Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Scibor, E."
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Scibor, E.: Some remarks on the establishment of concordances between a universal classification system and an interdisciplinary thesaurus (1996) 0.02 
    0.01752632 = product of:
  0.03505264 = sum of:
    0.03505264 = product of:
      0.07010528 = sum of:
        0.07010528 = weight(_text_:classification in 6056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07010528 = score(doc=6056,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05213454 = queryNorm
            0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 6056, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6056)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  2. Scibor, E.: KDD a UKD : Przeszlosc, stan obecny, perspektywy (1994) 0.01 
    0.011684213 = product of:
  0.023368426 = sum of:
    0.023368426 = product of:
      0.04673685 = sum of:
        0.04673685 = weight(_text_:classification in 3738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04673685 = score(doc=3738,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05213454 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 3738, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3738)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Outlines the history of decimal classification and compares DDC with UDC. DDC has not been used in Poland or in other central and east European countries whereas UDC is widely used in that region. Thus, when making decisions in Poland on which scheme to use in central or cooperative systems, UDC should be preferred
  3. Scibor, E.: Rewizja UKD dziedzinie jezykow, jezykoznawstwa i literatury pieknej (1995) 0.01 
    0.011684213 = product of:
  0.023368426 = sum of:
    0.023368426 = product of:
      0.04673685 = sum of:
        0.04673685 = weight(_text_:classification in 3235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04673685 = score(doc=3235,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05213454 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 3235, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3235)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Discusses how the prominence of linguistics, belle-lettres and literature in library resources has led the authors of classification schemes to pay particular attention to these subjects in their schemes. Focuses on UDC and how changes have been made in its schedules for these subjects, historically; and also on the complete revision of UDC in 1992, including the outline of new sections and sub-sections
  4. Scibor, E.; Tomasik-Beck, J.: On the establishment of concordances between indexing languages of universal or interdisciplinary scope : Polish experiences (1994) 0.01 
    0.008261986 = product of:
  0.016523972 = sum of:
    0.016523972 = product of:
      0.033047944 = sum of:
        0.033047944 = weight(_text_:classification in 8866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033047944 = score(doc=8866,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05213454 = queryNorm
            0.19904417 = fieldWeight in 8866, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=8866)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Reports on investigations conducted at the Institute for Scientific, Technical and Economic Information (ISTEI) in Warsaw (Poland) in 1992-1993. These investigations aimed at a comparative analysis of four indexing languages (ILs) developed and/or used in Poland and at the establishment of concordances between them. These were the following ILs: Polish Thematic Classification (PTC), descriptor language based on the Thesaurus of Common Topics (TCT), Universal Decimal Classification (UDC), Subject Heading Language of the National Library in Warsaw (SHL). When establishing concordances the PTC was chosen as the master language whereas the three other ILs served as target languages. The research in question comprised: a) pilot investigations; b) main investigations consisting in the elaboration of the Concordance Dictionary of Indexing Languages (CDIL). The pilot investigations comprised of three approaches: a) use of a random sample of 144 PTC headings to which the equivalent lexical units of the target ILs were assigned; b) generation of alphabetical comparison matrices (MI) enumerating the lexical units of the ILs under investigation belonging to 4 selected subject fields; c) establishment of concordance tables between the PTC and the 4 target ILs within the same 4 subject fields. The elaboration of the CDIL consisted in the assignment of the (more or less) equivalent lexical units of the 3 target ILs to all 1330 headings comprised in the PTC main table. The coincidence rate of the ILs under comparison was computed in the framework of the pilot investigations as well as when analysing the results of the elaboration of the CDIL. The computed coincidence rate was very low when only the full (exact) equivalence of the lexical units belonging to all ILs under investigation was taken into consideration but it considerably increased when also the partial equivalence was taken into account

Languages