strategies for Web searching and multimedia literacy including subject access.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 32(2001) no.2, S.5-30
-
Holley, R.P.: ¬The consequences of new technologies in classification and subject cataloguing in third world countries : the technological gap (1985)
0.02
0.015178238 = product of:
0.030356476 = sum of:
0.030356476 = product of:
0.060712952 = sum of:
0.060712952 = weight(_text_:classification in 1733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060712952 = score(doc=1733,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.3656675 = fieldWeight in 1733, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1733)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Since many nations rely upon subject headings and classification numbers from cataloguing agencies in developed countries, changes requiring computers would hinder subject access in Thrid World areas which lack high technology. New computer-supported systems such as PRECIS will probably take hold only in languages and countries where a subject analysis system does not already exist. For the traditional card catalogue-based subject access system, computer support may lead to more frequent changes in headings, less pre-coordinated structure, and the assignement of more terms per document. Third world countires may have difficulty in adapting to the developments. Classification, especially since it more easily crosses linguistc boundaries, may become to a greater degree the preferred means of subject access in Third World nations. During the transition, IFLA can serve as a forum for developing nations to make their needs known to the providers of bibliographic data
-
Holley, R.P.: IFLA and international standards in the area of bibliographic control (1996)
0.01
0.014458476 = product of:
0.028916951 = sum of:
0.028916951 = product of:
0.057833903 = sum of:
0.057833903 = weight(_text_:classification in 5572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057833903 = score(doc=5572,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 5572, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5572)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Cataloging and Classification Standards and Rules"
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1996) nos.3/4, S.17-36
-
Holley, R.P.: Is popular culture forgotten? (1993)
0.01
0.012361143 = product of:
0.024722286 = sum of:
0.024722286 = product of:
0.04944457 = sum of:
0.04944457 = weight(_text_:22 in 5054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04944457 = score(doc=5054,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5054, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5054)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 22(1993) no.1, S.13-17
-
Holley, R.P.: Cooperative cataloging outside North America : status report 1993 (1993)
0.01
0.011684213 = product of:
0.023368426 = sum of:
0.023368426 = product of:
0.04673685 = sum of:
0.04673685 = weight(_text_:classification in 7173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04673685 = score(doc=7173,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 7173, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7173)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 17(1993) nos.3/4, S.201-236
-
Holley, R.P.: Cataloging : an exciting subject for exciting times (2002)
0.01
0.010223686 = product of:
0.020447372 = sum of:
0.020447372 = product of:
0.040894743 = sum of:
0.040894743 = weight(_text_:classification in 5449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040894743 = score(doc=5449,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 5449, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5449)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 34(2002) nos.1/2, S.43-52
-
Pope, J.T.; Holley, R.P.: Google Book Search and metadata (2011)
0.01
0.010223686 = product of:
0.020447372 = sum of:
0.020447372 = product of:
0.040894743 = sum of:
0.040894743 = weight(_text_:classification in 1887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040894743 = score(doc=1887,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 1887, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1887)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 49(2011) no.1, S.1-13
-
Holley, R.P.: ¬The Répertoire de Vedettes-matière de l'Université Laval Library, 1946-92 : Francophone subject access in North America and Europe (2002)
0.01
0.008829388 = product of:
0.017658776 = sum of:
0.017658776 = product of:
0.03531755 = sum of:
0.03531755 = weight(_text_:22 in 159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03531755 = score(doc=159,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 159, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=159)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Holley, R.P.; Killheffer, R.E.: Is there an answer to the subject access crisis? (1981)
0.01
0.00876316 = product of:
0.01752632 = sum of:
0.01752632 = product of:
0.03505264 = sum of:
0.03505264 = weight(_text_:classification in 5531) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03505264 = score(doc=5531,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 5531, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5531)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 1(1981) nos.2/3, S.125-133
-
Holley, R.P.: Are technical services topics underrepresented in the contributed papers at the ACRL national conferences? (2007)
0.01
0.0073026326 = product of:
0.014605265 = sum of:
0.014605265 = product of:
0.02921053 = sum of:
0.02921053 = weight(_text_:classification in 265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02921053 = score(doc=265,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 265, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=265)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 44(2007) nos.3/4, S.259-269
