Search (105 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.06 
    0.06332567 = product of:
  0.12665135 = sum of:
    0.12665135 = sum of:
      0.04673685 = weight(_text_:classification in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04673685 = score(doc=2408,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05213454 = queryNorm
          0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
      0.079914495 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.079914495 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05213454 = queryNorm
          0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  2. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.06 
    0.061301984 = product of:
  0.12260397 = sum of:
    0.12260397 = sum of:
      0.06609589 = weight(_text_:classification in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06609589 = score(doc=249,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05213454 = queryNorm
          0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
      0.056508083 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056508083 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05213454 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper reviews library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2005-06. It covers pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of cataloging; Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records (FRBR); metadata and its applications and relation to Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC); cataloging tools and standards; authority control; and recruitment, training, and the changing role of catalogers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. Weber, L.B.: Reading formatting MARC AMC (1990) 0.05 
    0.051622465 = product of:
  0.10324493 = sum of:
    0.10324493 = sum of:
      0.04673685 = weight(_text_:classification in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04673685 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05213454 = queryNorm
          0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.056508083 = weight(_text_:22 in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056508083 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05213454 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    8. 1.2007 14:22:51
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 11(1990) nos.3/4, S.117-143
  4. Ranta, J.A.: Queens Borough Public Library's Guidelines for cataloging community information (1996) 0.05 
    0.04516966 = product of:
  0.09033932 = sum of:
    0.09033932 = sum of:
      0.040894743 = weight(_text_:classification in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040894743 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05213454 = queryNorm
          0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
      0.04944457 = weight(_text_:22 in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04944457 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05213454 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.51-69
  5. Aslanidi, M.; Papadakis, I.; Stefanidakis, M.: Name and title authorities in the music domain : alignment of UNIMARC authorities format with RDA (2018) 0.05 
    0.04516966 = product of:
  0.09033932 = sum of:
    0.09033932 = sum of:
      0.040894743 = weight(_text_:classification in 5178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040894743 = score(doc=5178,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05213454 = queryNorm
          0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 5178, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5178)
      0.04944457 = weight(_text_:22 in 5178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04944457 = score(doc=5178,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05213454 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5178, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5178)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    19. 3.2019 12:17:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 56(2018) no.4, S.354-373
  6. Woods, E.W.; IFLA Section on classification and Indexing and Indexing and Information Technology; Joint Working Group on a Classification Format: Requirements for a format of classification data : Final report, July 1996 (1996) 0.04 
    0.03505264 = product of:
  0.07010528 = sum of:
    0.07010528 = product of:
      0.14021055 = sum of:
        0.14021055 = weight(_text_:classification in 3008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14021055 = score(doc=3008,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05213454 = queryNorm
            0.8444729 = fieldWeight in 3008, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3008)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Object
    USMARC for classification data
  7. Guenther, R.S.: Automating the Library of Congress Classification Scheme : implementation of the USMARC format for classification data (1996) 0.03 
    0.033908132 = product of:
  0.067816265 = sum of:
    0.067816265 = product of:
      0.13563253 = sum of:
        0.13563253 = weight(_text_:classification in 5578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13563253 = score(doc=5578,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05213454 = queryNorm
            0.81689996 = fieldWeight in 5578, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5578)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Potential uses for classification data in machine readable form and reasons for the development of a standard, the USMARC Format for Classification Data, which allows for classification data to interact with other USMARC bibliographic and authority data are discussed. The development, structure, content, and use of the standard is reviewed with implementation decisions for the Library of Congress Classification scheme noted. The author examines the implementation of USMARC classification at LC, the conversion of the schedules, and the functionality of the software being used. Problems in the effort are explored, and enhancements desired for the online classification system are considered.
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Cataloging and Classification Standards and Rules"
    Object
    USMARC for classification data
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1996) nos.3/4, S.177-203
  8. Concise UNIMARC Classification Format : Draft 5 (20000125) (2000) 0.03 
    0.033047944 = product of:
  0.06609589 = sum of:
    0.06609589 = product of:
      0.13219178 = sum of:
        0.13219178 = weight(_text_:classification in 4421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13219178 = score(doc=4421,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05213454 = queryNorm
            0.7961767 = fieldWeight in 4421, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4421)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Object
    UNIMARC for classification data
  9. USMARC format for classification data : including guidelines for content designation (1991) 0.03 
    0.032330137 = product of:
  0.06466027 = sum of:
    0.06466027 = product of:
      0.12932055 = sum of:
        0.12932055 = weight(_text_:classification in 4372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12932055 = score(doc=4372,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05213454 = queryNorm
            0.7788835 = fieldWeight in 4372, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4372)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Format specifications for the communication of MARC classification records, which may be used in online public catalog retrieval systems, in systems to maintain and develop classification schedules, and in online systems for library classifiers. Defines the codes and conventions (tags, indicators, subfield codes, and codes values) that identify the data elements in the records. Developed to support the 2 major US classification schemes: Library of Congress Classification and Dewey Decimal Classification, but also lets you communicate other classification schemes. Includes a glossary of classification terms and full record examples of LCC, DDC, NLM classification and UDC
    Object
    USMARC for classification data
  10. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.03 
    0.029967938 = product of:
  0.059935875 = sum of:
    0.059935875 = product of:
      0.11987175 = sum of:
        0.11987175 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11987175 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05213454 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  11. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.03 
    0.028254041 = product of:
  0.056508083 = sum of:
    0.056508083 = product of:
      0.113016166 = sum of:
        0.113016166 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.113016166 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05213454 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  12. Guenther, R.S.: ¬The Library of Congress Classification in the USMARC format (1994) 0.03 
    0.027049331 = product of:
  0.054098662 = sum of:
    0.054098662 = product of:
      0.108197324 = sum of:
        0.108197324 = weight(_text_:classification in 8864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.108197324 = score(doc=8864,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05213454 = queryNorm
            0.6516607 = fieldWeight in 8864, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8864)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The paper reviews the development of the USMARC Format for Classification Data, a standard for communication of classification data in machine-readable form. It considers the uses for online classification schedules, both for technical services and reference functions and gives an overview of the format specification details of data elements used and of the structure of the records. The paper describes an experiment conducted at the Library of Congress to test the format as well as the development of the classification database encompassing the LCC schedules. Features of the classification system are given. The LoC will complete its conversion of the LCC in mid-1995
    Object
    USMARC for classification data
  13. Guenther, R.S.: ¬The USMARC Format for Classification Data : development and implementation (1992) 0.03 
    0.026126694 = product of:
  0.052253388 = sum of:
    0.052253388 = product of:
      0.104506776 = sum of:
        0.104506776 = weight(_text_:classification in 2996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.104506776 = score(doc=2996,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05213454 = queryNorm
            0.6294329 = fieldWeight in 2996, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2996)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the newly developed USMARC Format for Classification Data. It reviews its potential uses within an online system and its development as one of the USMARC standards for representing bibliographic and related information in machine-readable form. It provides a summary of the fields in the format, and considers the prospects for its implementation.
    Object
    USMARC for classification data
    Source
    Classification research for knowledge representation and organization. Proc. 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991. Ed. by N.J. Williamson u. M. Hudon
  14. Guenther, R.S.: ¬The development and implementation of the USMARC format for classification data (1992) 0.03 
    0.026126694 = product of:
  0.052253388 = sum of:
    0.052253388 = product of:
      0.104506776 = sum of:
        0.104506776 = weight(_text_:classification in 8865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.104506776 = score(doc=8865,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05213454 = queryNorm
            0.6294329 = fieldWeight in 8865, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8865)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the newly developed USMARC Format for Classification Data. It reviews its potential uses within an online system and its development as one of the USMARC standards. It provides a summary of the fields in the format and considers the prospects for its implementation. The papaer describes an experiment currently being conducted at the Library of Congress to create USMARC classification records and use a classification database in classifying materials in the social sciences
    Object
    USMARC for classification data
  15. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02 
    0.024722286 = product of:
  0.04944457 = sum of:
    0.04944457 = product of:
      0.09888914 = sum of:
        0.09888914 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09888914 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05213454 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  16. Geißelmann, F.: Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000) 0.02 
    0.024722286 = product of:
  0.04944457 = sum of:
    0.04944457 = product of:
      0.09888914 = sum of:
        0.09888914 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09888914 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05213454 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    26. 8.2000 19:22:35
  17. Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001) 0.02 
    0.024722286 = product of:
  0.04944457 = sum of:
    0.04944457 = product of:
      0.09888914 = sum of:
        0.09888914 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09888914 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05213454 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
  18. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.02 
    0.024722286 = product of:
  0.04944457 = sum of:
    0.04944457 = product of:
      0.09888914 = sum of:
        0.09888914 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09888914 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05213454 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  19. Oehlschläger, S.: Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme : Aus der 46. Sitzung am 21. und 22. April 2004 im Bibliotheksservice-Zentrum Baden-Württemberg in Konstanz (2004) 0.02 
    0.02258483 = product of:
  0.04516966 = sum of:
    0.04516966 = sum of:
      0.020447372 = weight(_text_:classification in 2434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.020447372 = score(doc=2434,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05213454 = queryNorm
          0.12315229 = fieldWeight in 2434, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2434)
      0.024722286 = weight(_text_:22 in 2434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024722286 = score(doc=2434,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05213454 = queryNorm
          0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2434, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2434)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    - Elektronischer DDC-Dienst Im Fall der deutschen Übersetzung der Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) wurde die Idee einer Normdatei DDC-Deutsch zugunsten eines zentralen elektronischen DDC-Dienstes bei Der Deutschen Bibliothek aufgegeben. Dieser Dienst hält die übersetzten Daten bereit und stellt sie in drei verschiedenen Ausprägungen zur Verfügung: 1. Zentrales Such- und Browsingtool für Benutzer 2. Klassifikationswerkzeug für Sacherschließer 3. SOAP-Schnittstelle für den elektronischen Datenaustausch. Um die DDC künftig gewinnbringend in der Benutzung einsetzen zu können, werden Konkordanzen zu anderen Klassifikationen, insbesondere aber zur weit verbreiteten Regensburger Verbundklassifikation (RVK) benötigt. Mithilfe dieser Konkordanzen können Benutzer im OPAL Der Deutschen Bibliothek nach DDC-Notationen suchen und würden zusätzlich Ergebnisse aus den Verbünden angezeigt bekommen, die bislang nicht mit der DDC erschlossen sind. Der GBV plant eine Grunderschließung seiner Verbunddatenbank mit der DDC in 5 Ebenen. Ziel ist es, bis Ende 2005 alle Verbunddaten mit der DDC zu verbinden und damit ein bedeutendes Recherchetool zu erhalten.
  20. Beall, J.; Mitchell, J.S.: History of the representation of the DDC in the MARC Classification Format (2010) 0.02 
    0.021907898 = product of:
  0.043815795 = sum of:
    0.043815795 = product of:
      0.08763159 = sum of:
        0.08763159 = weight(_text_:classification in 3568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08763159 = score(doc=3568,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05213454 = queryNorm
            0.5277955 = fieldWeight in 3568, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3568)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article explores the history of the representation of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) in the Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC) formats, with a special emphasis on the development of the MARC classification format. Until 2009, the format used to represent the DDC has been a proprietary one that predated the development of the MARC classification format. The need to replace the current editorial support system, the desire to deliver DDC data in a variety of formats to support different uses, and the increasingly global context of editorial work with translation partners around the world prompted the Dewey editorial team, along with OCLC research and development colleagues, to rethink the underlying representation of the DDC and choose the MARC 21 formats for classification and authority data. The discussion is framed with quotes from the writings of Nancy J. Williamson, whose analysis of the content of the Library of Congress Classification (LCC) schedules played a key role in shaping the original MARC classification format.
    Object
    MARC for Classification Data
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 48(2010) no.1, S.48-63

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 88
  • d 14
  • f 1
  • pl 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 91
  • s 7
  • el 4
  • b 2
  • n 2
  • l 1
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Themes