Search (176 results, page 1 of 9)

  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  1. Porter, M.; Galpin, V.: Relevance feedback in a public access catalogue for a research library : Muscat at the Scott Polar Research Institute (1988) 0.05
    0.051622465 = product of:
      0.10324493 = sum of:
        0.10324493 = sum of:
          0.04673685 = weight(_text_:classification in 4165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04673685 = score(doc=4165,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 4165, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4165)
          0.056508083 = weight(_text_:22 in 4165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056508083 = score(doc=4165,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4165, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4165)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reports on the successful introduction of a sophisticated online catalogue system at the library of the Scott Polar Research Institute, Cambridge, using the Muscat program package. The system provides to both end-users and library staff a choice between boolean searching on keywords and access using relevance feedback based on free text in English, mixed with UDC classification numbers. The system is implemented on an IBM 3084 computer. Significant benefits from the application of relevance feedback are reported with 10,000 records on file.
    Source
    Program. 22(1988), S.1-20
  2. Hillmann, D.I.: "Parallel universes" or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996) 0.05
    0.051622465 = product of:
      0.10324493 = sum of:
        0.10324493 = sum of:
          0.04673685 = weight(_text_:classification in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04673685 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
          0.056508083 = weight(_text_:22 in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056508083 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.97-103
  3. Hillmann, D.I.: 'Parallel universes' or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996) 0.05
    0.04516966 = product of:
      0.09033932 = sum of:
        0.09033932 = sum of:
          0.040894743 = weight(_text_:classification in 3656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040894743 = score(doc=3656,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 3656, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3656)
          0.04944457 = weight(_text_:22 in 3656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04944457 = score(doc=3656,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3656, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3656)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
  4. Sloan, B.G.: Remote access : design implications for the online catalog (1991) 0.05
    0.04516966 = product of:
      0.09033932 = sum of:
        0.09033932 = sum of:
          0.040894743 = weight(_text_:classification in 3696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040894743 = score(doc=3696,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 3696, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3696)
          0.04944457 = weight(_text_:22 in 3696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04944457 = score(doc=3696,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3696, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3696)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8. 1.2007 17:22:42
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 13(1991) nos.3/4, S.133-140
  5. Ayres, F.H.; Nielsen, L.P.S.; Ridley, M.J.: Bibliographic management : a new approach using the manifestations concept and the Bradford OPAC (1996) 0.05
    0.04516966 = product of:
      0.09033932 = sum of:
        0.09033932 = sum of:
          0.040894743 = weight(_text_:classification in 5162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040894743 = score(doc=5162,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 5162, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5162)
          0.04944457 = weight(_text_:22 in 5162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04944457 = score(doc=5162,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5162, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5162)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.3-28
  6. Striedieck, S.: Online catalog maintenance : the OOPS command in LIAS (1985) 0.05
    0.04516966 = product of:
      0.09033932 = sum of:
        0.09033932 = sum of:
          0.040894743 = weight(_text_:classification in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040894743 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
          0.04944457 = weight(_text_:22 in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04944457 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7. 1.2007 13:22:30
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 6(1985) no.1, S.21-32
  7. Morgan, E.L.: Possible solutions for incorporating digital information mediums into traditional library cataloging services (1996) 0.05
    0.04516966 = product of:
      0.09033932 = sum of:
        0.09033932 = sum of:
          0.040894743 = weight(_text_:classification in 600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040894743 = score(doc=600,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 600, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=600)
          0.04944457 = weight(_text_:22 in 600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04944457 = score(doc=600,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 600, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=600)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.143-170
  8. Walker, S.: Improving subject access painlessly : recent work on the Okapi online catalogue projects (1988) 0.03
    0.028254041 = product of:
      0.056508083 = sum of:
        0.056508083 = product of:
          0.113016166 = sum of:
            0.113016166 = weight(_text_:22 in 7403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.113016166 = score(doc=7403,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7403, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7403)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Program. 22(1988), S.21-31
  9. Hug, H.; Nöthiger, R.: ETHICS: an online public access catalogue at ETH-Bibliothek, Zürich (1988) 0.03
    0.028254041 = product of:
      0.056508083 = sum of:
        0.056508083 = product of:
          0.113016166 = sum of:
            0.113016166 = weight(_text_:22 in 7483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.113016166 = score(doc=7483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7483)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Program. 22(1988), S.133-142
  10. Barnes, S.; McCue, J.: Linking library records to bibliographic databases : an analysis of common data elements in BIOSIS, Agricola, and the OPAC (1991) 0.03
    0.025811233 = product of:
      0.051622465 = sum of:
        0.051622465 = sum of:
          0.023368426 = weight(_text_:classification in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.023368426 = score(doc=520,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.14074548 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
          0.028254041 = weight(_text_:22 in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028254041 = score(doc=520,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8. 1.2007 17:22:25
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 13(1991) nos.3/4, S.157-187
  11. Wimmer, W.: Multimedia-Angebote im Bibliothekskatalog : Neue Möglichkeiten durch das ALLEGRO-Programm ALCARTA (1999) 0.02
    0.024973279 = product of:
      0.049946558 = sum of:
        0.049946558 = product of:
          0.099893115 = sum of:
            0.099893115 = weight(_text_:22 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.099893115 = score(doc=4368,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2000 19:36:10
    22. 1.2000 19:41:58
  12. Mitev, N.; Hildreth, C.R.: ¬Les catalogues interactifs en Grande-Bretagne et aux Etats-Unis (1989) 0.02
    0.024722286 = product of:
      0.04944457 = sum of:
        0.04944457 = product of:
          0.09888914 = sum of:
            0.09888914 = weight(_text_:22 in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09888914 = score(doc=3628,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bulletin des bibliothèques de France. 34(1989) no.1, S.22-47
  13. Wagner, H.: OPAC für jedermann? (1993) 0.02
    0.024722286 = product of:
      0.04944457 = sum of:
        0.04944457 = product of:
          0.09888914 = sum of:
            0.09888914 = weight(_text_:22 in 5575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09888914 = score(doc=5575,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5575, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5575)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Eine Replik zu Auer: OPAC und Zeichensatz (Mitteilungen der VÖB 46(1993) H.2, S.21-22)
  14. Auer, G.: Online-Kataloge und Zeichensatz (1993) 0.02
    0.024722286 = product of:
      0.04944457 = sum of:
        0.04944457 = product of:
          0.09888914 = sum of:
            0.09888914 = weight(_text_:22 in 7584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09888914 = score(doc=7584,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7584, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7584)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekare. 46(1993) H.2, S.21-22
  15. Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Stuurman, P.: Tendenzen in de onderwerpsontsluiting : T.4: Onderwerpsontsluiting en on-line catalogi (1990) 0.02
    0.024722286 = product of:
      0.04944457 = sum of:
        0.04944457 = product of:
          0.09888914 = sum of:
            0.09888914 = weight(_text_:22 in 211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09888914 = score(doc=211,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 211, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=211)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Open. 22(1990) no.10, S.326-330
  16. Ostendorp, C.; Trinks-Schulz, H.: Integriertes Bibliothekssystem BABSY/i3v an der Hochschulbibliothek der Fachhochschule Gelsenkirchen (1999) 0.02
    0.024722286 = product of:
      0.04944457 = sum of:
        0.04944457 = product of:
          0.09888914 = sum of:
            0.09888914 = weight(_text_:22 in 4513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09888914 = score(doc=4513,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4513, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4513)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    23. 3.2000 15:22:58
  17. Furniss, P.: ¬A proposed methodology for examining the provision of subject access in the OPAC (1990) 0.02
    0.023368426 = product of:
      0.04673685 = sum of:
        0.04673685 = product of:
          0.0934737 = sum of:
            0.0934737 = weight(_text_:classification in 352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0934737 = score(doc=352,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 352, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=352)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    International classification. 17(1990), S.85-89
  18. Markey, K.: Subject searching experiences and needs on online catalog users : implications for library classification (1985) 0.02
    0.023368426 = product of:
      0.04673685 = sum of:
        0.04673685 = product of:
          0.0934737 = sum of:
            0.0934737 = weight(_text_:classification in 379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0934737 = score(doc=379,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 379, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=379)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Nohr, H.: Subject access in german-language OPACs : a survey (1989) 0.02
    0.023368426 = product of:
      0.04673685 = sum of:
        0.04673685 = product of:
          0.0934737 = sum of:
            0.0934737 = weight(_text_:classification in 1523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0934737 = score(doc=1523,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 1523, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1523)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    International classification. 16(1989), S.95-100
  20. Oberhauser, O.: Implementierung und Parametrisierung klassifikatorischer Recherchekomponenten im OPAC (2005) 0.02
    0.02258483 = product of:
      0.04516966 = sum of:
        0.04516966 = sum of:
          0.020447372 = weight(_text_:classification in 3353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.020447372 = score(doc=3353,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.12315229 = fieldWeight in 3353, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3353)
          0.024722286 = weight(_text_:22 in 3353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024722286 = score(doc=3353,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05213454 = queryNorm
              0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3353, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3353)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Das in den letzten Jahren wiedererwachte Interesse an der klassifikatorischen Erschließung und Recherche hat sich allem Anschein nach noch nicht ausreichend bis zu den Herstellern integrierter Bibliothekssysteme herumgesprochen. Wie wäre es sonst zu erklären, dass im OPAC-Modul eines führenden Systems wie Aleph 500 so gut wie keine Features für klassifikationsbasierte Recherchen zu erblicken sind? Tatsächlich finden wir heute einen im Vergleich zum einstigen System Bibos kaum veränderten Zustand vor: Notationen eines oder mehrerer Klassifikationssysteme können in einer durch MAB dafür bestimmten Kategorie (700, nebst Indikatoren) katalogisiert und dann recherchiert bzw. angezeigt werden. Doch welcher Benutzer weiß schon, was diese Notationen im einzelnen bedeuten? Wer macht sich die Mühe, dies selbst herauszufinden, um dann danach zu recherchieren? Hier liegt im wesentlich dasselbe Problem vor, das schon dem systematischen Zettelkatalog anhaftete und ihn zu einem zwar mühevoll erstellten, aber wenig genutzten Rechercheinstrument machte, das nur dann (zwangsläufig) angenommen wurde, wenn ein verbaler Sachkatalog fehlte. Nun könnte eingewandt werden, dass im Vergleich zu früher unter Aleph 500 wenigstens das Aufblättern von Indizes möglich sei, sodass im OPAC ein Index für die vergebenen Notationen angeboten werden kann (bzw. mehrere solche Indizes bei Verwendung von mehr als nur einem Klassifikationssystem). Gewiss, doch was bringt dem Uneingeweihten das Aufblättern des Notationsindex - außer einer alphabetischen Liste von kryptischen Codes? Weiter könnte man einwenden, dass es im Aleph-500-OPAC die so genannten Suchdienste ("services") gibt, mithilfe derer von bestimmten Elementen einer Vollanzeige hypertextuell weiternavigiert werden kann. Richtig, doch damit kann man bloß wiederum den Index aufblättern oder alle anderen Werke anzeigen lassen, die dieselbe Notationen - also einen Code, dessen Bedeutung meist unbekannt ist - aufweisen. Wie populär mag dieses Feature beim Publikum wohl sein? Ein anderer Einwand wäre der Hinweis auf das inzwischen vom Hersteller angebotene Thesaurus-Modul, das vermutlich auch für Klassifikationssysteme eingesetzt werden könnte. Doch wie viele Bibliotheken unseres Verbundes waren bisher bereit, für dieses Modul, das man eigentlich als Bestandteil des Basissystems erwarten könnte, gesondert zu bezahlen? Schließlich mag man noch einwenden, dass es im Gegensatz zur Bibos-Zeit nun die Möglichkeit gibt, Systematiken und Klassifikationen als Normdateien zu implementieren und diese beim Retrieval für verbale Einstiege in die klassifikatorische Recherche oder zumindest für die Veranschaulichung der Klassenbenennungen in der Vollanzeige zu nutzen. Korrekt - dies ist möglich und wurde sogar einst für die MSC (Mathematics Subject Classification, auch bekannt als "AMS-Klassifikation") versucht. Dieses Projekt, das noch unter der Systemversion 11.5 begonnen wurde, geriet jedoch nach einiger Zeit ins Stocken und fand bedauerlicherweise nie seinen Weg in die folgende Version (14.2). Mag auch zu hoffen sein, dass es unter der neuen Version 16 wieder weitergeführt werden kann, so weist dieses Beispiel doch auf die grundsätzliche Problematik des Normdatei-Ansatzes (zusätzlicher Aufwand, Kontinuität) hin. Zudem lohnt sich die Implementierung einer eigenen Normdatei 4 wohl nur bei einem größeren bzw. komplexen Klassifikationssystem, wogegen man im Falle kleinerer Systematiken kaum daran denken würde.
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 58(2005) H.1, S.22-37

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 165
  • s 5
  • m 4
  • el 3
  • b 2
  • p 1
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…