Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Stock, W.G."
  1. Stock, W.G.: Wissenschaftsinformatik : Fundierung, Gegenstand und Methoden (1980) 0.03
    0.028254041 = product of:
      0.056508083 = sum of:
        0.056508083 = product of:
          0.113016166 = sum of:
            0.113016166 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.113016166 = score(doc=2808,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Ratio. 22(1980), S.155-164
  2. Stock, W.G.: Informationsmangel trotz Überfluß : Informationsgesellschaft verlangt neue Berufe und Berufsbilder (1995) 0.03
    0.028254041 = product of:
      0.056508083 = sum of:
        0.056508083 = product of:
          0.113016166 = sum of:
            0.113016166 = weight(_text_:22 in 2027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.113016166 = score(doc=2027,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2027, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2027)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Insider. 1995, Nr.4, Juli, S.19-22
  3. Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Recherchieren im Internet (2004) 0.03
    0.028254041 = product of:
      0.056508083 = sum of:
        0.056508083 = product of:
          0.113016166 = sum of:
            0.113016166 = weight(_text_:22 in 4686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.113016166 = score(doc=4686,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4686, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4686)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27.11.2005 18:04:22
  4. Stock, W.G.: Informetrische Untersuchungsmethoden auf der Grundlage der Textwortmethode (1984) 0.02
    0.024785958 = product of:
      0.049571916 = sum of:
        0.049571916 = product of:
          0.09914383 = sum of:
            0.09914383 = weight(_text_:classification in 721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09914383 = score(doc=721,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.5971325 = fieldWeight in 721, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=721)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the mathematical basis of scientometrics involving text keywords independent of thesauri and classification schemes
    Source
    International classification. 11(1984) no.3, S.151-157
  5. Stock, W.G.: Endnutzersystem für internationale Geschäftsinformationen (1998) 0.02
    0.024722286 = product of:
      0.04944457 = sum of:
        0.04944457 = product of:
          0.09888914 = sum of:
            0.09888914 = weight(_text_:22 in 2407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09888914 = score(doc=2407,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2407, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2407)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Password. 1998, H.10, S.22-28
  6. Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002) 0.02
    0.017658776 = product of:
      0.03531755 = sum of:
        0.03531755 = product of:
          0.0706351 = sum of:
            0.0706351 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0706351 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
  7. Linde, F.; Stock, W.G.: Informationsmarkt : Informationen im I-Commerce anbieten und nachfragen (2011) 0.01
    0.014127021 = product of:
      0.028254041 = sum of:
        0.028254041 = product of:
          0.056508083 = sum of:
            0.056508083 = weight(_text_:22 in 291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056508083 = score(doc=291,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 291, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=291)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    23. 9.2010 11:15:22
  8. Schumann, L.; Stock, W.G.: ¬Ein umfassendes ganzheitliches Modell für Evaluation und Akzeptanzanalysen von Informationsdiensten : Das Information Service Evaluation (ISE) Modell (2014) 0.01
    0.012361143 = product of:
      0.024722286 = sum of:
        0.024722286 = product of:
          0.04944457 = sum of:
            0.04944457 = weight(_text_:22 in 1492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04944457 = score(doc=1492,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1492, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1492)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2014 18:56:46
  9. Stock, W.G.: Textwortmethode : Norbert Henrichs zum 65. (3) (2000) 0.01
    0.011684213 = product of:
      0.023368426 = sum of:
        0.023368426 = product of:
          0.04673685 = sum of:
            0.04673685 = weight(_text_:classification in 4891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04673685 = score(doc=4891,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 4891, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4891)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Nur wenige Dokumentationsmethoden werden mit dem Namen ihrer Entwickler assoziiert. Ausnahmen sind Melvil Dewey (DDC), S.R. Ranganathan (Colon Classification) - und Norbert Henrichs. Seine Textwortmethode ermöglicht die Indexierung und das Retrieval von Literatur aus Fachgebieten, die keine allseits akzeptierte Fachterminologie vorweisen, also viele Sozial- und Geisteswissenschaften, vorneweg die Philosophie. Für den Einsatz in der elektronischen Philosophie-Dokumentation hat Henrichs in den späten sechziger Jahren die Textwortmethode entworfen. Er ist damit nicht nur einer der Pioniere der Anwendung der elektronischen Datenverarbeitung in der Informationspraxis, sondern auch der Pionier bei der Dokumentation terminologisch nicht starrer Fachsprachen
  10. Stock, W.G.: Qualitätskriterien von Suchmaschinen : Checkliste für Retrievalsysteme (2000) 0.01
    0.008829388 = product of:
      0.017658776 = sum of:
        0.017658776 = product of:
          0.03531755 = sum of:
            0.03531755 = weight(_text_:22 in 5773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03531755 = score(doc=5773,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5773, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5773)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Password. 2000, H.5, S.22-31
  11. Stock, W.G.: Hochschulmanagement, Information Appliances, Fairness als Grundsatz : Information und Mobilität (2002) 0.01
    0.008829388 = product of:
      0.017658776 = sum of:
        0.017658776 = product of:
          0.03531755 = sum of:
            0.03531755 = weight(_text_:22 in 1364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03531755 = score(doc=1364,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1364, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1364)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2003 19:39:36
  12. Stock, W.G.: Informational cities : analysis and construction of cities in the knowledge society (2011) 0.01
    0.008829388 = product of:
      0.017658776 = sum of:
        0.017658776 = product of:
          0.03531755 = sum of:
            0.03531755 = weight(_text_:22 in 4452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03531755 = score(doc=4452,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4452, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4452)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3. 7.2011 19:22:49
  13. Stock, W.G.: Concepts and semantic relations in information science (2010) 0.01
    0.0073026326 = product of:
      0.014605265 = sum of:
        0.014605265 = product of:
          0.02921053 = sum of:
            0.02921053 = weight(_text_:classification in 4008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02921053 = score(doc=4008,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 4008, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4008)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Concept-based information retrieval and knowledge representation are in need of a theory of concepts and semantic relations. Guidelines for the construction and maintenance of knowledge organization systems (KOS) (such as ANSI/NISO Z39.19-2005 in the U.S.A. or DIN 2331:1980 in Germany) do not consider results of concept theory and theory of relations to the full extent. They are not able to unify the currently different worlds of traditional controlled vocabularies, of the social web (tagging and folksonomies) and of the semantic web (ontologies). Concept definitions as well as semantic relations are based on epistemological theories (empiricism, rationalism, hermeneutics, pragmatism, and critical theory). A concept is determined via its intension and extension as well as by definition. We will meet the problem of vagueness by introducing prototypes. Some important definitions are concept explanations (after Aristotle) and the definition of family resemblances (in the sense of Wittgenstein). We will model concepts as frames (according to Barsalou). The most important paradigmatic relation in KOS is hierarchy, which must be arranged into different classes: Hyponymy consists of taxonomy and simple hyponymy, meronymy consists of many different part-whole-relations. For practical application purposes, the transitivity of the given relation is very important. Unspecific associative relations are of little help to our focused applications and should be replaced by generalizable and domain-specific relations. We will discuss the reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity of paradigmatic relations as well as the appearance of specific semantic relations in the different kinds of KOS (folksonomies, nomenclatures, classification systems, thesauri, and ontologies). Finally, we will pick out KOS as a central theme of the Semantic Web.
  14. Peters, I.; Stock, W.G.: Power tags in information retrieval (2010) 0.01
    0.0073026326 = product of:
      0.014605265 = sum of:
        0.014605265 = product of:
          0.02921053 = sum of:
            0.02921053 = weight(_text_:classification in 865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02921053 = score(doc=865,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 865, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=865)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - Many Web 2.0 services (including Library 2.0 catalogs) make use of folksonomies. The purpose of this paper is to cut off all tags in the long tail of a document-specific tag distribution. The remaining tags at the beginning of a tag distribution are considered power tags and form a new, additional search option in information retrieval systems. Design/methodology/approach - In a theoretical approach the paper discusses document-specific tag distributions (power law and inverse-logistic shape), the development of such distributions (Yule-Simon process and shuffling theory) and introduces search tags (besides the well-known index tags) as a possibility for generating tag distributions. Findings - Search tags are compatible with broad and narrow folksonomies and with all knowledge organization systems (e.g. classification systems and thesauri), while index tags are only applicable in broad folksonomies. Based on these findings, the paper presents a sketch of an algorithm for mining and processing power tags in information retrieval systems. Research limitations/implications - This conceptual approach is in need of empirical evaluation in a concrete retrieval system. Practical implications - Power tags are a new search option for retrieval systems to limit the amount of hits. Originality/value - The paper introduces power tags as a means for enhancing the precision of search results in information retrieval systems that apply folksonomies, e.g. catalogs in Library 2.0environments.
  15. Stock, W.G.; Stock, M.: Handbook of information science : a comprehensive handbook (2013) 0.01
    0.0073026326 = product of:
      0.014605265 = sum of:
        0.014605265 = product of:
          0.02921053 = sum of:
            0.02921053 = weight(_text_:classification in 2784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02921053 = score(doc=2784,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 2784, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2784)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Dealing with information is one of the vital skills in the 21st century. It takes a fair degree of information savvy to create, represent and supply information as well as to search for and retrieve relevant knowledge. How does information (documents, pieces of knowledge) have to be organized in order to be retrievable? What role does metadata play? What are search engines on the Web, or in corporate intranets, and how do they work? How must one deal with natural language processing and tools of knowledge organization, such as thesauri, classification systems, and ontologies? How useful is social tagging? How valuable are intellectually created abstracts and automatically prepared extracts? Which empirical methods allow for user research and which for the evaluation of information systems? This Handbook is a basic work of information science, providing a comprehensive overview of the current state of information retrieval and knowledge representation. It addresses readers from all professions and scientific disciplines, but particularly scholars, practitioners and students of Information Science, Library Science, Computer Science, Information Management, and Knowledge Management. This Handbook is a suitable reference work for Public and Academic Libraries.