Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

0.070444 = product of:
  0.140888 = sum of:
    0.140888 = sum of:
      0.091443434 = weight(_text_:classification in 5543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.091443434 = score(doc=5543,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05213454 = queryNorm
          0.55075383 = fieldWeight in 5543, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5543)
      0.04944457 = weight(_text_:22 in 5543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04944457 = score(doc=5543,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05213454 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5543, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5543)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Study of the organization of knowledge and of theories, systems, and practices of library classification provides a foundation for considering the design of an effective scheme. Use of existing standard systems has disadvantages and requires a library to either adapt itself to a standard or adapt that standard to the library. Prompt reclassification to an effective system will produce ultimate economy in service. Helpful order within a system is secured by application of certain principles. The scheme should be plastic to accommodate differing requirements and include alternative locations and citation orders of components. Construction and application of a relative classification present persistent problems.

Pages

S.17-22

Series

Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.19, nos.3/4

Source

Classification: options and opportunities. Ed.: A.R. Thomas

0.061301984 = product of:
  0.12260397 = sum of:
    0.12260397 = sum of:
      0.06609589 = weight(_text_:classification in 5118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06609589 = score(doc=5118,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05213454 = queryNorm
          0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 5118, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5118)
      0.056508083 = weight(_text_:22 in 5118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056508083 = score(doc=5118,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05213454 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5118, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5118)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Cataloging and classification: trends, transformations, teaching, and training."

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 24(1997) nos.1/2, S.5-22

0.025042813 = product of:
  0.050085627 = sum of:
    0.050085627 = product of:
      0.10017125 = sum of:
        0.10017125 = weight(_text_:classification in 3748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10017125 = score(doc=3748,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05213454 = queryNorm
            0.60332054 = fieldWeight in 3748, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3748)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Reviews the ideas and achievements of Henry E. Bliss concerning his Bliss Classification Scheme (BC), based on material in the Henry E. Bliss Papers at Columbia University, New York. Describes his views on various aspects of classification: its function; arrangements; adaptability; and notation. Discusses the role and qualifications of classification staff. Notes the advantages and disadvantages of standard systems, including: LCC, DDC, and UDC. Explores the origins, evolution, publication, and impact of the original BC and its relationship to the radical revision of the BC, 2nd ed.

Footnote

Fortsetzung in: Cataloging and classification quarterly 26(1998) no.2, S.73-75

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 25(1997) no.1, S.51-104

0.023368426 = product of:
  0.04673685 = sum of:
    0.04673685 = product of:
      0.0934737 = sum of:
        0.0934737 = weight(_text_:classification in 3747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0934737 = score(doc=3747,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05213454 = queryNorm
            0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 3747, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3747)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The original article on the Bliss Bibliographical Classification excluded some text provided with the submitted manuscript and disc: The excluded matter, devised to pilot the reader through a lenghty paper treating a complicated subject, consisted of a contents guide, lists of sources drawn on for each numbered section and for some subsections and axplanation of the arrangement of the reference. The excluded text is provided in this addenda

Footnote

Originaltext in: Cataloging and classification quarterly 26(1997) no.1, S.51-104

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 26(1998) no.2, S.73-75

0.022860859 = product of:
  0.045721717 = sum of:
    0.045721717 = product of:
      0.091443434 = sum of:
        0.091443434 = weight(_text_:classification in 5544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.091443434 = score(doc=5544,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05213454 = queryNorm
            0.55075383 = fieldWeight in 5544, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5544)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Development of the 2nd edition of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification (BC2) is outlined. The scope of the Introduction volume is described. Parts already issued, those ready for publication, and those awaiting completion are listed. The level of detail of the vocabulary is indicated. Four forms of synthesis are explained: addition of common subdivisions, facet combination including alternative combination patterns, array combination, and drawing marks from other parts of the system. Notational features which contribute to the relatively brief classmarks are identified. Different kinds of alternative location of subjects are discerned and examples provided. The potential feature of phenomenon-based classification is noted. Present use of the scheme is summarized and documented and its future application suggested.

Series

Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.19, nos.3/4

Source

Classification: options and opportunities. Ed.: A.R. Thomas

0.022860859 = product of:
  0.045721717 = sum of:
    0.045721717 = product of:
      0.091443434 = sum of:
        0.091443434 = weight(_text_:classification in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.091443434 = score(doc=541,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05213454 = queryNorm
            0.55075383 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Publication of the 2nd ed. of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification presents librarians with a fresh opportunity to reassess the nature and benefits of helpful order for their collections and records. Half the parts are now available, exhibiting major expansion, revision, and development of the scheme. The new edition is sponsored by the Bliss Classification Association which welcomes the views and inputs of American librarians. It has been applied to libraries and information centers and used in thesaurus construction. This edition provides intensive subject specifity through detailed term listings and full synthetic capability. The notation is designed to be as brief as possible for the detail attainable. The classification allows a large measure of flexibility in arrangement and syntax

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 15(1992) no.4, S.3-17

0.020447372 = product of:
  0.040894743 = sum of:
    0.040894743 = product of:
      0.081789486 = sum of:
        0.081789486 = weight(_text_:classification in 3934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.081789486 = score(doc=3934,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05213454 = queryNorm
            0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 3934, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3934)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.017707944 = product of:
  0.035415888 = sum of:
    0.035415888 = product of:
      0.070831776 = sum of:
        0.070831776 = weight(_text_:classification in 4855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070831776 = score(doc=4855,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05213454 = queryNorm
            0.42661208 = fieldWeight in 4855, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4855)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

A rationale for self-instruction in thesaurus making is presented. Some definitions of a thesaurus are given and sources suitable to begin self-tuition indicated. A sound grasp of grammar is emphasized and appropriate readings and exercises recommended. Readings in classification, facet analysis, and subject cataloging are described. An approach for deconstruction and reconstruction of sections of classification systems and thesauri is proposed and explained. Procedures for using exercises in thesaurus construction are detailed. The means of examining individual thesauri is suggested. The availability and use of free software are described. The creation of opportunities for self-learning is considered.

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 37(2004) nos.3/4, S.23-34

0.011684213 = product of:
  0.023368426 = sum of:
    0.023368426 = product of:
      0.04673685 = sum of:
        0.04673685 = weight(_text_:classification in 4864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04673685 = score(doc=4864,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05213454 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 4864, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4864)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 37(2004) nos.3/4, S.xxx-xxx