Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"pl"
  1. Tarszkiewicz, B.: Haslo korporatywne - Co? Kiedy? Jak? (1995) 0.02
    0.024722286 = product of:
      0.04944457 = sum of:
        0.04944457 = product of:
          0.09888914 = sum of:
            0.09888914 = weight(_text_:22 in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09888914 = score(doc=4121,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Poradnik bibliotekarza. 1995, no.10, S.22-26
  2. Sosinska-Kalata, B.: Modele organizacji wiedzy w systemach wyszukiwania informacji o dukumentach (1999) 0.02
    0.02119053 = product of:
      0.04238106 = sum of:
        0.04238106 = product of:
          0.08476212 = sum of:
            0.08476212 = weight(_text_:22 in 6043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08476212 = score(doc=6043,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6043, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6043)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Isbn
    83-97629-22-7
  3. Prozych, A.: Zastosowanie Klasyfikacji Biblioteki Kongresu w Bibliotece Uniwersyteckiej w Warszawie (1997) 0.02
    0.01752632 = product of:
      0.03505264 = sum of:
        0.03505264 = product of:
          0.07010528 = sum of:
            0.07010528 = weight(_text_:classification in 3157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07010528 = score(doc=3157,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 3157, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3157)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Using the Library of Congress Classification in the Warsaw University Library
  4. Radwanski, A.: Rozwoj formatu MARC (1996) 0.01
    0.014127021 = product of:
      0.028254041 = sum of:
        0.028254041 = product of:
          0.056508083 = sum of:
            0.056508083 = weight(_text_:22 in 3052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056508083 = score(doc=3052,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3052, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3052)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 20:34:37
  5. Kotalska, B.: Opracowanie przedmiotowe dokumentow w Bibliotece Narodowej w Paryzu (1994) 0.01
    0.011684213 = product of:
      0.023368426 = sum of:
        0.023368426 = product of:
          0.04673685 = sum of:
            0.04673685 = weight(_text_:classification in 3729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04673685 = score(doc=3729,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 3729, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3729)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Subject classification in the Paris National Library
  6. Scibor, E.: KDD a UKD : Przeszlosc, stan obecny, perspektywy (1994) 0.01
    0.011684213 = product of:
      0.023368426 = sum of:
        0.023368426 = product of:
          0.04673685 = sum of:
            0.04673685 = weight(_text_:classification in 3738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04673685 = score(doc=3738,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 3738, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3738)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Outlines the history of decimal classification and compares DDC with UDC. DDC has not been used in Poland or in other central and east European countries whereas UDC is widely used in that region. Thus, when making decisions in Poland on which scheme to use in central or cooperative systems, UDC should be preferred
  7. Prozych, A.: Zastosowanie Klasyfikacji Bilioteki Kongresu w Bibliotece Uniwersyteckiej w Warszawie (1997) 0.01
    0.011684213 = product of:
      0.023368426 = sum of:
        0.023368426 = product of:
          0.04673685 = sum of:
            0.04673685 = weight(_text_:classification in 3233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04673685 = score(doc=3233,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 3233, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3233)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Using Library of Congress Classification in the Warzaw University Library
  8. Scibor, E.: Rewizja UKD dziedzinie jezykow, jezykoznawstwa i literatury pieknej (1995) 0.01
    0.011684213 = product of:
      0.023368426 = sum of:
        0.023368426 = product of:
          0.04673685 = sum of:
            0.04673685 = weight(_text_:classification in 3235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04673685 = score(doc=3235,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 3235, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3235)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses how the prominence of linguistics, belle-lettres and literature in library resources has led the authors of classification schemes to pay particular attention to these subjects in their schemes. Focuses on UDC and how changes have been made in its schedules for these subjects, historically; and also on the complete revision of UDC in 1992, including the outline of new sections and sub-sections