Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Vickery, B.C."
  1. Vickery, B.C.: Faceted classification schemes (1972) 0.03
    0.030356476 = product of:
      0.060712952 = sum of:
        0.060712952 = product of:
          0.121425904 = sum of:
            0.121425904 = weight(_text_:classification in 1142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.121425904 = score(doc=1142,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.731335 = fieldWeight in 1142, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1142)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Nachdruck aus: Vickery, B.C.: Faceted classification schemes. New Brunswick: Rutgers State Univ. 1966. S.30-39,40,42,45-46,50.
    Source
    Reader in classification and descriptive cataloging. Ed.: A.F. Painter
  2. Vickery, B.C.: Classification and indexing in science (1975) 0.03
    0.02921053 = product of:
      0.05842106 = sum of:
        0.05842106 = product of:
          0.11684212 = sum of:
            0.11684212 = weight(_text_:classification in 3615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11684212 = score(doc=3615,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.70372736 = fieldWeight in 3615, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3615)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Vickery, B.C.: Relations between subject fields : problems of constructing a general classification (1957) 0.02
    0.024785958 = product of:
      0.049571916 = sum of:
        0.049571916 = product of:
          0.09914383 = sum of:
            0.09914383 = weight(_text_:classification in 566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09914383 = score(doc=566,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.5971325 = fieldWeight in 566, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=566)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Proceedings of the International Study Conference on Classification for Information Retrieval, held at Beatrice Webb House, Dorking, England, 13.-17.5.1957
  4. Vickery, B.C.: ¬The significance of John Wilkins in the history of bibliographical classification (1953) 0.02
    0.023368426 = product of:
      0.04673685 = sum of:
        0.04673685 = product of:
          0.0934737 = sum of:
            0.0934737 = weight(_text_:classification in 1079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0934737 = score(doc=1079,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 1079, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1079)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Vickery, B.C.: Classificatory principles in natural language indexing systems (1976) 0.02
    0.020447372 = product of:
      0.040894743 = sum of:
        0.040894743 = product of:
          0.081789486 = sum of:
            0.081789486 = weight(_text_:classification in 1276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.081789486 = score(doc=1276,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 1276, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1276)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Classification in the 1970s: a second look. Rev. ed. Ed.: A. Maltby
  6. Vickery, B.C.: Faceted classification schemes (1966) 0.02
    0.020447372 = product of:
      0.040894743 = sum of:
        0.040894743 = product of:
          0.081789486 = sum of:
            0.081789486 = weight(_text_:classification in 3439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.081789486 = score(doc=3439,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 3439, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3439)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  7. Vickery, B.C.: Structure and function in retrieval languages (1997) 0.02
    0.02023765 = product of:
      0.0404753 = sum of:
        0.0404753 = product of:
          0.0809506 = sum of:
            0.0809506 = weight(_text_:classification in 572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0809506 = score(doc=572,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 572, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=572)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    From classification to 'knowledge organization': Dorking revisited or 'past is prelude'. A collection of reprints to commemorate the firty year span between the Dorking Conference (First International Study Conference on Classification Research 1957) and the Sixth International Study Conference on Classification Research (London 1997). Ed.: A. Gilchrist
  8. Vickery, B.C.: Knowledge representation : a brief review (1997) 0.02
    0.02023765 = product of:
      0.0404753 = sum of:
        0.0404753 = product of:
          0.0809506 = sum of:
            0.0809506 = weight(_text_:classification in 574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0809506 = score(doc=574,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 574, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=574)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    From classification to 'knowledge organization': Dorking revisited or 'past is prelude'. A collection of reprints to commemorate the firty year span between the Dorking Conference (First International Study Conference on Classification Research 1957) and the Sixth International Study Conference on Classification Research (London 1997). Ed.: A. Gilchrist
  9. Vickery, B.C.: Faceted classification : A guide to construction and use of special schemes (1986) 0.02
    0.019595021 = product of:
      0.039190043 = sum of:
        0.039190043 = product of:
          0.078380086 = sum of:
            0.078380086 = weight(_text_:classification in 2475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.078380086 = score(doc=2475,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.4720747 = fieldWeight in 2475, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2475)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A perfect little book, with just 63 pages of text. From chapter A, Introduction, to U, Mechanization, it covers everything about making a faceted classification: what they are, why they are needed, how to do facet analysis, examples from existing faceted schemes, orderings, common subdivisions, the contents of each facet, notation, filing order, how to perform classification with the created system, and indexing. Each chapter is brief but has full coverage of the subject. "The technique of constructing a special faceted classification is not a settled, automatic, codified procedure. Nothing so complex as the field of knowledge could be analysed and organized by rule-of-thumb. We can therefore offer no more than a guide, describing tested procedures and discussing some difficulties." Vickery was a member of the Classification Research Group and one of the foremost classificationists.
  10. Vickery, B.C.; Slater, M.; Presanis, A.; Reynolds, R.: Classification in science information : a comparative study undertaken by Aslib for the International Council of Scientific Unions as contribution to the ICSU/Unesco study of the feasibility of a world science information system (UNISIST) (1969) 0.02
    0.01752632 = product of:
      0.03505264 = sum of:
        0.03505264 = product of:
          0.07010528 = sum of:
            0.07010528 = weight(_text_:classification in 2037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07010528 = score(doc=2037,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 2037, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2037)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  11. Vickery, B.C.: Classification and indexing in science (1959) 0.02
    0.01752632 = product of:
      0.03505264 = sum of:
        0.03505264 = product of:
          0.07010528 = sum of:
            0.07010528 = weight(_text_:classification in 6160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07010528 = score(doc=6160,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 6160, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6160)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Vickery, B.C.: Systematic subject indexing (1985) 0.02
    0.016523972 = product of:
      0.033047944 = sum of:
        0.033047944 = product of:
          0.06609589 = sum of:
            0.06609589 = weight(_text_:classification in 3636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06609589 = score(doc=3636,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 3636, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3636)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Brian C. Vickery, Director and Professor, School of Library, Archive and Information Studies, University College, London, is a prolific writer on classification and information retrieval. This paper was one of the earliest to present initial efforts by the Classification Research Group (q.v.). In it he clearly outlined the need for classification in subject indexing, which, at the time he wrote, was not a commonplace understanding. In fact, some indexing systems were made in the first place specifically to avoid general classification systems which were out of date in all fast-moving disciplines, especially in the "hard" sciences. Vickery picked up Julia Pettee's work (q.v.) an the concealed classification in subject headings (1947) and added to it, mainly adopting concepts from the work of S. R. Ranganathan (q.v.). He had already published a paper an notation in classification, pointing out connections between notation, words, and the concepts which they represent. He was especially concerned about the structure of notational symbols as such symbols represented relationships among subjects. Vickery also emphasized that index terms cover all aspects of a subject so that, in addition to having a basis in classification, the ideal index system should also have standardized nomenclature, as weIl as show evidence of a systematic classing of elementary terms. The necessary linkage between system and terms should be one of a number of methods, notably:
    - adding a relational term ("operator") to identify and join terms; - indicating grammatical case with terms where this would help clarify relationships; and - analyzing elementary terms to reveal fundamental categories where needed. He further added that a standard order for showing relational factors was highly desirable. Eventually, some years later, he was able to suggest such an order. This was accepted by his peers in the Classification Research Group, and utilized by Derek Austin in PRECIS (q.v.). Vickery began where Farradane began - with perception (a sound base according to current cognitive psychology). From this came further recognition of properties, parts, constituents, organs, effects, reactions, operations (physical and mental), added to the original "identity," "difference," "class membership," and "species." By defining categories more carefully, Vickery arrived at six (in addition to space (geographic) and time): - personality, thing, substance (e.g., dog, bicycle, rose) - part (e.g., paw, wheel, leaf) - substance (e.g., copper, water, butter) - action (e.g., scattering) - property (e.g., length, velocity) - operation (e.g., analysis, measurement) Thus, as early as 1953, the foundations were already laid for research that ultimately produced very sophisticated systems, such as PRECIS.
  13. Vickery, B.C.; Vickery, A.: ¬An application of language processing for a search interface (1992) 0.01
    0.011684213 = product of:
      0.023368426 = sum of:
        0.023368426 = product of:
          0.04673685 = sum of:
            0.04673685 = weight(_text_:classification in 2757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04673685 = score(doc=2757,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 2757, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2757)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The paper describes techniques developed by Tome Associates to process natural language queries into search statements suitable for transmission to online text database systems. The problems discussed include word identification, the handling of unknown words, the contents and structure of system dictionaries, the use of semantic categories and classification, disambiguation of multi-meaning words, stemming and truncation, noun compounds and indications of relationship between search terms