-
Taniguchi, S.: Mapping and merging of IFLA Library Reference Model and BIBFRAME 2.0 (2018)
0.01
0.014605265 = product of:
0.02921053 = sum of:
0.02921053 = product of:
0.05842106 = sum of:
0.05842106 = weight(_text_:classification in 5162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05842106 = score(doc=5162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 5162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5162)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 56(2018) no.5/6, S.354-373
-
Taniguchi, S.: Is BIBFRAME 2.0 a suitable schema for exchanging and sharing diverse descriptive metadata about bibliographic resources? (2018)
0.01
0.014458476 = product of:
0.028916951 = sum of:
0.028916951 = product of:
0.057833903 = sum of:
0.057833903 = weight(_text_:classification in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057833903 = score(doc=5165,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Knowledge organization systems have been studied in several fields and for different and complementary aspects. Among the aspects that concentrate common interests, in this article we highlight those related to the terminological and conceptual relationships among the components of any knowledge organization system. This research aims to contribute to the critical analysis of knowledge organization systems, especially ontologies, thesauri, and classification systems, by the comprehension of its similarities and differences when dealing with concepts and their ways of relating to each other as well as to the conceptual design that is adopted.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 56(2018) no.1, S.40-61
-
Taniguchi, S.: Understanding RDA as a DC application profile (2013)
0.01
0.011684213 = product of:
0.023368426 = sum of:
0.023368426 = product of:
0.04673685 = sum of:
0.04673685 = weight(_text_:classification in 1906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04673685 = score(doc=1906,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 1906, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1906)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 51(2013) no.6, S.601-623
-
Taniguchi, S.: Expression-level bibliographic entity records : a trial on creation from pre-existing MARC records (2004)
0.01
0.010223686 = product of:
0.020447372 = sum of:
0.020447372 = product of:
0.040894743 = sum of:
0.040894743 = weight(_text_:classification in 5658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040894743 = score(doc=5658,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 5658, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5658)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 38(2004) no.2, S.xx-xx
-
Tokita, T.; Koto, M.; Miyata, Y.; Yokoyama, Y.; Taniguchi, S.; Ueda, S.: Identifying works for Japanese classics toward construction of FRBRized OPACs (2012)
0.01
0.010223686 = product of:
0.020447372 = sum of:
0.020447372 = product of:
0.040894743 = sum of:
0.040894743 = weight(_text_:classification in 1925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040894743 = score(doc=1925,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 1925, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 50(2012) no.5/7, S.670-687
-
Taniguchi, S.: Viewing RDA from FRBR and FRAD : does RDA represent a different conceptual model? (2012)
0.01
0.010223686 = product of:
0.020447372 = sum of:
0.020447372 = product of:
0.040894743 = sum of:
0.040894743 = weight(_text_:classification in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040894743 = score(doc=1936,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 50(2012) no.8, S.929-943
-
Taniguchi, S.: Aggregate and component entities in RDA : model and description (2013)
0.01
0.010223686 = product of:
0.020447372 = sum of:
0.020447372 = product of:
0.040894743 = sum of:
0.040894743 = weight(_text_:classification in 1951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040894743 = score(doc=1951,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 1951, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1951)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 51(2013) no.5, S.580-599
-
Taniguchi, S.: User tasks in the RDA-based model (2013)
0.01
0.010223686 = product of:
0.020447372 = sum of:
0.020447372 = product of:
0.040894743 = sum of:
0.040894743 = weight(_text_:classification in 1956) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040894743 = score(doc=1956,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 1956, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1956)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 51(2013) no.7, S.788-815
-
Taniguchi, S.: Modeling resource description tasks in RDA (2015)
0.01
0.010223686 = product of:
0.020447372 = sum of:
0.020447372 = product of:
0.040894743 = sum of:
0.040894743 = weight(_text_:classification in 2013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040894743 = score(doc=2013,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 2013, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2013)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 53(2015) no.1, S.88-111
-
Taniguchi, S.: Examining BIBFRAME 2.0 from the viewpoint of RDA metadata schema (2017)
0.01
0.010223686 = product of:
0.020447372 = sum of:
0.020447372 = product of:
0.040894743 = sum of:
0.040894743 = weight(_text_:classification in 5154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040894743 = score(doc=5154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 5154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5154)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 55(2017) no.6, S.387-412
