-
Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996)
0.04
0.03871685 = product of:
0.0774337 = sum of:
0.0774337 = sum of:
0.03505264 = weight(_text_:classification in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03505264 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
0.04238106 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04238106 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Considers the principles of indexing and the intellectual skills involved in order to determine what automatic indexing systems would be required in order to supplant or complement the human indexer. Good indexing requires: considerable prior knowledge of the literature; judgement as to what to index and what depth to index; reading skills; abstracting skills; and classification skills, Illustrates these features with a detailed description of abstracting and indexing processes involved in generating entries for the mechanical engineering database POWERLINK. Briefly assesses the possibility of replacing human indexers with specialist indexing software, with particular reference to the Object Analyzer from the InTEXT automatic indexing system and using the criteria described for human indexers. At present, it is unlikely that the automatic indexer will replace the human indexer, but when more primary texts are available in electronic form, it may be a useful productivity tool for dealing with large quantities of low grade texts (should they be wanted in the database)
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
-
Koltay, T.: ¬A hypertext tutorial on abstracting for library science students (1995)
0.02
0.017658776 = product of:
0.03531755 = sum of:
0.03531755 = product of:
0.0706351 = sum of:
0.0706351 = weight(_text_:22 in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0706351 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 1.1996 18:22:06
-
Wellisch, H.H.: Indexing and abstracting 1977-1981 : an international bibliography (1984)
0.02
0.01752632 = product of:
0.03505264 = sum of:
0.03505264 = product of:
0.07010528 = sum of:
0.07010528 = weight(_text_:classification in 1453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07010528 = score(doc=1453,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 1453, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1453)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: International classification 13(1986) S.103 (I. Dahlberg)
-
Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (1991)
0.01
0.014458476 = product of:
0.028916951 = sum of:
0.028916951 = product of:
0.057833903 = sum of:
0.057833903 = weight(_text_:classification in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057833903 = score(doc=752,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Library and information science resaerch 14(1992) no.1, S.117-118 (C. Tenopir); International classification 19(1992) no.4, S.227-228 (R. Fugmann); Journal of the American Society for Information Science 43(1992) no.6, S.456 (B.R. Boyce); Cataloging & classification quarterly 15(1992) no.1, S.245-247 (E.M. Rasmussen) Journal of academic librarianship 18(1992) no.1, S.39 (G.A. Crawford) // Winner of the 1992 ASIS best information science book award
-
Palais, E.S.: Abstracting for reference librarians (1988)
0.01
0.014127021 = product of:
0.028254041 = sum of:
0.028254041 = product of:
0.056508083 = sum of:
0.056508083 = weight(_text_:22 in 2832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056508083 = score(doc=2832,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2832, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2832)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Reference librarian. 1988, no.22, S.297-308
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996)
0.01
0.010595265 = product of:
0.02119053 = sum of:
0.02119053 = product of:
0.04238106 = sum of:
0.04238106 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04238106 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
-
Wan, X.; Yang, J.; Xiao, J.: Incorporating cross-document relationships between sentences for single document summarizations (2006)
0.01
0.010595265 = product of:
0.02119053 = sum of:
0.02119053 = product of:
0.04238106 = sum of:
0.04238106 = weight(_text_:22 in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04238106 = score(doc=2421,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
-
Bowman, J.H.: Annotation: a lost art in cataloguing (2007)
0.01
0.010223686 = product of:
0.020447372 = sum of:
0.020447372 = product of:
0.040894743 = sum of:
0.040894743 = weight(_text_:classification in 255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040894743 = score(doc=255,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 255, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=255)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 44(2007) nos.1/2, S.95-111
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996)
0.01
0.008829388 = product of:
0.017658776 = sum of:
0.017658776 = product of:
0.03531755 = sum of:
0.03531755 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03531755 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18256627 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05213454 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356
